Sarcoma, Soft TissuePhase 3NCT00142571
Comparison of Gemcitabine v. Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Unresectable Soft Tissue Sarcoma
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in people with Sarcoma, Soft Tissue, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the drug gemcitabine to two drugs, gemcitabine and docetaxel, to find out which treatment is better for people with sarcomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sarcoma, Soft Tissue
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine and Docetaxel
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Sep 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven soft tissue sarcoma (except the following histologies: gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Kaposi's Sarcoma, mesotheliomas
- Age >= 10 years
- Recurrent or progressive disease defined as an increase in size of any existing tumor mass, or the development of new tumor mass or masses, which is not amenable to definitive surgical therapy.
- Patients may have had another cancer but there must be convincing clinical evidence that the sarcoma is the disease requiring therapeutic intervention. (ie. Several sarcoma patients have had had a prior cancer (Hodgkin's disease or breast cancer) treated years previously and then developed a clinically active sarcoma.)
- Patients may have failed no more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens.
- Measurable disease as defined by RECIST. Measurable disease is the presence of at least one measurable lesion. If the measurable disease is restricted to a solitary lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology. A measurable lesion is one that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension with longest diameter >20 mm using conventional techniques or >10 mm with spiral CT scan.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Karnofsky performance status of greater than or equal to 60%
- Peripheral neuropathy, if present, must be < or = to grade 1
- At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy (10 days if the patient was on imatinib, thalidomide, or an interferon)
- At least 3 weeks since prior radiation therapy
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/mm3
- Hemoglobin > 8.0 g/dl
- Platelet count > 100,000/mm3
- Total Bilirubin < upper limit of normal (ULN).
- ALT (SGOT) or AST (SGPT) <5 x ULN.
- Alkaline Phosphatase < 2.5 x ULN.
- Serum creatinine < or equal to 2.0 mg/dL
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test
- Men and women of child-bearing potential must be willing to consent to using effective contraception while on treatment and for a reasonable period thereafter (approximately 3 months)
- If the patient is 18 or older, the patient must be capable of providing written, informed consent. If the patient is younger than 18, written and voluntary informed consent from patient's parents or legal guardians and the patient's assent are required.
Who cannot join
- Soft tissue sarcomas with the following histologies: gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Kaposi's sarcoma, mesotheliomas
- Active or uncontrolled infection (on antibiotic therapy for acute or chronic infection)
- Prior treatment with gemcitabine or docetaxel
- Peripheral neuropathy > or = grade 2
- History of known hypersensitivity reaction to agents formulated in polysorbate 80, the solubilizing agent for docetaxel [e.g. interferon alpha-2a, children's ibuprofen suspension (Advil), terconazole (Terazol), lamivudine (Epivir), etoposide, amiodarone, vaccines (DtaP, influenza), bupropion (Wellbutrin), Vitamins B12, C+zinc+selenium].
- Uncontrolled, central nervous system metastases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: Ph III Random Trial of 120-Min Infusion Gemcitabine v. 90-Min Infusion Gemcitabine + Docetaxel in Unresectable Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Disciplinary Trial of the North Amer. Sarcoma Study Group of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society
The purpose of this study is to compare the drug gemcitabine to two drugs, gemcitabine and docetaxel, to find out which treatment is better for people with sarcomas.
Read the detailed description
This research is being done because better treatments for sarcomas are needed. This is a phase III study. This means that one treatment is being compared to another to find out which is better. We are comparing the drug gemcitabine to the two drugs gemcitabine and docetaxel to find out which treatment is better for people who have sarcomas. From previous studies we know that gemcitabine causes shrinking of some people's sarcoma tumors. We also know that gemcitabine and docetaxel are useful for sarcomas as well, but we believe the two drugs together may be more toxic than the single drug alone. In this study we are trying to answer the question: "Is the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel any better than just gemcitabine alone?"
This is a randomized Phase III trial comparing two treatment regimens in patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma. The failure rates observed on both treatment arms (failure defined as progression or death) will be compared to determine which regimen results in the lowest failure rate (Primary objective). As a secondary endpoint, the percentage of patients who are failure-free (failure defined as progression or death) at 3 months and 6 months will be compared between the two arms (Secondary objective).
This trial, sponsored by the North American Sarcoma Study Group of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society, is being done at a number of hospitals around the country and is expected to enroll up to 120 patients.
