AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaNCT00129883

Adherence to Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Respiratory Infections at Hospitals

A study testing Professional education, Implementation of a Critical Care Pathway and Professional audit and feedback in people with Pneumonia and Chronic Bronchitis, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 7 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test a strategy to improve the quality of antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) at hospitals. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention strategy is compared to a control strategy and the effectiveness and feasibility of the intervention is assessed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia, Chronic Bronchitis, COPD
What is being tested?
Professional education, Implementation of a Critical Care Pathway and Professional audit and feedback
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
7 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Sep 2002to Apr 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients admitted to a respiratory care or internal medicine ward with community-acquired pneumonia or acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Who cannot join

  • Recent (< 30 days) admission for LRTI
  • Patients with underlying immunodeficiency (HIV infection, neutropenia, treatment with immunomodulating drugs, active hematological malignancies, anatomical or functional asplenia and hypogammaglobulinemia)
  • Patients already on treatment with antibiotics for another culture proven infection at the time of admission
  • Patients from nursing homes
  • Patients who had been transferred to another hospital or ICU and patients who had died within 24 hours of admission
  • Patients with very poor prognosis (life expectancy < 2 weeks on admission).

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

Netherlands7 sites
  • Gelre Ziekenhuizen

    Apeldoorn

  • Deventer Ziekenhuis

    Deventer

  • Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei

    Ede

  • Bernhoven Ziekenhuis

    Oss

  • Bernhoven Ziekenhuis

    Veghel

  • Maxima Medisch Centrum

    Veldhoven

  • Vie Curi Medisch Centrum

    Venlo

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitals: Promoting Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Hospital Departments of Internal and Pulmonary Medicine

The purpose of this study is to test a strategy to improve the quality of antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) at hospitals. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention strategy is compared to a control strategy and the effectiveness and feasibility of the intervention is assessed.

Read the detailed description

Improving processes of care in patients with hospital LRTI has been related to better patient outcome. Inappropriate use of antibiotics has contributed to the emergence and spread of drug-resistant micro organisms and increased treatment costs. International guidelines provide recommendations for the initial evaluation and management of LRTI, including advice on judicious antibiotic therapy. Nonetheless, studies have demonstrated a wide variability in adherence to these guidelines.

To implement key recommendations in clinical practice, various strategies have been used, with mixed results. Perhaps the most important aspect of choosing a potentially effective intervention is that the choice of intervention should be based upon assessment of potential barriers in the target group. Many intervention studies are flawed by failing to control for secular trends.

The investigators performed a cluster randomised controlled trial, to study the effect of a multifaceted intervention strategy on the quality of antibiotic use for LRTI. Their intervention was tailored to the areas most in need for improvement and took perceived barriers in the target group into consideration at the individual hospital level.

Being tested
Professional education, Implementation of a Critical Care Pathway, Professional audit and feedback, Process analysis and redesign
Keywords
quality of care, antibiotic use, intervention, lower respiratory tract infections, Community acquired Pneumonia, Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis or COPD
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Bronchitis, Chronic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Community-Acquired Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Professional educationBehavioural

  • Implementation of a Critical Care PathwayBehavioural

  • Professional audit and feedbackBehavioural

  • Process analysis and redesignBehavioural

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. adherence to key quality indicators for antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (indicators were developed from current [inter]national guideline recommendations and a systematic review of the literature)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. cost

  2. process evaluation: how well was the intervention performed

  3. length of hospital stay

  4. in-hospital mortality

  5. Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-transfer

  6. 30 day re-admission rate

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2002
  3. Study completionApr 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Early clinical test
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,000 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00129883
Sponsor's protocol ID
AGAR-2001-1
Other IDs
ZonMw grant no. 2300.0024
Status last verified
Aug 2002
First submitted
11 Aug 2005
Last updated
27 Sep 2005
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Professional education, Implementation of a Critical Care Pathway and Professional audit and feedback in people with Pneumonia and Chronic Bronchitis, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 7 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

adherence to key quality indicators for antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections (indicators were developed from current [inter]national guideline recommendations and a systematic review of the literature). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2005.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in