AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2TOPNCT00162812

Topoisomerase II Alpha Gene Amplification and Protein Overexpression Predicting Efficacy of Epirubicin

A Phase 2 study testing Epirubicin in people with Breast Cancer, run by Jules Bordet Institute at 1 site in Belgium.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

prospective evaluation of topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification and protein overexpression as markers predicting the efficacy of epirubicin in the primary treatment of breast cancer patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Epirubicin
How many people
338 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jan 2003to Apr 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically-confirmed breast cancer (operable, locally advanced or inflammatory)
  • Age less than 70 years
  • Female patient
  • Tumor size 2 cm at ultrasound examination.
  • ER-negative tumors defined according to immunohistochemistry (i.e. < 10% of positive cells after immunostaining).
  • Multifocal and multicentric breast tumors are allowed if all foci are ER-negative.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Fixed and frozen samples from the primary tumor, obtained before treatment with epirubicin, must be available for evaluation of biological markers (topo II alpha gene and protein, HER-2 gene, p-53 gene, oligonucleotides microarrays).
  • Written informed consent before study registration.
  • Performance status 0 or 1 (ECOG scale)
  • Normal CBC, hepatic and renal functions
  • Normal left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography or muga scan
  • Negative pregnancy test for all women of childbearing potential. Patients of childbearing potential must implement adequate non-hormonal measures to avoid pregnancy during treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Serious medical conditions like:
  • congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris, previous history of myocardial infarction within 1 year from study entry, uncontrolled arrhythmias.
  • history of significant neurologic or psychiatric disorders
  • active uncontrolled infection
  • active peptic ulcer, unstable diabetes mellitus
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Concomitant contralateral invasive breast cancer
  • Concurrent treatment with hormonal replacement therapy
  • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy
  • Previous treatment with anthracyclines for breast cancer

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Jules Bordet Institute

    Brussels, 1000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Prospective Evaluation of Topoisomerase II Alpha Gene Amplification and Protein Overexpression as Markers Predicting the Efficacy of Epirubicin in the Primary Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients

prospective evaluation of topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification and protein overexpression as markers predicting the efficacy of epirubicin in the primary treatment of breast cancer patients.

Read the detailed description

Clinical evaluation of topo II a as a predictive marker: Preliminary results from a clinical study suggest that complete remission after treatment with anthracyclines for advanced breast cancer is observed only in case of topo II a gene amplification (7 complete remissions, all in patients with topo II a gene amplified tumors, no complete remissions in patients with a normal or deleted topo II a gene).

Moreover, our group has analyzed the predictive value of topo II a in a population of node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with anthracyclines or with CMF (Belgian cooperative trial). In a first study, topo II a was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, which allows the detection of topo II a protein expression. The results of this study suggested that patients deriving the highest benefit from anthracyclines were those in which topo II a protein is immunostained in more than 10% of tumor cells. The main findings of this study should be seen as hypothesis-generating because of the limited number of patients evaluated (about fifty in each study arm) and because topo II a protein levels depend on gene amplification as well as on tumor proliferation rate. Therefore, topo II a protein expression does not necessarily reflect topo II a gene status.

The second study run by our group was based on the same series of patients evaluated in the first study, but, this time, both HER-2 and topo II a genes were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), which allows the detection of gene aberrations. The main findings of the second study were quite consistent with the pre-clinical data suggesting that only HER-2 amplified/topo II a amplified tumours show great sensitivity to anthracyclines while the efficacy of these same agents in HER-2 amplified/topo II a non-amplified tumors is comparable to the efficacy of other drugs or regimens like CMF.

Nevertheless, although the results reported in this study bring some additional support to the hypothesis of topo II a as a marker predicting the efficacy of anthracyclines, no definitive conclusions can be drawn because of the fairly limited number of patients evaluated, and the retrospective nature of the analyses.

The present study protocol: Supported by "in-vitro" and preliminary "in-vivo" data, briefly summarized above, this study is designed to test prospectively the value of topo II alpha gene amplification and protein overexpression in predicting the efficacy of anthracyclines. To our knowledge this is the only prospective trial worldwide which is attempting to prospectively clarify the predictive value of this interesting biological marker. This study could have important practical implications in the daily clinical management of early breast cancer patients because, if the trial confirms that topo II a gene amplification and/or protein overexpression are associated with high efficacy of anthracyclines, while topo II a normal/deleted gene and low protein content are associated with modest efficacy, an important step forward in the direction of anthracycline "tailoring" would be accomplished.

The practical advantage of this approach would be to use anthracyclines primarily in patients who are supposed to derive the largest benefit, thus sparing the long-term anthracycline-related toxicity (i.e. secondary acute myeloid leukemia, cardiac dysfunction, and amenorrhea/sterility in case of fertile women) to those patients for whom no significant gain in antitumor activity is anticipated.

