Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic LeukemiaPhase 4NCT00196768
Treatment Protocol for Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) With Arsenic
A Phase 4 study testing Arsenic trioxide and Trisenox in people with Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, run by German AML Cooperative Group at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Summary Acute promyelocytic leukemia is defined by a characteristic morphology (AML FAB M3/M3v), by the specific translocation t(15;17) and its molecular correlates (PML/RARa and RARa/PML). Thereby it can be separated from all other forms of acute leukemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Arsenic trioxide and Trisenox
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients in first or subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL
- Persistence of a positive PCR or no hematological complete remission (CR) after first line therapy
- No complete hematological remission after first line therapy
- Age over 18 years
- No upper age limit
- Informed consent of the patient
Who cannot join
- Absolute QTc-interval prolonged over 460 msec before therapy (normal electrolytes, no other drugs prolonging the QT-interval)
- Heart failure New York Health Association grade III and IV
- Renal or hepatic failure World Health Organization grade >= III
- Pneumonia with hypoxemia
- Uncontrolled sepsis
- Pregnancy and lactation period
Show all 9Show fewer
- Secondary malignancy, which will have major influence on the prognosis
- Expected noncompliance
- No informed consent of the patient.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Eva Lengfelder, MD, PhD
Mannheim, 68305
Eva Lengfelder, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia With Arsenic Trioxide (Phase IV Study)
Summary
Acute promyelocytic leukemia is defined by a characteristic morphology (AML FAB M3/M3v), by the specific translocation t(15;17) and its molecular correlates (PML/RARa and RARa/PML). Thereby it can be separated from all other forms of acute leukemia.
Read more
By all-trans retinoic acid in combination with chemotherapy cure rates of 70 to 80% can be reached. On average, about 10% of patients still die in the early phase of the treatment and about 20 to 30% relapse. Molecular monitoring of the minimal residual disease (MRD) by qualitative nested RT-PCR and quantitative REAL-time PCR of PML/RARa allows to follow the individual kinetics of MRD and to identify patients with an imminent hematological relapse.
A standardized treatment for patients with relapsed APL has not yet been established. With arsenic trioxide (ATO) monotherapy remission rates over 80% were achieved and long-lasting molecular remissions are described. The drug was mostly well tolerated. ATO exerts a dose dependent dual effect on APL blasts, apoptosis in higher and partial differentiation in lower concentrations. ATO was also successfully administered before allogeneic and autologous transplantation. ATO is approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory APL in Europe and in the USA.
In the present protocol, ATO is given for remission induction:
- in patients with hematological or molecular first or subsequent relapse of APL and
- in patients who do not reach a hematological or molecular remission after first line therapy.
Induction therapy with ATO is the mandatory part of the protocol.
After remission induction, there are several options for postremission therapy. Factors which have influence on the treatment decision in the individual case are:
- the eligibility for allogeneic transplantation
- the eligibility for autologous transplantation
- the presence or absence of contraindications against intensive chemotherapy
- the PCR status after induction and during follow up (RT-PCR of PML/RARa, sensitivity 10-4)
A mandatory form of post-remission therapy is not defined in the protocol. Data and outcomes of any post-remission therapy should be documented in order to collect data of treatment after ATO.
The following stratification of post-remission therapy can be performed according to the decision of the treating physician:
Patients with a HLA-compatible donor who are suitable for allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be transplanted. In patients with a positive PCR one cycle of intensive chemotherapy (HAM) before transplantation should be considered and patients with a negative result are immediately transplanted without preceding chemotherapy. In patients who do not qualify for allogeneic, but for autologous transplantation, the intensity of the chemotherapy (Ara-C dose of the HAM cycle) is scheduled according to the PCR status after ATO and to the patient's age. In patients under 60 years, the recommended single Ara-C dose is scheduled to 3 g/m² in case of a positive PCR result and to 1 g/m² in case of a negative PCR result after ATO. In all patients aged over 60 years, the Ara-C dose should be uniformly reduced to 1 g/m² independent of the PCR status. Patients who are not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation (too old, no stem cells collected, PCR positive stem cell transplant, contraindications against intensive chemotherapy) receive three further cycles with ATO and ATRA. The group of patients not qualifying for autologous transplantation, but without contraindications against intensive chemotherapy should receive an age adapted HAM, whenever a positive PCR persists or reappears after the three maintenance cycles of ATO. A close monitoring of the PCR of PML/RARa after each treatment cycle is part of the protocol.
