ThrombosisPhase 4NCT00203658
Assessment of Long-Term Out-of-Hospital Treatment of Patients With Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Using Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus LMWH Followed by Warfarin
A Phase 4 study testing Tinzaparin sodium in people with Thrombosis and Thromboembolism, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term out-of-hospital treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin sodium. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Thrombosis, Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis
- What is being tested?
- Tinzaparin sodium
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 1997to Oct 2000
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients having a first or recurrent episode of acute proximal vein thrombosis who are eligible for outpatient or home care during the initial therapy.
Who cannot join
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes entire out-of-hospital treatment
- Presence of familial bleeding diathesis or the presence of active bleeding contraindicating anticoagulant therapy
- Receiving therapeutic heparin for more than 48 hours or have already been on warfarin for more than 2 days for the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis
- Receiving long-term warfarin treatment
- Females who are pregnant
- Known allergy to heparin, warfarin sodium, or bisulfites
Show all 13Show fewer
- History of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia
- Severe malignant hypertension
- Hepatic encephalopathy
- Severe renal failure
- Inability to attend follow-up due to geographic inaccessibility
- Inability or refusal to give signed informed consent
- Mothers who are breast-feeding and who are unable to refuse to discontinue breast-feeding during study treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Thrombosis Research Unit, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
About this study
Official title: LITE Study, Appendix A (HOME-LITE), Amendment 6
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term out-of-hospital treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin sodium.
Read the detailed description
Two studies demonstrated that out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin given by twice daily subcutaneous injection without laboratory monitoring was as effective and as safe as continuous intravenous heparin given in-hospital. Innohep (tinzaparin) has been shown to be safe and effective for both the initial and long-term treatment of DVT. The Home LITE study compares long-term Innohep treatment to treatment with a combination of initial low-molecular-weight heparin followed by standard long-term warfarin therapy.
- Conditions
- Thrombosis, Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis
- Being tested
- Tinzaparin sodium
- Medical subject headings
- Thrombosis, Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tinzaparin sodiumDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism during initial treatment or during the 12 week follow-up period
death during initial treatment or during the 12 week follow-up period
safety endpoint for assessing harm was the occurrence of bleeding (all, major or minor) during the 12 week treatment interval
Secondary outcomes (2)
recurrent venous thromboembolism at 12 months
death at 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1997
- Study completionOct 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), LEO Pharma, Dupont Applied Biosciences
- Investigators
- Russell D Hull, MBBS, MSc, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00203658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2736-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2005
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2007
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F, Ockelford PA, Brandjes DP, van der Meer J, Gallus AS, Simonneau G, Chesterman CH, Prins MH. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):682-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341102.
PubMed 8594426Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Leclerc J, Anderson D, Weitz J, Ginsberg J, Turpie AG, Demers C, Kovacs M. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):677-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101.
PubMed 8594425Lancaster TR, Singer DE, Sheehan MA, Oertel LB, Maraventano SW, Hughes RA, Kistler JP. The impact of long-term warfarin therapy on quality of life. Evidence from a randomized trial. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Oct;151(10):1944-9.
PubMed 1929681Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74.
PubMed 7168798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- LITE Study, Appendix A (HOME-LITE), Amendment 6
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00203658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2736-2
- Conditions
- Thrombosis, Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), LEO Pharma, Dupont Applied Biosciences
- Study start
- Apr 1997
- Study completion
- Oct 2000
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term out-of-hospital treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin sodium.
Detailed description
Two studies demonstrated that out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin given by twice daily subcutaneous injection without laboratory monitoring was as effective and as safe as continuous intravenous heparin given in-hospital. Innohep (tinzaparin) has been shown to be safe and effective for both the initial and long-term treatment of DVT. The Home LITE study compares long-term Innohep treatment to treatment with a combination of initial low-molecular-weight heparin followed by standard long-term warfarin therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients having a first or recurrent episode of acute proximal vein thrombosis who are eligible for outpatient or home care during the initial therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes entire out-of-hospital treatment
- Presence of familial bleeding diathesis or the presence of active bleeding contraindicating anticoagulant therapy
- Receiving therapeutic heparin for more than 48 hours or have already been on warfarin for more than 2 days for the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis
- Receiving long-term warfarin treatment
- Females who are pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tinzaparin sodium | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism during initial treatment or during the 12 week follow-up period
death during initial treatment or during the 12 week follow-up period
safety endpoint for assessing harm was the occurrence of bleeding (all, major or minor) during the 12 week treatment interval
2 secondary outcomes
recurrent venous thromboembolism at 12 months
death at 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2007.
- Background: PubMed 8594426Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F, Ockelford PA, Brandjes DP, van der Meer J, Gallus AS, Simonneau G, Chesterman CH, Prins MH. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):682-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341102.
- Background: PubMed 8594425Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Leclerc J, Anderson D, Weitz J, Ginsberg J, Turpie AG, Demers C, Kovacs M. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):677-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101.
- Background: PubMed 1929681Lancaster TR, Singer DE, Sheehan MA, Oertel LB, Maraventano SW, Hughes RA, Kistler JP. The impact of long-term warfarin therapy on quality of life. Evidence from a randomized trial. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Oct;151(10):1944-9.
- Background: PubMed 7168798Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74.
Related trials for Thrombosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Long-Term Safety and Outcomes of Treating Pulmonary Embolism With the Indigo Aspiration System
Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingPhase 2
SBRT With Immunotherapy and Atezo-Bev in HCC With Major Portal Vein Thrombosis
HCC
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study Evaluating Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Device in Acute Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism (PE), Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricle Enlargement
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Russell D Hull, MBBS, MSc principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tinzaparin sodium in people with Thrombosis and Thromboembolism, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism during initial treatment or during the 12 week follow-up period. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00203658, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2007.