- Conditions
- Sarcoma, Soft Tissue
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine, Docetaxel
- Keywords
- Sarcoma, Soft Tissue, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GemcitabineDrug
DocetaxelDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine whether the failure rate (defined as progression or death) among patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma is improved with gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone
Secondary outcomes (4)
Determine whether the failure rate (defined as progression or death) at 3 and 6 months is improved among patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma treated with gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with those treated with gemcitabine alone.
Overall survival will be evaluated
Response rate will be evaluated
Toxicity will be evaluated
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Study completionSep 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sarcoma, Soft TissueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Connective Tissue Oncology Society, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Investigators
- Robert Maki, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00142571
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 02-129
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ph III Random Trial of 120-Min Infusion Gemcitabine v. 90-Min Infusion Gemcitabine + Docetaxel in Unresectable Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Disciplinary Trial of the North Amer. Sarcoma Study Group of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00142571
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 02-129
- Conditions
- Sarcoma, Soft Tissue
- Keywords
- Sarcoma, Soft Tissue, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Connective Tissue Oncology Society, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Study completion
- Sep 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the drug gemcitabine to two drugs, gemcitabine and docetaxel, to find out which treatment is better for people with sarcomas.
Detailed description
This research is being done because better treatments for sarcomas are needed. This is a phase III study. This means that one treatment is being compared to another to find out which is better. We are comparing the drug gemcitabine to the two drugs gemcitabine and docetaxel to find out which treatment is better for people who have sarcomas. From previous studies we know that gemcitabine causes shrinking of some people's sarcoma tumors. We also know that gemcitabine and docetaxel are useful for sarcomas as well, but we believe the two drugs together may be more toxic than the single drug alone. In this study we are trying to answer the question: "Is the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel any better than just gemcitabine alone?"
This is a randomized Phase III trial comparing two treatment regimens in patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma. The failure rates observed on both treatment arms (failure defined as progression or death) will be compared to determine which regimen results in the lowest failure rate (Primary objective). As a secondary endpoint, the percentage of patients who are failure-free (failure defined as progression or death) at 3 months and 6 months will be compared between the two arms (Secondary objective).
This trial, sponsored by the North American Sarcoma Study Group of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society, is being done at a number of hospitals around the country and is expected to enroll up to 120 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Histologically proven soft tissue sarcoma (except the following histologies: gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Kaposi's Sarcoma, mesotheliomas
- Age >= 10 years
- Recurrent or progressive disease defined as an increase in size of any existing tumor mass, or the development of new tumor mass or masses, which is not amenable to definitive surgical therapy.
- Patients may have had another cancer but there must be convincing clinical evidence that the sarcoma is the disease requiring therapeutic intervention. (ie. Several sarcoma patients have had had a prior cancer (Hodgkin's disease or breast cancer) treated years previously and then developed a clinically active sarcoma.)
- Patients may have failed no more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Soft tissue sarcomas with the following histologies: gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Kaposi's sarcoma, mesotheliomas
- Active or uncontrolled infection (on antibiotic therapy for acute or chronic infection)
- Prior treatment with gemcitabine or docetaxel
- Peripheral neuropathy > or = grade 2
- History of known hypersensitivity reaction to agents formulated in polysorbate 80, the solubilizing agent for docetaxel [e.g. interferon alpha-2a, children's ibuprofen suspension (Advil), terconazole (Terazol), lamivudine (Epivir), etoposide, amiodarone, vaccines (DtaP, influenza), bupropion (Wellbutrin), Vitamins B12, C+zinc+selenium].
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine | Drug | – |
| Docetaxel | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Determine whether the failure rate (defined as progression or death) among patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma is improved with gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone
4 secondary outcomes
Determine whether the failure rate (defined as progression or death) at 3 and 6 months is improved among patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma treated with gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with those treated with gemcitabine alone.
Overall survival will be evaluated
Response rate will be evaluated
Toxicity will be evaluated
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2007.
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Sarcoma, Soft Tissue
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating 68Ga-HX01 Injection for PET/CT Imaging
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Evaluation of the I-phase Clinical Trial of 177Lu-HX02 Injection in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Maki, MD, PhD principal investigator
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in people with Sarcoma, Soft Tissue, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine whether the failure rate (defined as progression or death) among patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma is improved with gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2007.