Diffuse Large-Cell LymphomaPhase 3NCT00140595
ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Age-adjusted IPI of 1
A Phase 3 study testing rituximab, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in people with Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma, run by Lymphoma Study Association at 10 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a multicentric randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination ACVBP+rituximab compared to the combination of CHOP+rituximab in patients aged from 18 to 59 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (IPI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- rituximab, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
- How many people
- 380 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2003to Jan 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification) Aged from 18 to 59 years. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index equal to 1 (elevated LDH level OR stage III-IV OR ECOG status 2-3-4).
- Patient not previously treated. With a minimum life expectancy of 3 months. Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies test 4 weeks (except after vaccination). Having previously signed a written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Any other histological type of lymphoma. Any history of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma. However, patients not previously diagnosed and having a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with some small cell infiltration in bone marrow or lymph node may be included.
- Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision). Poor renal function (creatinin level>150µmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level>30mmol/l, transaminases>2.5 maximum normal level) unless these abnormalities are related to the lymphoma.
- Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils <1.5 G/l or platelets <100 G/l, unless related to bone marrow infiltration.
- Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma.
- Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study.
- Pregnant or lactating women. Adult patient under tutelage.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 2 countries.
10 sites in 2 countries
France9 sites
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris, 75010
Hématologie Adultes - Hôpital Necker
Paris, 75743
Service d'Hématologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Centre Hospitalier Robert Debré
Reims, 51092
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Hématologie CHU Purpan
Toulouse, 31059
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
About this study
Official title: Randomized Study of ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients Aged From 18 to 59 Years With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and a Age-adjusted IPI of 1.
This study is a multicentric randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination ACVBP+rituximab compared to the combination of CHOP+rituximab in patients aged from 18 to 59 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (IPI).
Read the detailed description
This phase III multicentric open label randomized study is based on the results of previous LNH 93-5 and LNH98-5 studies.
The LNH93-5 study has shown that the ACVBP regimen gave a longer EFS (39% vs 29% at 5 years, p=0.005) and a longer overall survival (46% vs 38% at 5 years, p=0.036) than CHOP in patients aged between 61 and 69 with an IPI score ≥1. However ACVBP had a more important toxicity and a higher treatment related mortality (13% vs 7%, p<0.01), specially after 65 years. In younger patients ACVBP is better tolerated.
The addition of Rituximab to standard CHOP (R-CHOP) has been shown in LNH98-5 study to improve complete remission rate (CR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with B-DLCL. Considering only patients with an aa-IPI score of 1, the 2 year EFS was 75% in the R-CHOP group as compared with 42% in the CHOP group.
This study is designed to test whether addition of rituximab to ACVBP is better than R-CHOP in patients younger than 60. Primary endpoint is event-free survival, we expect a gain in 2 years-EFS of 10% in R-ACVBP group as compared with R-CHOP group.
This study is a multicentric, phase III open-label, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of ACVBP+rituximab compared to CHOP+rituximab in patients aged from 18 to 59 years with non previously treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma
- Being tested
- rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, rituximab, chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rituximabDrug
doxorubicinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event-free survival (EFS), events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during or after treatment, changes of therapy during allocated treatment.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Response rate at the end of the treatment, progression rate, relapse rate, disease-free survival for complete responders, overall survival, neuromeningeal relapse rate and additional toxicities with ACVBP+rituximab combination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2003
- Primary completionJan 2009
- Study completionJan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diffuse Large-Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lymphoma Study Association
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Investigators
- Christian Recher, MD, Principal investigator, Lymphoma Study AssociationHervé Tilly, MD, Study chair, Lymphoma Study AssociationCorinne Haioun, MD, Study chair, Lymphoma Study Association
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00140595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LNH03-2B
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B, Blanc M, Herbrecht R, Bosly A, Attal M, Fillet G, Guettier C, Molina TJ, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
PubMed 12920037Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Ferme C, Christian B, Lepage E, Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Gaulard P, Salles G, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.
