Bipolar DisorderPhase 3NCT00145470
12 Week Study of the Safety/Efficacy of Asenapine When Added to Lithium/Valproate in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder (A7501008 / P05844 / MK-8274-017)
A Phase 3 study testing Asenapine in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Organon and Co.
Trial summary
This is a 12-week study that will test the safety and efficacy of asenapine when used in addition to lithium or valproate for subjects with acute manic or mixed episodes of Bipolar I Disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bipolar Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Asenapine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 326 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2005to 22 Mar 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have bipolar I disorder, current episode manic or mixed
- Treated with lithium or valproic acid
Who cannot join
- Have an unstable medical condition
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormality.
- Have a primary diagnosis other than bipolar I disorder.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Asenapine in Subjects Continuing Lithium or Valproic Acid/Divalproex Sodium for the Treatment of an Acute Manic or Mixed Episode
This is a 12-week study that will test the safety and efficacy of asenapine when used in addition to lithium or valproate for subjects with acute manic or mixed episodes of Bipolar I Disorder.
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Being tested
- Asenapine, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Bipolar Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AsenapineDrug
Also called Org 5222
Asenapine fast dissolving SL tablets 5 and 10 mg; starting dose 5 mg BID on Day 1; 5-10 mg BID after Day 1.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo fast dissolving SL tablets, BID
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Experimental | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Receives: Drug: Asenapine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 21 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Secondary outcomes (27)
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
The number of participants experiencing an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product.
Measured: Up to Day 114
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE
The number of participants discontinuing study treatment due to an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product.
Measured: Up to Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 42
The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 42 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 42
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 84 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Responder Status
The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS responder status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a 50% decrease from baseline in Y-MRS total score. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Up to Day 84
Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Remitter Status
The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS remitter status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a Y-MRS total score of 12 or lower. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Up to Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 21 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 84 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 21 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 84 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 21 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 84 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 21 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 84 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 21 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery
Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
- Verbal Memory test: recognize/remember/retrieve words (range 0-60)
- Visual Memory test: recognize/remember/retrieve geometric figures (range 0-60)
- Speed of Processing: recognize/process information. No min./max. score. Normative average (NA); correct answers: 65.1, avg. errors: 1.37
- Social Acuity/Perception of Emotions test: perceive/respond to emotional cues. Min. score: -64/Max. score: 16
- Reasoning: reason/respond to non-verbal, visual-abstract stimuli; scores range: -15 to 15
- Executive Function: recognize rules/categories/decision making. No min./max. score. NA correct answers: 55.01/avg. errors: 5.28
- Working Memory/Continuous Performance Task (CPT): perceive/attend to symbols. Min. score: -45/Max. score: 15
- Sustained Attention: direct/focus on specific stimuli: Max. score (raw score); 45; Min. score: -170
- Composite Memory: working+verbal+visual memory, Range 0-135.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 84 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery
Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
- Verbal Memory test: recognize/remember/retrieve words (range 0-60)
- Visual Memory test: recognize/remember/retrieve geometric figures (range 0-60)
- Speed of Processing: recognize/process information. No min./max. score. Normative average (NA); correct answers: 65.1, avg. errors: 1.37
- Social Acuity/Perception of Emotions test: perceive/respond to emotional cues. Min. score: -64/Max. score: 16
- Reasoning: reason/respond to non-verbal, visual-abstract stimuli; scores range: -15 to 15
- Executive Function: recognize rules/categories/decision making. No min./max. score. NA correct answers: 55.01/avg. errors: 5.28
- Working Memory/Continuous Performance Task (CPT): perceive/attend to symbols. Min. score: -45/Max. score: 15
- Sustained Attention: direct/focus on specific stimuli: Max. score (raw score); 45; Min. score: -170
- Composite Memory: working+verbal+visual memory, Range 0-135.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Percentage of Participants Determined to be Ready to Discharge at Day 84 (Kaplan-Meier Estimation)
The percentage of participants determined to be ready to discharge at day 84 was estimated (Kaplan-Meier), using the readiness to discharge questionnaire (RDQ). The RDQ is clinician-rated scale to assess readiness for discharge, composed of 7 items. Of the 7 items, only the first 5 items were utilized:
- Not actively suicidal/homicidal;
- Adequate control over aggression and impulsivity;
- Able to carry out basic activities of daily life;
- Able to take medicine independently; and
- Delusions and hallucinations do not significantly interfere with functioning.
For the 5 items, the clinician provided a response (Strongly Disagree; Disagree; Agree; or Strongly Agree) at each pre-specified visit. The first visit at which the responses to the first 5 items on the RDQ are "Strongly Agree" or "Agree," was defined as the point a participant was ready to discharge.
Measured: Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 21 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 84
The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 84 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 21 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Least squares mean change from baseline at day 21 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 84 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Least squares mean change from baseline at day 84 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Day 21
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study start2 Jun 2005
- Primary completion28 Feb 2007
- Study completion22 Mar 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bipolar DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and Co
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00145470
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P05844
- Other IDs
- A7501008, 2004-003927-11, MK-8274-017, P05844, 2004
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 21 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Szegedi A, Calabrese JR, Stet L, Mackle M, Zhao J, Panagides J; Apollo Study Group. Asenapine as adjunctive treatment for acute mania associated with bipolar disorder: results of a 12-week core study and 40-week extension. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):46-55. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f872f.
PubMed 22198448
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Asenapine in Subjects Continuing Lithium or Valproic Acid/Divalproex Sodium for the Treatment of an Acute Manic or Mixed Episode
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00145470
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P05844
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and CoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 12-week study that will test the safety and efficacy of asenapine when used in addition to lithium or valproate for subjects with acute manic or mixed episodes of Bipolar I Disorder.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Experimental | Drug: AsenapineParticipants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Have bipolar I disorder, current episode manic or mixed
- Treated with lithium or valproic acid
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Have an unstable medical condition
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormality.
- Have a primary diagnosis other than bipolar I disorder.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AsenapineAlso: Org 5222Asenapine fast dissolving SL tablets 5 and 10 mg; starting dose 5 mg BID on Day 1; 5-10 mg BID after Day 1. | Drug | Asenapine |
| PlaceboPlacebo fast dissolving SL tablets, BID | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 21 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments.
27 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Up to Day 114
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 42
Time frame: Baseline and Day 42
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Responder Status
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Remitter Status
Time frame: Up to Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 21 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 84 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Percentage of Participants Determined to be Ready to Discharge at Day 84 (Kaplan-Meier Estimation)
Time frame: Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 21
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 84
Time frame: Baseline and Day 84
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 21 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 84 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Time frame: Baseline and Day 21
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22198448Szegedi A, Calabrese JR, Stet L, Mackle M, Zhao J, Panagides J; Apollo Study Group. Asenapine as adjunctive treatment for acute mania associated with bipolar disorder: results of a 12-week core study and 40-week extension. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):46-55. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f872f.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bipolar Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Recruiting
Safety and Feasibility of DBS for Bipolar Depression
Bipolar I Disorder, Bipolar Depression
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Recruiting
Affective Cognitive Training in Mood Disorders and High-risk Relatives
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Asenapine in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Organon and Co.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 21 (time frame: Baseline and Day 21). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00145470, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2024.