Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4NCT00133250
Value of Abciximab in Patients With AMI Undergoing Primary PCI After Clopidogrel Pretreatment (BRAVE 3)
A Phase 4 study testing Abciximab in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether abciximab is associated with additional benefit in patients with AMI treated with PCI after high dose clopidogrel loading. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Abciximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2003to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients presenting with ST-Elevation acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours from the onset of symptoms
Who cannot join
- Age >80 years
- Malignancies
- Cardiogenic shock
- Prolonged cardio-pulmonary resuscitation
- Increased risk of bleeding
- Relevant hematologic deviations (hemoglobin <100 g/L or hematocrit <34%, platelet count <100 x 10^9 /L or platelet count >600 x 10^9 /L)
- Known allergy to the study medication
- Pregnancy (present or suspected)
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
Germany4 sites
Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen
Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 82467
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Munich, 80636
First Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
Munich, 81675
Klinikum Traunstein
Traunstein, 83278
About this study
Official title: Value of Abciximab in Patients With AMI Undergoing PCI After High Dose Clopidogrel Pretreatment (BRAVE 3)
The purpose of this study is to assess whether abciximab is associated with additional benefit in patients with AMI treated with PCI after high dose clopidogrel loading.
Read the detailed description
The goal of all reperfusion therapies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an effective restoration of coronary blood flow and the reduction of infarct size. Recently, the researchers were able to achieve excellent results with primary stenting plus abciximab in terms of reduction of infarct size and improvement of clinical outcome in the STOPAMI trial. This strategy provided a clear benefit compared to fibrinolysis. On the basis of the data published in the last 2 years, hospitals without angioplasty facilities have now better possibilities to improve the results of primary treatment of patients with AMI by immediately referring these patients to highly experienced centers in coronary interventions. There is an increasing interest to assess the additional advantages of pharmacologic reperfusion approaches which are readily applicable in the time window between presentation and arrival at the catheterization room. Two studies have shown that the results of the PCI in patients with AMI pretreated with fibrinolysis may even be more unfavorable than those achieved with angioplasty alone. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blocker abciximab has been shown to improve the results of the primary PCI in AMI. However, no rapidly effective antiplatelets therapy was available at the time when the studies on the benefit of abciximab were performed. Recent studies have shown that a high, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is significantly more rapidly acting and that maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation is achieved within 2 hours after administration. In the ISAR-REACT trial, a high loading dose of clopidogrel was well tolerated, associated with such a low frequency of procedural complications that the use of abciximab offered no clinically measurable benefit at 30 days.
Comparison:
Abciximab (bolus+infusion for 12h) versus Placebo (bolus+infusion for 12h) after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel.
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Abciximab, Placebo Heparin Sodium
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbciximabDrug
Also called ReoPro
Abciximab bolus and infusion is given. Study medication includes 3 identical vials, each with 5 ml solution containing 10 mg abciximab. The bolus dose to be given should be rated at 0.125 ml/kg of patient's weight. After the bolus, a total dose of 0.045 ml/kg study substance (up to a maximal quantity of 3.6 ml) should be given over 12 hours.
Placebo Heparin SodiumOther
Placebo bolus plus infusion is given. Study medication includes 3 identical vials, each with 5 ml solution containing 3000 U Heparin. The bolus dose to be given should be rated at 0.125 ml/kg of patient's weight. After the bolus, a total dose of 0.045 ml/kg study substance (up to a maximal quantity of 3.6 ml) should be given over 12 hours.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Abciximab Receives: Drug: Abciximab |
| B | Placebo comparator | Heparin Sodium Receives: Other: Placebo Heparin Sodium |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Left ventricular infarct size calculated as the final perfusion defect at follow-up scintigraphic study
Measured: 5-7 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical adverse events (death of any cause, reinfarction, stroke, urgent reinterventions, major and minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia <20 x 10^9 /L)
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2003
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Technical University of Munich
- Investigators
- Albert Schomig, MD, Study chair, Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenAdnan Kastrati, MD, Principal investigator, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00133250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE IDE No. I00902
- Status last verified
- Mar 2010
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, Grinfeld L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, DeWood MA, Ribichini F. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997 Dec 17;278(23):2093-8.
