AzTrials
AzTrials

Abruptio PlacentaeNCT00186069

Magnesium Sulfate vs Placebo for Placental Abruption

A study testing Magnesium Sulfate and Normal Saline in people with Abruptio Placentae, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of magnesium sulfate for preterm suspected abruption. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Abruptio Placentae
What is being tested?
Magnesium Sulfate and Normal Saline
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2004to Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • vaginal bleeding and contractions consistent with suspected placental abruption between 24 and 34 weeks gestation.

Who cannot join

  • preterm labor, severe bleeding necessitating immediate delivery, maternal coagulopathy, fetal distress

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center

    San Jose, California, 95128

  • Stanford University School of Medicine

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Double Blind Trial of Magnesium Sulfate Tocolysis Versus Intravenous Saline for Suspected Placental Abruption

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of magnesium sulfate for preterm suspected abruption.

Read the detailed description

We hope to learn if there is a difference in the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous saline infusion in the resolution of vaginal bleeding and contractions in patients with a suspected placental abruption.

Being tested
Magnesium Sulfate, Normal Saline
Medical subject headings
Abruptio Placentae

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnesium SulfateDrug

    Also called Active study drug

    Magnesium Sulfate 4 gram bolus, followed by a maintenance dose at 2 grams per hour. Rate increases up to 4 grams per hour may be administered per physician discretion.

  • Normal SalineOther

    Also called Normal Saline infusion as placebo

    Normal Saline infusion of 4 gram bolus, followed by 2 grams per hour with rate increases up to 4 grams per hour per physician discretion.

Study groups in NCT00186069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Magnesium SulfateActive comparatorMagnesium Sulfate 4 gram bolus, followed by 2 grams per hour
Receives: Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
Normal SalinePlacebo comparatorNormal Saline 4 gram bolus, followed by 2 grams per hour
Receives: Other: Normal Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Undelivered With Resolution of Vaginal Bleeding and Contractions in First 48 Hours

    The primary outcome was the proportion of women undelivered at 48 hours with resolution of vaginal bleeding and uterine contractions.

    Measured: 48 hours after the randomization

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Gestational Age at Delivery (Weeks)

    Median gestational age at delivery (in full weeks)

    Measured: Time of delivery

  2. Neonatal Apgar Score at 5 Minutes

    The median Apgar score at 5 minutes. Apgar score scale is from 0 to 10 with score 0 expressing the worst neonatal status and score 10 the best status.

    Measured: At 5 minutes after birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2004
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00186069
Sponsor's protocol ID
79811
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
2 Jan 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Colon I, Berletti M, Garabedian MJ, Wilcox N, Williams K, El-Sayed YY, Chueh J. Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial of Magnesium Sulfate Tocolysis versus Intravenous Normal Saline for Preterm Nonsevere Placental Abruption. Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;33(7):696-702. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571324. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

    PubMed 26871905

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Magnesium Sulfate and Normal Saline in people with Abruptio Placentae, run by Stanford University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Undelivered With Resolution of Vaginal Bleeding and Contractions in First 48 Hours (time frame: 48 hours after the randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00186069, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in