Esophageal CancerPhase 2NCT00201747
Sequentially Administered CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in Patients With Advanced Esophageal and Stomach Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in people with Esophageal Cancer and Esophagus Cancer, run by Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine the most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer, Esophagus Cancer, Cancer of Stomach
- What is being tested?
- CPT-11 and Mitomycin C
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2001to Feb 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must have pathologically confirmed \& measurable advanced esophageal or Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
- No prior chemotherapy
- Prior radiation allowed if <=20% of bone marrow was irradiated
- Target lesions must not be in radiation field.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequentially Administered CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in Patients With Advanced Esophageal and Stomach Cancer
To determine the most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Previous studies suggest that both irinotecan and Mytomycin C when administered alone have some efficacy against stomach cancer. Based on laboratory testing, researchers hypothesized that Mytomycin C may enhance the efficacy of irinotecan through an enzyme called Topoisomerase I. In addition, because Mytomycin C has severe side effects, combining these chemotherapy agents together may allow for lower dosages resulting in greater efficacy and reduced side effects. A recent study indicates that the combination of these drugs has promising anti-tumor activity against esophageal and stomach cancers. The current study builds on previous research to explore the most effective schedule for administering these drugs together.
Purpose: This study is evaluating the combination of irinotecan and Mytomycin C on two different treatment schedules in patients with advanced esophageal and stomach cancers. Characteristics of different genes will also be measured, along with genetic and molecular changes by comparing test results from the beginning and end of the study.
Treatment: Patients in this study will receive irinotecan and Mytomycin C in one of two treatment schedules. Both drugs will be administered in patients through an intravenous infusion. A computer will randomly assign patients to a treatment group. Group one will receive Mytomycin C on day 1 and irinotecan on days 2 and 9. Group two will receive Mytomycin C on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan on days 2 and 9. After day 9, patients in both groups will not be given any study drugs for almost three weeks to complete a four week cycle. Several tests and exams will be given throughout the study to closely monitor patients. Patients will continue receiving the study drugs until they experience disease growth or unacceptable side effects.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Esophagus Cancer, Cancer of Stomach, Stomach Cancer
- Being tested
- CPT-11, Mitomycin C
- Keywords
- Advanced
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPT-11Drug
CPT-11 will be administered intravenously on days 2 and 9 (24 hours after MMC, when the MMC is required) Two weeks of rest (beginning days 15 and 22) (drug free) will complete the cycle, with therapy planned to be resumed on day 29.
Mitomycin CDrug
MMC will be administered intravenously on day 1 (Arm A) and days 1 and 8 (Arm B)
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas
Measured: 2001-2010
Secondary outcomes (3)
Evaluate gene expression profile of NQ01, and Topo I genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue during therapy with MMC and CPT-11
Measured: 2001-2010
Evaluate the frequency of NQ01 gene mutations in patients with esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas and its association to prognosis and antitumor activity.
Measured: 2001-2010
Evaluate if pre- and/or post-treatment Topo I-, CE and NQ01-gene expression in fresh tumor specimens and adjacent tissue, are associated with antitumor efficacy or toxicity.
Measured: 2001-2010
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2001
- Primary completionOct 2006
- Study completionFeb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharmacia and Upjohn
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Miguel Villalona, MD, Principal investigator, Ohio State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00201747
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OSU-0151
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lustberg MB, Bekaii-Saab T, Young D, Otterson G, Burak W, Abbas A, McCracken-Bussa B, Lustberg ME, Villalona-Calero MA. Phase II randomized study of two regimens of sequentially administered mitomycin C and irinotecan in patients with unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):713-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d7776d.
PubMed 20354452
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequentially Administered CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in Patients With Advanced Esophageal and Stomach Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00201747
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSU-0151
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Esophagus Cancer, Cancer of Stomach, Stomach Cancer
- Keywords
- Advanced
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharmacia and Upjohn
- Study start
- Sep 2001
- Primary completion
- Oct 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine the most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas.
Detailed description
Rationale: Previous studies suggest that both irinotecan and Mytomycin C when administered alone have some efficacy against stomach cancer. Based on laboratory testing, researchers hypothesized that Mytomycin C may enhance the efficacy of irinotecan through an enzyme called Topoisomerase I. In addition, because Mytomycin C has severe side effects, combining these chemotherapy agents together may allow for lower dosages resulting in greater efficacy and reduced side effects. A recent study indicates that the combination of these drugs has promising anti-tumor activity against esophageal and stomach cancers. The current study builds on previous research to explore the most effective schedule for administering these drugs together.
Purpose: This study is evaluating the combination of irinotecan and Mytomycin C on two different treatment schedules in patients with advanced esophageal and stomach cancers. Characteristics of different genes will also be measured, along with genetic and molecular changes by comparing test results from the beginning and end of the study.
Treatment: Patients in this study will receive irinotecan and Mytomycin C in one of two treatment schedules. Both drugs will be administered in patients through an intravenous infusion. A computer will randomly assign patients to a treatment group. Group one will receive Mytomycin C on day 1 and irinotecan on days 2 and 9. Group two will receive Mytomycin C on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan on days 2 and 9. After day 9, patients in both groups will not be given any study drugs for almost three weeks to complete a four week cycle. Several tests and exams will be given throughout the study to closely monitor patients. Patients will continue receiving the study drugs until they experience disease growth or unacceptable side effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Must have pathologically confirmed \& measurable advanced esophageal or Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
- No prior chemotherapy
- Prior radiation allowed if <=20% of bone marrow was irradiated
- Target lesions must not be in radiation field.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPT-11CPT-11 will be administered intravenously on days 2 and 9 (24 hours after MMC, when the MMC is required) Two weeks of rest (beginning days 15 and 22) (drug free) will complete the cycle, with therapy planned to be resumed on day 29. | Drug | – |
| Mitomycin CMMC will be administered intravenously on day 1 (Arm A) and days 1 and 8 (Arm B) | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas
Time frame: 2001-2010
3 secondary outcomes
Evaluate gene expression profile of NQ01, and Topo I genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue during therapy with MMC and CPT-11
Time frame: 2001-2010
Evaluate the frequency of NQ01 gene mutations in patients with esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas and its association to prognosis and antitumor activity.
Time frame: 2001-2010
Evaluate if pre- and/or post-treatment Topo I-, CE and NQ01-gene expression in fresh tumor specimens and adjacent tissue, are associated with antitumor efficacy or toxicity.
Time frame: 2001-2010
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 20354452Lustberg MB, Bekaii-Saab T, Young D, Otterson G, Burak W, Abbas A, McCracken-Bussa B, Lustberg ME, Villalona-Calero MA. Phase II randomized study of two regimens of sequentially administered mitomycin C and irinotecan in patients with unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):713-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d7776d.
- JameslineLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Bispecific Antibody MCLA-158 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Colorectal Cancer
Recruiting
The Effectiveness of Structured Swallowing Exercise Therapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Assessment of Swallowing Function and Quality of Life
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Application of an AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
CR-002 in Adult Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) - Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M), Gastric/GEJ
RecruitingPhase 4
Intraoperative Imaging of Gastrointestinal Malignancies Using Pafolacianine (CYTALUX™)
Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Miguel Villalona, MD principal investigator
Ohio State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in people with Esophageal Cancer and Esophagus Cancer, run by Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Most efficacious of two combination regimens of sequential CPT-11 and MMC in patients with advanced and previously untreated esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas (time frame: 2001-2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00201747, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2017.