PubMed 9403425Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG, Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, Lousberg AH, Dassen WR, Bar FW. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study. Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):426-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.426.
PubMed 10490554Neumann FJ, Blasini R, Schmitt C, Alt E, Dirschinger J, Gawaz M, Kastrati A, Schomig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998 Dec 15;98(24):2695-701. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.24.2695.
PubMed 9851955Muller I, Seyfarth M, Rudiger S, Wolf B, Pogatsa-Murray G, Schomig A, Gawaz M. Effect of a high loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement. Heart. 2001 Jan;85(1):92-3. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.1.92. No abstract available.
PubMed 11119474Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schlotterbeck K, Dotzer F, Dirschinger J, Schmitt C, Nekolla SG, Seyfarth M, Martinoff S, Markwardt C, Clermont G, Gerbig HW, Leiss J, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE) Study Investigators. Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab vs abciximab alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):947-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.947.
PubMed 14982910Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schuhlen H, Dirschinger J, Dotzer F, ten Berg JM, Neumann FJ, Bollwein H, Volmer C, Gawaz M, Berger PB, Schomig A; Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Study Investigators. A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):232-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031859.
PubMed 14724302Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Schricke U, Neverve J, Pache J, Martinoff S, Neumann FJ, Nekolla S, Blasini R, Seyfarth M, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (STOPAMI-2) Study. Myocardial salvage after coronary stenting plus abciximab versus fibrinolysis plus abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):920-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08022-4.
PubMed 11918909Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Schulz S, Frungel S, Nekolla SG, Moshage W, Dotzer F, Huber K, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Seyfarth M, Martinoff S, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation-3 (BRAVE-3) Study Investigators. Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial. Circulation. 2009 Apr 14;119(14):1933-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818617. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
PubMed 19332467Schulz S, Birkmeier KA, Ndrepepa G, Moshage W, Dotzer F, Huber K, Dirschinger J, Seyfarth M, Schomig A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J. One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the BRAVE-3 randomized trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0185-z. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
PubMed 20582594
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Value of Abciximab in Patients With AMI Undergoing PCI After High Dose Clopidogrel Pretreatment (BRAVE 3)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00133250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GE IDE No. I00902
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Technical University of Munich
- Study start
- Jun 2003
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess whether abciximab is associated with additional benefit in patients with AMI treated with PCI after high dose clopidogrel loading.
Detailed description
The goal of all reperfusion therapies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an effective restoration of coronary blood flow and the reduction of infarct size. Recently, the researchers were able to achieve excellent results with primary stenting plus abciximab in terms of reduction of infarct size and improvement of clinical outcome in the STOPAMI trial. This strategy provided a clear benefit compared to fibrinolysis. On the basis of the data published in the last 2 years, hospitals without angioplasty facilities have now better possibilities to improve the results of primary treatment of patients with AMI by immediately referring these patients to highly experienced centers in coronary interventions. There is an increasing interest to assess the additional advantages of pharmacologic reperfusion approaches which are readily applicable in the time window between presentation and arrival at the catheterization room. Two studies have shown that the results of the PCI in patients with AMI pretreated with fibrinolysis may even be more unfavorable than those achieved with angioplasty alone. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blocker abciximab has been shown to improve the results of the primary PCI in AMI. However, no rapidly effective antiplatelets therapy was available at the time when the studies on the benefit of abciximab were performed. Recent studies have shown that a high, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is significantly more rapidly acting and that maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation is achieved within 2 hours after administration. In the ISAR-REACT trial, a high loading dose of clopidogrel was well tolerated, associated with such a low frequency of procedural complications that the use of abciximab offered no clinically measurable benefit at 30 days.
