Atrial FibrillationPhase 2/3NCT00129545
WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
A Phase 2/3 study testing WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 62 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized study, stratified by center, comparing the WATCHMAN device to long term warfarin therapy, demonstrating that the treatment arm is non-inferior to the control arm. This study was amended to allow for a non-randomized arm and increased enrollment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology and Warfarin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- 62 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2005to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
- Eligible for long term warfarin
- CHADS score >= 1 [congestive heart failure (CHF), history of high blood pressure, 75 years of age or older, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)]
Who cannot join
- Contraindicated for warfarin
- Contraindicated for aspirin or clopidogrel (Plavix)
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) Class 4
- Implanted mechanical valve
- Atrial septal or Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) device
- Platelets < 100,000 or hemoglobin < 10
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%
Trial locations and contacts
62 sites in 3 countries.
62 sites in 3 countries
United States58 sites
Summa Health System
Akron, Ohio, 44304
New Mexico Heart Institute
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Midtown Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia
Austin, Texas, 78705
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
North Shore University
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Advanced Cardiac Specialists
Gilbert, Arizona, 85233
Harrisburg Hospital / Associated Cardiology
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110
Terrebonne General Medical Center
Houma, Louisiana, 70360
St. Lukes Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Mississippi Healthcare Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
St. Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Mercy Medical Center West
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37934
Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine
La Jolla, California, 92037
Baptist Hospital West
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0294
Nebraska Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Los Angeles Cardiology Associates
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Marshfield Clinic
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, 94040
St. Thomas Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee
Ochsner Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Orange County Heart
Orange County, California, 92868
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Presbyterian University Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902
William Beaumont
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
St. Paul Heart Clinic
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Intermountain Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
St. John's Hospital / Pacific Heart
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Arizona Arrhythmia
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Prairie Education Research Cooperative
Springfield, Illinois, 60637
Bay Heart Group
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Moffitt Heart & Vascular
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043
Germany3 sites
Cardiovasculares Centrum Frankfurt - Sankt Katharinen
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60389
Herzzentrum
Leipzig
Krankenhaus der Barmherzige Bruder
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93049
About this study
Official title: WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (PROTECT AF)
This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized study, stratified by center, comparing the WATCHMAN device to long term warfarin therapy, demonstrating that the treatment arm is non-inferior to the control arm. This study was amended to allow for a non-randomized arm and increased enrollment.
Read the detailed description
The WATCHMAN device is designed to be permanently implanted distal to the ostium of the left atrial appendage (LAA) to trap potential emboli before they exit the LAA.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- Being tested
- WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology, Warfarin
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, AF, A Fib, Stroke, Coumadin, Warfarin, Blood thinning medication, transient ischemic attack (TIA), WATCHMAN, Left atrial appendage, LAA isolation, LAA occlusion
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, Ischemic Attack, Transient
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure TechnologyDevice
Also called WATCHMAN
Implant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology
WarfarinDrug
Also called Coumadin
Subjects receive warfarin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN | Experimental | Implant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology Receives: Device: WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology |
| Warfarin control | Active comparator | Subjects are treated with current standard of care Oral Anticoagulation Therapy with Warfarin Receives: Drug: Warfarin |
| Roll-in | Other | Implant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology. Up to 3 non-randomized subjects per site, these subjects were not included in the primary analysis. Receives: Device: WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite of Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Cardiovascular or Unexplained Death
A Bayesian model allowed for sequential evaluation of the primary endpoints, event rates reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100*N events/Total patient-years)
Measured: 5 years
The Occurrence of Life-threatening Events, Including Device Embolization or Serious Bleeding Events
Serious bleeding events evaluated by the Clinical Events Committee included pericardial effusion requiring drainage, cranial bleeding events due to any source, gastrointestinal bleeds requiring transfusion, and any bleeding related to the device or procedure that necessitates an operation.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Procedure Success
Implant procedure success is defined as the delivery and release of a WATCHMAN Device into the LAA.
Measured: Initial implant procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2005
- Primary completionAug 2013
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Holmes, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00129545
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ST1021 and ST1055
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 15 May 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Dukkipati SR, Holmes DR Jr, Doshi SK, Kar S, Singh SM, Gibson D, Price MJ, Natale A, Mansour M, Sievert H, Houle VM, Allocco DJ, Reddy VY. Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;80(5):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.062.
