Prostate CancerPhase 2/3NCT00164437
CD-ROM Intervention for Prostate Cancer Screening
A Phase 2/3 study testing educational CD-ROM in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study populations consist of a sample of the patient population (men aged 40-79 years) of a large, group model HMO and a community sample of men age 50-79. Follow-up interviews of men randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups are being conducted by telephone to assess issues related to prostate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- educational CD-ROM
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 554 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2002to Sep 2004
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -
Who cannot join
- prostate cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
About this study
The study populations consist of a sample of the patient population (men aged 40-79 years) of a large, group model HMO and a community sample of men age 50-79. Follow-up interviews of men randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups are being conducted by telephone to assess issues related to prostate cancer screening and the men's use of the CD-Rom educational intervention.
Read the detailed description
The study populations consist of a sample of the patient population (men aged 40-79 years) of a large, group model HMO and a community sample of men age 50-79. Follow-up interviews of men randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups are being conducted by telephone to assess issues related to prostate cancer screening and the men's use of the CD-Rom educational intervention. Preliminary results are available for the first 1304 follow-up interviews (interim response rate = 26%). Of 554 men randomized to receive the CD-ROM, 227 (41%) reported receiving the CD-ROM, and 78 (14%) used it in a computer. About 51% of these 78 men used the CD-ROM once only, while 42% used it twice, and 27% shared it with someone else. Most users reported learning some (44%) or a great deal (46%) of new information from the CD-ROM, and most reported that it helped them organize their thoughts about screening somewhat (44%) or a great deal (28%). About 19% indicated that the CD-ROM increased their uncertainty somewhat or a great deal about whether or not they want to be screened, 30% reported that the CD-ROM changed their feelings about whether or not they want to be screened somewhat, and 12% reported that it changed their feelings a great deal. Men who used the CD-ROM had higher education, higher income, higher levels of computer usage, and were more likely to have previously had a PSA test compared to non-users. No other subject characteristics were significantly related to use. Using randomized group assignment in an "intention to treat" analysis, prostate cancer knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group; there were no differences between study groups in decisional conflict or realistic expectations. However, when comparing those who did and did not use the CD-ROM using multiple regression analysis and controlling for differences in age, race, education, income, insurance status, previous receipt of prostate cancer screening, and computer usage, use of the CD-ROM was significantly associated with higher prostate cancer related knowledge, lower decisional conflict, and more realistic expectations about risk of dying from prostate cancer. After controlling for differences between users and non-users we found evidence that the CD-ROM was effective in reducing decisional conflict, and increasing knowledge and realistic expectations related to prostate cancer screening.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- educational CD-ROM
- Keywords
- screening, community healt education, decision making, computer-assisted decision making
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
educational CD-ROMBehavioural
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
prostate cancer knowledge,
ability to make an informed decision about prostate cancer screning,
decisional conflict,
realistic expectations
Secondary outcomes (1)
costs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2002
- Study completionSep 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Early clinical test
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 554 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Investigators
- Lori A. Crane, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Colorado, Denver
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00164437
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDC-NCCDPHP-4020
- Other IDs
- U48/CCU815787
- Status last verified
- Sep 2005
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2005
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CD-ROM Intervention for Prostate Cancer Screening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00164437
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDC-NCCDPHP-4020
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- screening, community healt education, decision making, computer-assisted decision making
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 554 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Study start
- Sep 2002
- Study completion
- Sep 2004
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study populations consist of a sample of the patient population (men aged 40-79 years) of a large, group model HMO and a community sample of men age 50-79. Follow-up interviews of men randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups are being conducted by telephone to assess issues related to prostate cancer screening and the men's use of the CD-Rom educational intervention.
Detailed description
The study populations consist of a sample of the patient population (men aged 40-79 years) of a large, group model HMO and a community sample of men age 50-79. Follow-up interviews of men randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups are being conducted by telephone to assess issues related to prostate cancer screening and the men's use of the CD-Rom educational intervention. Preliminary results are available for the first 1304 follow-up interviews (interim response rate = 26%). Of 554 men randomized to receive the CD-ROM, 227 (41%) reported receiving the CD-ROM, and 78 (14%) used it in a computer. About 51% of these 78 men used the CD-ROM once only, while 42% used it twice, and 27% shared it with someone else. Most users reported learning some (44%) or a great deal (46%) of new information from the CD-ROM, and most reported that it helped them organize their thoughts about screening somewhat (44%) or a great deal (28%). About 19% indicated that the CD-ROM increased their uncertainty somewhat or a great deal about whether or not they want to be screened, 30% reported that the CD-ROM changed their feelings about whether or not they want to be screened somewhat, and 12% reported that it changed their feelings a great deal. Men who used the CD-ROM had higher education, higher income, higher levels of computer usage, and were more likely to have previously had a PSA test compared to non-users. No other subject characteristics were significantly related to use. Using randomized group assignment in an "intention to treat" analysis, prostate cancer knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group; there were no differences between study groups in decisional conflict or realistic expectations. However, when comparing those who did and did not use the CD-ROM using multiple regression analysis and controlling for differences in age, race, education, income, insurance status, previous receipt of prostate cancer screening, and computer usage, use of the CD-ROM was significantly associated with higher prostate cancer related knowledge, lower decisional conflict, and more realistic expectations about risk of dying from prostate cancer. After controlling for differences between users and non-users we found evidence that the CD-ROM was effective in reducing decisional conflict, and increasing knowledge and realistic expectations related to prostate cancer screening.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Early clinical test
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- prostate cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| educational CD-ROM | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
prostate cancer knowledge,
ability to make an informed decision about prostate cancer screning,
decisional conflict,
realistic expectations
1 secondary outcome
costs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2005.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IIA-B Prostate Cancer
Stage II Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy in Cancer Patients With Adjustment Disorder
Adjustment Disorder, Adjustment Disorder With Anxious Mood
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study for Detection of PSMA-Low CRPC-NE Tumors With Fluciclovine PET/CT
Advanced Prostate Cancer, Metastatic Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of JANX007 in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (ENGAGER-PSMA-01)
Prostate Cancer, Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lori A. Crane, PhD, MPH principal investigator
University of Colorado, Denver
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing educational CD-ROM in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
prostate cancer knowledge,. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2005.