AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3PREMIERNCT00195663

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab and Methotrexate (MTX) Versus MTX Monotherapy in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 123 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Adalimumab and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
799 participants
Where
123 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
Dec 2000to Apr 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) >= 1.5 mg/dl

Who cannot join

  • Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16
  • Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
  • Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
  • Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients
  • Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

123 sites in 19 countries.

123 sites in 19 countries

United States31 sites
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 96122

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 306

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 313

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 762

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 316

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 318

    Concord, New Hampshire, 03301

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 319

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2437

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 314

    Dayton, Ohio, 45408

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2500

    Denver, Colorado, 80230

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4649

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 488

    Durham, North Carolina, 27704

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 757

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95960

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2532

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 758

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95957

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 429

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 361

    Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 336

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2491

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 761

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 302

    Rockford, Illinois, 61103

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 328

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 322

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 321

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 327

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 326

    Wheaton, Maryland, 20902

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2533

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605-0000

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 305

    Yakima, Washington, 98902

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 325

    Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542

Other trials in United States

Canada14 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4646

    Edmonton, T6G 2S2

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 303

    Hamilton, L8N 1Y2

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 330

    Hamilton, L8N 2B6

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4634

    Montreal, H2L 1S6

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 311

    Montreal, H3Z 2Z3

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 309

    Newmarket, L3Y 3R7

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 98199

    North York, Ontario, M3H 5Y8

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 304

    Pointe-Claire, H9J 3W3

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4633

    Richmond, V7C 5L9

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 763

    St. John's, A1A 5E8

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4635

    Toronto, M4N 3M5

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 490

    Toronto, M5L 3L9

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 760

    Victoria, V8V 3P9

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4632

    Winnipeg, R3N OK6

Other trials in Canada

Australia11 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 310

    Brisbane, 4102

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 755

    Camperdown, 2050

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 337

    Clayton, 3168

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 331

    Darlinghurst, Sydney, 2010

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 745

    Kogarah, 2217

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 738

    Maroochydore, 4558

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 335

    New Lambton, 2305

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 737

    Shenton Park, 6008

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 307

    South Hobart, 7004

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 427

    West Heidelberg, 3081

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 739

    Woodville, 5011

Other trials in Australia

Germany11 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4631

    Berlin, 10117

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 759

    Berlin, 14059

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3417

    Buch, 13125

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4630

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 347

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 742

    Görlitz, 02826

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 746

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 98125

    Munich, 80336

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 339

    Munich, 80336

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 744

    Ratingen, 40882

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 338

    Vogelsang-Gommern, 39245

Other trials in Germany

Spain9 sites
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 96121

    Alicante, 03010

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 735

    Alicante, 03010

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1525

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1528

    Barcelona, 08915

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 750

    Guadalajara, 19002

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 1526

    Madrid, 28040

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 741

    Madrid, 28040

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 390

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 749

    Seville, 41014

Other trials in Spain

Belgium7 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 753

    Brussels, 1070

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 308

    Brussels, 1090

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 752

    Brussels, 1200

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 748

    Diepenbeek, 3590

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6136

    Ghent, 9000

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 98256

    Leuven, 3000

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 333

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Sweden7 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 728

    Stockholm, 113 24

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2565

    Stockholm, 171 76

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4638

    Stockholm, SE-141 86

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 96126

    Umeå, 901 84

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 747

    Uppsala, 75185

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 96120

    Västerås, S-721 89

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 736

    Västerås, S-721 89

Other trials in Sweden

France6 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 428

    Bobigny, 93009

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 348

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4650

    Paris, 75679

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3415

    Pierre-Bénite, 69310

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 733

    Rennes, 35056

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 346

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 96116

    Bangor, LL57 2PW

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95877

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 98258

    Hereford, HR1 2ER

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95795

    Leeds, LS1 3EX

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95958

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 98255

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Italy4 sites
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95719

    Genoa, 16132

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 323

    Naples, 80131

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 345

    Udine, 33100

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 756

    Verona, 37134

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands4 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 343

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6133

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 317

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 315

    Nijmegen, 6500 HB

Other trials in Netherlands

Czechia3 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 754

    Hradec Králové, 500 05

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 332

    Pilsen, 305 99

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 734

    Prague, 128 50

Other trials in Czechia

Finland2 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6135

    Heinola, FI-18120

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 6134

    Helsinki, 00029

Other trials in Finland

Ireland2 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 740

    Cork, WDQ-23-KM9

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 751

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

Norway2 sites
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95800

    Oslo, 0027

  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95875

    Oslo, 0370

Other trials in Norway

Austria1 site
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 344

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Denmark1 site
  • Site Ref # / Investigator 95878

    Gråsten, 6300

Other trials in Denmark

Slovakia1 site
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3426

    Piešťany, 92112

Other trials in Slovakia

Switzerland1 site
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 334

    Lausanne, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Study Comparing the Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-TNFα Antibody Adalimumab Given Every Second Week With Methotrexate Given Weekly and the Combination of Adalimumab and Methotrexate Administered Over 2 Years in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREMIER).

