AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyIWPS-RNCT00196014

Individual Workload Perception Scale - Revised (IWPS-R)

An observational study of Healthy, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to validate the psychometrics of the Individual Workload Perception Scale (IWPS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
How many people
12,000 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2001to Oct 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: LPNS and Registered Nurses

Who may be able to join

  • Nurses

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Tool to Measure a Nurse's Individual Perception of Workload

The purpose of this study is to validate the psychometrics of the Individual Workload Perception Scale (IWPS).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to validate the psychometrics of the Individual Workload Perception Scale (IWPS) designed to measure the perception of individual workloads of inpatient registered nurses.

Conditions
Healthy
Keywords
Registered Nurses, Workload, Clinical staff nurses that are currently working

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2001
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
12,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00196014
Sponsor's protocol ID
1989
Acronym
IWPS-R
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
12 Sep 2005
Last updated
16 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cox KS, Anderson SC, Teasley SL, Sexton KA, Carroll CA. Nurses' work environment perceptions when employed in states with and without mandatory staffing ratios and/or mandatory staffing plans. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2005 Aug;6(3):191-7. doi: 10.1177/1527154405279091.

    PubMed 16443974
  • Lacey SR, Teasley SL, Henion JS, Cox KS, Bonura A, Brown J. Enhancing the work environment of staff nurses using targeted interventions of support. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):336-40. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000323942.04888.36.

    PubMed 18690124
  • Lacey SR, Teasley SL, Cox KS. Differences between pediatric registered nurses' perception of organizational support, intent to stay, workload, and overall satisfaction, and years employed as a nurse in magnet and non-magnet pediatric hospitals: implications for administrators. Nurs Adm Q. 2009 Jan-Mar;33(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000343342.24925.0c.

    PubMed 19092517
  • Cox KS, Teasley SL, Zeller RA, Lacey SR, Parsons L, Carroll CA, Ward-Smith P. Know staff's "intent to stay". Nurs Manage. 2006 Jan;37(1):13-5. doi: 10.1097/00006247-200601000-00004. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16395045
  • Cox KS, Teasley SL, Lacey SR, Carroll CA, Sexton KA. Work environment perceptions of pediatric nurses. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Feb;22(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2006.05.005.

    PubMed 17234494
  • Teasley SL, Sexton KA, Carroll CA, Cox KS, Riley M, Ferriell K. Improving work environment perceptions for nurses employed in a rural setting. J Rural Health. 2007 Spring;23(2):179-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00087.x.

    PubMed 17397376
  • Lacey SR, Cox KS, Lorfing KC, Teasley SL, Carroll CA, Sexton K. Nursing support, workload, and intent to stay in Magnet, Magnet-aspiring, and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2007 Apr;37(4):199-205. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000266839.61931.b6.

    PubMed 17415107
  • Sexton KA, Hunt CE, Cox KS, Teasley SL, Carroll CA. Differentiating the workplace needs of nurses by academic preparation and years in nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(2):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.021.

    PubMed 18358445

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Healthy, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00196014, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in