AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lung InjuryPhase 3NCT00133614

Prone Positioning in Pediatric Acute Lung Injury

A Phase 3 study testing Prone Positioning in people with Acute Lung Injury, run by National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this trial is to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, infants and children with acute lung injury treated with prone positioning would have more ventilator-free days than those treated with supine positioning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 weeks to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Lung Injury
What is being tested?
Prone Positioning
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2001to Apr 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 weeks to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >42 weeks post-conceptual age and <18 years of age
  • On mechanical ventilation (defined as presence of an endotracheal/tracheostomy tube and currently using ventilator support)
  • All of the following in the same 48 hour period:
  • acute pulmonary parenchymal disease (i.e., chest radiograph report of diffuse bilateral pulmonary alveolar infiltrates)
  • mechanical ventilation for at least 1 hour and anticipated need to continue mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
  • at least one PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 (adjusted for barometric pressure: if altitude > 1000m, then PaO2/FiO2 <= 300x(B.P./760), regardless of mean airway pressure)
  • functional arterial catheter for blood gas analysis

Who cannot join

  • Persistent hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure of 70mmHg+(2x age in years)); i.e. patients requiring either intravenous fluids and/or increases of additional cardiotonic medications every 2 hours
  • Active bleeding that requires ongoing blood/fluid volume replacement
  • Currently on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Severe chronic lung disease (cystic fibrosis or bronchopulmonary dysplasia)
  • Respiratory failure presumed to be the result of cardiac disease
  • History of symptomatic or uncorrected congenital heart disease or a right to left intracardiac shunt
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Bone marrow or lung transplant
  • Current known diagnosis of any of the following:
  • upper airway disease (i.e., tracheitis, tracheomalacia)
  • reactive airway disease (receiving beta agonists or acute doses of systemic corticosteroids)
  • refractory cerebral hypertension (intracranial pressure [ICP] >20mmHg for 1 hr)
  • neuromuscular respiratory failure (chronic assisted ventilation)
  • spinal instability (uncleared cervical spine)
  • unstable long bone fractures
  • Nonpulmonary condition that may be exacerbated by the prone position (for example, osteogenesis imperfecta, craniofacial surgery in the past week)
  • Draining abdominal surgical wound
  • Pregnancy
  • Subject's family/medical team have decided not to provide full support (patient treatment considered futile)
  • Enrollment in any other clinical trial within the last 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Childrens Hospital, Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this trial is to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, infants and children with acute lung injury treated with prone positioning would have more ventilator-free days than those treated with supine positioning.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted from August 28, 2001 to April 23, 2004, of 102 pediatric patients from 7 US pediatric intensive care units aged 2 weeks to 18 years who were treated with supine vs. prone positioning. Randomization was concealed and group assignment was not blinded.

Patients were randomized to either supine or prone positioning within 48 hours of meeting acute lung injury criteria, with those patients in the prone group being positioned within 4 hours of randomization and remaining prone for 20 hours each day during the acute phase of their illness for a maximum of 7 days, after which they were positioned supine. Both groups were treated using lung protective ventilator and sedation protocols, extubation readiness testing, and hemodynamic, nutrition, and skin care guidelines.

Being tested
Prone Positioning
Medical subject headings
Acute Lung Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prone PositioningProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prone positioning versus supine positioning in determining ventilator-free days in infants and children

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2001
  3. Study completionApr 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00133614
Sponsor's protocol ID
5336
Other IDs
5R01NR005336-04
Status last verified
Aug 2005
First submitted
19 Aug 2005
Last updated
31 Oct 2005
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Curley MA, Hibberd PL, Fineman LD, Wypij D, Shih MC, Thompson JE, Grant MJ, Barr FE, Cvijanovich NZ, Sorce L, Luckett PM, Matthay MA, Arnold JH. Effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in children with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):229-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.229.

    PubMed 16014597

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Prone Positioning in people with Acute Lung Injury, run by National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prone positioning versus supine positioning in determining ventilator-free days in infants and children. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00133614, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2005.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in