Irritable Bowel SyndromePhase 2/3NCT00167635
Nursing Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome:Improving Outcomes
A Phase 2/3 study testing cognitive-behavioral in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome, run by University of Washington at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is 1) to determine whether a comprehensive self-management intervention is effective in a sample that includes men and women with irritable bowel syndrome, and 2) to determine whether the comprehensive self-management intervention is as effective when delivered over the telephone as compared… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- cognitive-behavioral
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Feb 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Who cannot join
- GI pathology (organic disease)
- Co-morbid pain disorders
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Northgate Executive 1
Seattle, Washington, 98125
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
About this study
Official title: Nursing Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Improving Outcomes
The purpose of this study is 1) to determine whether a comprehensive self-management intervention is effective in a sample that includes men and women with irritable bowel syndrome, and 2) to determine whether the comprehensive self-management intervention is as effective when delivered over the telephone as compared to a face-to-face approach.
Read the detailed description
Randomization and Intervention Phase. Upon completing the baseline assessment phase, participants will be randomized to one of 3 treatment groups. A customized computer program will be used to do the randomization in an adaptive manner that ensures the 3 groups remain fairly balanced with respect to possible important predictors of outcomes: age, sex, predominant stool pattern (alternating, constipation-predominant or diarrhea-predominant), and severity of IBS symptoms and psychological symptoms at baseline. When each new participant is randomized, the program will adjust the probabilities of assignment to the three groups so that there is a higher probability of assignment to the group that results in the best balance.
Intervention Groups. Face-to-Face Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-FF) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FF group will be scheduled for 9 weekly sessions with the nurse therapist followed by post-intervention follow-up assessment.
Telephone Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-TEL) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-TEL group will initially have 2 face-to-face meetings with the nurse therapist, 6 sessions over the phone and the final session face-to-face at 9 weeks.
Usual Care Control Group (UC). Following randomization the participants in the control group will no receive any contacts during the comparable 9-week intervention in the treatment groups.
Follow-up Phase. Participants in all 3 groups will be reassessed at 3-mo, 6-mo, and 12-mo post randomization. At this time the participants will complete questionnaires, a 4 week diary and collect 4 urines.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- Being tested
- cognitive-behavioral
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Cognitive-behavioral intervention, Psychological distress, Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cognitive-behavioralBehavioural
Also called Usual care
Cognitive-behavioral over 9 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Face-to-Face Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-FF) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FF group will be scheduled for 9 weekly sessions with the nurse therapist followed by post-intervention follow-up assessment. Receives: Behavioral: cognitive-behavioral |
| 2 | Experimental | Telephone Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-TEL) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FTF group will initially have 2 face-to-face meetings with the nurse therapist, 6 sessions over the phone and the final session face-to-face at 9 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: cognitive-behavioral |
| 3 | No intervention | Usual Care Control Group (UC). Following randomization the participants in the control group will receive two short phone calls to maintain contact during the comparable 9-week intervention in the treatment groups. Receives: Behavioral: cognitive-behavioral |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Psychological distress
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Cognitive Scale for Functional Bowel Disorders (CFBD) describes 25 cognitive beliefs related to functional bowel disorders.
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Health Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) will be measures with the Disease Specific Questionnaire-IBS (IBS-DSQ), a 42-item questionnaire.
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Secondary outcomes (5)
Sleep disturbance
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Sexual dysfunction
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Catecholamine and cortisol levels (urine)
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Stool frequency/consistency
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Health care utilization
Measured: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionFeb 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Investigators
- Margaret M Heitkemper, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00167635
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12707-C
- Other IDs
- 2R01NR04142-5, 97-3895-C 11, 2R01NR004142
- Status last verified
- May 2009
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 25 May 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Heitkemper MM, Jarrett ME, Levy RL, Cain KC, Burr RL, Feld A, Barney P, Weisman P. Self-management for women with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jul;2(7):585-96. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00242-3.
PubMed 15224283Yang PL, Burr RL, Buchanan DT, Pike KC, Kamp KJ, Heitkemper MM. Indirect effect of sleep on abdominal pain through daytime dysfunction in adults with irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):1701-1710. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8658.
PubMed 32620184Kamp KJ, Weaver KR, Sherwin LB, Barney P, Hwang SK, Yang PL, Burr RL, Cain KC, Heitkemper MM. Effects of a comprehensive self-management intervention on extraintestinal symptoms among patients with IBS. J Psychosom Res. 2019 Nov;126:109821. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109821. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
PubMed 31499231Han CJ, Kohen R, Jun S, Jarrett ME, Cain KC, Burr R, Heitkemper MM. COMT Val158Met Polymorphism and Symptom Improvement Following a Cognitively Focused Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Nurs Res. 2017 Mar/Apr;66(2):75-84. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000199.
