Depressive DisorderPhase 2NCT00135512
Study Of 323U66 SR In Major Depressive Disorder
A Phase 2 study testing bupropion hydrochloride in people with Depressive Disorder, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 7 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in major depressive disorder patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- bupropion hydrochloride
- How many people
- 234 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2004to 28 May 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Met DSM-IV-TR criteria for major depressive disorder for their current episode for at least 8 weeks prior to screening visit.
- Must give a written informed consent. But if the patient is under 20, both the patient himself/herself and his/her proxy consenter must give written informed consent.
- Must have rating scores as outlined.
Who cannot join
- Current or past history of seizure disorder or brain injury.
- Current or past history of anorexia or bulimia nervosa.
- History of manic episode.
- Past or current DSM- IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
- Diagnosis of substance abuse (alcohol or drug) by the DSM-IV-TR criteria.
- Pregnant, possibly pregnant or lactating.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Must not be suicidal.
- Blood pressure of SBP>160mmHg, DBP>100mmHg.
- History or complication of cancer or malignant tumour.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 2 countries.
7 sites in 2 countries
Japan6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 814-0180
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 651-1145
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 228-0828
GSK Investigational Site
Kumamoto, 861-8002
GSK Investigational Site
Saitama, 332-0012
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 160-0023
Location not given1 site
GSK Investigational Site
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of 323U66 SR in Patients With Depression
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in major depressive disorder patients.
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- bupropion hydrochloride
- Keywords
- MDD
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bupropion hydrochlorideDrug
Study drug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 8 in Observed Cases
The MADRS is a semi-structured interview rating scale for depression that assesses 10 symptoms. The scale is composed of 10 questions (1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts) with a fixed 7 point scale (0, no depression; 60, severely depressed). Total score ranges from 0-60. A higher score indicates more depressive symptoms. MADRS Response was defined as a reduction in MADRS score from Baseline. Change from Baseline in the total score was calculated as the value at Week 8 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in the MADRS Total Score at Week 52 in Observed Cases
The MADRS is a semi-structured interview rating scale for depression that assesses 10 symptoms. The scale is composed of 10 questions (1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts) with a fixed 7 point scale (0, no depression; 60, severely depressed). Total score ranges from 0-60. A higher score indicates more depressive symptoms. MADRS Response was defined as a reduction in MADRS score from Baseline. Change from Baseline in the total score was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D; 17 Items) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Each item was rated on either a 3-point scale (0 to 2; 8 questions) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4; 9 questions), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The total score was calculated by summing the individual response scores. Total score ranged from 0 to 52. The following symptoms were rated on a 5-point scale (0-4): depressed mood, low self-esteem (guilt), suicidal thoughts, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychomotor agitation, anxiety (psychic), anxiety (somatic), and hypochondriasis (somatization). The following symptoms were rated on a 3-point scale (0-2): insomnia (initial), insomnia (middle), insomnia (late), gastrointestinal symptoms (appetite), somatic symptoms (general), sexual disturbances, insight, and weight loss. Change from Baseline in the total score was calculated as the score at Week 8 and 52 minus the score at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Percentage of Participants Who Were Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responders at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
The CGI-I scale was used to rate improvement in the participant's condition (benefits) since Baseline using the following 7-point scale: 1: very much improved, 2: much improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: not changed, 5: minimally worse, 6: much worse and 7: very much worse. A responder was defined as "very much improved" or "much improved".
Measured: Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in CGI Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
CGI-SI was assessed on an 8-grade scale: 0, not assessed; 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill and 7, among the most extremely ill. Higher score indicated severely ill. CGI-SI was assessed by the investigator. The change from Baseline in CGI-SI score was calculated as the score at Weeks 8 and 52 minus the score at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDISS) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
SDISS is a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in the participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities, and (3) home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. To get a total score, 3 individual scores were added and the total score ranged from "0 = unimpaired" to "30 = highly impaired". Higher scores indicate worsening. The change from Baseline in SDISS total score was calculated as the score at Weeks 8 and 52 minus the score at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in the Motivation Energy Inventory Short Form (MEI-SF) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
The MEI-SF (18 questions) was used to measure the reductions in mental energy, physical energy and social motivation. Minimal clinically important differences were estimated as 0.5 standard deviations or 7.5 points. All items use either a 7-level (0 to 6) or 5-level (0 to 4) response scale; items with a 5-level response scale were rescaled to 7-levels and items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL) total score ranges from 0 to 108 points. Recall period was past week prior to administration. The change from Baseline in MEI-SF total score was calculated as the score at Weeks 8 and 52 minus the score at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study start1 Dec 2004
- Primary completion28 May 2007
- Study completion28 May 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00135512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AK1102364
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of 323U66 SR in Patients With Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00135512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AK1102364
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- MDD
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2004 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 May 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 May 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in major depressive disorder patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Met DSM-IV-TR criteria for major depressive disorder for their current episode for at least 8 weeks prior to screening visit.
- Must give a written informed consent. But if the patient is under 20, both the patient himself/herself and his/her proxy consenter must give written informed consent.
- Must have rating scores as outlined.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Current or past history of seizure disorder or brain injury.
- Current or past history of anorexia or bulimia nervosa.
- History of manic episode.
- Past or current DSM- IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
- Diagnosis of substance abuse (alcohol or drug) by the DSM-IV-TR criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bupropion hydrochlorideStudy drug | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 8 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8
The MADRS is a semi-structured interview rating scale for depression that assesses 10 symptoms. The scale is composed of 10 questions (1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts) with a fixed 7 point scale (0, no depression; 60, severely depressed). Total score ranges from 0-60. A higher score indicates more depressive symptoms. MADRS Response was defined as a reduction in MADRS score from Baseline. Change from Baseline in the total score was calculated as the value at Week 8 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
6 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the MADRS Total Score at Week 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D; 17 Items) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Percentage of Participants Who Were Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responders at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in CGI Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDISS) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Change From Baseline in the Motivation Energy Inventory Short Form (MEI-SF) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 52 in Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
7 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing bupropion hydrochloride in people with Depressive Disorder, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 7 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 8 in Observed Cases (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2019.