Acute Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4NCT00157768
IRIS : Use of Implantable Defibrillator in High-risk Patients Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction
A Phase 4 study testing Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Of the patients who survive hospitalization after an acute myocardial infarction, ca. 10% die of sudden cardiac death in the following 2 years. The prognosis appears not improved by medication with antiarrhythmics (class I/III). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 1999to 15 Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- acute myocardial infarction (5-31 days)
- fulfill requirement I and/or II :
- I first ECG heart rate >= 90 bpm (within day 1-2 post MI) and LVEF <= 40 % (within day 5-31 post-MI)
- II >= 1 episode of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia >= 150 bpm (on Holter, within 5-31 days post-MI)
Who cannot join
- Patients with ventricular arrhythmia, requiring clinical therapy, before the index infarction or more than 48 h later
- Patients with therapy refractory heart failure (NYHA IV)
- Myocardial infarction older than 31 days
- First-ECG not available or was recorded more than 48 h after the symptom onset.
- Patients with indication for CABG operation before inclusion
- Patients with cerebral organic psycho syndrome
Show all 13Show fewer
- Secondary diseases which clearly limit life expectancy
- Patient with right sided artificial heart valve
- Patients with poor compliance
- Patients who are participating in another study
- Unstable clinical condition
- Pregnancy
- No consent from patient
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: IRIS - Immediate Risk-stratification Improves Survival - Joint Study of the German University Hospitals and German Society of Leading Cardiological Hospital Physicians (ALKK)
Of the patients who survive hospitalization after an acute myocardial infarction, ca. 10% die of sudden cardiac death in the following 2 years. The prognosis appears not improved by medication with antiarrhythmics (class I/III). A positive effect of beta-blockers (Metoprolol CR/Zok) on total mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with heart failure is well established. On the other hand, an implantable defibrillator (ICD) proved to be superior to medication when used for secondary prevention in patients after cardiac arrest. The question arises whether ICD therapy is also effective in primary prevention in high risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. This study determines if patients, who were defined as high risk patients in the early post infarction phase by means of noninvasive methods, benefit from primary prevention by means of an ICD. Special emphasis is put on an individual optimization of the infarction therapy, including beta-blockers.
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, Left ventricular dysfunction, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Risk-stratification
- Medical subject headings
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillatorDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The null hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the treatment (Implantable cardioverter defibrillator =ICD) and control group is identical. The alternative hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the ICD group and control group is different.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Type of death, Arrhythmic events, Serious cardiac and cerebral interventions,
Device-related complications, Hospitalizations, Quality of life
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jun 1999
- Primary completion15 Oct 2007
- Study completion15 Oct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Investigators
- D. Andresen, Prof., Principal investigator, Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, GermanyJ. Senges, Prof., Principal investigator, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, GermanyG. Steinbeck, Prof., Principal investigator, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00157768
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Medtronic_BRC_CRM_002
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Sredniawa B, Lupkovics G, Hofgartner F, Lubinski A, Rosenqvist M, Habets A, Wegscheider K, Senges J; IRIS Investigators. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 8;361(15):1427-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901889.
PubMed 19812399
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IRIS - Immediate Risk-stratification Improves Survival - Joint Study of the German University Hospitals and German Society of Leading Cardiological Hospital Physicians (ALKK)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00157768
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Medtronic_BRC_CRM_002
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, Left ventricular dysfunction, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Risk-stratification
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Study start
- 9 Jun 1999 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Of the patients who survive hospitalization after an acute myocardial infarction, ca. 10% die of sudden cardiac death in the following 2 years. The prognosis appears not improved by medication with antiarrhythmics (class I/III). A positive effect of beta-blockers (Metoprolol CR/Zok) on total mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with heart failure is well established. On the other hand, an implantable defibrillator (ICD) proved to be superior to medication when used for secondary prevention in patients after cardiac arrest. The question arises whether ICD therapy is also effective in primary prevention in high risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. This study determines if patients, who were defined as high risk patients in the early post infarction phase by means of noninvasive methods, benefit from primary prevention by means of an ICD. Special emphasis is put on an individual optimization of the infarction therapy, including beta-blockers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- acute myocardial infarction (5-31 days)
- fulfill requirement I and/or II :
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients with ventricular arrhythmia, requiring clinical therapy, before the index infarction or more than 48 h later
- Patients with therapy refractory heart failure (NYHA IV)
- Myocardial infarction older than 31 days
- First-ECG not available or was recorded more than 48 h after the symptom onset.
- Patients with indication for CABG operation before inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantable cardioverter defibrillator | Device | – |
Primary outcome
The null hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the treatment (Implantable cardioverter defibrillator =ICD) and control group is identical. The alternative hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the ICD group and control group is different.
2 secondary outcomes
Type of death, Arrhythmic events, Serious cardiac and cerebral interventions,
Device-related complications, Hospitalizations, Quality of life
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19812399Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D, Kornacewicz-Jach Z, Sredniawa B, Lupkovics G, Hofgartner F, Lubinski A, Rosenqvist M, Habets A, Wegscheider K, Senges J; IRIS Investigators. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 8;361(15):1427-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901889.
Related trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
D. Andresen, Prof. principal investigator
Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
J. Senges, Prof. principal investigator
Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Germany
G. Steinbeck, Prof. principal investigator
Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The null hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the treatment (Implantable cardioverter defibrillator =ICD) and control group is identical. The alternative hypothesis is that all cause mortality in the ICD group and control group is different.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00157768, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2025.