MalariaPhase 3NCT00132548
A Trial of Four Drug Regimens for the Prevention of Malaria in Senegalese Children
A Phase 3 study testing Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, Amodiaquine and Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Senegal.
Trial summary
A recent study has shown that the administration of a single dose of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus artesunate to Senegalese children on three occasions during a short malaria transmission season reduced the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria by 86%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, Amodiaquine and Artesunate
- How many people
- 2,200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSenegal
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Dec 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Ages 1 - 5 years
- Residence in the study area
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to study drugs
- Chronic, underlying illness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Four Drug Regimens When Used for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Senegalese Children
A recent study has shown that the administration of a single dose of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus artesunate to Senegalese children on three occasions during a short malaria transmission season reduced the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria by 86%. However, use of this drug regimen led to the selection of parasites with molecular markers of resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine. Therefore, a trial of three alternative regimens has been undertaken to see if these are as effective and safe as the drug combination used in the initial study but less likely to select for drug resistance.
Read the detailed description
Background:
In countries of the Sahel and sub-Sahel, malaria transmission is highly seasonal with nearly all episodes of malaria occuring during a few months of the year. However, mortality and morbidity from malaria may be very high during this period, especially in children who are the most vulnerable group. It has been shown previously in The Gambia and elsewhere in West Africa that regular administration of anti-malarial drugs throughout the period of malaria transmission (chemoprophylaxis) reduces mortality and morbidity substantially but chemoprophylaxis is difficult to sustain. Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) differs from chemoprophylaxis in that drugs are given at less frequent intervals and drug concentrations fall below the inhibitory level between administrations. IPT was used first to protect pregnant women from malaria and this approach has proved very effective. More recently, the IPT concept has been applied to the prevention of malaria in infants, drugs being given at the same time as infant vaccines are administered. However, in areas of seasonal malaria, such as Senegal, only a small proportion of cases of severe malaria occur during the first year of life. In such areas, older children require protection. Intermittent preventive treatment in children (IPTc) is a potential way of doing this. IPTc involves the administration of drugs to all children in the age group at risk on two or three occasions during the period of high malaria transmission. In a recent study in Senegal it was shown that the administration of a single dose of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) plus artesunate to children aged 6 weeks to 59 months reduced the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria by 86%. However, administration of these drugs was associated with selection of parasites with molecular markers of resistance to pyrimethamine and to sulfonamides. The aim of the new study was to investigate alternative drug regimens which might be equally effective but less likely to select for drug resistance.
Objective:
The object of the study was to find the most effective drug regimen for use in intermittent preventive treatment in children in Senegal.
Study Area:
The study was conducted in Niakhar, a rural area in central Senegal where the previous trial of IPTc had been conducted. In this area, malaria transmission is very seasonal with nearly all cases occuring during a three to four month period of the year. The entomological inoculation rate in the area is 10 infectious bites per person per year.
Study Population:
All children aged 1 - 5 years residing in the study area were eligible to join the trial.
Study Procedure:
Following village meetings, the families of all eligible children were contacted and asked if they wished their child to join the study. If they wished to do so, informed consent was obtained and the child randomised to one of four treatment arms. At the beginning and at the end of the malaria transmission season, children were examined and a finger prick blood sample was obtained for determination of haemoglobin and preparation of blood films for microscopy. A drop of blood was collected on filter paper for subsequent molecular studies.
Following initial evaluation children were treated with one of four drug regimens. These were SP + 1 dose of artesunate (the regimen used in the initial trial), SP + three doses of artesunate, SP + 3 doses of amodiaquine and 3 doses of amodiaquine and artesunate. Initial drug administration was given under observation. Treatment was repeated on two further occasions at monthly intervals. The health assistants responsible for giving drugs were not blinded to the study group but they played no further part in the trial. Staff who made observations in the field, for example on the prevalence of side effects, and laboratory staff were blind to the study code.
The incidence of clinical attacks of malaria in children in each randomisation group was measured during the period of the malaria transmission. Weekly home visits were made to detect any children who were sick and children in the study who attended one of the clinics in the study area with a febrile illness were identified.
