AzTrials
AzTrials

Apnea of PrematurityNCT00161694

Use of Sucrose to Relieve Pain During Eye Exams in Infants

A study testing sucrose solution in people with Apnea of Prematurity and Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to see if an oral sucrose solution can comfort premature infants during their necessary eye exams. The investigators believe that the use of this solution prior to the eye exams will lead to a decrease in pain as measured by a rise in heart rate and a fall in oxygen saturation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 weeks and older
What is being tested?
sucrose solution
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2005to not given
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 weeks and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All premature infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit requiring serial dilated examinations to assess for retinopathy of prematurity will be candidates for this study. This includes all infants with a birthweight of less than 1500 g and infants between 1500 g and 2000 g who require supplemental oxygen.

Who cannot join

  • Any infant who is unable to safely suckle 0.5 cc of fluid will be excluded from the study. This includes infants that are being maintained on ventilators and those with serious gastrointestinal complications that may be exacerbated by an oral fluid bolus.
  • Any infant being maintained on narcotics for any reason will not be eligible for the study.
  • All infants with major congenital anomalies will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • NYPH - Weill Cornell Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10021

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of an Oral Sucrose Solution in Reducing Pain and Anxiety Associated With Neonatal Ophthalmologic Examination

The purpose of this study is to see if an oral sucrose solution can comfort premature infants during their necessary eye exams. The investigators believe that the use of this solution prior to the eye exams will lead to a decrease in pain as measured by a rise in heart rate and a fall in oxygen saturation. In addition this will lead to a decrease in events in the 12 hours following examination. Events include episodes when the infants temporarily stop breathing, have a drop in their heart rates, or have a drop in their oxygen levels.

Being tested
sucrose solution
Keywords
pain control
Medical subject headings
Apnea, Retinopathy of Prematurity, Pain, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sucrose solutionDietary supplement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2005

Why it stopped: results did not show intervention was beneficial

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00161694
Sponsor's protocol ID
0412007634
Status last verified
Jun 2008
First submitted
8 Sep 2005
Last updated
4 Jun 2008
Results posted
No

Publications

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics: screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Pediatrics 2001;108:809-811. 2 Laws DE,C Morton, MWeindling, D Clark. Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Opthalmol 1996;80:425-428. 3 Kumar H, S Naniwal, USingha, E Azad, VK Paul. Stress induced by screening for retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr Opthalmology and Strabismus. 2002;39:349-350. 4 Aguirre Rodriguez FJ, A Bonilla Perales, J Diez-Delgado Rubio, M Gonzales-Ripoll Garzon, J Arcos Martinez, J Lopez Munoz. An Pediatr (Barc) 2003;58:504-505. 5 Slevin M, JFA Murphy, L Daly, m o'Keefe. Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related response, the role of nesting. Br J Opthalmol 1997;81:762-764. 6 Als H, G Lawhon, E Brown et al. Individualized behavior and environmental care for the VLBW preterm infant at high risk for BPD: NICU and developmental outcome. Pediatrics 1986;78:1123-1132. 7 Stevens B, J Yamada, A Ohlsson. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. 8 Benis MM. Efficacy of sucrose analgesia for procedural pain in neonates. Dv Neonatal Care. 2002;2:93-100. 9 Masters-Harte LD. Sucrose analgesia for minor procedures in newborn infants. Ann Pharmacother 2001;35:947-952. 10 Akman I, EOzek, H Bilgen, T Ozgodan, D Cebeci. Sweet solutions and pacifiers for pain relief in newborn infants. The Journal of Pain 2002:3. 11 Blass EM. Behavioral and physiological consequences of suckling in rat and human newborns. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1994;397:71-76. 12 Campos RG. Soothing pain-elicited distress in infants with swaddling and pacifiers. Child Dev 1989;60:781-792. 13 Blass EM. Suckling and sucrose-induced analgesia in human newborns. Pain 1999;83:611-623. 14 Carbajal R, R Lenclen, V Gadjos, M Jugic, A Paupe. Crossover trial of analgesic efficacy of glucose and pacifier in very preterm neonates during subcutaneous injections. Pediatrics 2002;110:389-393. 15 Blass EM. Milk induced hypoalgesia in human newborns. Pediatrics 1997;99:825-829. 16 Carbajal R, S Veerapen, S Coulder, M Jugie, Y Ville. Analgesic effect of breast-feeding in term neonates: randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2003;326:13. 17 Guala A. Glucose or sucrose as an analgesic for newborns: a randomized controlled blind trial. Minerva Pediatr 2001;53:271-274. 18 Anseloni VC. Age-dependency of analgesia elicited by intraoral sucrose in acute and persistent pain models. Pain 2002;97:93-103. 19 Willis D, J Chabot, I Radde, G Chance. Unsuspected hyperosmolality of oral solutions contributing to necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics 1997;60:535-538. 20 American Academy of Pediatrics. Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the Neonate. Pediatrics 2000;105:454-461. 21 Morison S, R Grunau, T Oberlander, F Tim, M Whitfield. Relations between behavioral and cardiac autonomic reactivity to acute pain in preterm neonates. Clinical Journal of Pain 2001;17:350-358.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing sucrose solution in people with Apnea of Prematurity and Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: results did not show intervention was beneficial). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00161694, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in