Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-DependentNCT00160017
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Diabetes Integrated Care Breakthrough Collaborative
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 52 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The study tests whether implementing professional evidence-based guidelines and best practices for diabetes care -through participation of multidisciplinary teams in a Breakthrough collaborative- results in an improvement of diabetes care, its health outcomes and economic costs. Determinants of success are studied. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
- What is being tested?
- Breakthrough collaborative
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 1,861 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 6 intervention and 9 control sites representing multiporfessional provider teams from 13 outpatient clinics (47 internists) and 37 general practices (42 general practitioners) NB To assess the effects of the collaborative, patient outcomes, professional performance, and structural aspects of care management are measured. Patients visiting the clinics were invited to participate by filling out questionnaires and providing written consent to have their medical records examined. Below information on patient inclusion is provided.
Who may be able to join
- each patient, male or female, visiting the hospital outpatient clinic or general practice with type II diabetes mellitus during a specified period. Patients should be able to read and write the Dutch language.
Who cannot join
- pregnancy
- patients with a life expectancy < 1 year
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 1 country.
52 sites in 1 country
Netherlands52 sites
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar, North Holland, 1815 JD
Huisartspraktijk1
Alkmaar, North Holland, 1825 CJ
Huisartspraktijk24
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1015 TV
St. Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1061 AE
Huisartspraktijk29
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1064 LG
Slotervaartziekenhuis, Maatschap Interne
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 EC
Huisartspraktijk18
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 PL
Huisartspraktijk20
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1068 ML
Huisartspraktijk19
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1068 NP
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091 AC
Huisartspraktijk21
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091 EB
Huisartspraktijk23
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091 EB
Huisartspraktijk25
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1092 AT
Huisartsenpraktijk Julianastraat14
Asten, North Brabant, 5721 GK
Huisartspraktijk De Poort10
Beuningen, North Brabant, 6641 BJ
Mesos Medisch Centrum
Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB
Huisartspraktijk5
Den Helder, North Holland, 1781 JP
Gemini Ziekenhuis
Den Helder, North Holland, 1782 GZ
Gezondheidscentrum "De Schooten"6
Den Helder, North Holland, 1785 RM
Praktijk Van Mechelen32
Dinteloord, North Brabant, 4671 DA
Huisartspraktijk33
Fijnaart, North Brabant, 4793 AW
St. Annaziekenhuis, Maatschap Interne Geneeskunde
Geldrop, North Brabant, 5664 EH
Therapeuticum Lemminkäinen36
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9712 VK
Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, Afdeling Inwendige Geneeskunde
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713 GZ
Huisartspraktijk35
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9714 DX
Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Afdeling Inwendige Geneeskunde
Haarlem, North Holland, 2012 CE
Huisartsenpraktijk Scholten17
Helmond, North Brabant, 5704 AP
Huisartsenpraktijk Dams15
Helmond, North Brabant, 5704 CM
Quartz Transmuraal Centrum voor de Regio Helmond, Elkerliek ziekenhuis Provisorium 1e etage
Helmond, North Brabant, 5707 HA
Huisartsenpraktijk van den Nieuwenhof16
Helmond, North Brabant, 5709 HX
Huisartspraktijk2
Hoofddorp, South Holland, 2132 DW
Huisartspraktijk3
Hoofddorp, South Holland, 2132 GB
Atrium Medisch Centrum, Polikliniek Interne Geneeskunde
Kerkrade, Limburg, 6461 AL
Medisch Centrum Het Joppe8
Leiden, South Holland, 2317 LV
Gezondheidscentrum Stevenshof4
Leiden, South Holland, 2331 JE
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Diaconessenhuis
Leiden, South Holland, 2334 CK
Huisartspraktijk27
Limmen, North Holland, 1906 AW
Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA
Huisartspraktijk28
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 ZD
Huisartspraktijk34
Roosendaal, North Brabant, 4702 GJ
Huisartspraktijk31
Roosendaal, North Brabant, 4702 NS
Huisartspraktijk13
Roosendaal, North Brabant, 4702 XD
Huisartspraktijk Vincenten12
Roosendaal, North Brabant, 4703 HZ
Huisartspraktijk30
Roosendaal, North Brabant, 4706 BL
Huisartspraktijk26
Schoorl, North Holland, 1871 ER
Huisartspraktijk22
Someren, North Brabant, 5711 GV
Artsenpraktijk Ruiterstal11
Steenbergen, North Brabant, 4651 ER
Gezondheidscentrum Kanaleneiland38
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3527 GB
