Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, FamilialPhase 2/3NCT00134758
Ursodeoxycholic Acid in the Treatment of Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) Patients
A Phase 2/3 study testing Ursodeoxycholic acid in people with Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Malignant transformation of adenomas of the duodenum is now the leading cause of death in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients who had a restorative proctocolectomy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) modifies the biliary acid profile and could reduce the severity of duodenal adenomas and prevent such transformation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial
- What is being tested?
- Ursodeoxycholic acid
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients between 18 and 65 years of age
- Weight less than or equal to 100 kg
- Restorative proctocolectomy
- Activated protein C (APC) mutation identified or more than 100 polyps on the colectomy specimen
- SPIGELMAN score of duodenal adenoma greater than or equal to 1
- Efficient contraceptive treatment for pre-menopausal women
Show all 9Show fewer
- Cooperative patient
- Signed consent
- Social security insurance
Who cannot join
- SPIGELMAN score of duodenal adenoma equal to 4 with severe dysplasia
- Hepatic disease
- Intermesenteric desmoid tumour
- Any severe disease
- Daily use during the last 3 months of:
- aspirin;
Show all 11Show fewer
- non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs;
- tamoxifen;
- cholestyramine.
- Pregnancy
- Breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficiency of Ursodesoxycholic Acid in the Treatment of Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients. URSOPAF
Malignant transformation of adenomas of the duodenum is now the leading cause of death in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients who had a restorative proctocolectomy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) modifies the biliary acid profile and could reduce the severity of duodenal adenomas and prevent such transformation.
Read the detailed description
We designed a randomized double blinded study to evaluate the efficiency of UDCA in the treatment of duodenal adenomas. One hundred patients are planned to be included. Fifty will receive UDCA and fifty a placebo. Three duodenoscopies are planned: one before inclusion, one at the end of the first year of follow-up and one after two years of follow-up at the end of the protocol. These duodenoscopies are associated to endoscopies of the ileal reservoir performed at the time of restorative proctocolectomy and are recorded numerically. Severity of the duodenal adenomas are evaluated according to the SPIGELMAN score. Patients are seen every 6 months. Before each endoscopy, blood samples are collected for biliary acid profile analysis. Moreover, during endoscopies, duodenal fluid and ileal fluid are collected for biliary acid profile analysis, also.
At the end of the follow-up of the last patients included (nov 2008), biliary acid profile analysis will be performed and statistical analysis of the results will be performed.
- Conditions
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial
- Being tested
- Ursodeoxycholic acid, Placebo
- Keywords
- Treatment of adenomas of the duodenum in FAP patients., Adenoma
- Medical subject headings
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Adenoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ursodeoxycholic acidDrug
Also called Delursan
During 2 years :
- between 40 and 50 kg : 500 mg/day
- between 51 and 75 kg : 750 mg/day
- between 76 and 100 kg : 1000 mg/day
PlaceboDrug
During 2 years :
- between 40 and 50 kg : 2 tabs/day
- between 51 and 75 kg : 3 tabs/day
- between 76 and 100 kg : 4 tabs/day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Ursodeoxycholic acid during 2 years :
* between 40 and 50 kg : 500 mg/day
* between 51 and 75 kg : 750 mg/day
* between 76 and 100 kg : 1000 mg/day Receives: Drug: Ursodeoxycholic acid |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SPIGELMAN severity score of duodenal lesion after 2 years of follow-up
Measured: Baseline, 1 and 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Cellular proliferation (Ki 67 and PCNA)
Measured: At the baseline, 1 and 2 years
Biliary acid profile
Measured: At the baseline, 1 and 2 years
Compliance to the treatment
Measured: Every 6 months during 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionOct 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, FamilialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Axcan Pharma
- Investigators
- Yann RA Parc, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Hospital of Paris (AP/HP), Pierre et Marie Curie University, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00134758
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P030419
- Other IDs
- AOM 03041
- Status last verified
- Jul 2009
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Talbot IC, Domizio P, Phillips RK. Upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Lancet. 1989 Sep 30;2(8666):783-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90840-4.
PubMed 2571019Nugent KP, Farmer KC, Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Phillips RK. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of sulindac on duodenal and rectal polyposis and cell proliferation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1993 Dec;80(12):1618-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801244.
PubMed 8298943Jarvinen HJ, Nyberg M, Peltokallio P. Biliary involvement in familial adenomatosis coli. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983 Aug;26(8):525-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02563746.
PubMed 6872780Spigelman AD, Owen RW, Hill MJ, Phillips RK. Biliary bile acid profiles in familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):321-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780318.
