Bipolar DisorderPhase 4NCT00186017
Short Term Rescue Study of Olanzapine
A Phase 4 study testing Olanzapine/Zyprexa in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
We will assess the effect of olanzapine compared to placebo added to prior treatment on CGI-S in a one-week randomized double-blind study. We will also assess the effect of olanzapine added to prior treatment on CGI-S in an eight-week open treatment study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bipolar Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Olanzapine/Zyprexa
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2005to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria:Patients must meet the following criteria to be eligible to participate in the study:
- Male or female outpatients, 18 to 70 years of age
- Female patients of childbearing potential must be using a medically accepted means of contraception
- Able to communicate intelligently with the investigator, and study coordinator
- Able to give informed consent
- DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I, bipolar II, cyclothymic disorder or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified, experiencing an acute exacerbation of their illness at Visit 1 (hypomania, subsyndromal depression, hypomania and subsyndromal depression, depression and hypomania, or depression if diagnosed with bipolar II) as verified by SCID-I/P
- CGI-BP Overall Severity score greater than or equal to mildly ill at Visit 1
- Must have been on prior medications for at least 2 weeks (6 weeks for fluoxetine) immediately prior to study entry Exclusion Criteria:Patients may not participate in the study if they have any of the following conditions:
- Pregnant, nursing, or intending to become pregnant during the study
- Serious, unstable illnesses including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular (including ischemic heart disease), endocrinologic, neurologic, immunologic, or hematologic disease such that hospitalization for the disease is anticipated within 3 months or death is anticipated within 3 years.
- A history of seizure disorder
- History of leukopenia without a clear and resolved etiology.
- DSM-IV substance (except nicotine or caffeine) dependence within the past month
- Judged clinically to be at serious suicidal risk
- Participation in clinical trial of another investigational drug within 1 month (30 days) prior to study entry.
- Treatment with an injectable depot neuroleptic within less than one dosing interval between depot neuroleptic injections prior to study entry
- Treatment resistance, non-response, or intolerability with olanzapine by the investigator's judgment
- Treatment with clozapine within 3 months prior to study entry
- Treatment with remoxipride within 6 months (180 days) prior to study entry
- Treatment with an oral antipsychotic within 2 days prior to study entry
- A course of ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) in the preceding 4 weeks
- Excluded mood symptoms noted in Table 1 [of protocol]
- Unstable thyroid pathology and treatment-initiated or altered within the past 3 months
- Meet criteria for antisocial personality disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Olanzapine Add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Syndromal and Subsyndromal Exacerbations in Bipolar Disorders
We will assess the effect of olanzapine compared to placebo added to prior treatment on CGI-S in a one-week randomized double-blind study. We will also assess the effect of olanzapine added to prior treatment on CGI-S in an eight-week open treatment study. In addition, we will assess the effect of olanzapine on Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales (HDRS, and MADRS), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HARS) in the above paradigms. We will also assess the influence of presentation severity (CGI-S) and polarity (mood elevation versus depression) on olanzapine response. Finally, we will assess safety and tolerability of olanzapine in the above paradigms.
We hypothesize that in diverse mild syndromal and subsyndromal exacerbations of BD in outpatients, randomized double-blind flexibly dosed olanzapine added to prior treatment (including no treatment) will yield greater CGI-S improvement than placebo by the end of one week, and that such improvement will persist over one week of open continuation treatment.
Read the detailed description
Development and marketing of new therapies for bipolar disorders (BD) has typically entailed performing double-blind placebo-controlled trials in acute mania maintenance studies and more recently acute depression studies. Such an approach addresses BD primarily in terms of episodes and has the strength of studying levels of pathology sufficiently high to permit detection of treatment effects, and guiding clinicians when they encounter syndromal mood episodes. However, this approach has the important limitation of not addressing an important unmet clinical need, namely the management of subsyndromal symptoms. Indeed, emerging data suggest that in BD subsyndromal symptoms compared to syndromal episodes are far more pervasive. Also such an approach runs the risk of not paying sufficient attention to the disorder construct, in a sense permitting preoccupation with syndromal episodes to carry more importance than the disorder.
We will assess the effect of olanzapine compared to placebo added to prior treatment on CGI-S in a one-week randomized double-blind study. We will also assess the effect of olanzapine added to prior treatment on CGI-S in an eight-week open treatment study. In addition, we will assess the effect of olanzapine on Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales (HDRS, and MADRS), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HARS) in the above paradigms. We will also assess the influence of presentation severity (CGI-S) and polarity (mood elevation versus depression) on olanzapine response. Finally, we will assess safety and tolerability of olanzapine in the above paradigms.
