Esophagus CancerPhase 3NCT00193882
Advanced Oesophageal Cancer Study to Compare Quality of Life and Palliation of Dysphagia.
A Phase 3 study testing Cisplatin, Radiotherapy and 5-Fluorouracil in people with Esophagus Cancer, run by Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group at 25 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the treatment of gullet cancer with radiotherapy alone and assess the advantage and toxicity of adding chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested is as follows: That the addition of chemotherapy to a short course of radiation treatment improves the proportion of patients who achieve relief of dysphagia and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophagus Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cisplatin, Radiotherapy and 5-Fluorouracil
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Jul 2003to 18 Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy proven Carcinoma of the oesophagus.
- Not a candidate for radical/curative treatment due to the advanced nature of the disease, presence of metastases, or intercurrent illness. (It should be noted that, patients with mediastinal nodes and no more distant disease maybe suitable for radical treatment).
- Symptomatic patients with dysphagia scores of ≥ 1 i.e. able to eat only some solids (see Mellow Scale appendix 1)
- Performance status ECOG ≤ 2
- Patients must begin treatment within 2 weeks of randomization.
- Patient is at least 18 years old.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Adequate haematological function to undergo chemotherapy. Peripheral blood - Neutrophils > 1.5 x 10^9/L - Platelets > 100 x 10^9/L
- Adequate renal function, Creatinine - Calculated clearance ≥ 50 ml/min
- Patients capable of childbearing are using adequate contraception.
- Written informed consent of patient.
Who cannot join
- Previous mega-voltage external beam Radiotherapy or brachy-therapy delivered to the region of the chest.
- Synchronous active malignancies.
- Pregnant or lactating patients.
- Patients unfit for any treatment component.
- Tracheo-oesophageal fistula.
- Stents in situ.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Previous chemotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer
- CT scan of thorax and abdomen more than 8 weeks prior to randomization
- Full Blood Count, Biochemistry (including creatinine) and creatinine clearance more than 2 weeks prior to randomization
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 4 countries.
25 sites in 4 countries
Australia15 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Premion - Wesley
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4006
Peter MacCallum - Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Peter MacCallum - Moorrabbin
East Bentleigh, Victoria, 3165
Andrew Love Cancer Care Centre, Geelong Hospital
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Royal Brisbane Hospital
Herston, Queensland, 4029
Launceston General Hospital
Launceston, Tasmania, 7250
Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool, New South Wales, 1871
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 8006
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, 6001
Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031
Radiation Oncology - Mater Centre
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Royal North Shore Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2069
North Queensland Oncology Service
Townsville, Queensland, 4810
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Canada8 sites
Cross Cancer Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario Kingston
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
Grand River Cancer Centre
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3
Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, G1R 2J6
Saint John Regional Hospital - Atlantic Health Sci
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Cancer Care Manitoba Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase III Study in Advanced Oesophageal Cancer to Compare Quality of Life and Palliation of Dysphagia in Patients Treated With Radiotherapy vs ChemoRadiotherapy.
To compare the treatment of gullet cancer with radiotherapy alone and assess the advantage and toxicity of adding chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested is as follows: That the addition of chemotherapy to a short course of radiation treatment improves the proportion of patients who achieve relief of dysphagia and improves quality of life compared to radiation alone in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Prospective radical treatment trials in oesophageal cancer have shown responses in both radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy when combined with chemotherapy. Retrospective studies show a response in the palliative setting to relieve dysphagia. The response, durability and quality of life end points have not been previously fully documented. This will be addressed by this trial.
Dysphagia is the commonest presenting symptom due to local disease obstructing the oesophagus. Difficulty eating not only affects the patient's ability to maintain nutrition, but also impacts on all areas of quality of life. Relief of dysphagia becomes the highest priority for treatment.
At the time of developing this protocol there were no randomised trials comparing chemo-radiotherapy and radiotherapy in the palliative setting.
Few studies have prospectively assessed quality of life data for patients with oesophageal cancer, and although toxicity and survival data is available, there is no long-term data on quality of life. This trial will assess quality of life in a consecutive manner using a standardised self-reporting measure of quality of life, and compare quality of life across two groups having different treatments.
Eligible patients are those with proven carcinoma of the oesophagus who are deemed not suitable for definitive radical treatment due to the advanced nature of disease, presence of metastases or intercurrent illness, who have symptomatic dysphagia requiring loco-regional palliation.