To reach this ambitious aim, early breast cancer patients with tumors of at least 2 cm (defined by breast ultrasound) will be evaluated for topo II a gene and protein expression. For this purpose, a pre-treatment biopsy (tru-cut) will be performed and topo II a gene will be evaluated on fixed samples by FISH. The use of a triple probe will allow the concomitant evaluation of the HER-2 gene status. Topo II a protein will be evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Afterwards, all patients, independently of the topo II a gene and protein status, will be treated with single-agent epirubicin Eligibility criteria will allow the participation of patients for whom the use of an anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy would have been most probably proposed after breast cancer surgery, mainly because of estrogen receptor (ER) negativity. Therefore, no overtreatment with anthracyclines will occur in this group of patients. Pathological complete response (pCR) to epirubicin will be correlated with the topo II a gene and protein status. The study has two biological hypotheses, one for the subgroup of patients with ER negative/HER-2 amplified tumors, the other one for the subgroup of patients with ER negative/HER-2 non amplified tumors.

  1. st hypothesis: Patients with ER negative/HER-2 amplified tumors: In this subgroup of patients, topo II a gene will be amplified in about 40% of cases. We hypothesize that in topo II a amplified tumors a three-fold increase in pCR rate will be observed, as opposed to the pCR rate in tumors with topo II a normal or deleted gene.
  2. nd hypothesis : Patients with ER negative/HER-2 non amplified tumors: In this subset of patients, almost no topo II a gene aberrations will be found based on previous data discussed above. However, recent data reported by C. Sotiriou et al using cDNA microarrays, suggest that in this subset of ER-negative HER-2 negative tumors, also defined as the basal-like subset, two distinct subgroups can be identified (i.e. basal-like 1 and 2). While basal-like 1 tumors show a high proliferation rate and high levels of topo II a RNA, basal-like 2 tumors have a moderate-low proliferation rate and normal levels of topo II a RNA. We hypothesize that the topo II a RNA overexpression in basal-like 1 tumors is not related to topo II a gene amplification because no concomitant HER-2 gene amplification is reported in this subset of tumors. The second study hypothesis is that in ER negative/HER-2 non amplified tumors with topo II a protein overexpression, a 2.5 fold increase in pCR rate will be observed, as opposed to the pCR rate in tumors with low topo II a protein content.

A tumor sample drawn at the time of pre-treatment biopsy will be frozen and used to perform oligonucleotide based microarrays (Affymetrix). This technique allows the evaluation of thousands of genes and ultimately provides us with the tumor genetic profile. Homogeneous genetic profiles (genetic clusters) that might be identified, will be correlated with the efficacy of single-agent epirubicin. This correlation will allow us to address the secondary end-point of this study, which is the identification of other genes or eventually a genetic profile playing a role in the determination of sensitivity to anthracyclines. Among the genes that could interfere with sensitivity to anthracyclines, p-53 seems to deserve special attention. Indeed, "in-vitro" data suggest that at least some p-53 mutated tumors are poorly sensitive to anthracyclines, primarily because anthracycline-induced apoptosis is prevented. Interestingly, p-53 mutated tumors display frequently HER-2 gene amplification and therefore topo II a gene amplification (23). Accordingly, p-53 mutations could hamper response to anthracyclines even in tumors carrying topo II a gene amplification. This hypothesis will also be explored in the present study, because p-53 mutations will be evaluated by DNA sequencing, and the efficacy of epirubicin in topo II a amplified and non-amplified tumors will be correlated with p-53 status.

Additionally, patients with inflammatory breast cancer will be treated with dense administration of epirubicin (100 mg/m2/2 weeks). We keep the same drug as for early breast cancer but we use a slightly more aggressive regimen with a higher dose-density. The feasibility of the administration of epirubicin 100 mg/m2 every two weeks with granulocyte-growth factor support has been shown in the neoadjuvant, metastatic and adjuvant settings with acceptable toxicity. This neoadjuvant epirubicin regimen may be completed by adjuvant chemotherapy, such as taxane-based regimens, since the sequential approach (anthracyclines and taxanes) has been suggested superior to anthracyclines regimen in LABC.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Epirubicin
Keywords
neoadjuvant chemotherapy, early breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EpirubicinDrug

    100 mg/m² every three weeks (4 cycles) or every two weeks (6 cycles)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. correlation of topoisomerase II and pathologic complete response

    Measured: pCR at surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionDec 2008 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2009 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Low accrual rate

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
338 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00162812
Sponsor's protocol ID
TOP Trial
Other IDs
CE1141
Acronym
TOP
Status last verified
Jul 2008
First submitted
9 Sep 2005
Last updated
18 Jul 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Epirubicin in people with Breast Cancer, run by Jules Bordet Institute at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Low accrual rate). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

correlation of topoisomerase II and pathologic complete response (time frame: pCR at surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2008; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in