AzTrials
AzTrials

Soft Tissue SarcomaPhase 1NCT00188422

Study of Low Dose CT in Sarcoma Patients

A Phase 1 study testing low dose CT in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary outcome of this study is the detection of lung metastases comparing Low dose CT (LDCT) and Minimum dose CT (MnDCT) with CXR. Hypothesis 1. LDCT and MnDCT have similar sensitivity for the detection of lung nodules (metastases). 2. MnDCT of the thorax detects a larger number of nodules (metastases) than CXR. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
What is being tested?
low dose CT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Aug 2003to Jan 2006
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • High Grade Soft tissue sarcoma

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Surveillance Low Dose Computed Tomography of the Thorax in Patients With High Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The primary outcome of this study is the detection of lung metastases comparing Low dose CT (LDCT) and Minimum dose CT (MnDCT) with CXR.

Hypothesis

  1. LDCT and MnDCT have similar sensitivity for the detection of lung nodules (metastases).
  2. MnDCT of the thorax detects a larger number of nodules (metastases) than CXR.
Read the detailed description

A 3-year prospective phase II non-randomized study commenced May 2003 enrolling 60 high-risk patients with Intermediate and High Grade STS. Each patient is kept under radiological surveillance for 3 years unless lung metastases are detected. Conventional thoracic imaging for staging and surveillance of STS patients is shown in Figure 1. In the trial, LDCT and MnDCT are added to each imaging visit (Figure 1). A 2-view CXR (CR) is performed (Direct View, Kodak, Rochester) followed by thoracic CT scans performed on a Siemens 16 row MDCT (Sensation 16, Siemens, Erlangen), CT acquisition; 120kVp, 5/2.5/2.5mm. Images are reconstructed with high and low spatial frequency filters and soft copy viewing is performed on a standalone PACS workstation using standard mediastinal (w 350, l 40) and lung (w 1500, l -600) settings. Examinations are performed with varying mAs; SDCT 120 mAs, LDCT 40 mAs and MnDCT 20 mAs. The examinations are evaluated, blinded to the results of the alternative and previous studies, for the presence of nodules (defined as a non-calcified focal opacity ≥3 mm < 3 cm). Surveillance imaging is commenced 3 months post surgery.

Being tested
low dose CT
Medical subject headings
Sarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • low dose CTProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Detection of metastases

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2003
  3. Study completionJan 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00188422
Sponsor's protocol ID
03-0468-CE
Status last verified
Apr 2007
First submitted
12 Sep 2005
Last updated
23 Apr 2007
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing low dose CT in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Detection of metastases. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in