AzTrials
AzTrials

DyspneaPhase 4NCT00130611

B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation (BASEL) Study - Private Practice

A Phase 4 study testing BNP measurement and Clinical examination in people with Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 9 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dyspnea
What is being tested?
BNP measurement and Clinical examination
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
250 participants
Where
9 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jan 2004to Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute dyspnoea is the main symptom

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years
  • Obvious traumatic cause
  • Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 250 umol/l)
  • Sepsis

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 2 countries.

9 sites in 2 countries

Switzerland8 sites
  • Private practices of Kanton Aargau

    Aarau, Canton of Aargau, 4300

  • Private Practice of Kanton Schwyz

    Altendorf, Canton of Schwyz, 8852

  • Private Practices of Kanton Basel Stadt

    Basel, Basel, 4000

  • Private Practices of Kanton Basel-Landschaft

    Basel-Landschaft, Basel-Landschaft, 4100

  • Private Practices of Kanton Graubünden

    Chur, Chur, 7500

  • Private practices of Kanton St. Gallen

    Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen

  • Private practices in Kanton Obwalden

    Sarnen, Sarnen, 6060

  • Private practices of Kanton Solothurn

    Solothurn, Canton of Solothurn, 4500

Other trials in Switzerland

Germany1 site
  • Private practices of Baden-Wuertemberg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Freiburg

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.

The aim is to test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

The primary endpoint is total medical cost within 3 months.

Read the detailed description

Background: Most patients with dyspnea primarily consult physicians in private practice. Heart failure and pulmonary disease are "epidemic" disorders and account for the majority of cases of dyspnea. There are approximately 24 million individuals in the United States with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and another 10 million persons suffer from asthma. These illnesses generate in excess of 17 million physician office visits a year at a cost of over $10.4 billion. In addition, there are nearly 1.5 million new cases of heart failure in North America and Europe every year. The total direct cost of care for heart failure exceed $38 billion in the United States per year. Therefore, cost-effective management of these diseases is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. The symptoms of heart failure may be nonspecific, and signs are not sensitive enough and considerably overlap with those of pulmonary disease. In addition, signs of volume overload take time to evolve and may be completely absent in patients with acute heart failure.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a neurohormone secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to ventricular volume expansion and pressure overload. BNP levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. Recently, the researchers were able to show that the use of BNP levels significantly improves the management of patients with acute dyspnea in the emergency department. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might also be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

Primary endpoint: Total medical cost within 3 months. Secondary endpoints: Hospitalisation, time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy, 3-month mortality, dyspnea (NYHA) at 3 months, 12-month mortality, 12-month total medical cost, cost-effectiveness.

Patients and Methods: The trial is designed to enrol 250 patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 into a control group using evaluation of patients according to local standards without the use of BNP (or other natriuretic peptides) and to a BNP group with early testing for BNP by a rapid point-of-care assay during the first consultation in each private practice.

Expected results: It is the researchers' hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy will improve the evaluation and management and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.

Significance: Given the significant morbidity associated with dyspnea, as well as the enormous expenses associated with heart failure and pulmonary disease, BNP testing could represent a major advance in clinical medicine. In addition, BNP testing in the appropriate clinical setting may prove very helpful in the attempts to reduce cost of health care to society without reducing (but possibly increasing) the quality of health care.

Conditions
Dyspnea
Being tested
BNP measurement, Clinical examination
Keywords
heart failure, cost effectiveness, BNP, private practice, Acute dyspnoea
Medical subject headings
Dyspnea, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BNP measurementOther

  • Clinical examinationOther

Study groups in NCT00130611
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BNP blinded therapyPlacebo comparatorClinical treatment without knowledge of BNP levels
Receives: Other: Clinical examination
BNP guided therapyExperimentalClinical treatment based on clinical examination and BNP-levels
Receives: Other: BNP measurement; Other: Clinical examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total medical cost within 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Hospitalisation

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy

    Measured: 1 month

  3. therapy

    Measured: 1 month

  4. 3-month mortality

    Measured: 3 month

  5. Dyspnea (New York Heart Association [NYHA]) at 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  6. 12-month mortality

    Measured: 12 months

  7. 12-month total medical cost

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Cost-effectiveness

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2004
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00130611
Sponsor's protocol ID
BASEL III - Private Practice
Other IDs
PP00B-102853/1, 04.001, 287/03
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
12 Aug 2005
Last updated
29 May 2013
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Mueller C, Scholer A, Laule-Kilian K, Martina B, Schindler C, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Perruchoud AP. Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of acute dyspnea. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):647-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031681.

    PubMed 14960741
  • Burri E, Hochholzer K, Arenja N, Martin-Braschler H, Kaestner L, Gekeler H, Hatziisaak T, Buttiker M, Fraulin A, Potocki M, Breidthardt T, Reichlin T, Socrates T, Twerenbold R, Mueller C. B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care. J Intern Med. 2012 Nov;272(5):504-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02552.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

    PubMed 22550938

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing BNP measurement and Clinical examination in people with Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 9 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Switzerland, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total medical cost within 3 months (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00130611, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in