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Being tested
- Olanzapine/Zyprexa
- Medical subject headings
- Bipolar Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Olanzapine/ZyprexaDrug
Also called Zyprexa
Olanzapine was started at 2.5-10mg/day and adjusted by 2.5-5mg/day on a daily basis with a maximum dose of 20mg/day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Olanzapine/Zyprexa | Experimental | Olanzapine/Zyprexa 2.5 mg up to 8 per day for 1 week Receives: Drug: Olanzapine/Zyprexa |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo was taken in the same manner as olanzapine with up to 8 per day for 1 week Receives: Drug: Olanzapine/Zyprexa |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in CGI-BP-OS After 1 Week of Treatment
The Clinical Global Impression - bipolar version - overall severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not ill; 2, minimally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, very severely ill
Measured: Baseline, 1 Week
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean Change in YMRS After 1 Week of Treatment
The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scale has 11 items and is based on the patient's subjective report of his or her clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. Responses to each item are summed with a higher score indicating more mania symptoms endorsed.
Scale:0-60 0=Good 60=Bad
Measured: Baseline, 1 week
Mean Change in MADRS After 1 Week of Treatment.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales (MADRS) is a multi-item clinician tool assessing depression. Each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week
Mean Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HAM-A)
The HAM-A was one of the first rating scales developed to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms, and is still widely used today in both clinical and research settings. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). The HAM-A does not provide any standardized probe questions. Despite this,the reported levels of interrater reliability for the scale appear to be acceptable.
Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
Measured: Baseline, 1 Week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2005
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Bipolar DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Terrence Ketter, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Terence Arthur Ketter, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00186017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 79897
- Other IDs
- F1D-US-X279
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 16 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Olanzapine Add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Syndromal and Subsyndromal Exacerbations in Bipolar Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00186017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 79897
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- Jul 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We will assess the effect of olanzapine compared to placebo added to prior treatment on CGI-S in a one-week randomized double-blind study. We will also assess the effect of olanzapine added to prior treatment on CGI-S in an eight-week open treatment study. In addition, we will assess the effect of olanzapine on Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales (HDRS, and MADRS), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HARS) in the above paradigms. We will also assess the influence of presentation severity (CGI-S) and polarity (mood elevation versus depression) on olanzapine response. Finally, we will assess safety and tolerability of olanzapine in the above paradigms.
We hypothesize that in diverse mild syndromal and subsyndromal exacerbations of BD in outpatients, randomized double-blind flexibly dosed olanzapine added to prior treatment (including no treatment) will yield greater CGI-S improvement than placebo by the end of one week, and that such improvement will persist over one week of open continuation treatment.
Detailed description
Development and marketing of new therapies for bipolar disorders (BD) has typically entailed performing double-blind placebo-controlled trials in acute mania maintenance studies and more recently acute depression studies. Such an approach addresses BD primarily in terms of episodes and has the strength of studying levels of pathology sufficiently high to permit detection of treatment effects, and guiding clinicians when they encounter syndromal mood episodes. However, this approach has the important limitation of not addressing an important unmet clinical need, namely the management of subsyndromal symptoms. Indeed, emerging data suggest that in BD subsyndromal symptoms compared to syndromal episodes are far more pervasive. Also such an approach runs the risk of not paying sufficient attention to the disorder construct, in a sense permitting preoccupation with syndromal episodes to carry more importance than the disorder.
We will assess the effect of olanzapine compared to placebo added to prior treatment on CGI-S in a one-week randomized double-blind study. We will also assess the effect of olanzapine added to prior treatment on CGI-S in an eight-week open treatment study. In addition, we will assess the effect of olanzapine on Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales (HDRS, and MADRS), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HARS) in the above paradigms. We will also assess the influence of presentation severity (CGI-S) and polarity (mood elevation versus depression) on olanzapine response. Finally, we will assess safety and tolerability of olanzapine in the above paradigms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Olanzapine/Zyprexa | Experimental | Drug: Olanzapine/ZyprexaOlanzapine/Zyprexa 2.5 mg up to 8 per day for 1 week |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Olanzapine/ZyprexaPlacebo was taken in the same manner as olanzapine with up to 8 per day for 1 week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Olanzapine/ZyprexaAlso: ZyprexaOlanzapine was started at 2.5-10mg/day and adjusted by 2.5-5mg/day on a daily basis with a maximum dose of 20mg/day. | Drug | Olanzapine/Zyprexa, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in CGI-BP-OS After 1 Week of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week
The Clinical Global Impression - bipolar version - overall severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not ill; 2, minimally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, very severely ill
3 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in YMRS After 1 Week of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week
Mean Change in MADRS After 1 Week of Treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week
Mean Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HAM-A)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Stanford University Bipolar Disorders ClinicLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bipolar Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Recruiting
Safety and Feasibility of DBS for Bipolar Depression
Bipolar I Disorder, Bipolar Depression
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Recruiting
Affective Cognitive Training in Mood Disorders and High-risk Relatives
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Terence Arthur Ketter principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Olanzapine/Zyprexa in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in CGI-BP-OS After 1 Week of Treatment (time frame: Baseline, 1 Week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2017.