Blood films were stained with Giemsa and examined by two microscopists. DNA was extracted from filter papers obtained from parasitaemic children and examined for mutations in the dhfr and dhps genes which are associated with resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfonamides respectively.
All serious adverse events were noted and reported to the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB). Home visits were made to the first 100 children in each arm of the trial seven days after drug administration to enquire about any side effects associated with drug administration.
Trial End-Points:
The primary end-point of the trial was the prevalence of markers of drug resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfonamides at the end of the malaria transmission season. Secondary end-points were the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria and the incidence of side effects.
Sample Size:
Sample size was calculated on the basis of a comparison of the three new drug regimens with the one used in the previous trial (SP + 1 dose of artesunate). It was assumed that about 20% of children in the SP + 1 dose of artesunate group would have Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia at the end of the malaria transmission season providing around 100% samples for molecular studies. Assuming that the prevalence of resistance mutations at the dhfr codons 108, 59 and 51 was about 90%, 500 children would be needed in each study arm to give a trial with 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the prevalence of resistance mutations in children receiving the new drug combinations at a 5% level of significance. Allowing for a loss to follow-up of about 10% a sample size of 2,200 was selected.
Monitoring:
The trial was monitored by a clinical monitor provided by the IPTi consortium. A DSMB reviewed the study protocol, standard operating procedures and approved the analytical plan.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, Amodiaquine, Artesunate
- Keywords
- Malaria, Children, Intermittent preventive treatment, Senegal
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxineDrug
AmodiaquineDrug
ArtesunateDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of drug resistance
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incidence of clinical malaria
Side effects
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Study completionDec 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 2,200 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Senegal, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal, Ministry of Health, Senegal
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Investigators
- Cheick Sokhna, PhD, Principal investigator, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Senegal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00132548
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ITCRVF02
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Sokhna C, Cisse B, Ba el H, Milligan P, Hallett R, Sutherland C, Gaye O, Boulanger D, Simondon K, Simondon F, Targett G, Lines J, Greenwood B, Trape JF. A trial of the efficacy, safety and impact on drug resistance of four drug regimens for seasonal intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in Senegalese children. PLoS One. 2008 Jan 23;3(1):e1471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001471.
PubMed 18213379
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Four Drug Regimens When Used for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Senegalese Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00132548
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ITCRVF02
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Malaria, Children, Intermittent preventive treatment, Senegal
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,200 participants
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Senegal, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal, Ministry of Health, Senegal
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Study completion
- Dec 2004
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A recent study has shown that the administration of a single dose of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine plus artesunate to Senegalese children on three occasions during a short malaria transmission season reduced the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria by 86%. However, use of this drug regimen led to the selection of parasites with molecular markers of resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine. Therefore, a trial of three alternative regimens has been undertaken to see if these are as effective and safe as the drug combination used in the initial study but less likely to select for drug resistance.
Detailed description
Background:
In countries of the Sahel and sub-Sahel, malaria transmission is highly seasonal with nearly all episodes of malaria occuring during a few months of the year. However, mortality and morbidity from malaria may be very high during this period, especially in children who are the most vulnerable group. It has been shown previously in The Gambia and elsewhere in West Africa that regular administration of anti-malarial drugs throughout the period of malaria transmission (chemoprophylaxis) reduces mortality and morbidity substantially but chemoprophylaxis is difficult to sustain. Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) differs from chemoprophylaxis in that drugs are given at less frequent intervals and drug concentrations fall below the inhibitory level between administrations. IPT was used first to protect pregnant women from malaria and this approach has proved very effective. More recently, the IPT concept has been applied to the prevention of malaria in infants, drugs being given at the same time as infant vaccines are administered. However, in areas of seasonal malaria, such as Senegal, only a small proportion of cases of severe malaria occur during the first year of life. In such areas, older children require protection. Intermittent preventive treatment in children (IPTc) is a potential way of doing this. IPTc involves the administration of drugs to all children in the age group at risk on two or three occasions during the period of high malaria transmission. In a recent study in Senegal it was shown that the administration of a single dose of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) plus artesunate to children aged 6 weeks to 59 months reduced the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria by 86%. However, administration of these drugs was associated with selection of parasites with molecular markers of resistance to pyrimethamine and to sulfonamides. The aim of the new study was to investigate alternative drug regimens which might be equally effective but less likely to select for drug resistance.
