AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial IschemiaPhase 3NCT00170014

Precision of the Magnetocardiographer for Data Aquision and Analysis.

A Phase 3 study testing Magnetocardiograph in people with Myocardial Ischemia, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

magnetocardiography has been extensively studied focusing on the possible clinical applications of the device. Evaluating the precision of a device is a prerequisite condition to know what are significant changes and how can these be trusted. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Myocardial Ischemia
What is being tested?
Magnetocardiograph
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2004to Jun 2007
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Age less than or equal to 45 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reproducibility of Magnetocardiography Measurements Using the Cardiomag Magnetocardiograph System Model 2409 and Its Software for Data Acquisition and Analysis

magnetocardiography has been extensively studied focusing on the possible clinical applications of the device. Evaluating the precision of a device is a prerequisite condition to know what are significant changes and how can these be trusted. A respectable reproducibility study for the MCG measurements is crucial for this new device to be used for clinical applications. In this study, we will focus on a critical portion of the heart cycle assessing for changes in time of the computerized analysis of this phase and comparing the analysis done by two examiners.

Read the detailed description

The studies involving magnetocardiography have almost exclusively focused on evaluating possible clinical applications of the device. Leder et al saw the need for investigating the reproducibility of High Temperature Superconducting (HTS-)MCG measurements. They tested 18 healthy volunteers, stating that assessment of the reproducibility of HTS-MCGs in the normal heart is a prerequisite condition for the definition of significant levels of changes which, for instance, may be observed in serial measurements of patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes. They also pointed out the potentially strong electromagnetic interference inside a hospital, likely to be very different from the noise found in engineering laboratories where the MCGs are originally calibrated and tested. A respectable reproducibility for the MCG measurements is crucial for clinical applications. Leder et al studied the reproducibility of QRS complexes, ST segments, and T waves. They found that the reproducibility of the measurements in the depolarization phase was high, whereas the reproducibility of their repolarization readings was considerably lower. The results led Leder et al to conclude that further technical development was needed to improve signal-to-noise ratio allowing for clinical application of repolarization abnormalities for recognizing Acute Coronary Syndromes. In this study, we will focus on the repolarization phase by assessing the reproducibility of the T wave only. Comparison of scores and results based on computer analyses will provide the basis for our evaluation. Visual interpretations by the two examiners will also be compared.

Being tested
Magnetocardiograph
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MagnetocardiographDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The objective of our study is to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility in the MCG results retrieved from data acquisition and analysis by two examiners. HTS-MCG measurements will be obtained from healthy AND diseased subjects in an unshielded clinical

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Primary completionJun 2007
  4. Study completionJun 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00170014
Sponsor's protocol ID
850-04
Status last verified
Feb 2011
First submitted
12 Sep 2005
Last updated
15 Feb 2011
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Magnetocardiograph in people with Myocardial Ischemia, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The objective of our study is to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility in the MCG results retrieved from data acquisition and analysis by two examiners. HTS-MCG measurements will be obtained from healthy AND diseased subjects in an unshielded clinical. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in