Huisartspraktijk Carnegiedreef37
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3563 AA
Huisartspraktijk De Heelhoek9
Wijchen, North Brabant, 6602 DD
Huisartspraktijk7
Zuidhorn, Provincie Groningen, 9801 AD
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Diabetes Integrated Care Breakthrough Collaborative to Improve Diabetes Care, Its Health Outcomes and Economic Costs
The study tests whether implementing professional evidence-based guidelines and best practices for diabetes care -through participation of multidisciplinary teams in a Breakthrough collaborative- results in an improvement of diabetes care, its health outcomes and economic costs. Determinants of success are studied. Data on diabetes will also be used to better understand Breakthrough as an implementation or improvement method.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes mellitus as a chronic disease is a major and growing health care problem. Studies on the prevention of severe complications provide evidence for the necessity of tight control. Different interventions and models to achieve strict control and reduce diabetes related risks of complications are available. These are, however, not implemented in daily practice. Our study focuses on this implementation problem: it tests whether implementing professional evidence-based guidelines and best practices -through participation of multidisciplinary teams in the Breakthrough collaborative- results in an improvement of diabetes care, its health outcomes and economic costs.
Data on diabetes will also be used to explore and better understand the Breakthrough model as an implementation method. Only uncontrolled observational studies have, so far, described the outcomes of Breakthrough collaboratives. They also describe significant differences between teams in specific improvements made in patient care and organisational performance, resulting in different implementation and medical costs. There is hardly any information regarding these costs and the cost-effectiveness of collaboratives, and little knowledge about how they could be made more effective. Insight is also needed into the factors that influence the success of individual teams. There are no data regarding the sustainability of improvements.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
- Being tested
- Breakthrough collaborative
- Keywords
- Quality assurance health care, Diabetes, Breakthrough collaborative (IHI), Evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Breakthrough collaborativeBehavioural
Participants (professionals) participate in a Breakthrough Collaborative to improve diabetes care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Collaborative group | Participants (i.e. profesionals) participate in a Breakthrough Collaborative intervention to improve diabetes care so that patients are provided more often with diabetes care as described in guidelines Receives: Behavioral: Breakthrough collaborative | |
| usual care group | Participants are offered no intervention and care is provided as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HbA1c
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
To improve the patient outcomes mentioned above, teams are supported:
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(I) to introduce self-management of patients,
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(II) to change professional performance and the organisation of care (by implementing guidelines and local protocols focusing on the prevention of severe complications and introducing diabetes nurses) and
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(III) to introduce a system to administrate clinical parameters.
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
These intermediate outcomes will be measured as well, in both the intervention and the control group.
Measured: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Primary completionMar 2008
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-DependentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,861 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Dutch Institute for HealthCare Improvement (CBO), College of Health Insurances CVZ
- Investigators
- Marlies E.J.L. Hulscher, MSc, PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Centre for Quality of Care ResearchLouis W. Niessen, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Erasmus Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG)Richard PTM Grol, Prof., Study director, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Centre for Quality of Care ResearchRobbert Huijsman, Prof., Study director, Erasmus Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00160017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Breakthrough_LoesSchouten
- Other IDs
- ZonMw grant no. 945-14-405
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Schouten LM, Niessen LW, van de Pas JW, Grol RP, Hulscher ME. Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative focusing on patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2010 Oct;48(10):884-91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eb318f.