Objective:
The object of the study was to find the most effective drug regimen for use in intermittent preventive treatment in children in Senegal.
Study Area:
The study was conducted in Niakhar, a rural area in central Senegal where the previous trial of IPTc had been conducted. In this area, malaria transmission is very seasonal with nearly all cases occuring during a three to four month period of the year. The entomological inoculation rate in the area is 10 infectious bites per person per year.
Study Population:
All children aged 1 - 5 years residing in the study area were eligible to join the trial.
Study Procedure:
Following village meetings, the families of all eligible children were contacted and asked if they wished their child to join the study. If they wished to do so, informed consent was obtained and the child randomised to one of four treatment arms. At the beginning and at the end of the malaria transmission season, children were examined and a finger prick blood sample was obtained for determination of haemoglobin and preparation of blood films for microscopy. A drop of blood was collected on filter paper for subsequent molecular studies.
Following initial evaluation children were treated with one of four drug regimens. These were SP + 1 dose of artesunate (the regimen used in the initial trial), SP + three doses of artesunate, SP + 3 doses of amodiaquine and 3 doses of amodiaquine and artesunate. Initial drug administration was given under observation. Treatment was repeated on two further occasions at monthly intervals. The health assistants responsible for giving drugs were not blinded to the study group but they played no further part in the trial. Staff who made observations in the field, for example on the prevalence of side effects, and laboratory staff were blind to the study code.
The incidence of clinical attacks of malaria in children in each randomisation group was measured during the period of the malaria transmission. Weekly home visits were made to detect any children who were sick and children in the study who attended one of the clinics in the study area with a febrile illness were identified.
Blood films were stained with Giemsa and examined by two microscopists. DNA was extracted from filter papers obtained from parasitaemic children and examined for mutations in the dhfr and dhps genes which are associated with resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfonamides respectively.
All serious adverse events were noted and reported to the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB). Home visits were made to the first 100 children in each arm of the trial seven days after drug administration to enquire about any side effects associated with drug administration.
Trial End-Points:
The primary end-point of the trial was the prevalence of markers of drug resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfonamides at the end of the malaria transmission season. Secondary end-points were the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria and the incidence of side effects.
Sample Size:
Sample size was calculated on the basis of a comparison of the three new drug regimens with the one used in the previous trial (SP + 1 dose of artesunate). It was assumed that about 20% of children in the SP + 1 dose of artesunate group would have Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia at the end of the malaria transmission season providing around 100% samples for molecular studies. Assuming that the prevalence of resistance mutations at the dhfr codons 108, 59 and 51 was about 90%, 500 children would be needed in each study arm to give a trial with 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the prevalence of resistance mutations in children receiving the new drug combinations at a 5% level of significance. Allowing for a loss to follow-up of about 10% a sample size of 2,200 was selected.
Monitoring:
The trial was monitored by a clinical monitor provided by the IPTi consortium. A DSMB reviewed the study protocol, standard operating procedures and approved the analytical plan.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Ages 1 - 5 years
- Residence in the study area
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Known allergy to study drugs
- Chronic, underlying illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine | Drug | – |
| Amodiaquine | Drug | – |
| Artesunate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of drug resistance
2 secondary outcomes
Incidence of clinical malaria
Side effects
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18213379Sokhna C, Cisse B, Ba el H, Milligan P, Hallett R, Sutherland C, Gaye O, Boulanger D, Simondon K, Simondon F, Targett G, Lines J, Greenwood B, Trape JF. A trial of the efficacy, safety and impact on drug resistance of four drug regimens for seasonal intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in Senegalese children. PLoS One. 2008 Jan 23;3(1):e1471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001471.
- web site for the IPTi consortiumLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cheick Sokhna, PhD principal investigator
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Senegal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, Amodiaquine and Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Senegal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Senegal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of drug resistance. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00132548, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2017.