Patients will be randomised to the following treatment options:
- Radiotherapy Alone
- 35 Gy in 15 fractions (Australia and New Zealand) or
- 30 Gy in 10 fractions(Canada ONLY)
- Chemo-Radiotherapy
- 35 Gy in 15 fractions (Australia and New Zealand) or
- 30 Gy in 10 fractions (Canada ONLY)
- Cisplatin 80mg/m2 IV day 1 (or 20mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4)
- 5-Fluorouracil 800mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4
Patients will have an initial baseline assessment then be followed up weekly during treatment, monthly for 1 year post treatment and then 3 monthly.
- Conditions
- Esophagus Cancer
- Being tested
- Cisplatin, Radiotherapy, 5-Fluorouracil
- Keywords
- Oesophageal, Dysphagia, Palliation, Quality of Life, Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Deglutition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CisplatinDrug
Also called Cisplatin Injection
80mg/m2 IV day 1
RadiotherapyRadiation
Also called Radiation, Radiation Therapy
35 Gy in 15 fractions
5-FluorouracilDrug
Also called DBL Flurouracil Injection BP, Efudix
800mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A: Radiotherapy | Active comparator | Radiotherapy alone Receives: Radiation: Radiotherapy |
| B: Chemo-radiotherapy | Experimental | Chemotherapy (Cisplatin + 5-Fluorouracil ) and Radiotherapy Receives: Drug: Cisplatin; Radiation: Radiotherapy; Drug: 5-Fluorouracil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relief of dysphagia
Measured: This will be measured at nine weeks after the start of radiotherapy and must be maintained at the next review 4 weeks thereafter.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Dysphagia progression free survival.
Measured: This will be measured from randomisation to the time of first progression of dysphagia.
Quality of Life differences post treatment and at 3 months and 6 months.
Measured: post treatment and at 3 months and 6 months.
Acute and late toxicity.
Measured: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Survival.
Measured: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Time to achieving any response in dysphagia after treatment as measured by an improvement of at least 1 point on the 5 point dysphagia scale.
Measured: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Number of patients receiving secondary treatment (radiation, chemotherapy or stenting).
Measured: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Time to achieving a complete response i.e. dysphagia score of 0.
Measured: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study start7 Jul 2003
- Primary completion21 Mar 2012
- Study completion18 Jun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophagus CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, Canadian Cancer Trials Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Penniment, FRANZCR, Study chair, Royal Adelaide Hopsital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00193882
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TROG 03.01
- Other IDs
- NCIC CTG ES.2, TGA 2004/83, NHMRC 291103
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Penniment MG, De Ieso PB, Harvey JA, Stephens S, Au HJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Kneebone A, Ngan SY, Ward IG, Roy R, Smith JG, Nijjar T, Biagi JJ, Mulroy LA, Wong R; TROG 03.01/CCTG ES.2 group. Palliative chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for dysphagia in advanced oesophageal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TROG 03.01). Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;3(2):114-124. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30363-1. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
PubMed 29248399
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase III Study in Advanced Oesophageal Cancer to Compare Quality of Life and Palliation of Dysphagia in Patients Treated With Radiotherapy vs ChemoRadiotherapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00193882
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TROG 03.01
- Conditions
- Esophagus Cancer
- Keywords
- Oesophageal, Dysphagia, Palliation, Quality of Life, Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, Canadian Cancer Trials Group
- Study start
- 7 Jul 2003
- Primary completion
- 21 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the treatment of gullet cancer with radiotherapy alone and assess the advantage and toxicity of adding chemotherapy. The hypothesis to be tested is as follows: That the addition of chemotherapy to a short course of radiation treatment improves the proportion of patients who achieve relief of dysphagia and improves quality of life compared to radiation alone in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.
Detailed description
Prospective radical treatment trials in oesophageal cancer have shown responses in both radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy when combined with chemotherapy. Retrospective studies show a response in the palliative setting to relieve dysphagia. The response, durability and quality of life end points have not been previously fully documented. This will be addressed by this trial.
Dysphagia is the commonest presenting symptom due to local disease obstructing the oesophagus. Difficulty eating not only affects the patient's ability to maintain nutrition, but also impacts on all areas of quality of life. Relief of dysphagia becomes the highest priority for treatment.
At the time of developing this protocol there were no randomised trials comparing chemo-radiotherapy and radiotherapy in the palliative setting.
