AzTrials
AzTrials

GliomaNCT00137488

Angiogenic Profile and Non-invasive Imaging May Predict Tumor Progression of High Risk Group Low Grade Glioma (LGG)

An observational study of Glioma, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The low grade glioma (LGG) is a type of brain tumor which is generally more common in younger age group patients. Most patients with LGG undergo surgery which is mostly incomplete due to concern about loss of function. This is an incurable disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Glioma
What is being tested?
imaging and angiogenic profiles
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Nov 2005to Dec 2007
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients referred to Cross Cancer Institute between 2004 and 2005

Who may be able to join

  • Greater than 18 years of age
  • Brain tumor with no contrast enhancement on conventional MRI and confirmed histological of LGG
  • No adjustment treatment
  • Consent to participate in study
  • No contra-indication for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The low grade glioma (LGG) is a type of brain tumor which is generally more common in younger age group patients. Most patients with LGG undergo surgery which is mostly incomplete due to concern about loss of function. This is an incurable disease. More than half of these patients progress to a higher grade with a worse outcome within five years of their diagnosis and only one-third survive for up to ten years. Post-operative radiation treatment improves local control without survival advantage. Efforts are being made without great success to select the patients with a higher risk of progression based on physical characteristics and histological features.

Tumor vascularity is thought to be the key element in tumor progression. Tremendous progress has been made in functional imaging by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 3-Tesla (3T) and in biotechnology which can be used to investigate angiogenic gene profiles in order to identify gene signature for these tumors. In this study the investigators are proposing that patients of LGG with a higher risk of tumor progression may be selected by functional imaging and angiogenic profiles. These higher risk patients may be candidates for post-operative radiation in the future with a potential survival benefit.

Read the detailed description

Summary: Comprehensive analysis of the angiogenesis-related gene expression profiles and tumor perfusion of patients with LGG will provide a novel understanding of subgroup (low and high-risk) of LGG. Thus, this study will allow identifying clinically relevant factors predictive for tumor progression and to select patients in high-risk group for adjuvant radiation therapy.

Conditions
Glioma
Being tested
imaging and angiogenic profiles
Keywords
non-enhancing lesion, low grade glioma, high risk group selection
Medical subject headings
Glioma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • imaging and angiogenic profilesDevice

    Image tumor angiogenesis by DCE-MRI using 1.5- or 3-T MRI instruments (13,14,15) pre-and postoperatively (before biopsy or surgery).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2005
  3. Primary completionDec 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00137488
Sponsor's protocol ID
CNS-09-0024/ethics 21656
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
26 Aug 2005
Last updated
26 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Glioma, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in