PubMed 20808258
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Diabetes Integrated Care Breakthrough Collaborative to Improve Diabetes Care, Its Health Outcomes and Economic Costs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00160017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Breakthrough_LoesSchouten
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
- Keywords
- Quality assurance health care, Diabetes, Breakthrough collaborative (IHI), Evaluation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,861 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Dutch Institute for HealthCare Improvement (CBO), College of Health Insurances CVZ
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Primary completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study tests whether implementing professional evidence-based guidelines and best practices for diabetes care -through participation of multidisciplinary teams in a Breakthrough collaborative- results in an improvement of diabetes care, its health outcomes and economic costs. Determinants of success are studied. Data on diabetes will also be used to better understand Breakthrough as an implementation or improvement method.
Detailed description
Diabetes mellitus as a chronic disease is a major and growing health care problem. Studies on the prevention of severe complications provide evidence for the necessity of tight control. Different interventions and models to achieve strict control and reduce diabetes related risks of complications are available. These are, however, not implemented in daily practice. Our study focuses on this implementation problem: it tests whether implementing professional evidence-based guidelines and best practices -through participation of multidisciplinary teams in the Breakthrough collaborative- results in an improvement of diabetes care, its health outcomes and economic costs.
Data on diabetes will also be used to explore and better understand the Breakthrough model as an implementation method. Only uncontrolled observational studies have, so far, described the outcomes of Breakthrough collaboratives. They also describe significant differences between teams in specific improvements made in patient care and organisational performance, resulting in different implementation and medical costs. There is hardly any information regarding these costs and the cost-effectiveness of collaboratives, and little knowledge about how they could be made more effective. Insight is also needed into the factors that influence the success of individual teams. There are no data regarding the sustainability of improvements.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Collaborative group | – | Behavioral: Breakthrough collaborativeParticipants (i.e. profesionals) participate in a Breakthrough Collaborative intervention to improve diabetes care so that patients are provided more often with diabetes care as described in guidelines |
| usual care group | – | –Participants are offered no intervention and care is provided as usual |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 6 intervention and 9 control sites representing multiporfessional provider teams from 13 outpatient clinics (47 internists) and 37 general practices (42 general practitioners) NB To assess the effects of the collaborative, patient outcomes, professional performance, and structural aspects of care management are measured. Patients visiting the clinics were invited to participate by filling out questionnaires and providing written consent to have their medical records examined. Below information on patient inclusion is provided.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- each patient, male or female, visiting the hospital outpatient clinic or general practice with type II diabetes mellitus during a specified period. Patients should be able to read and write the Dutch language.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- pregnancy
- patients with a life expectancy < 1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Breakthrough collaborativeParticipants (professionals) participate in a Breakthrough Collaborative to improve diabetes care | Behavioural | Collaborative group |
Primary outcome
HbA1c
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
5 secondary outcomes
To improve the patient outcomes mentioned above, teams are supported:
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(I) to introduce self-management of patients,
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(II) to change professional performance and the organisation of care (by implementing guidelines and local protocols focusing on the prevention of severe complications and introducing diabetes nurses) and
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
(III) to introduce a system to administrate clinical parameters.
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
These intermediate outcomes will be measured as well, in both the intervention and the control group.
Time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20808258Schouten LM, Niessen LW, van de Pas JW, Grol RP, Hulscher ME. Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative focusing on patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2010 Oct;48(10):884-91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eb318f.
- Information about the Centre for Quality of Care ResearchLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of AU-007, A Monoclonal Antibody That Binds to IL-2 and Inhibits IL-2Rα Binding, in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer
Advanced Solid Tumor, Metastatic Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Integrated Diabetes and Oral Health Care in Oman
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of BNT116 Alone and in Combinations in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
ED Diabetes Screening and Outpatient Care - Aim 3
Diabetes Mellitus, Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Enrolling by invitation
T2D Intermittent Nonprescription Sensors for Informed Glucose Health Tracking
Type 2 Diabetes, Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marlies E.J.L. Hulscher, MSc, PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Centre for Quality of Care Research
Louis W. Niessen, MD, PhD principal investigator
Erasmus Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG)
Richard PTM Grol, Prof. study director
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Centre for Quality of Care Research
52 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 52 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HbA1c (time frame: baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00160017, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.