Few studies have prospectively assessed quality of life data for patients with oesophageal cancer, and although toxicity and survival data is available, there is no long-term data on quality of life. This trial will assess quality of life in a consecutive manner using a standardised self-reporting measure of quality of life, and compare quality of life across two groups having different treatments.
Eligible patients are those with proven carcinoma of the oesophagus who are deemed not suitable for definitive radical treatment due to the advanced nature of disease, presence of metastases or intercurrent illness, who have symptomatic dysphagia requiring loco-regional palliation.
Patients will be randomised to the following treatment options:
- Radiotherapy Alone
- 35 Gy in 15 fractions (Australia and New Zealand) or
- 30 Gy in 10 fractions(Canada ONLY)
- Chemo-Radiotherapy
- 35 Gy in 15 fractions (Australia and New Zealand) or
- 30 Gy in 10 fractions (Canada ONLY)
- Cisplatin 80mg/m2 IV day 1 (or 20mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4)
- 5-Fluorouracil 800mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4
Patients will have an initial baseline assessment then be followed up weekly during treatment, monthly for 1 year post treatment and then 3 monthly.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A: Radiotherapy | Active comparator | Radiation: RadiotherapyRadiotherapy alone |
| B: Chemo-radiotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Cisplatin, Radiation: Radiotherapy, Drug: 5-FluorouracilChemotherapy (Cisplatin + 5-Fluorouracil ) and Radiotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Biopsy proven Carcinoma of the oesophagus.
- Not a candidate for radical/curative treatment due to the advanced nature of the disease, presence of metastases, or intercurrent illness. (It should be noted that, patients with mediastinal nodes and no more distant disease maybe suitable for radical treatment).
- Symptomatic patients with dysphagia scores of ≥ 1 i.e. able to eat only some solids (see Mellow Scale appendix 1)
- Performance status ECOG ≤ 2
- Patients must begin treatment within 2 weeks of randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous mega-voltage external beam Radiotherapy or brachy-therapy delivered to the region of the chest.
- Synchronous active malignancies.
- Pregnant or lactating patients.
- Patients unfit for any treatment component.
- Tracheo-oesophageal fistula.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CisplatinAlso: Cisplatin Injection80mg/m2 IV day 1 | Drug | B: Chemo-radiotherapy |
| RadiotherapyAlso: Radiation, Radiation Therapy35 Gy in 15 fractions | Radiation | A: Radiotherapy, B: Chemo-radiotherapy |
| 5-FluorouracilAlso: DBL Flurouracil Injection BP, Efudix800mg/m2/day IV days 1 - 4 | Drug | B: Chemo-radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Relief of dysphagia
Time frame: This will be measured at nine weeks after the start of radiotherapy and must be maintained at the next review 4 weeks thereafter.
7 secondary outcomes
Dysphagia progression free survival.
Time frame: This will be measured from randomisation to the time of first progression of dysphagia.
Quality of Life differences post treatment and at 3 months and 6 months.
Time frame: post treatment and at 3 months and 6 months.
Acute and late toxicity.
Time frame: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Survival.
Time frame: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Time to achieving any response in dysphagia after treatment as measured by an improvement of at least 1 point on the 5 point dysphagia scale.
Time frame: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Number of patients receiving secondary treatment (radiation, chemotherapy or stenting).
Time frame: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Time to achieving a complete response i.e. dysphagia score of 0.
Time frame: Interim analyses planned at 110 pateints. Final analyses will occur after 5 years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29248399Penniment MG, De Ieso PB, Harvey JA, Stephens S, Au HJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Kneebone A, Ngan SY, Ward IG, Roy R, Smith JG, Nijjar T, Biagi JJ, Mulroy LA, Wong R; TROG 03.01/CCTG ES.2 group. Palliative chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for dysphagia in advanced oesophageal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TROG 03.01). Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;3(2):114-124. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30363-1. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
- Click here for more information about this study on the TROG official websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Esophagus Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers in Barrett's Esophagus (PCAB BE Study)
Barrett Esophagus
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Penniment, FRANZCR study chair
Royal Adelaide Hopsital
25 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cisplatin, Radiotherapy and 5-Fluorouracil in people with Esophagus Cancer, run by Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group at 25 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relief of dysphagia (time frame: This will be measured at nine weeks after the start of radiotherapy and must be maintained at the next review 4 weeks thereafter.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00193882, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.