The main objective of the protocol is to take advantage of the expected low toxicity of ATO and to keep the part of chemotherapy as low as possible.
Read the detailed description
Synopsis
Title of study
Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with arsenic trioxide (ATO). A phase-IV study to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of ATO as well as the kinetics of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with first and subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL.
Study coordination: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Eva Lengfelder
Protocol committee: German AMLCG and German AML-Intergroup (open for other participating groups)
Study duration: Time of recruitment 3 years, individual follow up scheduled for 3 years
Objectives of the study
Primary objectives
Assessment of:
- the rate of hematological remission
- the rate of molecular remission
- the kinetics of the MRD of PML/RARa during and after ATO
Secondary objectives
Assessment of:
- the side effects of ATO
- percentage of transplantable patients in comparison to the historical results after chemotherapy
- the overall survival
- duration of the hematological and molecular remission Study characteristics: Open-label multicenter controlled phase-IV study Number of patients: 30 patients Inclusion criteria
- Patients in first or subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL
- Persistence of a positive PCR or no hematological CR after first line therapy
- No complete hematological remission after first line therapy
- Age over 18 years
- No upper age limit
- Informed consent of the patient Exclusion criteria
- Absolute QTc-interval prolonged over 460 msec before therapy (normal electrolytes, no other drugs prolonging the QT-interval )
- Heart failure NYHA grade III and IV
- Renal or hepatic failure WHO grade >= III
- Pneumonia with hypoxemia
- Uncontrolled sepsis
- Pregnancy and lactation period
- Secondary malignancy, which will have major influence on the prognosis
- Expected noncompliance
- No informed consent of the patient Diagnostic measures: Confirmation of relapse by RT-PCR of PML/RARa and by cytogenetics. Follow up PCRs with quantitative nested RT-PCR and qualitative REAL-time PCR of PML/RARa. Treatment plan Induction therapy:
- 3 cycles of ATO with the aim to induce a hematological or a molecular remission. Options for postremission therapy:
- Allogeneic transplantation (PBSCT) in suitable patients with a related or unrelated donor. The administration of chemotherapy preceding allogeneic transplantation is stratified according to the PCR status after ATO. Chemotherapy (HAM) should be considered in PCR positive patients according to the individual situation. No chemotherapy is given in PCR negative patients.
- Autologous PBSCT in patients without a donor qualifying for autologous transplantation. The intensity of chemotherapy (HAM with either 3 or 1 g/m²) is proposed according to the PCR status of PML/RARa (sensitivity 10-4) after ATO and to patient's age.
- 3 maintenance cycles of ATO. This is followed by HAM in patients with persistence or reappearance of a positive PCR. Patients not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation, but without contraindications against intensive chemotherapy. · 3 maintenance cycles of ATO in patients not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation (no suitable donor, too old, no stem cells collected, positive stem cell transplant) and with contraindications against intensive chemotherapy. Monitoring of MRD is mandatory after each ATO cycle and further treatment step. (Details of the treatment plan are shown in the overview of the study design, Paragraph 2.2). Criteria for evaluation The effectiveness of the therapy is assessed by the evaluation of the rate of hematological and molecular remission and of the duration of remission according to the commonly used definitions. The safety of the therapy is assessed by a close study monitoring using the criteria of toxicity according to WHO.
- Being tested
- Arsenic trioxide, Trisenox
- Keywords
- relapsed, acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arsenic trioxideDrug
TrisenoxDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the rate of hematological remission
the rate of molecular remission
the kinetics of the MRD of PML/RARa during and after ATO
Secondary outcomes (4)
the side effects of ATO
percentage of transplantable patients in comparison to the historical results after chemotherapy
the overall survival
duration of the hematological and molecular remission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- German AML Cooperative Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Eva Lengfelder, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, German AMLCG
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00196768
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 30052004
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2007
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Toft P, Olsen HT, Jorgensen HK, Strom T, Nibro HL, Oxlund J, Wian KA, Ytrebo LM, Kroken BA, Chew M. Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (NONSEDA Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:499. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-499.