PubMed 28252569
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nursing Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Improving Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00167635
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12707-C
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- Keywords
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Cognitive-behavioral intervention, Psychological distress, Quality of life
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is 1) to determine whether a comprehensive self-management intervention is effective in a sample that includes men and women with irritable bowel syndrome, and 2) to determine whether the comprehensive self-management intervention is as effective when delivered over the telephone as compared to a face-to-face approach.
Detailed description
Randomization and Intervention Phase. Upon completing the baseline assessment phase, participants will be randomized to one of 3 treatment groups. A customized computer program will be used to do the randomization in an adaptive manner that ensures the 3 groups remain fairly balanced with respect to possible important predictors of outcomes: age, sex, predominant stool pattern (alternating, constipation-predominant or diarrhea-predominant), and severity of IBS symptoms and psychological symptoms at baseline. When each new participant is randomized, the program will adjust the probabilities of assignment to the three groups so that there is a higher probability of assignment to the group that results in the best balance.
Intervention Groups. Face-to-Face Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-FF) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FF group will be scheduled for 9 weekly sessions with the nurse therapist followed by post-intervention follow-up assessment.
Telephone Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-TEL) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-TEL group will initially have 2 face-to-face meetings with the nurse therapist, 6 sessions over the phone and the final session face-to-face at 9 weeks.
Usual Care Control Group (UC). Following randomization the participants in the control group will no receive any contacts during the comparable 9-week intervention in the treatment groups.
Follow-up Phase. Participants in all 3 groups will be reassessed at 3-mo, 6-mo, and 12-mo post randomization. At this time the participants will complete questionnaires, a 4 week diary and collect 4 urines.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: cognitive-behavioralFace-to-Face Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-FF) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FF group will be scheduled for 9 weekly sessions with the nurse therapist followed by post-intervention follow-up assessment. |
| 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: cognitive-behavioralTelephone Individualized Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM-TEL) Group. Participants in the individualized CSM-FTF group will initially have 2 face-to-face meetings with the nurse therapist, 6 sessions over the phone and the final session face-to-face at 9 weeks. |
| 3 | No intervention | Behavioral: cognitive-behavioralUsual Care Control Group (UC). Following randomization the participants in the control group will receive two short phone calls to maintain contact during the comparable 9-week intervention in the treatment groups. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- GI pathology (organic disease)
- Co-morbid pain disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cognitive-behavioralAlso: Usual careCognitive-behavioral over 9 weeks | Behavioural | 1, 2, 3 |
Primary outcome
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Psychological distress
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Cognitive Scale for Functional Bowel Disorders (CFBD) describes 25 cognitive beliefs related to functional bowel disorders.
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Health Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) will be measures with the Disease Specific Questionnaire-IBS (IBS-DSQ), a 42-item questionnaire.
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
5 secondary outcomes
Sleep disturbance
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Sexual dysfunction
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Catecholamine and cortisol levels (urine)
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Stool frequency/consistency
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Health care utilization
Time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2009.
- Background: PubMed 15224283Heitkemper MM, Jarrett ME, Levy RL, Cain KC, Burr RL, Feld A, Barney P, Weisman P. Self-management for women with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jul;2(7):585-96. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00242-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32620184Yang PL, Burr RL, Buchanan DT, Pike KC, Kamp KJ, Heitkemper MM. Indirect effect of sleep on abdominal pain through daytime dysfunction in adults with irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):1701-1710. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8658.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31499231Kamp KJ, Weaver KR, Sherwin LB, Barney P, Hwang SK, Yang PL, Burr RL, Cain KC, Heitkemper MM. Effects of a comprehensive self-management intervention on extraintestinal symptoms among patients with IBS. J Psychosom Res. 2019 Nov;126:109821. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109821. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28252569Han CJ, Kohen R, Jun S, Jarrett ME, Cain KC, Burr R, Heitkemper MM. COMT Val158Met Polymorphism and Symptom Improvement Following a Cognitively Focused Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Nurs Res. 2017 Mar/Apr;66(2):75-84. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000199.
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Abdominal Symptoms and Rosacea: An Observational Study on the Association Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and the Gut-Skin Axis
IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Rosacea
Recruiting
Stress Reduction and Lifestyle Modification in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation (IBS-C)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Margaret M Heitkemper principal investigator
University of Washington
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing cognitive-behavioral in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome, run by University of Washington at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gastrointestinal symptoms (time frame: baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post randomization). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00167635, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2009.