PubMed 35902169Brouwer TF, Whang W, Kuroki K, Halperin JL, Reddy VY. Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(23):e013525. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013525. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
PubMed 31752643Price MJ, Reddy VY, Valderrabano M, Halperin JL, Gibson DN, Gordon N, Huber KC, Holmes DR Jr. Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1925-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
PubMed 26627989Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192.
PubMed 25399274Alli O, Doshi S, Kar S, Reddy V, Sievert H, Mullin C, Swarup V, Whisenant B, Holmes D Jr. Quality of life assessment in the randomized PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial of patients at risk for stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 30;61(17):1790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.061. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PubMed 23500276Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Halperin JL, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):720-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PubMed 23325525Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):417-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976449. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
PubMed 21242484Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.
PubMed 19683639
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (PROTECT AF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00129545
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ST1021 and ST1055
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, AF, A Fib, Stroke, Coumadin, Warfarin, Blood thinning medication, transient ischemic attack (TIA)
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2005
- Primary completion
- Aug 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 May 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized study, stratified by center, comparing the WATCHMAN device to long term warfarin therapy, demonstrating that the treatment arm is non-inferior to the control arm. This study was amended to allow for a non-randomized arm and increased enrollment.
Detailed description
The WATCHMAN device is designed to be permanently implanted distal to the ostium of the left atrial appendage (LAA) to trap potential emboli before they exit the LAA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN | Experimental | Device: WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure TechnologyImplant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology |
| Warfarin control | Active comparator | Drug: WarfarinSubjects are treated with current standard of care Oral Anticoagulation Therapy with Warfarin |
| Roll-in | Other | Device: WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure TechnologyImplant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology. Up to 3 non-randomized subjects per site, these subjects were not included in the primary analysis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient has paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
- Eligible for long term warfarin
- CHADS score >= 1 [congestive heart failure (CHF), history of high blood pressure, 75 years of age or older, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)]
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Contraindicated for warfarin
- Contraindicated for aspirin or clopidogrel (Plavix)
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) Class 4
- Implanted mechanical valve
- Atrial septal or Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) device
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure TechnologyAlso: WATCHMANImplant of WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology | Device | Roll-in, WATCHMAN |
| WarfarinAlso: CoumadinSubjects receive warfarin | Drug | Warfarin control |
Primary outcome
Composite of Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Cardiovascular or Unexplained Death
Time frame: 5 years
A Bayesian model allowed for sequential evaluation of the primary endpoints, event rates reported per 100 patient-years (calculated as 100*N events/Total patient-years)
The Occurrence of Life-threatening Events, Including Device Embolization or Serious Bleeding Events
Time frame: 5 years
Serious bleeding events evaluated by the Clinical Events Committee included pericardial effusion requiring drainage, cranial bleeding events due to any source, gastrointestinal bleeds requiring transfusion, and any bleeding related to the device or procedure that necessitates an operation.
1 secondary outcome
Procedure Success
Time frame: Initial implant procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35902169Dukkipati SR, Holmes DR Jr, Doshi SK, Kar S, Singh SM, Gibson D, Price MJ, Natale A, Mansour M, Sievert H, Houle VM, Allocco DJ, Reddy VY. Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;80(5):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31752643Brouwer TF, Whang W, Kuroki K, Halperin JL, Reddy VY. Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(23):e013525. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013525. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26627989Price MJ, Reddy VY, Valderrabano M, Halperin JL, Gibson DN, Gordon N, Huber KC, Holmes DR Jr. Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1925-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25399274Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23500276Alli O, Doshi S, Kar S, Reddy V, Sievert H, Mullin C, Swarup V, Whisenant B, Holmes D Jr. Quality of life assessment in the randomized PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial of patients at risk for stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 30;61(17):1790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.061. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23325525Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Halperin JL, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):720-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21242484Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):417-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976449. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19683639Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.
- Sponsor websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Holmes, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
62 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 62 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 62 sites in United States, Germany, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite of Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Cardiovascular or Unexplained Death (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00129545, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2015.