PubMed 15867204Dumontet C, Mounier N, Munck JN, Bosly A, Morschauser F, Simon D, Marit G, Casasnovas O, Reman O, Molina T, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Factors predictive of early death in patients receiving high-dose CHOP (ACVB regimen) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a GELA study. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jul;118(1):210-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03565.x.
PubMed 12100150Ghesquieres H, Larrabee BR, Haioun C, Link BK, Verney A, Slager SL, Ketterer N, Ansell SM, Delarue R, Maurer MJ, Fitoussi O, Habermann TM, Peyrade F, Dogan A, Molina TJ, Novak AJ, Tilly H, Cerhan JR, Salles G. FCGR3A/2A polymorphisms and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome treated with immunochemotherapy: a meta-analysis on 1134 patients from two prospective cohorts. Hematol Oncol. 2017 Dec;35(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/hon.2305. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
PubMed 27282998Copie-Bergman C, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Baia M, Briere J, Delarue R, Canioni D, Salles G, Parrens M, Belhadj K, Fabiani B, Recher C, Petrella T, Ketterer N, Peyrade F, Haioun C, Nagel I, Siebert R, Jardin F, Leroy K, Jais JP, Tilly H, Molina TJ, Gaulard P. MYC-IG rearrangements are negative predictors of survival in DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy: a GELA/LYSA study. Blood. 2015 Nov 26;126(22):2466-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647602. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PubMed 26373676Molina TJ, Canioni D, Copie-Bergman C, Recher C, Briere J, Haioun C, Berger F, Ferme C, Copin MC, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Petrella T, Leroy K, Salles G, Fabiani B, Morschauser F, Mounier N, Coiffier B, Jardin F, Gaulard P, Jais JP, Tilly H. Young patients with non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma benefit from intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab compared with CHOP plus rituximab: analysis of data from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte/lymphoma study association phase III trial LNH 03-2B. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):3996-4003. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.9493. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
PubMed 25385729Recher C, Coiffier B, Haioun C, Molina TJ, Ferme C, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Bosly A, Laurent G, Morschhauser F, Ghesquieres H, Jardin F, Bologna S, Fruchart C, Corront B, Gabarre J, Bonnet C, Janvier M, Canioni D, Jais JP, Salles G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1858-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61040-4.
PubMed 22118442
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Study of ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients Aged From 18 to 59 Years With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and a Age-adjusted IPI of 1.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00140595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LNH03-2B
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, rituximab, chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lymphoma Study AssociationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Study start
- Dec 2003
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a multicentric randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination ACVBP+rituximab compared to the combination of CHOP+rituximab in patients aged from 18 to 59 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (IPI).
Detailed description
This phase III multicentric open label randomized study is based on the results of previous LNH 93-5 and LNH98-5 studies.
The LNH93-5 study has shown that the ACVBP regimen gave a longer EFS (39% vs 29% at 5 years, p=0.005) and a longer overall survival (46% vs 38% at 5 years, p=0.036) than CHOP in patients aged between 61 and 69 with an IPI score ≥1. However ACVBP had a more important toxicity and a higher treatment related mortality (13% vs 7%, p<0.01), specially after 65 years. In younger patients ACVBP is better tolerated.
The addition of Rituximab to standard CHOP (R-CHOP) has been shown in LNH98-5 study to improve complete remission rate (CR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with B-DLCL. Considering only patients with an aa-IPI score of 1, the 2 year EFS was 75% in the R-CHOP group as compared with 42% in the CHOP group.
This study is designed to test whether addition of rituximab to ACVBP is better than R-CHOP in patients younger than 60. Primary endpoint is event-free survival, we expect a gain in 2 years-EFS of 10% in R-ACVBP group as compared with R-CHOP group.
This study is a multicentric, phase III open-label, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of ACVBP+rituximab compared to CHOP+rituximab in patients aged from 18 to 59 years with non previously treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification) Aged from 18 to 59 years. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index equal to 1 (elevated LDH level OR stage III-IV OR ECOG status 2-3-4).
