AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerPhase 3NCT00206609

The Role of Oxygen in the Management of Dyspnoea in Advanced Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Oxygen and air administration in people with Cancer, run by Bayside Health at 1 site in Australia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect that oxygen has when administered to patients complaining of shortness of breath, where the underlying cause of this symptom is advanced cancer. The study tests the hypothesis that oxygen improves shortness of breath more than air in this population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer
What is being tested?
Oxygen and air administration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
Nov 2000to Mar 2005
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who have dyspnoea mainly due to advanced cancer. Patients with a history of COAD will be eligible for participation in this study as long as the main mechanism of current dyspnoea is related to tumor.
  • intensity of dyspnoea of at least 3 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale at the time of treatment.
  • Regular Bronchodilators and corticosteroids and other adjuvant medications for dyspnoea will be allowed to continue during the study. Inhaled bronchodilator steriods may not be used during the study period.
  • Patients may be receiving regular oral or parenteral opioids and opioid dose must be stable for 24 hours.
  • Patients must have normal cognitive status defined as normal state of arousal and absence of obvious clinical findings of confusion, memory or concentration deficit according to Blessed Orientation Memory \& Concentration mental status examination (score<10).
  • Patients must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients must have no contraindications to oxygen.
  • Patients must sign written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have evidence of acute respiratory distress.
  • Patients who are currently oxygen dependent
  • Patients who refuse to participate or are deemed incapable of completing the research.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • The Alfred Hospital

    Prahran, Victoria, 3004

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-Blind Cross-Over Trial of the Effect of Oxygen on Dyspnoea in Patients With Advanced Cancer

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect that oxygen has when administered to patients complaining of shortness of breath, where the underlying cause of this symptom is advanced cancer. The study tests the hypothesis that oxygen improves shortness of breath more than air in this population. Both oxygen and air will be administered to patients in random order and in a blinded fashion, with patients asked to rate their shortness of breath before and after each gas. Finally patients will be asked which gas they prefer.

Read the detailed description

Dyspnoea is a devastating symptom in patients with advanced cancer. Management strategies are limited and include behavioural therapies such as relaxation, and pharmacological therapies such as opioids and anxiolytics. The latter are associated with problematic side effects in many patients. Inhalational oxygen is frequently administered but there are few studies in this population which define its role and benefits.

Main Aim: To compare patient preference for inhalational oxygen versus air for relief of dyspnoea.

Specific aims:

  1. To compare the patient preference for inhalational oxygen versus compressed air in the relief of dyspnoea.
  2. To compare the response to oxygen and air in improvement of dyspnoea in patients with advanced cancer.
  3. To compare the response to oxygen and air in improvement of dyspnoea in those patients with advanced cancer with documented hypoxia.
  4. To identify factors other than hypoxia which impact on the sensation of dyspnoea and its relief, when patients are administered oxygen and air.

Hypotheses

  1. Oxygen improves dyspnoea in patients with cancer more than compressed air.
  2. Patients with cancer who are hypoxic are more likely than those who are not hypoxic to have improvement of dyspnoea with oxygen administration.
  3. The cause of the dyspnoea may affect whether dyspnoea improves more with oxygen than with air.

Using a randomised, double blind, crossover study design, patients will be adminstered air and oxygen for 15 minutes and be asked to rate dyspnoea scores before and after each gas. Measures of oxygen saturation will be simultaneously measured, and finally the patient preferences for the gases will be sought at trial completion.

Conditions
Cancer
Being tested
Oxygen and air administration
Keywords
Cancer, palliative care, dyspnoea, oxygen
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Dyspnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oxygen and air administrationProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient preference for gas

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patient ratings of dyspnoea on visual analogue scales

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2000
  3. Study completionMar 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
50 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00206609
Sponsor's protocol ID
149/00
Status last verified
Sep 2005
First submitted
18 Sep 2005
Last updated
21 Sep 2005
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Oxygen and air administration in people with Cancer, run by Bayside Health at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient preference for gas. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2005.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in