HyperlipidemiaPhase 3NCT00160329
Atazanavir or Boosted Atazanavir Substitution for Ritonavir Boosted PI in Patients With Hyperlipidemia
A Phase 3 study testing Atazanavir in people with Hyperlipidemia and HIV Infections, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study is looking to compare the impact of lipid levels and HIV viral loads between three different drug regimens: Continuing current regimen (ritonavir boosted regimen), Switching to Atazanavir, or Switching to Atazanavir in combination to Ritonavir. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hyperlipidemia, HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Atazanavir
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2004to Mar 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable primary care
- Male or Female HIV + adults > 18 years of age.
- Subjects who are receiving a ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimen.
- Subjects who are on a stable antiretroviral regimen for > 3 months.
- Subjects who have a plasma viral load > 1,000 and < 100,000 c/mL.
- Protease Inhibitor (PI) resistance: Subjects must have a minimum of 3 of the following PI-mutations (10, 20, 46, 47, 48, 50V, 54, 71, 82, 84, 90).
Show all 39Show fewer
- Subjects who have a CD4 > 100 cells/cc.
- Subjects who are experiencing hyperlipidemia :
- Total cholesterol > 240 mg/dL, or
- LDL > 160 mg/dL, or
- Fasting triglycerides > 200 mg/dL, or
- On lipid lowering drugs.
- All women of reproductive potential (who have not reached menopause or undergone hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation) must have a negative serum or urine ²-HCG pregnancy test performed within 48 hours of entry.
- Female study volunteers who are not of reproductive potential (who have reached menopause or undergone hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation) or whose male partner has undergone successful vasectomy with documented azoospermia or has documented azoospermia for any other reason, are eligible without requiring the use of contraception. Acceptable documentation of menopause, sterilization, and azoospermia are as follows:
- Written or oral documentation communicated by clinician or clinician's staff of one of the following:
- Physician report/letter
- Operative report or other source documentation in the patient record
- Discharge summary
- Laboratory report of azoospermia (required for acceptable documentation of successful vasectomy)
- FSH measurement elevated into the menopausal range as established by the reporting laboratory. Exclusion Criteria:1. Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
- 2. Subjects who use substances or with a mental health condition that would in the opinion of the treating clinician interfere with the ability of the subject to comply with study treatment and monitoring.
- 3. Subjects who have significant liver disease defined as AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) > 5 x ULN.
- 4. Subjects who have a history of an acute opportunistic infection within 8 weeks prior to study screening. Chronic infections will not be excluded.
- 5. Subjects who have received a vaccination within 2 weeks prior to study screening.
- 6. Subjects who are receiving experimental ARV therapy.
- 7. Subjects who are receiving systemic chemotherapy.
- 8. Subjects who are receiving IL-2 or IFN-alpha.
- 9. Subjects who are receiving GM-CSF.
- 10. Subjects who have any grade 3-4 laboratory abnormality or clinical AE, other than lipid abnormalities.
- 11. Prior use of Atazanavir
- 12. Subjects who have a history of
- Symptomatic heart block
- 3rd degree heart block, even if asymptomatic
- Pre-excitation syndromes
- Heart rate < 40 bpm
- Ventricular pause length > 3 sec
- QTc > 500 msec
- History of syncope of undetermined origin
- Cardiomyopathy
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: The De-Escalate Trial: Atazanavir or Atazanavir/Ritonavir Substitution for Ritonavir Boosted PI Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals Experiencing Ongoing HIV Viremia and Hyperlipidemia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
The study is looking to compare the impact of lipid levels and HIV viral loads between three different drug regimens: Continuing current regimen (ritonavir boosted regimen), Switching to Atazanavir, or Switching to Atazanavir in combination to Ritonavir.
Read the detailed description
Study Overview
This is a randomized controlled pilot study to compare the safety and efficacy of substitution of atazanavir (ATV) or ATV/RTV for ritonavir boosted PI in patients with ongoing viremia who are experiencing hyperlipidemia and/or requiring treatment with lipid lowering agents. In this study 60 subjects on a ritonavir boosted PI-containing antiretroviral regimen who are experiencing hyperlipidemia and ongoing HIV viremia will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either switch the ritonavir boosted PI component of the antiretroviral regimen to ATV or ATV/RTV, or continue the ritonavir boosted PI-based regimen.
No other changes in the antiretroviral regimen will be allowed for the first 12 weeks. Thereafter, the investigator may change background ARVs based on the results of the screening resistance test. No new class of antiretrovirals will be allowed to be added through 48 weeks. Subjects will be monitored closely over 48 weeks with careful assessment of CD4 profile, viral loads and lipid profiles as well as drug resistance and replication capacity. Stopping rules will be implemented based on CD4 and viral load profile to ensure subject safety. The objective of this study is to determine whether protease inhibitor regimens that have less of an adverse impact on lipid profiles can maintain a stable CD4 profile compared to standard ritonavir boosted PI regimens.