- Patient not previously treated. With a minimum life expectancy of 3 months. Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies test 4 weeks (except after vaccination). Having previously signed a written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any other histological type of lymphoma. Any history of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma. However, patients not previously diagnosed and having a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with some small cell infiltration in bone marrow or lymph node may be included.
- Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision). Poor renal function (creatinin level>150µmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level>30mmol/l, transaminases>2.5 maximum normal level) unless these abnormalities are related to the lymphoma.
- Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils <1.5 G/l or platelets <100 G/l, unless related to bone marrow infiltration.
- Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma.
- Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rituximab | Drug | – |
| doxorubicin | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Event-free survival (EFS), events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during or after treatment, changes of therapy during allocated treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Response rate at the end of the treatment, progression rate, relapse rate, disease-free survival for complete responders, overall survival, neuromeningeal relapse rate and additional toxicities with ACVBP+rituximab combination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2011.
- Background: PubMed 12920037Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B, Blanc M, Herbrecht R, Bosly A, Attal M, Fillet G, Guettier C, Molina TJ, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 15867204Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Ferme C, Christian B, Lepage E, Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Gaulard P, Salles G, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.
- Background: PubMed 12100150Dumontet C, Mounier N, Munck JN, Bosly A, Morschauser F, Simon D, Marit G, Casasnovas O, Reman O, Molina T, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Factors predictive of early death in patients receiving high-dose CHOP (ACVB regimen) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a GELA study. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jul;118(1):210-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03565.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27282998Ghesquieres H, Larrabee BR, Haioun C, Link BK, Verney A, Slager SL, Ketterer N, Ansell SM, Delarue R, Maurer MJ, Fitoussi O, Habermann TM, Peyrade F, Dogan A, Molina TJ, Novak AJ, Tilly H, Cerhan JR, Salles G. FCGR3A/2A polymorphisms and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome treated with immunochemotherapy: a meta-analysis on 1134 patients from two prospective cohorts. Hematol Oncol. 2017 Dec;35(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/hon.2305. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26373676Copie-Bergman C, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Baia M, Briere J, Delarue R, Canioni D, Salles G, Parrens M, Belhadj K, Fabiani B, Recher C, Petrella T, Ketterer N, Peyrade F, Haioun C, Nagel I, Siebert R, Jardin F, Leroy K, Jais JP, Tilly H, Molina TJ, Gaulard P. MYC-IG rearrangements are negative predictors of survival in DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy: a GELA/LYSA study. Blood. 2015 Nov 26;126(22):2466-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647602. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25385729Molina TJ, Canioni D, Copie-Bergman C, Recher C, Briere J, Haioun C, Berger F, Ferme C, Copin MC, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Petrella T, Leroy K, Salles G, Fabiani B, Morschauser F, Mounier N, Coiffier B, Jardin F, Gaulard P, Jais JP, Tilly H. Young patients with non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma benefit from intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab compared with CHOP plus rituximab: analysis of data from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte/lymphoma study association phase III trial LNH 03-2B. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):3996-4003. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.9493. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22118442Recher C, Coiffier B, Haioun C, Molina TJ, Ferme C, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Bosly A, Laurent G, Morschhauser F, Ghesquieres H, Jardin F, Bologna S, Fruchart C, Corront B, Gabarre J, Bonnet C, Janvier M, Canioni D, Jais JP, Salles G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1858-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61040-4.
Related trials for Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The CARDIOPROTECT Trial
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Cardiotoxicity
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
QLS4131 Plus Isa-V-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed, HIV-Negative PBL: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study
Plasmablastic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Combination Targeted Therapy (ViPOR) for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Recher, MD principal investigator
Lymphoma Study Association
Hervé Tilly, MD study chair
Lymphoma Study Association
Corinne Haioun, MD study chair
Lymphoma Study Association
10 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing rituximab, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in people with Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma, run by Lymphoma Study Association at 10 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in France, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event-free survival (EFS), events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during or after treatment, changes of therapy during allocated treatment.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00140595, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2011.