AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionPhase 4NCT00129233

Comparison of Valsartan With Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients With Glucose Intolerance

A Phase 4 study testing Valsartan and Amlodipine in people with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Nagoya University at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Various guidelines recommended angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin Ⅱ receptor-1 blockers (ARBs) for hypertensive patients with diabetes on the basis of the cardiac- and reno-protective effects of these drugs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Valsartan and Amlodipine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,150 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Oct 2004to Apr 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of hypertension
  • Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance

Who cannot join

  • History of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization in the recent 6 months.
  • Taking calcium channel blocker for the purpose of angina pectoris
  • Reduced ejection fraction (< 40%)
  • Second- or third-degree of atrioventricular block
  • Severe hypertension (> 200/110 mmHg) or secondary hypertension
  • History of stroke in the recent 6 months
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl
  • Estimated survival duration less than 3 years due to other conditions
  • Pregnant woman or possibly pregnant woman

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8550

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: The Novel Antihypertensive Goal Of hYpertension With diAbetes - Hypertensive Events and ARb Treatment (NAGOYA-HEART) Study

Various guidelines recommended angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin Ⅱ receptor-1 blockers (ARBs) for hypertensive patients with diabetes on the basis of the cardiac- and reno-protective effects of these drugs. However, these recommendations could not be extrapolated to Japanese patients, because Japan has been known as a country with a low incidence of coronary artery disease and a high incidence of cerebrovascular disease. Furthermore, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) also were protective against renal function as well as ACE inhibitors in Japanese diabetic hypertensive patients. This study will test whether ARBs or CCBs are superior in treating Japanese diabetic hypertensive patients.

Being tested
Valsartan, Amlodipine
Keywords
cardiovascular disease, rennin-angiotensin system, calcium channel blocker, impaired glucose tolerance
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases, Glucose Intolerance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ValsartanDrug

    valsartan 80 to 160 mg daily

  • AmlodipineDrug

    Amlodipine 5 to 10 mg daily.

Study groups in NCT00129233
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ValsartanActive comparatorValsartan group treated with 80-160mg daily valsartan without Ca channel blockers or ACE inhibitors.
Receives: Drug: Valsartan
AmlodipineActive comparatorAmlodipine group treated with 5-10mg daily amlodipine without ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.
Receives: Drug: Amlodipine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite cardiovascular events including fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, admission due to heart failure, coronary intervention and sudden cardiac death

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. total death

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

  2. cardiac function evaluated by ultrasonography

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

  3. incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

  4. control of blood glucose

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

  5. renal function

    Measured: At least 3 years of mean follow up period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Primary completionJul 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00129233
Sponsor's protocol ID
169
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
10 Aug 2005
Last updated
1 May 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, Brunner HR, Ekman S, Hansson L, Hua T, Laragh J, McInnes GT, Mitchell L, Plat F, Schork A, Smith B, Zanchetti A; VALUE trial group. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2022-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16451-9.

    PubMed 15207952
  • Yamashita K, Kondo T, Muramatsu T, Matsushita K, Nagahiro T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Murohara T. Effects of valsartan versus amlodipine in diabetic hypertensive patients with or without previous cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 1;112(11):1750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

    PubMed 24035165
  • Muramatsu T, Matsushita K, Yamashita K, Kondo T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Ichimiya S, Ohno M, Sone T, Ikeda N, Watarai M, Murohara T; NAGOYA HEART Study Investigators. Comparison between valsartan and amlodipine regarding cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with glucose intolerance: NAGOYA HEART Study. Hypertension. 2012 Mar;59(3):580-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.184226. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

    PubMed 22232134
  • Matsushita K, Muramatsu T, Kondo T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Murohara T; NAGOYA HEART Study Group. Rationale and design of the NAGOYA HEART Study: comparison between valsartan and amlodipine regarding morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension and glucose intolerance. J Cardiol. 2010 Jul;56(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

    PubMed 20409690

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Valsartan and Amlodipine in people with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Nagoya University at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite cardiovascular events including fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, admission due to heart failure, coronary intervention and sudden cardiac death (time frame: At least 3 years of mean follow up period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00129233, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in