Comparison:
Abciximab (bolus+infusion for 12h) versus Placebo (bolus+infusion for 12h) after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: AbciximabAbciximab |
| B | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo Heparin SodiumHeparin Sodium |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients presenting with ST-Elevation acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours from the onset of symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age >80 years
- Malignancies
- Cardiogenic shock
- Prolonged cardio-pulmonary resuscitation
- Increased risk of bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbciximabAlso: ReoProAbciximab bolus and infusion is given. Study medication includes 3 identical vials, each with 5 ml solution containing 10 mg abciximab. The bolus dose to be given should be rated at 0.125 ml/kg of patient's weight. After the bolus, a total dose of 0.045 ml/kg study substance (up to a maximal quantity of 3.6 ml) should be given over 12 hours. | Drug | A |
| Placebo Heparin SodiumPlacebo bolus plus infusion is given. Study medication includes 3 identical vials, each with 5 ml solution containing 3000 U Heparin. The bolus dose to be given should be rated at 0.125 ml/kg of patient's weight. After the bolus, a total dose of 0.045 ml/kg study substance (up to a maximal quantity of 3.6 ml) should be given over 12 hours. | Other | B |
Primary outcome
Left ventricular infarct size calculated as the final perfusion defect at follow-up scintigraphic study
Time frame: 5-7 days
1 secondary outcome
Clinical adverse events (death of any cause, reinfarction, stroke, urgent reinterventions, major and minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia <20 x 10^9 /L)
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2010.
- Background: PubMed 9403425Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, Grinfeld L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, DeWood MA, Ribichini F. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997 Dec 17;278(23):2093-8.
- Background: PubMed 10490554Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG, Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, Lousberg AH, Dassen WR, Bar FW. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study. Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):426-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.426.
- Background: PubMed 9851955Neumann FJ, Blasini R, Schmitt C, Alt E, Dirschinger J, Gawaz M, Kastrati A, Schomig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998 Dec 15;98(24):2695-701. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.24.2695.
- Background: PubMed 11119474Muller I, Seyfarth M, Rudiger S, Wolf B, Pogatsa-Murray G, Schomig A, Gawaz M. Effect of a high loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement. Heart. 2001 Jan;85(1):92-3. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.1.92. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14982910Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schlotterbeck K, Dotzer F, Dirschinger J, Schmitt C, Nekolla SG, Seyfarth M, Martinoff S, Markwardt C, Clermont G, Gerbig HW, Leiss J, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE) Study Investigators. Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab vs abciximab alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):947-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.947.
- Background: PubMed 14724302Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schuhlen H, Dirschinger J, Dotzer F, ten Berg JM, Neumann FJ, Bollwein H, Volmer C, Gawaz M, Berger PB, Schomig A; Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Study Investigators. A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):232-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031859.
- Background: PubMed 11918909Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Schricke U, Neverve J, Pache J, Martinoff S, Neumann FJ, Nekolla S, Blasini R, Seyfarth M, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (STOPAMI-2) Study. Myocardial salvage after coronary stenting plus abciximab versus fibrinolysis plus abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):920-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08022-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19332467Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Schulz S, Frungel S, Nekolla SG, Moshage W, Dotzer F, Huber K, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Seyfarth M, Martinoff S, Schwaiger M, Schomig A; Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation-3 (BRAVE-3) Study Investigators. Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial. Circulation. 2009 Apr 14;119(14):1933-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818617. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20582594Schulz S, Birkmeier KA, Ndrepepa G, Moshage W, Dotzer F, Huber K, Dirschinger J, Seyfarth M, Schomig A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J. One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the BRAVE-3 randomized trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0185-z. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
Related trials for Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The DANE-HEART Trial - Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Primary Prevention
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Other Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Albert Schomig, MD study chair
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Adnan Kastrati, MD principal investigator
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Abciximab in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Germany, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Left ventricular infarct size calculated as the final perfusion defect at follow-up scintigraphic study (time frame: 5-7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00133250, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2010.