AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationPhase 3DICAMNCT00213590

Renal Function Evaluation After Reduction of Cyclosporine A Dose in Renal Transplant Patients

A Phase 3 study testing cyclosporine A in people with Kidney Transplantation and Primary Prevention, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
cyclosporine A
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
208 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2000to Nov 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • first or second renal graft
  • cadaveric renal graft
  • second year of renal transplantation
  • stable renal function
  • moderate renal dysfunction risk
  • bitherapy with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil
  • corticosteroid withdrawal since 3 months at less

Who cannot join

  • 2 or more acute rejection episodes
  • PRA> 80%
  • serum creatinine> 250µmol/L
  • 24-hour proteinuria > 1g
  • humoral rejection
  • vasculitis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de ROUEN

    Rouen, 76031

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Multicentric, Randomized, Opened Study to Evaluate Efficacy on Renal Function of an Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Cyclosporine A Dose Reduction in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil, From the Second Year of Renal Transplantation

The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients

Read the detailed description

Study population Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age and primary or secondary renal transplant recipients in their second year posttransplant with stable serum creatinine levels (i.e., < 20% variation for the previous 3 months). All patients must have received induction therapy, been corticosteroid-free for at least 3 months, and receiving combination maintenance therapy consisting of cyclosporine (trough level, 125 to 175 ng/mL) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, F. Hoffmann- La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) 2 g daily.

Patients at either low or high risk of graft dysfunction were ineligible; a majority of the participating centers maintained low immunological risk patients on cyclosporine alone and those with a high risk of graft dysfunction were usually maintained on corticosteroids. For this study, low risk was defined as the presence of the following: zero or one acute rejection episode with a return of renal function to previous levels after corticosteroid treatment, panel-reactive antibody titer <25%, serum creatinine level <125 µmol/L, age >25 years, and donor age <40 years. High risk was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: a serum creatinine level >250 µmol/L, proteinuria >1 g/day, panel-reactive antibody titer >80%, >1 episode of T-cell-mediated rejection or at least one episode of antibody-mediated rejection posttransplant, or the presence of vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus which usually were treated with corticosteroids.

Other exclusion criteria were evidence of systemic infection or malignancy within the previous 5 years (except adequately treated nonmetastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), leukocyte count <2.5x103/µL, hemoglobin <80 g/dL, platelet count <100x103/µL, severe intestinal disorders, pregnancy, breast feeding, current immunosuppressive treatment with drugs other than cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Women of childbearing age were required to use adequate contraception during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and for six weeks after its discontinuation.

Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment failure (failure to prevent kidney dysfunction) at 24 months, which was a composite of graft loss, histologically confirmed acute rejection or cyclosporine toxicity, or a > 15% increase in the mean serum creatinine level from the baseline assessment. The mean of the current and two previous serum creatinine levels was used to determine the level at baseline, the level at the nadir (the time of the lowest serum creatinine measurement),and the level at 2 years.

The secondary endpoints included the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline calculated using the four-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study; blood pressure, urinary protein, and lipid levels; severe adverse events such as infection requiring hospitalization, neoplasia, or lymphoma; and graft and patient survival.

Study Follow-up and Procedures Weight, blood pressure after a 10-minute rest, serum creatinine and glucose levels, a complete blood cell count, and urinary protein levels were measured, and the use of immunosuppressive, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs was recorded at baseline and every 2 months. Serum lipid levels were measured at baseline and every 6 months. Gynecologic and dermatologic examinations were performed at baseline and yearly. Adverse events were recorded.

Renal biopsies were performed when creatinine levels increased > 20% relative to the nadir or when proteinuria was >1 g/day. The nadir level was used as a reference point to obviate the risk of missing the diagnosis of rejection in the low-exposure arm; serum creatinine levels usually fell after the initiation of a low exposure regimen. Biopsies were classified using Banff 1997 criteria by four senior pathologists blinded to the clinical information. CNI-associated nephrotoxicity was graded mild, moderate, or severe according to the Banff 1997 chronicity rejection scores.

Being tested
cyclosporine A
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cyclosporine ADrug

    Also called cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral Novartis Basel Switzerland

    The usual-exposure level was based on the mean area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h). In the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L and in the low-exposure group the target was 50% or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L. Ranges were asymmetrical for safety reasons, i.e., to prevent the occurrence of rejection in the low-exposure arm and nephrotoxicity in the usual-exposure arm.The AUC 0-12h was estimated using a Bayesian estimator and a three-point limited sampling strategy (0, 1, and 3 hours). A computer program was used to calculate the dose adjustment required to reach the therapeutic target. Doses were adjusted in increments of 25% to reach the target within 2 months. Cyclosporine AUC0-12h was determined every 2 months.

Study groups in NCT00213590
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1No interventionthe usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L
2Experimentalthe low-exposure group the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 50% usual target or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L
Receives: Drug: cyclosporine A

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. renal function at two years

    Measured: every two months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. proteinuria

    Measured: every two months

  2. hypertension

    Measured: every two months

  3. hemodialysis

    Measured: at any time during the study period

  4. nephrotoxicity

    Measured: at any time during the study period

  5. chronic renal dysfunction

    Measured: at two years

  6. biopsy proven late acute rejection

    Measured: at any time during the study period

  7. dyslipidemia

    Measured: every six months

  8. patient survival

    Measured: at two years

  9. graft survival

    Measured: at two years

  10. severe infection with hospitalisation

    Measured: at any time during the study period

  11. post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

    Measured: at any time during the study period

  12. cutaneous carcinoma

    Measured: every year

  13. area under the concentration-time of cyclosporine A

    Measured: every two months

  14. area under the concentration-time of mycophenolate mofetil

    Measured: at month 0 6 12 and 24

  15. biodisponibility of mycophenolate mofetil after reduction of cyclosporine A exposure

    Measured: at month 6 12 and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2000
  3. Primary completionNov 2006
  4. Study completionNov 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
208 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00213590
Sponsor's protocol ID
1998/081/HP
Acronym
DICAM
Status last verified
Feb 2012
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
4 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing cyclosporine A in people with Kidney Transplantation and Primary Prevention, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

renal function at two years (time frame: every two months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in