PubMed 1850640Mower HF, Ray RM, Shoff R, Stemmermann GN, Nomura A, Glober GA, Kamiyama S, Shimada A, Yamakawa H. Fecal bile acids in two Japanese populations with different colon cancer risks. Cancer Res. 1979 Feb;39(2 Pt 1):328-31.
PubMed 761204Hill MJ, Drasar BS, Williams RE, Meade TW, Cox AG, Simpson JE, Morson BC. Faecal bile-acids and clostridia in patients with cancer of the large bowel. Lancet. 1975 Mar 8;1(7906):535-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91556-1.
PubMed 47015Tanida N, Hikasa Y, Shimoyama T, Setchell KD. Comparison of faecal bile acid profiles between patients with adenomatous polyps of the large bowel and healthy subjects in Japan. Gut. 1984 Aug;25(8):824-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.8.824.
PubMed 6745720van der Werf SD, Nagengast FM, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Huijbregts AW, van Tongeren JH. Colonic absorption of secondary bile-acids in patients with adenomatous polyps and in matched controls. Lancet. 1982 Apr 3;1(8275):759-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91810-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 6121223Wilpart M, Mainguet P, Maskens A, Roberfroid M. Structure-activity relationship amongst biliary acids showing comutagenic activity towards 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Carcinogenesis. 1983 Oct;4(10):1239-41. doi: 10.1093/carcin/4.10.1239.
PubMed 6616753Earnest DL, Holubec H, Wali RK, Jolley CS, Bissonette M, Bhattacharyya AK, Roy H, Khare S, Brasitus TA. Chemoprevention of azoxymethane-induced colonic carcinogenesis by supplemental dietary ursodeoxycholic acid. Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 1;54(19):5071-4.
PubMed 7923119Serfaty L, De Leusse A, Rosmorduc O, Desaint B, Flejou JF, Chazouilleres O, Poupon RE, Poupon R. Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an observational study. Hepatology. 2003 Jul;38(1):203-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50311.
PubMed 12830003Parc Y, Piquard A, Dozois RR, Parc R, Tiret E. Long-term outcome of familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative coloproctectomy. Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):378-82. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114216.90947.f6.
PubMed 15075655Parc Y, Desaint B, Flejou JF, Lefevre JH, Serfaty L, Vienne A, Kotti S, Simon T, Tiret E. The effect of ursodesoxycholic acid on duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective randomized placebo-control trial. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;14(7):854-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02816.x.
PubMed 21899713
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficiency of Ursodesoxycholic Acid in the Treatment of Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients. URSOPAF
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00134758
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P030419
- Conditions
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial
- Keywords
- Treatment of adenomas of the duodenum in FAP patients., Adenoma
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Axcan Pharma
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2009 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Malignant transformation of adenomas of the duodenum is now the leading cause of death in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients who had a restorative proctocolectomy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) modifies the biliary acid profile and could reduce the severity of duodenal adenomas and prevent such transformation.
Detailed description
We designed a randomized double blinded study to evaluate the efficiency of UDCA in the treatment of duodenal adenomas. One hundred patients are planned to be included. Fifty will receive UDCA and fifty a placebo. Three duodenoscopies are planned: one before inclusion, one at the end of the first year of follow-up and one after two years of follow-up at the end of the protocol. These duodenoscopies are associated to endoscopies of the ileal reservoir performed at the time of restorative proctocolectomy and are recorded numerically. Severity of the duodenal adenomas are evaluated according to the SPIGELMAN score. Patients are seen every 6 months. Before each endoscopy, blood samples are collected for biliary acid profile analysis. Moreover, during endoscopies, duodenal fluid and ileal fluid are collected for biliary acid profile analysis, also.
At the end of the follow-up of the last patients included (nov 2008), biliary acid profile analysis will be performed and statistical analysis of the results will be performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Ursodeoxycholic acidUrsodeoxycholic acid during 2 years : * between 40 and 50 kg : 500 mg/day * between 51 and 75 kg : 750 mg/day * between 76 and 100 kg : 1000 mg/day |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female patients between 18 and 65 years of age
- Weight less than or equal to 100 kg
- Restorative proctocolectomy
- Activated protein C (APC) mutation identified or more than 100 polyps on the colectomy specimen
- SPIGELMAN score of duodenal adenoma greater than or equal to 1
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- SPIGELMAN score of duodenal adenoma equal to 4 with severe dysplasia
- Hepatic disease
- Intermesenteric desmoid tumour
- Any severe disease
- Daily use during the last 3 months of:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ursodeoxycholic acidAlso: DelursanDuring 2 years : * between 40 and 50 kg : 500 mg/day * between 51 and 75 kg : 750 mg/day * between 76 and 100 kg : 1000 mg/day | Drug | 1 |
| PlaceboDuring 2 years : * between 40 and 50 kg : 2 tabs/day * between 51 and 75 kg : 3 tabs/day * between 76 and 100 kg : 4 tabs/day | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
SPIGELMAN severity score of duodenal lesion after 2 years of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years
3 secondary outcomes
Cellular proliferation (Ki 67 and PCNA)
Time frame: At the baseline, 1 and 2 years
Biliary acid profile
Time frame: At the baseline, 1 and 2 years
Compliance to the treatment
Time frame: Every 6 months during 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2009.