Background
Antiretroviral regimens that include ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors are commonly recommended and prescribed, particularly in patients with some degree of drug resistance. Despite the potency of boosted regimens, many HIV-infected patients receiving these regimens have incomplete viral suppression and yet maintain clinical stability and CD4 counts above nadir levels: the so called 'CD4/HIV disconnect' state. It is likely that this state of CD4/HIV discordance is due in part to the maintenance of drug resistant HIV virus that is relatively unfit, that is its replication capacity and ability to infect and destroy CD4 cells is compromised. The selective pressure exerted by antiretroviral therapy appears to be important in maintaining these drug resistant but relatively unfit quasispecies. It has been shown that even patients with CD4 counts below 50 cells/cc and ongoing viremia maintain a clinical benefit from continued therapy.
Unfortunately, lipid abnormalities are commonly seen in patients receiving boosted PI regimens. For example, in a clinical trial in which lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) was given to treatment naïve subjects, approximately 1/3 developed grade 2 or higher lipid abnormalities over 48 weeks. There is a growing concern that these lipid abnormalities will increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In fact, recent data suggest an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality related to HIV infection and/or antiretroviral therapy. There are increasing efforts directed at minimizing long-term toxicities of antiretroviral therapy while maintaining its clinical benefit. (Witness the high degree of interest in treatment interruptions as a strategy to limit toxicities associated with long-term antiretroviral therapy.)
Atazanavir (ATV), a recently approved PI, appears to have little to no impact on the lipid profile in subjects enrolled in clinical trials. Other advantages with atazanavir are its dosing schedule and overall tolerability. Furthermore, recent studies using ritonavir-boosted ATV also show favorable lipid effects compared to LPV/r. Ritonavir boosting provides higher drug levels and therefore may improve the potency of ATV, especially against PI-resistant virus.
- Conditions
- Hyperlipidemia, HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Atazanavir
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperlipidemias, HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AtazanavirDrug
Also called Reyataz
300 mg with ritonavir boosting or 400 mg without
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare the three arms (ATV, ATV/r and continued ritonavir boosted-PI) in the following primary endpoint: % subjects who have normal serum lipid profile off lipid lowering agents and maintain CD4 counts > 75% of baseline line values.
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
% subjects with serum lipids within normal limits at week 48 off of any lipid lowering agent.
Measured: 48 weeks
% subjects who maintain CD4 counts > 75% of baseline values at week 48.
Measured: 48 weeks
Compare the change in CD4 count and CD4 % at 24 and 48 weeks between the three study arms.1.2.4Compare HIV plasma viral load profile over 24 and 48 weeks as DAVG between the three study arms.
Measured: 24 and 48 weeks
Compare lipid profile over 48 weeks, change in total cholesterol, TC/HDL ratio and triglycerides.
Measured: 48 weeks
Compare the evolution of genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance over 12 and 48 weeks between the three arms.
Measured: 12 and 48 weeks
Compare the evolution of viral fitness as measured by replication capacity assay at 12 and 48 weeks between the three arms.
Measured: 12 and 48 weeks
Explore determinates of viral fitness and the relationship of viral fitness with the 'CD4/VL disconnect' state.
Measured: 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2004
- Primary completionApr 2007
- Study completionMar 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HyperlipidemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Investigators
- Andrew R Zolopa, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00160329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- De-Escalate Trial
- Other IDs
- IRB # 79603, Spo# 29750
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The De-Escalate Trial: Atazanavir or Atazanavir/Ritonavir Substitution for Ritonavir Boosted PI Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals Experiencing Ongoing HIV Viremia and Hyperlipidemia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00160329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- De-Escalate Trial
- Conditions
- Hyperlipidemia, HIV Infections
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Study start
- Jan 2004
- Primary completion
- Apr 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is looking to compare the impact of lipid levels and HIV viral loads between three different drug regimens: Continuing current regimen (ritonavir boosted regimen), Switching to Atazanavir, or Switching to Atazanavir in combination to Ritonavir.
Detailed description
Study Overview
This is a randomized controlled pilot study to compare the safety and efficacy of substitution of atazanavir (ATV) or ATV/RTV for ritonavir boosted PI in patients with ongoing viremia who are experiencing hyperlipidemia and/or requiring treatment with lipid lowering agents. In this study 60 subjects on a ritonavir boosted PI-containing antiretroviral regimen who are experiencing hyperlipidemia and ongoing HIV viremia will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either switch the ritonavir boosted PI component of the antiretroviral regimen to ATV or ATV/RTV, or continue the ritonavir boosted PI-based regimen.