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.

Read the detailed description

This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.

Being tested
Adalimumab, Methotrexate, Adalimumab placebo, Methotrexate placebo
Keywords
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AdalimumabBiological

    Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira

  • MethotrexateDrug

  • Adalimumab placeboBiological

  • Methotrexate placeboDrug

Study groups in NCT00195663
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AdalimumabExperimentalParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Drug: Methotrexate placebo
Adalimumab + methotrexateExperimentalParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Drug: Methotrexate
MethotrexateExperimentalParticipants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.
Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Biological: Adalimumab placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 Weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52

    The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  2. Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 104

  3. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104

    The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 104

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52

    The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Measured: Week 52

  5. Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  6. Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment

    Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.

    Measured: Any 6 continuous months from Baseline to Week 104

  7. Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  8. Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 76

  9. Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

    American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

  10. Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

    American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

  11. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 76, and 104

  12. Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

  13. Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain.

    The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, and 104

  14. Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 104

  15. Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

  16. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint counts,
    • 28 swollen joint counts,
    • C-reactive protein, and
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity.

    Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26, 52, 76, and 104

  17. Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

    Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

  18. Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

    Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

  19. Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

    The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104.

    Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

  20. Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104

    The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0.

    Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

  21. Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104

    Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0.

    Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104

  22. Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

    Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

  23. Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

    Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

  24. Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

    Measured: Baseline and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab.

  25. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

  26. Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint counts,
    • 28 swollen joint counts,
    • C-reactive protein, and
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity.

    Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

  27. Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint counts,
    • 28 swollen joint counts,
    • C-reactive protein, and
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity.

    Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Measured: After 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of adalimumab exposure

  28. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years

    The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10

  29. Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years

    The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to first study drug treatment) and Years 2 and 10.

  30. Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score

    Measured: Year 10

  31. Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

    Measured: From the first dose of adalimumab (at Week 1 or Week 106 for patients initially randomized to methotrexate in the DB phase) to Year 10

  32. Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Years 1, 2, 5, and 10. Baseline was the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the MTX arm in the DB phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2000
  3. Primary completionApr 2004
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
799 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00195663
Sponsor's protocol ID
DE013
Acronym
PREMIER
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
12 Jul 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Smolen J, Fleischmann R, Aletaha D, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sainsbury I, Galindo IL. Disease activity improvements with optimal discriminatory ability between treatment arms: applicability in early and established rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Nov 10;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2005-9.

    PubMed 31707982
  • Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Kavanaugh A. Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;77(11):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213502. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PubMed 30076156
  • Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, Kupper H, Li Y, Florentinus S, Sainsbury I. Long-term use of adalimumab as monotherapy after attainment of low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 13;4(1):e000637. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000637. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29955381
  • Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Smolen JS, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Chen K, Kavanaugh A. Achieving comprehensive disease control in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 26;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000445. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 29018564
  • Moller B, Everts-Graber J, Florentinus S, Li Y, Kupper H, Finckh A. Low Hemoglobin and Radiographic Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Secondary Analysis From a Phase III Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;70(6):861-868. doi: 10.1002/acr.23427. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

    PubMed 28950430
  • Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

    PubMed 27338778
  • Landewe R, Smolen JS, Florentinus S, Chen S, Guerette B, van der Heijde D. Existing joint erosions increase the risk of joint space narrowing independently of clinical synovitis in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 21;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0626-1.

    PubMed 25994819
  • Landewe R, Ostergaard M, Keystone EC, Florentinus S, Liu S, van der Heijde D. Analysis of integrated radiographic data from two long-term, open-label extension studies of adalimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):180-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22426.

    PubMed 25073879
  • Keystone EC, Haraoui B, Guerette B, Mozaffarian N, Liu S, Kavanaugh A. Clinical, functional, and radiographic implications of time to treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a posthoc analysis of the PREMIER study. J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):235-43. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121468. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

    PubMed 24293583
  • Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Florentinus S, Arulmani U, Liu S, Kupper H, Kavanaugh A. Longterm effect of delaying combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in patients with aggressive early rheumatoid arthritis: 10-year efficacy and safety of adalimumab from the randomized controlled PREMIER trial with open-label extension. J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):5-14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130543. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

    PubMed 24241487
  • Smolen JS, van der Heijde DM, Keystone EC, van Vollenhoven RF, Goldring MB, Guerette B, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Liu S, Landewe RB. Association of joint space narrowing with impairment of physical function and work ability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: protection beyond disease control by adalimumab plus methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1156-62. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201620. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

    PubMed 22915617
  • Strand V, Rentz AM, Cifaldi MA, Chen N, Roy S, Revicki D. Health-related quality of life outcomes of adalimumab for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized multicenter study. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):63-72. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101161. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

    PubMed 22045836

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 123 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 123 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, Spain and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline and 52 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00195663, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in