- Background: PubMed 2571019Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Talbot IC, Domizio P, Phillips RK. Upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Lancet. 1989 Sep 30;2(8666):783-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90840-4.
- Background: PubMed 8298943Nugent KP, Farmer KC, Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Phillips RK. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of sulindac on duodenal and rectal polyposis and cell proliferation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1993 Dec;80(12):1618-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801244.
- Background: PubMed 6872780Jarvinen HJ, Nyberg M, Peltokallio P. Biliary involvement in familial adenomatosis coli. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983 Aug;26(8):525-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02563746.
- Background: PubMed 1850640Spigelman AD, Owen RW, Hill MJ, Phillips RK. Biliary bile acid profiles in familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):321-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780318.
- Background: PubMed 761204Mower HF, Ray RM, Shoff R, Stemmermann GN, Nomura A, Glober GA, Kamiyama S, Shimada A, Yamakawa H. Fecal bile acids in two Japanese populations with different colon cancer risks. Cancer Res. 1979 Feb;39(2 Pt 1):328-31.
- Background: PubMed 47015Hill MJ, Drasar BS, Williams RE, Meade TW, Cox AG, Simpson JE, Morson BC. Faecal bile-acids and clostridia in patients with cancer of the large bowel. Lancet. 1975 Mar 8;1(7906):535-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91556-1.
- Background: PubMed 6745720Tanida N, Hikasa Y, Shimoyama T, Setchell KD. Comparison of faecal bile acid profiles between patients with adenomatous polyps of the large bowel and healthy subjects in Japan. Gut. 1984 Aug;25(8):824-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.8.824.
- Background: PubMed 6121223van der Werf SD, Nagengast FM, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Huijbregts AW, van Tongeren JH. Colonic absorption of secondary bile-acids in patients with adenomatous polyps and in matched controls. Lancet. 1982 Apr 3;1(8275):759-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91810-4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6616753Wilpart M, Mainguet P, Maskens A, Roberfroid M. Structure-activity relationship amongst biliary acids showing comutagenic activity towards 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Carcinogenesis. 1983 Oct;4(10):1239-41. doi: 10.1093/carcin/4.10.1239.
- Background: PubMed 7923119Earnest DL, Holubec H, Wali RK, Jolley CS, Bissonette M, Bhattacharyya AK, Roy H, Khare S, Brasitus TA. Chemoprevention of azoxymethane-induced colonic carcinogenesis by supplemental dietary ursodeoxycholic acid. Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 1;54(19):5071-4.
- Background: PubMed 12830003Serfaty L, De Leusse A, Rosmorduc O, Desaint B, Flejou JF, Chazouilleres O, Poupon RE, Poupon R. Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an observational study. Hepatology. 2003 Jul;38(1):203-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50311.
- Background: PubMed 15075655Parc Y, Piquard A, Dozois RR, Parc R, Tiret E. Long-term outcome of familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative coloproctectomy. Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):378-82. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114216.90947.f6.
Related trials for Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing for Safety and Colorectal Cancer Preventive Effects of ONC201
Colorectal Adenomatous Polyp, Colorectal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
FOG-001 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of β-hydroxybutyrate Supplementation as Chemoprevention in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
FAP, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
RecruitingPhase 2
An Investigational Drug (TPST-1495) in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Colorectal Carcinoma, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Recruiting
An Intervention to Increase Genetic Testing in Families Who May Share a Gene Mutation Related to Cancer Risk and An Intervention to Help Patients and Their Primary Care Providers Stay Up-to-date About Uncertain Genetic Test Results
BRCA1 Mutation, POLD1 Gene Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yann RA Parc, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Hospital of Paris (AP/HP), Pierre et Marie Curie University, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Ursodeoxycholic acid in people with Adenomatous Polyposis Coli, Familial, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SPIGELMAN severity score of duodenal lesion after 2 years of follow-up (time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00134758, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2009.