Kidney TransplantationPhase 3DICAMNCT00213590
Renal Function Evaluation After Reduction of Cyclosporine A Dose in Renal Transplant Patients
A Phase 3 study testing cyclosporine A in people with Kidney Transplantation and Primary Prevention, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation, Primary Prevention, Kidney Failure
- What is being tested?
- cyclosporine A
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 208 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Apr 2000to Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- first or second renal graft
- cadaveric renal graft
- second year of renal transplantation
- stable renal function
- moderate renal dysfunction risk
- bitherapy with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil
- corticosteroid withdrawal since 3 months at less
Who cannot join
- 2 or more acute rejection episodes
- PRA> 80%
- serum creatinine> 250µmol/L
- 24-hour proteinuria > 1g
- humoral rejection
- vasculitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Multicentric, Randomized, Opened Study to Evaluate Efficacy on Renal Function of an Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Cyclosporine A Dose Reduction in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil, From the Second Year of Renal Transplantation
The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients
Read the detailed description
Study population Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age and primary or secondary renal transplant recipients in their second year posttransplant with stable serum creatinine levels (i.e., < 20% variation for the previous 3 months). All patients must have received induction therapy, been corticosteroid-free for at least 3 months, and receiving combination maintenance therapy consisting of cyclosporine (trough level, 125 to 175 ng/mL) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, F. Hoffmann- La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) 2 g daily.
Patients at either low or high risk of graft dysfunction were ineligible; a majority of the participating centers maintained low immunological risk patients on cyclosporine alone and those with a high risk of graft dysfunction were usually maintained on corticosteroids. For this study, low risk was defined as the presence of the following: zero or one acute rejection episode with a return of renal function to previous levels after corticosteroid treatment, panel-reactive antibody titer <25%, serum creatinine level <125 µmol/L, age >25 years, and donor age <40 years. High risk was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: a serum creatinine level >250 µmol/L, proteinuria >1 g/day, panel-reactive antibody titer >80%, >1 episode of T-cell-mediated rejection or at least one episode of antibody-mediated rejection posttransplant, or the presence of vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus which usually were treated with corticosteroids.
Other exclusion criteria were evidence of systemic infection or malignancy within the previous 5 years (except adequately treated nonmetastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), leukocyte count <2.5x103/µL, hemoglobin <80 g/dL, platelet count <100x103/µL, severe intestinal disorders, pregnancy, breast feeding, current immunosuppressive treatment with drugs other than cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Women of childbearing age were required to use adequate contraception during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and for six weeks after its discontinuation.
Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment failure (failure to prevent kidney dysfunction) at 24 months, which was a composite of graft loss, histologically confirmed acute rejection or cyclosporine toxicity, or a > 15% increase in the mean serum creatinine level from the baseline assessment. The mean of the current and two previous serum creatinine levels was used to determine the level at baseline, the level at the nadir (the time of the lowest serum creatinine measurement),and the level at 2 years.
The secondary endpoints included the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline calculated using the four-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study; blood pressure, urinary protein, and lipid levels; severe adverse events such as infection requiring hospitalization, neoplasia, or lymphoma; and graft and patient survival.
Study Follow-up and Procedures Weight, blood pressure after a 10-minute rest, serum creatinine and glucose levels, a complete blood cell count, and urinary protein levels were measured, and the use of immunosuppressive, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs was recorded at baseline and every 2 months. Serum lipid levels were measured at baseline and every 6 months. Gynecologic and dermatologic examinations were performed at baseline and yearly. Adverse events were recorded.
Renal biopsies were performed when creatinine levels increased > 20% relative to the nadir or when proteinuria was >1 g/day. The nadir level was used as a reference point to obviate the risk of missing the diagnosis of rejection in the low-exposure arm; serum creatinine levels usually fell after the initiation of a low exposure regimen. Biopsies were classified using Banff 1997 criteria by four senior pathologists blinded to the clinical information. CNI-associated nephrotoxicity was graded mild, moderate, or severe according to the Banff 1997 chronicity rejection scores.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation, Primary Prevention, Kidney Failure
- Being tested
- cyclosporine A
- Medical subject headings
- Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cyclosporine ADrug
Also called cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral Novartis Basel Switzerland
The usual-exposure level was based on the mean area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h). In the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L and in the low-exposure group the target was 50% or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L. Ranges were asymmetrical for safety reasons, i.e., to prevent the occurrence of rejection in the low-exposure arm and nephrotoxicity in the usual-exposure arm.The AUC 0-12h was estimated using a Bayesian estimator and a three-point limited sampling strategy (0, 1, and 3 hours). A computer program was used to calculate the dose adjustment required to reach the therapeutic target. Doses were adjusted in increments of 25% to reach the target within 2 months. Cyclosporine AUC0-12h was determined every 2 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L |
| 2 | Experimental | the low-exposure group the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 50% usual target or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L Receives: Drug: cyclosporine A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
renal function at two years
Measured: every two months
Secondary outcomes (15)
proteinuria
Measured: every two months
hypertension
Measured: every two months
hemodialysis
Measured: at any time during the study period
nephrotoxicity
Measured: at any time during the study period
chronic renal dysfunction
Measured: at two years
biopsy proven late acute rejection
Measured: at any time during the study period
dyslipidemia
Measured: every six months
patient survival
Measured: at two years
graft survival
Measured: at two years
severe infection with hospitalisation
Measured: at any time during the study period
post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Measured: at any time during the study period
cutaneous carcinoma
Measured: every year
area under the concentration-time of cyclosporine A
Measured: every two months
area under the concentration-time of mycophenolate mofetil
Measured: at month 0 6 12 and 24
biodisponibility of mycophenolate mofetil after reduction of cyclosporine A exposure
Measured: at month 6 12 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2000
- Primary completionNov 2006
- Study completionNov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, RouenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 208 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Isabelle ETIENNE, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Rouen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00213590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1998/081/HP
- Acronym
- DICAM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2012
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicentric, Randomized, Opened Study to Evaluate Efficacy on Renal Function of an Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Cyclosporine A Dose Reduction in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil, From the Second Year of Renal Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00213590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DICAM / 1998/081/HP
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation, Primary Prevention, Kidney Failure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 208 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2000
- Primary completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients
Detailed description
Study population Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age and primary or secondary renal transplant recipients in their second year posttransplant with stable serum creatinine levels (i.e., < 20% variation for the previous 3 months). All patients must have received induction therapy, been corticosteroid-free for at least 3 months, and receiving combination maintenance therapy consisting of cyclosporine (trough level, 125 to 175 ng/mL) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, F. Hoffmann- La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) 2 g daily.