PubMed 25528350
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia With Arsenic Trioxide (Phase IV Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00196768
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 30052004
- Keywords
- relapsed, acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- German AML Cooperative GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Study completion
- Dec 2010
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Summary
Acute promyelocytic leukemia is defined by a characteristic morphology (AML FAB M3/M3v), by the specific translocation t(15;17) and its molecular correlates (PML/RARa and RARa/PML). Thereby it can be separated from all other forms of acute leukemia.
By all-trans retinoic acid in combination with chemotherapy cure rates of 70 to 80% can be reached. On average, about 10% of patients still die in the early phase of the treatment and about 20 to 30% relapse. Molecular monitoring of the minimal residual disease (MRD) by qualitative nested RT-PCR and quantitative REAL-time PCR of PML/RARa allows to follow the individual kinetics of MRD and to identify patients with an imminent hematological relapse.
A standardized treatment for patients with relapsed APL has not yet been established. With arsenic trioxide (ATO) monotherapy remission rates over 80% were achieved and long-lasting molecular remissions are described. The drug was mostly well tolerated. ATO exerts a dose dependent dual effect on APL blasts, apoptosis in higher and partial differentiation in lower concentrations. ATO was also successfully administered before allogeneic and autologous transplantation. ATO is approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory APL in Europe and in the USA.
In the present protocol, ATO is given for remission induction:
- in patients with hematological or molecular first or subsequent relapse of APL and
- in patients who do not reach a hematological or molecular remission after first line therapy.
Induction therapy with ATO is the mandatory part of the protocol.
After remission induction, there are several options for postremission therapy. Factors which have influence on the treatment decision in the individual case are:
- the eligibility for allogeneic transplantation
- the eligibility for autologous transplantation
- the presence or absence of contraindications against intensive chemotherapy
- the PCR status after induction and during follow up (RT-PCR of PML/RARa, sensitivity 10-4)
A mandatory form of post-remission therapy is not defined in the protocol. Data and outcomes of any post-remission therapy should be documented in order to collect data of treatment after ATO.
The following stratification of post-remission therapy can be performed according to the decision of the treating physician:
Patients with a HLA-compatible donor who are suitable for allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be transplanted. In patients with a positive PCR one cycle of intensive chemotherapy (HAM) before transplantation should be considered and patients with a negative result are immediately transplanted without preceding chemotherapy. In patients who do not qualify for allogeneic, but for autologous transplantation, the intensity of the chemotherapy (Ara-C dose of the HAM cycle) is scheduled according to the PCR status after ATO and to the patient's age. In patients under 60 years, the recommended single Ara-C dose is scheduled to 3 g/m² in case of a positive PCR result and to 1 g/m² in case of a negative PCR result after ATO. In all patients aged over 60 years, the Ara-C dose should be uniformly reduced to 1 g/m² independent of the PCR status. Patients who are not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation (too old, no stem cells collected, PCR positive stem cell transplant, contraindications against intensive chemotherapy) receive three further cycles with ATO and ATRA. The group of patients not qualifying for autologous transplantation, but without contraindications against intensive chemotherapy should receive an age adapted HAM, whenever a positive PCR persists or reappears after the three maintenance cycles of ATO. A close monitoring of the PCR of PML/RARa after each treatment cycle is part of the protocol.
The main objective of the protocol is to take advantage of the expected low toxicity of ATO and to keep the part of chemotherapy as low as possible.
Detailed description
Synopsis
Title of study
Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with arsenic trioxide (ATO). A phase-IV study to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of ATO as well as the kinetics of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with first and subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL.
