EmphysemaPhase 2/3NCT00207337
Exhale (R) Stent for Emphysema
A Phase 2/3 study testing Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent in people with Emphysema, run by Broncus Technologies at 6 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Current treatment for emphysema is limited to measures that include inhaled oxygen, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Highly invasive procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation are also performed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Emphysema
- What is being tested?
- Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2004to May 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- High resolution computed tomography (CT) scan evidence of bilateral emphysema
- Residual volume (RV) ≥ 220% predicted.
- Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 133% of predicted value.
- Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) < 40% of predicted or FEV1 < 1 liter.
- Marked dyspnea, scoring ≥ 2 on the modified Medical Research Council scale of 0-4.
- Patient has undergone pulmonary rehabilitation of 16 - 20 sessions.
Who cannot join
- FEV1 > 20%
- Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) < 15% of predicted.
- Respiratory infection requiring > 3 hospitalizations in past year
- Inability to walk > 140 meters in 6 minutes
- Giant bulla > 1/3 of one lung's volume
- Previous lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or lobectomy.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 3 countries.
6 sites in 3 countries
Australia3 sites
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Burwood, 2134
The Alfred Hospital
Prahran, Victoria, 3181
The Prince Charles Hospital
Rode Road, Chermside, Queensland, 4032
Germany2 sites
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes
Homburg, Saarland, 66421
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Exhale(R) Drug-Eluting Stent System in Patients With Emphysema
Current treatment for emphysema is limited to measures that include inhaled oxygen, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Highly invasive procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation are also performed. Treatment using the Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic treatment that has the potential to reduce shortness of breath in emphysema patients. This study tests the safety and effects of Exhale DES in the treatment of patients with emphysema.
Read the detailed description
Emphysema affects an estimated 60 million people worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In its most basic terms, emphysema causes the destruction of lung parenchyma resulting in collateral ventilation from one part of the lung to another through the disrupted alveolar walls, to the point that gas transport from one part of the lung to another may exceed gas flow through the small airways. In other words, the gas can move freely about within the lung, but it cannot get out, which causes over inflation, or hyperinflation of the diseased lung. When the disease is far advanced, patients are afflicted with disabling dyspnea that progressively restricts their activities and eventually causes great suffering. The crippling effects of end-stage emphysema, including severe dyspnea and marked limitation of activities, relate in large measure to the dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs associated with the loss of elasticity, gas trapping and collapse of small airways. The progressive enlargement of the thorax and flattening of the diaphragm render inspiratory muscles inefficient, increase the work of breathing and contribute to a feeling of breathlessness. The major medical therapeutic modalities include bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drugs directed at decreasing airway resistance and antibiotics to combat infection. Pulmonary rehabilitation techniques and exercise training have proven of palliative benefit. In general, the results of medical treatment for advanced airway obstruction frequently result in a persistently anguished patient and frustrated physician. A system that could efficiently decompress emphysematous lungs with each breath would result in significant clinical benefit, including lessened dyspnea, decreased work of breathing, and increased exercise tolerance.
In addition to medical therapies, there are two surgical therapies available to emphysema sufferers: Lung transplantation and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS). In the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), LVRS was shown to be effective in a sub-set of emphysema patients, but it had the drawback of increased short-term mortality as compared to the medical control arm. This was likely due to the invasiveness of LVRS.
Lung transplantation is a widely accepted surgical treatment for emphysema; however it is an unrealistic option for most patients. The selection criteria are very stringent for acceptance to receive a donor lung(s). Lung transplantation carries a high long-term morbidity and mortality and is severely limited by the shortage of available donor lungs.
We seek to take advantage of collateral ventilation seen in advanced emphysema by creating passageways from the lung parenchyma to large airways, through which air can escape the lungs during exhalation. The Exhale therapeutic intervention should be applicable to the majority of emphysema patients who suffer from hyperinflation of their lungs. It would be desirable to have a therapeutic option that is both less invasive and more readily available to emphysema sufferers. We have been working on such a therapy and have begun to investigate it in the clinic.
