DyspneaPhase 4NCT00130611
B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation (BASEL) Study - Private Practice
A Phase 4 study testing BNP measurement and Clinical examination in people with Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 9 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dyspnea
- What is being tested?
- BNP measurement and Clinical examination
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2004to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute dyspnoea is the main symptom
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Obvious traumatic cause
- Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 250 umol/l)
- Sepsis
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 2 countries.
9 sites in 2 countries
Switzerland8 sites
Private practices of Kanton Aargau
Aarau, Canton of Aargau, 4300
Private Practice of Kanton Schwyz
Altendorf, Canton of Schwyz, 8852
Private Practices of Kanton Basel Stadt
Basel, Basel, 4000
Private Practices of Kanton Basel-Landschaft
Basel-Landschaft, Basel-Landschaft, 4100
Private Practices of Kanton Graubünden
Chur, Chur, 7500
Private practices of Kanton St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen
Private practices in Kanton Obwalden
Sarnen, Sarnen, 6060
Private practices of Kanton Solothurn
Solothurn, Canton of Solothurn, 4500
Germany1 site
Private practices of Baden-Wuertemberg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Freiburg
About this study
Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.
The aim is to test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
The primary endpoint is total medical cost within 3 months.
Read the detailed description
Background: Most patients with dyspnea primarily consult physicians in private practice. Heart failure and pulmonary disease are "epidemic" disorders and account for the majority of cases of dyspnea. There are approximately 24 million individuals in the United States with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and another 10 million persons suffer from asthma. These illnesses generate in excess of 17 million physician office visits a year at a cost of over $10.4 billion. In addition, there are nearly 1.5 million new cases of heart failure in North America and Europe every year. The total direct cost of care for heart failure exceed $38 billion in the United States per year. Therefore, cost-effective management of these diseases is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. The symptoms of heart failure may be nonspecific, and signs are not sensitive enough and considerably overlap with those of pulmonary disease. In addition, signs of volume overload take time to evolve and may be completely absent in patients with acute heart failure.
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a neurohormone secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to ventricular volume expansion and pressure overload. BNP levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. Recently, the researchers were able to show that the use of BNP levels significantly improves the management of patients with acute dyspnea in the emergency department. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might also be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.
Aim: To test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
Primary endpoint: Total medical cost within 3 months. Secondary endpoints: Hospitalisation, time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy, 3-month mortality, dyspnea (NYHA) at 3 months, 12-month mortality, 12-month total medical cost, cost-effectiveness.
Patients and Methods: The trial is designed to enrol 250 patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 into a control group using evaluation of patients according to local standards without the use of BNP (or other natriuretic peptides) and to a BNP group with early testing for BNP by a rapid point-of-care assay during the first consultation in each private practice.
Expected results: It is the researchers' hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy will improve the evaluation and management and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
Significance: Given the significant morbidity associated with dyspnea, as well as the enormous expenses associated with heart failure and pulmonary disease, BNP testing could represent a major advance in clinical medicine. In addition, BNP testing in the appropriate clinical setting may prove very helpful in the attempts to reduce cost of health care to society without reducing (but possibly increasing) the quality of health care.
- Conditions
- Dyspnea
- Being tested
- BNP measurement, Clinical examination
- Keywords
- heart failure, cost effectiveness, BNP, private practice, Acute dyspnoea
- Medical subject headings
- Dyspnea, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BNP measurementOther
Clinical examinationOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BNP blinded therapy | Placebo comparator | Clinical treatment without knowledge of BNP levels Receives: Other: Clinical examination |
| BNP guided therapy | Experimental | Clinical treatment based on clinical examination and BNP-levels Receives: Other: BNP measurement; Other: Clinical examination |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total medical cost within 3 months
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Hospitalisation
Measured: 1 month
Time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy
Measured: 1 month
therapy
Measured: 1 month
3-month mortality
Measured: 3 month
Dyspnea (New York Heart Association [NYHA]) at 3 months
Measured: 3 months
12-month mortality
Measured: 12 months
12-month total medical cost
Measured: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2004
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DyspneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss National Science Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Mueller, Prof., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00130611
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BASEL III - Private Practice
- Other IDs
- PP00B-102853/1, 04.001, 287/03
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 29 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Mueller C, Scholer A, Laule-Kilian K, Martina B, Schindler C, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Perruchoud AP. Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of acute dyspnea. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):647-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031681.
PubMed 14960741Burri E, Hochholzer K, Arenja N, Martin-Braschler H, Kaestner L, Gekeler H, Hatziisaak T, Buttiker M, Fraulin A, Potocki M, Breidthardt T, Reichlin T, Socrates T, Twerenbold R, Mueller C. B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care. J Intern Med. 2012 Nov;272(5):504-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02552.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
PubMed 22550938
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation (BASEL) Study - Private Practice
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00130611
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BASEL III - Private Practice
- Conditions
- Dyspnea
- Keywords
- heart failure, cost effectiveness, BNP, private practice, Acute dyspnoea
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss National Science Foundation
- Study start
- Jan 2004
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cost-effective management of heart failure and pulmonary disease is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.