Study coordination: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Eva Lengfelder
Protocol committee: German AMLCG and German AML-Intergroup (open for other participating groups)
Study duration: Time of recruitment 3 years, individual follow up scheduled for 3 years
Objectives of the study
Primary objectives
Assessment of:
- the rate of hematological remission
- the rate of molecular remission
- the kinetics of the MRD of PML/RARa during and after ATO
Secondary objectives
Assessment of:
- the side effects of ATO
- percentage of transplantable patients in comparison to the historical results after chemotherapy
- the overall survival
- duration of the hematological and molecular remission Study characteristics: Open-label multicenter controlled phase-IV study Number of patients: 30 patients Inclusion criteria
- Patients in first or subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL
- Persistence of a positive PCR or no hematological CR after first line therapy
- No complete hematological remission after first line therapy
- Age over 18 years
- No upper age limit
- Informed consent of the patient Exclusion criteria
- Absolute QTc-interval prolonged over 460 msec before therapy (normal electrolytes, no other drugs prolonging the QT-interval )
- Heart failure NYHA grade III and IV
- Renal or hepatic failure WHO grade >= III
- Pneumonia with hypoxemia
- Uncontrolled sepsis
- Pregnancy and lactation period
- Secondary malignancy, which will have major influence on the prognosis
- Expected noncompliance
- No informed consent of the patient Diagnostic measures: Confirmation of relapse by RT-PCR of PML/RARa and by cytogenetics. Follow up PCRs with quantitative nested RT-PCR and qualitative REAL-time PCR of PML/RARa. Treatment plan Induction therapy:
- 3 cycles of ATO with the aim to induce a hematological or a molecular remission. Options for postremission therapy:
- Allogeneic transplantation (PBSCT) in suitable patients with a related or unrelated donor. The administration of chemotherapy preceding allogeneic transplantation is stratified according to the PCR status after ATO. Chemotherapy (HAM) should be considered in PCR positive patients according to the individual situation. No chemotherapy is given in PCR negative patients.
- Autologous PBSCT in patients without a donor qualifying for autologous transplantation. The intensity of chemotherapy (HAM with either 3 or 1 g/m²) is proposed according to the PCR status of PML/RARa (sensitivity 10-4) after ATO and to patient's age.
- 3 maintenance cycles of ATO. This is followed by HAM in patients with persistence or reappearance of a positive PCR. Patients not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation, but without contraindications against intensive chemotherapy. · 3 maintenance cycles of ATO in patients not eligible for allogeneic or autologous transplantation (no suitable donor, too old, no stem cells collected, positive stem cell transplant) and with contraindications against intensive chemotherapy. Monitoring of MRD is mandatory after each ATO cycle and further treatment step. (Details of the treatment plan are shown in the overview of the study design, Paragraph 2.2). Criteria for evaluation The effectiveness of the therapy is assessed by the evaluation of the rate of hematological and molecular remission and of the duration of remission according to the commonly used definitions. The safety of the therapy is assessed by a close study monitoring using the criteria of toxicity according to WHO.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients in first or subsequent hematological or molecular relapse of APL
- Persistence of a positive PCR or no hematological complete remission (CR) after first line therapy
- No complete hematological remission after first line therapy
- Age over 18 years
- No upper age limit
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Absolute QTc-interval prolonged over 460 msec before therapy (normal electrolytes, no other drugs prolonging the QT-interval)
- Heart failure New York Health Association grade III and IV
- Renal or hepatic failure World Health Organization grade >= III
- Pneumonia with hypoxemia
- Uncontrolled sepsis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenic trioxide | Drug | – |
| Trisenox | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
the rate of hematological remission
the rate of molecular remission
the kinetics of the MRD of PML/RARa during and after ATO
4 secondary outcomes
the side effects of ATO
percentage of transplantable patients in comparison to the historical results after chemotherapy
the overall survival
duration of the hematological and molecular remission
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2007.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25528350Toft P, Olsen HT, Jorgensen HK, Strom T, Nibro HL, Oxlund J, Wian KA, Ytrebo LM, Kroken BA, Chew M. Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (NONSEDA Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:499. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-499.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva Lengfelder, MD, PhD principal investigator
German AMLCG
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Arsenic trioxide and Trisenox in people with Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia and Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, run by German AML Cooperative Group at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eva Lengfelder, MD, PhD (0049 621 3834110, eva.lengfelder@med3.ma.uni-heidelberg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the rate of hematological remission. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00196768, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2007.