Patients at either low or high risk of graft dysfunction were ineligible; a majority of the participating centers maintained low immunological risk patients on cyclosporine alone and those with a high risk of graft dysfunction were usually maintained on corticosteroids. For this study, low risk was defined as the presence of the following: zero or one acute rejection episode with a return of renal function to previous levels after corticosteroid treatment, panel-reactive antibody titer <25%, serum creatinine level <125 µmol/L, age >25 years, and donor age <40 years. High risk was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: a serum creatinine level >250 µmol/L, proteinuria >1 g/day, panel-reactive antibody titer >80%, >1 episode of T-cell-mediated rejection or at least one episode of antibody-mediated rejection posttransplant, or the presence of vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus which usually were treated with corticosteroids.
Other exclusion criteria were evidence of systemic infection or malignancy within the previous 5 years (except adequately treated nonmetastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), leukocyte count <2.5x103/µL, hemoglobin <80 g/dL, platelet count <100x103/µL, severe intestinal disorders, pregnancy, breast feeding, current immunosuppressive treatment with drugs other than cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Women of childbearing age were required to use adequate contraception during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and for six weeks after its discontinuation.
Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment failure (failure to prevent kidney dysfunction) at 24 months, which was a composite of graft loss, histologically confirmed acute rejection or cyclosporine toxicity, or a > 15% increase in the mean serum creatinine level from the baseline assessment. The mean of the current and two previous serum creatinine levels was used to determine the level at baseline, the level at the nadir (the time of the lowest serum creatinine measurement),and the level at 2 years.
The secondary endpoints included the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline calculated using the four-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study; blood pressure, urinary protein, and lipid levels; severe adverse events such as infection requiring hospitalization, neoplasia, or lymphoma; and graft and patient survival.
Study Follow-up and Procedures Weight, blood pressure after a 10-minute rest, serum creatinine and glucose levels, a complete blood cell count, and urinary protein levels were measured, and the use of immunosuppressive, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs was recorded at baseline and every 2 months. Serum lipid levels were measured at baseline and every 6 months. Gynecologic and dermatologic examinations were performed at baseline and yearly. Adverse events were recorded.
Renal biopsies were performed when creatinine levels increased > 20% relative to the nadir or when proteinuria was >1 g/day. The nadir level was used as a reference point to obviate the risk of missing the diagnosis of rejection in the low-exposure arm; serum creatinine levels usually fell after the initiation of a low exposure regimen. Biopsies were classified using Banff 1997 criteria by four senior pathologists blinded to the clinical information. CNI-associated nephrotoxicity was graded mild, moderate, or severe according to the Banff 1997 chronicity rejection scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | –the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: cyclosporine Athe low-exposure group the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 50% usual target or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- first or second renal graft
- cadaveric renal graft
- second year of renal transplantation
- stable renal function
- moderate renal dysfunction risk
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 2 or more acute rejection episodes
- PRA> 80%
- serum creatinine> 250µmol/L
- 24-hour proteinuria > 1g
- humoral rejection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cyclosporine AAlso: cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral Novartis Basel SwitzerlandThe usual-exposure level was based on the mean area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h). In the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L and in the low-exposure group the target was 50% or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L. Ranges were asymmetrical for safety reasons, i.e., to prevent the occurrence of rejection in the low-exposure arm and nephrotoxicity in the usual-exposure arm.The AUC 0-12h was estimated using a Bayesian estimator and a three-point limited sampling strategy (0, 1, and 3 hours). A computer program was used to calculate the dose adjustment required to reach the therapeutic target. Doses were adjusted in increments of 25% to reach the target within 2 months. Cyclosporine AUC0-12h was determined every 2 months. | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
renal function at two years
Time frame: every two months
15 secondary outcomes
proteinuria
Time frame: every two months
hypertension
Time frame: every two months
hemodialysis
Time frame: at any time during the study period
nephrotoxicity
Time frame: at any time during the study period
chronic renal dysfunction
Time frame: at two years
biopsy proven late acute rejection
Time frame: at any time during the study period
dyslipidemia
Time frame: every six months
patient survival
Time frame: at two years
graft survival
Time frame: at two years
severe infection with hospitalisation
Time frame: at any time during the study period
post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Time frame: at any time during the study period
cutaneous carcinoma
Time frame: every year
area under the concentration-time of cyclosporine A
Time frame: every two months
area under the concentration-time of mycophenolate mofetil
Time frame: at month 0 6 12 and 24
biodisponibility of mycophenolate mofetil after reduction of cyclosporine A exposure
Time frame: at month 6 12 and 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Isabelle ETIENNE, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Rouen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cyclosporine A in people with Kidney Transplantation and Primary Prevention, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
renal function at two years (time frame: every two months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.