- Conditions
- Emphysema
- Being tested
- Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent
- Keywords
- COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Emphysema, Minimally invasive
- Medical subject headings
- Emphysema, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exhale Drug-Eluting StentDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural and technical success - operatively
Decrease in residual volume > 300mL from baseline
Safety
Secondary outcomes (4)
Dyspnea scoring
Pulmonary function measures
Exercise tolerance
Quality of life measures
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2004
- Primary completionMay 2006
- Study completionMay 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EmphysemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Broncus Technologies
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Gregory I. Snell, MD, Principal investigator, The Alfred
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00207337
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0304-28
- Status last verified
- Jan 2008
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Exhale(R) Drug-Eluting Stent System in Patients With Emphysema
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00207337
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0304-28
- Conditions
- Emphysema
- Keywords
- COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Emphysema, Minimally invasive
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Broncus TechnologiesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2004
- Primary completion
- May 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Current treatment for emphysema is limited to measures that include inhaled oxygen, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Highly invasive procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation are also performed. Treatment using the Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic treatment that has the potential to reduce shortness of breath in emphysema patients. This study tests the safety and effects of Exhale DES in the treatment of patients with emphysema.
Detailed description
Emphysema affects an estimated 60 million people worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In its most basic terms, emphysema causes the destruction of lung parenchyma resulting in collateral ventilation from one part of the lung to another through the disrupted alveolar walls, to the point that gas transport from one part of the lung to another may exceed gas flow through the small airways. In other words, the gas can move freely about within the lung, but it cannot get out, which causes over inflation, or hyperinflation of the diseased lung. When the disease is far advanced, patients are afflicted with disabling dyspnea that progressively restricts their activities and eventually causes great suffering. The crippling effects of end-stage emphysema, including severe dyspnea and marked limitation of activities, relate in large measure to the dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs associated with the loss of elasticity, gas trapping and collapse of small airways. The progressive enlargement of the thorax and flattening of the diaphragm render inspiratory muscles inefficient, increase the work of breathing and contribute to a feeling of breathlessness. The major medical therapeutic modalities include bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drugs directed at decreasing airway resistance and antibiotics to combat infection. Pulmonary rehabilitation techniques and exercise training have proven of palliative benefit. In general, the results of medical treatment for advanced airway obstruction frequently result in a persistently anguished patient and frustrated physician. A system that could efficiently decompress emphysematous lungs with each breath would result in significant clinical benefit, including lessened dyspnea, decreased work of breathing, and increased exercise tolerance.
In addition to medical therapies, there are two surgical therapies available to emphysema sufferers: Lung transplantation and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS). In the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), LVRS was shown to be effective in a sub-set of emphysema patients, but it had the drawback of increased short-term mortality as compared to the medical control arm. This was likely due to the invasiveness of LVRS.
Lung transplantation is a widely accepted surgical treatment for emphysema; however it is an unrealistic option for most patients. The selection criteria are very stringent for acceptance to receive a donor lung(s). Lung transplantation carries a high long-term morbidity and mortality and is severely limited by the shortage of available donor lungs.
We seek to take advantage of collateral ventilation seen in advanced emphysema by creating passageways from the lung parenchyma to large airways, through which air can escape the lungs during exhalation. The Exhale therapeutic intervention should be applicable to the majority of emphysema patients who suffer from hyperinflation of their lungs. It would be desirable to have a therapeutic option that is both less invasive and more readily available to emphysema sufferers. We have been working on such a therapy and have begun to investigate it in the clinic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- High resolution computed tomography (CT) scan evidence of bilateral emphysema
- Residual volume (RV) ≥ 220% predicted.
- Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 133% of predicted value.
- Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) < 40% of predicted or FEV1 < 1 liter.
- Marked dyspnea, scoring ≥ 2 on the modified Medical Research Council scale of 0-4.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- FEV1 > 20%
- Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) < 15% of predicted.
- Respiratory infection requiring > 3 hospitalizations in past year
- Inability to walk > 140 meters in 6 minutes
- Giant bulla > 1/3 of one lung's volume
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Procedural and technical success - operatively
Decrease in residual volume > 300mL from baseline
Safety
4 secondary outcomes
Dyspnea scoring
Pulmonary function measures
Exercise tolerance
Quality of life measures
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2008.
- Broncus Technologies, Inc corporate web pageLink provided by the sponsor.
- American Lung AssociationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Emphysema
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Xenon MRI to Evaluate Changes to Lung Function Following Bronchoscopic Treatment of Air Trapping in Emphysema
Air Trapping, Emphysema
RecruitingPhase 4
Genetic Variation in IgG in Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
Alpha 1-Antitrypsin, COPD
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
AATD-Liver Scan Study
Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, AATD
RecruitingPhase 3
A Non-inferiority Pharmacokinetic and Safety/Tolerability Study of Two Different Doses of Weekly SC Alpha1-PI 15% Compared With Corresponding Standard IV Alpha1-PI in Participants With Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)
Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Genetic Factors in the Development of Lung Disease
Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregory I. Snell, MD principal investigator
The Alfred
6 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent in people with Emphysema, run by Broncus Technologies at 6 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Australia, Germany, Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural and technical success - operatively. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2008.