The aim is to test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
The primary endpoint is total medical cost within 3 months.
Detailed description
Background: Most patients with dyspnea primarily consult physicians in private practice. Heart failure and pulmonary disease are "epidemic" disorders and account for the majority of cases of dyspnea. There are approximately 24 million individuals in the United States with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and another 10 million persons suffer from asthma. These illnesses generate in excess of 17 million physician office visits a year at a cost of over $10.4 billion. In addition, there are nearly 1.5 million new cases of heart failure in North America and Europe every year. The total direct cost of care for heart failure exceed $38 billion in the United States per year. Therefore, cost-effective management of these diseases is of paramount importance. Unfortunately, the rapid and accurate differentiation of heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in private practice is challenging. The symptoms of heart failure may be nonspecific, and signs are not sensitive enough and considerably overlap with those of pulmonary disease. In addition, signs of volume overload take time to evolve and may be completely absent in patients with acute heart failure.
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a neurohormone secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to ventricular volume expansion and pressure overload. BNP levels are significantly higher in patients with congestive heart failure as compared to patients with dyspnea due to other causes. Recently, the researchers were able to show that the use of BNP levels significantly improves the management of patients with acute dyspnea in the emergency department. As a simple, non-expensive assay easily applicable in private practice is available, rapid measurement of BNP might also be very helpful in establishing or excluding the diagnosis of heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnea in private practice.
Aim: To test the hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy would improve the evaluation and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
Primary endpoint: Total medical cost within 3 months. Secondary endpoints: Hospitalisation, time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy, 3-month mortality, dyspnea (NYHA) at 3 months, 12-month mortality, 12-month total medical cost, cost-effectiveness.
Patients and Methods: The trial is designed to enrol 250 patients presenting with acute dyspnea to physicians in private practice. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 into a control group using evaluation of patients according to local standards without the use of BNP (or other natriuretic peptides) and to a BNP group with early testing for BNP by a rapid point-of-care assay during the first consultation in each private practice.
Expected results: It is the researchers' hypothesis that a BNP guided diagnostic strategy will improve the evaluation and management and thereby reduce total cost of diagnosis and treatment.
Significance: Given the significant morbidity associated with dyspnea, as well as the enormous expenses associated with heart failure and pulmonary disease, BNP testing could represent a major advance in clinical medicine. In addition, BNP testing in the appropriate clinical setting may prove very helpful in the attempts to reduce cost of health care to society without reducing (but possibly increasing) the quality of health care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BNP blinded therapy | Placebo comparator | Other: Clinical examinationClinical treatment without knowledge of BNP levels |
| BNP guided therapy | Experimental | Other: BNP measurement, Other: Clinical examinationClinical treatment based on clinical examination and BNP-levels |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Acute dyspnoea is the main symptom
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Obvious traumatic cause
- Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 250 umol/l)
- Sepsis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BNP measurement | Other | BNP guided therapy |
| Clinical examination | Other | BNP blinded therapy, BNP guided therapy |
Primary outcome
Total medical cost within 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
8 secondary outcomes
Hospitalisation
Time frame: 1 month
Time interval to the initiation of the most appropriate therapy
Time frame: 1 month
therapy
Time frame: 1 month
3-month mortality
Time frame: 3 month
Dyspnea (New York Heart Association [NYHA]) at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
12-month mortality
Time frame: 12 months
12-month total medical cost
Time frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2013.
- Background: PubMed 14960741Mueller C, Scholer A, Laule-Kilian K, Martina B, Schindler C, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Perruchoud AP. Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of acute dyspnea. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):647-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031681.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22550938Burri E, Hochholzer K, Arenja N, Martin-Braschler H, Kaestner L, Gekeler H, Hatziisaak T, Buttiker M, Fraulin A, Potocki M, Breidthardt T, Reichlin T, Socrates T, Twerenbold R, Mueller C. B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care. J Intern Med. 2012 Nov;272(5):504-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02552.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Dyspnea
Not yet recruiting
Mechanical Ventilator Adjustments and Patient Dyspnea
Respiratory Failure, Dyspnea During Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Lung Cancer and Aging: Improving Well-being for Older Adults With Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Recruiting
The Impact of Telemedicine, Using the Caller's Mobile Phone Camera, on the Quality of Care Provided to Adult Patients Contacting the 15 Centre for Acute Dyspnea
Dyspnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Mueller, Prof. principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
9 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing BNP measurement and Clinical examination in people with Dyspnea, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 9 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Switzerland, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total medical cost within 3 months (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00130611, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2013.