AzTrials
AzTrials

PancreatitisPhase 1/2NCT00133835

Comparison of ESWL Alone and ESWL + Endoscopy for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis

A Phase 1/2 study testing Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct in people with Pancreatitis, run by Erasme University Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endoscopy is an established method of treatment for painful obstructive calcified pancreatitis. It involves the disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments possibly associated with stent insertion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Mar 1998to 21 Feb 2022
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Painful chronic pancreatitis (>1 abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months)
  • At least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) with upstream duct dilation
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient

Who cannot join

  • History of treatment of the pancreas using ESWL, endoscopy, or surgery
  • Pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT scan
  • Alkaline phosphatase levels greater than twice the upper limit of normal values or signs of cholangitis
  • Age below 18 years
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Belgium1 site
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancretology; Erasme University Hospital

    Brussels, 1070

Other trials in Belgium

Italy1 site
  • Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University

    Rome, 00168

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison of ESWL Alone and ESWL Combined With Endoscopic Drainage of the Main Pancreatic Duct for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis

Endoscopy is an established method of treatment for painful obstructive calcified pancreatitis. It involves the disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone relieves pain in calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). The aim of this study is to compare both techniques in a randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct is an established method of treatment of painful obstructive calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). It involves disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments, possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone in calcified CP is followed by spontaneous elimination of stone fragments and pain relief, without sphincterotomy. After ESWL alone, the exocrine function was found to return to normal values in some cases. Potential benefits include lower costs and morbidity as well as wider availability compared to endoscopic techniques.

The primary outcome of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the relapse of pain at 2 years after treatment with ESWL alone or endoscopic treatment, consisting of ESWL followed by endoscopic stone extraction. Secondary outcomes include a comparison of technical results (as assessed by abdominal CT Scan 1 week after the last intervention and secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance at 1 month), complication rates, and treatment-related costs in both groups.

Patients are eligible to participate in the study according to the following criteria:

Inclusion criteria :

  • painful chronic pancreatitis (abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months);
  • at least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct with upstream duct dilation;
  • written informed consent obtained from the patient.

Exclusion criteria:

  • history of treatment of the pancreas using ESWL, endoscopy, or surgery;
  • pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT Scan;
  • alkaline phosphatase levels greater than twice the upper limit of normal values or signs of cholangitis;
  • age below 18 years;
  • pregnancy or lactation.

Pretherapeutic work-up will include detailed medical history (including date of the first episode of typical abdominal pain, date of diagnosis of CP, number of episodes of pain during the last year, alcohol intake, pain continuous or intermittent during the last episode, medication, intensity of the last episode of pain on a 10-point scale as previously described), blood chemistry, stool sampling (for elastase measurement), triolein breath test, plain abdominal film taken in four classical positions (left anterior oblique, right anterior oblique, lateral, and supine), CT Scan without contrast medium injection, and secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP).

After informed consent of the referring physician has been obtained, patients will be asked to participate in the study. If the patient accepts, after oral and written consent, he (or she) will be randomized to the ESWL or endoscopy group by opening an opaque sealed envelope numbered according to a table of random numbers.

ESWL will be performed in all patients using a electromagnetic lithotriptor as previously described. Shock-waves will be focused on the obstructing stones (if multiple stones are present, those responsible for MPD obstruction will be identified by comparing plain abdominal film, CT Scan and S-MRCP). ESWL sessions will be repeated if necessary, until stone fragmentation is obtained, as confirmed by abdominal plain film centered on the targeted area of the pancreas. At this time, treatment will be considered terminated in the ESWL group, patients in the endoscopy group will undergo endoscopy immediately, for endoscopic extraction of stone fragments possibly associated to stent insertion according to previously published criteria and techniques.

Cross-over: in the ESWL group, if no elimination of the fragments is observed one week after the last ESWL, endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct will be carried out at this time in case of continuous pain. For patients without continuous pain, delayed spontaneous elimination of the fragments will be sought by CT Scan and S-MRCP 2 months after the last ESWL. Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct will be proposed during follow-up only to the patients presenting a painful attack of CP.

Follow-up will consist of clinical examination 1 month after treatment and every 6 months thereafter. Data collected will include pain relapses, ESWL, endoscopic and surgical procedures, weight change, plus any other seemingly unrelated medical treatments. In addition to this, a S-MRCP will be performed 1 month after treatment. Triolein breath test will be performed at 1 month and 1 year. Sampling of stools (for elastase measurement) will be obtained every year.

Costs will be calculated starting on the day of first treatment as previously described. Costs not directly related to the treatment of pain or of procedure-related complications (e.g., diabetes) will be disregarded.

Conditions
Pancreatitis
Being tested
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Lithotripsy, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Abdominal pain
Medical subject headings
Pancreatitis, Abdominal Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyProcedure or surgery

  • Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic ductProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relapse of pain at 2 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Diameter of the main pancreatic duct at 1 month

  2. Complication rate at 1 month

  3. Treatment-related costs of initial intervention and during follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 1998
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion21 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00133835
Sponsor's protocol ID
97.187
Status last verified
Jul 2005
First submitted
22 Aug 2005
Last updated
9 Mar 2022
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct in people with Pancreatitis, run by Erasme University Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Belgium, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relapse of pain at 2 years. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in