AzTrials
AzTrials

GoutPhase 3APEXNCT00174915

Phase 3, Febuxostat, Allopurinol and Placebo-Controlled Study in Gout Subjects.

A Phase 3 study testing Febuxostat and Allopurinol in people with Gout, run by Takeda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare febuxostat, allopurinol and placebo, once daily (QD), in subjects with gout. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Gout
What is being tested?
Febuxostat and Allopurinol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,072 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2003to Apr 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hyperuricemia (serum urate ≥8.0 mg/dL and gout by American Rheumatism Association Criteria
  • Renal function defined as a serum creatinine level of < 2.0 mg/dL and creatinine clearance of > 20 milliliters per minute (mL/min) by Cockroft and Gault formula.

Who cannot join

  • History of xanthinuria
  • Intolerance to allopurinol
  • Presence of renal calculi,
  • Alcohol intake of ≥ 14 drinks/week
  • Clinically significant medical condition

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Allopurinol and Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Febuxostat in Subjects With Gout.

The purpose of this study is to compare febuxostat, allopurinol and placebo, once daily (QD), in subjects with gout.

Read the detailed description

A Phase 3 Study comparing 80 mg, 120 mg or 240 mg of febuxostat, allopurinol (300 mg for those with normal renal function and 100 mg for those with impaired renal function) and placebo administered once daily in subjects with gout.

Subjects will receive treatment for 28 weeks.

Conditions
Gout
Being tested
Febuxostat, Allopurinol, Placebo
Keywords
Uric Acid, gout, xanthine oxidase, febuxostat, tophi
Medical subject headings
Gout

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FebuxostatDrug

    Also called TMX-67, Tei-6720, Uloric

    Febuxostat 80 mg, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks.

  • FebuxostatDrug

    Also called TMX-67, Tei-6720, Uloric

    Febuxostat 120 mg, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks.

  • FebuxostatDrug

    Also called TMX-67, Tei-6720, Uloric

    Febuxostat 240 mg, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks.

  • AllopurinolDrug

    Allopurinol, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks. Dose of allopurinol received was based on renal status. Subjects with serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL received 300 mg once daily; subjects with serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL and ≤2.0 mg/dL received 100 mg once daily.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00174915
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Febuxostat 80 mg QDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Febuxostat
Febuxostat 120 mg QDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Febuxostat
Febuxostat 240 mg QDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Febuxostat
Allopurinol QDActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Allopurinol
Placebo QDPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Subjects Whose Last Three Serum Urate Levels Are <6.0 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL).

    Each subject's serum urate at the last 3 visits determined the subject's response for the primary efficacy variable. A subject who prematurely discontinued without least 3 postbaseline serum urate levels was considered a nonresponder; if at least 3 serum urate were obtained postbaseline, those 3 visits were used. The last 3 visits used may have differed for each subject.

    Measured: Last 3 visits (any last 3 visits up to week 28)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Percentage of Subjects Whose Serum Urate Levels Are <6.0 mg/dL at Week 28

    Serum urate values were obtained at the Week 28 visit. The percentage of subjects whose serum urate was <6.0 mg/dL at the Week 28 visit was summarized.

    Measured: Week 28

  2. Percentage of Subjects Whose Serum Urate Levels Are <6.0 mg/dL at Final Visit

    The percentage of subjects whose serum urate was <6.0 mg/dL at the final visit was summarized. The final visit was the last visit at which a serum urate value was collected and may have differed by subject.

    Measured: Final Visit (up to 28 weeks).

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Urate Levels at Week 28.

    Serum urate values were obtained at the Week 28 visit. The percent change in serum urate was calculated as [(Week 28 - baseline levels)/baseline]*100 and summarized.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 28

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Urate Levels at Final Visit

    The percent change in serum urate from baseline to the Final visit was summarized. The percent change in serum urate was calculated as [(Final visit - baseline levels)/baseline]*100. The final visit was the last visit at which a serum urate value was collected. The timing of the final visit may have differed for each subject.

    Measured: Baseline and Final Visit (up to 28 weeks)

  5. Percent Change in Primary Tophus Size at Week 28, as Determined by Physical Measurement in the Subset of Subjects With Palpable Tophi at the Screening Visit.

    The percent change from baseline in primary tophus size as determined by physical measurement was calculated as [(Week 28 - baseline sizes)/baseline]*100 for the subset of subjects with a primary palpable tophus at the Screening Visit. If the primary tophus was no longer palpable at the Week 28 visit, the size was assumed to be zero.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 28

  6. Percent Change in Primary Tophus Size at Final Visit, as Determined by Physical Measurement in the Subset of Subjects With Palpable Tophi at the Screening Visit.

    Percent change in primary tophus size was calculated as [(Final Visit - baseline sizes)/baseline]*100 for the subset of subjects with a primary palpable tophus at Screening. If tophus was not palpable at Final visit, the size was assumed to be 0. The timing of the final visit may have differed for each subject.

    Measured: Baseline and Final Visit (up to 28 weeks)

  7. Change in the Total Number of Tophi at Week 28 in the Subset of Subjects With Palpable Tophi at the Screening Visit.

    Change from baseline at Week 28 in the total number of tophi per subject was calculated for the subset of subjects with palpable tophi at the Screening Visit. If the tophi were not palpable at the Week 28 visit, the total count was assumed to be 0.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 28

  8. Change in the Total Number of Tophi at Final Visit in the Subset of Subjects With Palpable Tophi at the Screening Visit

    Change in number of tophi/subject was calculated for the subset of subjects with palpable tophi at the Screening. If the tophi were not palpable at the Final Visit, total count was assumed to be 0. The timing of the final visit may have differed for each subject.

    Measured: Final Visit (up to 28 weeks)

  9. Percentage of Subjects Requiring Treatment for a Gout Flare Between Weeks 8 and 28 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period.

    Percentage of subjects requiring treatment for a gout flare between Weeks 8 and 28 of the double-blind treatment period was summarized. A subject who reported more than 1 gout flare during this period was counted only once.

    Measured: Weeks 8 through 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2003
  3. Primary completionApr 2004
  4. Study completionApr 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,072 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00174915
Sponsor's protocol ID
C02-009
Other IDs
U1111-1113-9740
Acronym
APEX
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
9 Sep 2005
Last updated
2 Feb 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schumacher HR Jr, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, Macdonald PA, Hunt B, Streit J, Lademacher C, Joseph-Ridge N. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11):1540-8. doi: 10.1002/art.24209.

    PubMed 18975369
  • Becker MA, MacDonald PA, Hunt BJ, Lademacher C, Joseph-Ridge N. Determinants of the clinical outcomes of gout during the first year of urate-lowering therapy. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008 Jun;27(6):585-91. doi: 10.1080/15257770802136032.

    PubMed 18600509
  • Wortmann RL, Macdonald PA, Hunt B, Jackson RL. Effect of prophylaxis on gout flares after the initiation of urate-lowering therapy: analysis of data from three phase III trials. Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2386-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.008.

    PubMed 21353107
  • Chohan S, Becker MA, MacDonald PA, Chefo S, Jackson RL. Women with gout: efficacy and safety of urate-lowering with febuxostat and allopurinol. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):256-61. doi: 10.1002/acr.20680.

    PubMed 22052584

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Febuxostat and Allopurinol in people with Gout, run by Takeda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Subjects Whose Last Three Serum Urate Levels Are <6.0 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL). (time frame: Last 3 visits (any last 3 visits up to week 28)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00174915, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in