No other changes in the antiretroviral regimen will be allowed for the first 12 weeks. Thereafter, the investigator may change background ARVs based on the results of the screening resistance test. No new class of antiretrovirals will be allowed to be added through 48 weeks. Subjects will be monitored closely over 48 weeks with careful assessment of CD4 profile, viral loads and lipid profiles as well as drug resistance and replication capacity. Stopping rules will be implemented based on CD4 and viral load profile to ensure subject safety. The objective of this study is to determine whether protease inhibitor regimens that have less of an adverse impact on lipid profiles can maintain a stable CD4 profile compared to standard ritonavir boosted PI regimens.
Background
Antiretroviral regimens that include ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors are commonly recommended and prescribed, particularly in patients with some degree of drug resistance. Despite the potency of boosted regimens, many HIV-infected patients receiving these regimens have incomplete viral suppression and yet maintain clinical stability and CD4 counts above nadir levels: the so called 'CD4/HIV disconnect' state. It is likely that this state of CD4/HIV discordance is due in part to the maintenance of drug resistant HIV virus that is relatively unfit, that is its replication capacity and ability to infect and destroy CD4 cells is compromised. The selective pressure exerted by antiretroviral therapy appears to be important in maintaining these drug resistant but relatively unfit quasispecies. It has been shown that even patients with CD4 counts below 50 cells/cc and ongoing viremia maintain a clinical benefit from continued therapy.
Unfortunately, lipid abnormalities are commonly seen in patients receiving boosted PI regimens. For example, in a clinical trial in which lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) was given to treatment naïve subjects, approximately 1/3 developed grade 2 or higher lipid abnormalities over 48 weeks. There is a growing concern that these lipid abnormalities will increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In fact, recent data suggest an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality related to HIV infection and/or antiretroviral therapy. There are increasing efforts directed at minimizing long-term toxicities of antiretroviral therapy while maintaining its clinical benefit. (Witness the high degree of interest in treatment interruptions as a strategy to limit toxicities associated with long-term antiretroviral therapy.)
Atazanavir (ATV), a recently approved PI, appears to have little to no impact on the lipid profile in subjects enrolled in clinical trials. Other advantages with atazanavir are its dosing schedule and overall tolerability. Furthermore, recent studies using ritonavir-boosted ATV also show favorable lipid effects compared to LPV/r. Ritonavir boosting provides higher drug levels and therefore may improve the potency of ATV, especially against PI-resistant virus.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (39 listed)
- Stable primary care
- Male or Female HIV + adults > 18 years of age.
- Subjects who are receiving a ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimen.
- Subjects who are on a stable antiretroviral regimen for > 3 months.
- Subjects who have a plasma viral load > 1,000 and < 100,000 c/mL.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AtazanavirAlso: Reyataz300 mg with ritonavir boosting or 400 mg without | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Compare the three arms (ATV, ATV/r and continued ritonavir boosted-PI) in the following primary endpoint: % subjects who have normal serum lipid profile off lipid lowering agents and maintain CD4 counts > 75% of baseline line values.
Time frame: 48 weeks
7 secondary outcomes
% subjects with serum lipids within normal limits at week 48 off of any lipid lowering agent.
Time frame: 48 weeks
% subjects who maintain CD4 counts > 75% of baseline values at week 48.
Time frame: 48 weeks
Compare the change in CD4 count and CD4 % at 24 and 48 weeks between the three study arms.1.2.4Compare HIV plasma viral load profile over 24 and 48 weeks as DAVG between the three study arms.
Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks
Compare lipid profile over 48 weeks, change in total cholesterol, TC/HDL ratio and triglycerides.
Time frame: 48 weeks
Compare the evolution of genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance over 12 and 48 weeks between the three arms.
Time frame: 12 and 48 weeks
Compare the evolution of viral fitness as measured by replication capacity assay at 12 and 48 weeks between the three arms.
Time frame: 12 and 48 weeks
Explore determinates of viral fitness and the relationship of viral fitness with the 'CD4/VL disconnect' state.
Time frame: 48 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2011.
Related trials for Hyperlipidemia
Not yet recruiting
Plasma Lipids-Dependent Vitamin E Metabolism During Dynamic Hyperlipidemia
Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Developing a Learning COmmunity to Increase eNgagemeNt and Enrollment in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials (CONNECT)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Causes and Natural History of Dyslipidemias
Hypercholesterolemia, Atherosclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Pre-school Children ( CzeCH-IT)
Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew R Zolopa principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Atazanavir in people with Hyperlipidemia and HIV Infections, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 39 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare the three arms (ATV, ATV/r and continued ritonavir boosted-PI) in the following primary endpoint: % subjects who have normal serum lipid profile off lipid lowering agents and maintain CD4 counts > 75% of baseline line values. (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2011.