AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 4NCT00153075

Flow Rate Effect Respimat Inhaler Versus a Metered Dose Inhaler Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase 4 study testing Berodual Respimat and Berodual HFA-MDI in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this trial is to compare the total and regional deposition of aerosol in the lungs and oropharynx of patients with COPD at 3 different inspiratory flow rates following inhalation of Berodual delivered via the Respimat inhaler and Berodual? delivered via an HFA-metered dose inhaler. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
What is being tested?
Berodual Respimat and Berodual HFA-MDI
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
26 Sep 2005to 7 Dec 2005
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • COPD patients:
  • FEV1 less or equal 65 % pre
  • FEV1 less or equal 70 % of FVC

Who cannot join

  • Patients with any upper respiratory infection in the past 14 days prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1)
  • Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Inamed Research GmbH & Co. KG

    Gauting, 82131

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Open Label, Six Way, Cross-over Scintigraphic Evaluation of the Effect of Inspiratory Flow Rate on Lung and Oropharyngeal Deposition With the Respimat Inhaler vs. a Metered Dose Inhaler (HFA-MDI) Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

The objective of this trial is to compare the total and regional deposition of aerosol in the lungs and oropharynx of patients with COPD at 3 different inspiratory flow rates following inhalation of Berodual delivered via the Respimat inhaler and Berodual? delivered via an HFA-metered dose inhaler.

Read the detailed description

This is a single dose, randomised, active-controlled, six period, open-label cross-over trial in adult patients with COPD.

Berodual (fenoterol hydrobromide 50 g + ipratropium bromide 20 g) will be delivered via the Respimat inhaler and the MDI at 3 different inspiratory flow rates: 15 L/min, 30 L/min and 90 L/min. The optimal flow rate is expected to be 30 L/min for both inhalers.

On each test day patients will practise the inhalation manoeuvre with either a placebo Respimat or MDI inhaler. When patients can perform the inhalation technique correctly and they can obtain the required inspiratory flow rates the placebo will be replaced with the radio-labelled formulation.

The primary analysis will be carried out using the Sign Test. This is a non-parametric analysis in which no assumptions are made about the shape of the distribution of the responses from the Respimat inhaler and from the MDI under the null hypothesis.

Study Hypothesis:

The null hypothesis is that flow rate has the same effect on the Respimat and MDI inhalers. The alternative hypothesis is that flow rate has a different effect on the Respimat inhaler than on the MDI inhaler.

This means that under the null hypothesis the median of the differences between the Respimat inhaler and MDI pairs is zero i.e., the differences are equally lik ely to be positive or negative. Under the alternative hypothesis the median of the differences between the Respimat inhaler and MDI pairs is not zero i.e., the frequencies of the positive and negative signs are different.

Comparison(s):

For the primary comparison the whole lung deposition achieved for each patient at the 90 L/min flow rate will be expressed as a percentage of the whole lung deposition achieved by that patient at the 30 L/min flow rate for the Respimat and MDI inhalers separately. The difference between each pair of observations ((Respimat 90 L/min / Respimat 30 L/min) - (MDI 90 L/min / MDI 30 L/min)) will then be calculated and the sign of the direction of the difference noted i.e., positive or negative. The probability associated with the occurrence of the observed number of positive and negative differences will then be determined by reference to the binomial distribution with the probability of a positive or negative difference equal to 0.5 under the null hypothesis. If the alternative hypothesis is, however, true and flow rate does in fact have less effect on the Respimat inhaler than on the MDI inhaler, then there is likely to be a statistically significant greater number of positive differences.

Being tested
Berodual Respimat, Berodual HFA-MDI
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Berodual RespimatDevice

  • Berodual HFA-MDIDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Whole lung deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Central lung zone deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Intermediate lung zone deposition

    Measured: 10 weeks

  3. Peripheral lung zone deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Ratio of peripheral to central zone deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Oropharyngeal deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Device deposition and exhaled air filter deposition

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. FEV1 15, 30 and 60 minutes post-administration (safety only)

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Sep 2005
  3. Primary completion7 Dec 2005
  4. Study completion7 Dec 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00153075
Sponsor's protocol ID
215.1364
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
9 Sep 2005
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Berodual Respimat and Berodual HFA-MDI in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Whole lung deposition (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in