Atrial FibrillationNCT00215774
Flecainide-Short Long Study (Flec-SL)
A study testing Flecainide in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Atrial Fibrillation Network.
Trial summary
A randomized trial to test the hypothesis that short-term pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion is equally efficient to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation as standard long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Flecainide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 760 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented persistent atrial fibrillation
- Age of 18 years
- Documented oral anticoagulation (INR ≥ 2) for at least three weeks prior to inclusion, or exclusion of left atrial thrombi by trans-esophageal echocardiography
- Written informed consent of the patient
Who cannot join
- Current therapy with antiarrhythmic agents of class I and class III other than study medication flecainide. Such antiarrhythmic treatment must be stopped five half lives prior to enrollment. Five half lives correspond to 48 hours for almost all antiarrhythmic agents. For details regarding a specific agent, this information can be obtained through the internet at www.rote-liste.de or from the Fachinformation of the specific compound.
- Long-term therapy with amiodarone within the last 6 months prior to inclusion
- Symptomatic bradycardia or symptomatic sick sinus syndrome unless treated with a permanent pacemaker
- Symptomatic higher degree AV nodal block (grade II or III) unless treated with a permanent pacemaker
- Brugada syndrome
- Typical angina pectoris symptoms at rest or during exercise
Show all 21Show fewer
- Known untreated coronary artery disease with high-degree coronary stenosis (> 80% reduction in luminal diameter)
- Myocardial infarction within the last 3 months
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of more than 40%
- Creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min*1.73 m2 as determined by the Cockroft-Gould formula. The digital data management system will calculate this value for you during the inclusion process. For completeness of documentation, the formula is given below:
- Men: Creatinine clearance (ml/min) = (140 - age(years)) * body weight (kg) / (72 * serum creatinine level (mg/dl))
- Women: Value for men * 0,85
- Manifest hepatic insufficiency
- Hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism manifested clinically and in laboratory tests (TSH, T3, T4)
- Females who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Females of childbearing potential who are not using a scientifically accepted method of contraception
- Participation in a clinical trial within the last 30 days. Simultaneous participation in a registry (e.g. project AB1 of the AFNET) is permitted.
- Drug addiction or chronic alcohol abuse
- Legal incapacity, or other circumstances which would prevent the patient from understanding the aim, nature or extent of the clinical trial
- Evidence of an uncooperative attitude
- Prolongation of the QRS complex by more than 25% during flecainide treatment (measured as the difference in QRS duration between the baseline ECG and the ECG at cardioversion (34))
About this study
Official title: Targeted Pharmacological Reversal of Electrical Remodeling After Cardioversion.
A randomized trial to test the hypothesis that short-term pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion is equally efficient to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation as standard long-term antiarrhythmic therapy.
Read the detailed description
Details of the trial are described in a design paper published in the American Heart Journal (1).
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia with approximately one million affected patients in Germany. Current estimates suggest that the life-time risk for AF is 30% for men and slightly less for women at the age of 40 years. Due to demographic changes in the German population, the incidence and prevalence of AF is expected to double within the next 30 years. AF almost doubles mortality and causes important morbidity, mainly due to thrombo-embolic complications and stroke. In addition, the arrhythmia in itself reduces the chronotropic adaptation of the heart to increased work load and reduces cardiac output, especially in patients with heart failure or other cardiac disease. Restoration of sinus rhythm would reduce this burden of disease.
Acute termination of AF is almost always successful by external electrical cardioversion, especially using recently optimized techniques [biphasic shock wave forms, anterior-posterior electrode position, sintered steel electrode paddles. Maintaining sinus rhythm, however, is a more difficult task. Antiarrhythmic, ion channel-blocking drugs are effective in preventing a part of recurrent episodes of AF. Their long-term use, however, is limited by pro-arrhythmic side effects which are especially apparent during long-term therapy. AF initiates major changes in atrial electrophysiology per se which have been summarized as "electrical remodeling". The main consequence of these changes is a shortening of the atrial refractory period and action potential duration. Electrical remodeling maintains AF and is related to recurrence of AF after successful cardioversion. Electrical remodeling is reversed when sinus rhythm is maintained over approximately 4 weeks after successful cardioversion. Interestingly, the vast majority of AF recurrences occur during these first few weeks after cardioversion.
Conceptually, the initial phase of "reversal" of electrical remodeling can be separated from the long-term treatment aimed at modifying the underlying substrate of AF. Classical sodium- or potassium channel blocking antiarrhythmic drugs prolong the atrial action potential even in the fibrillating atrium and may therefore support or even anticipate reversal of electrical remodeling. Such pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling may only transiently be required, i.e. until electrical remodeling is in itself reversed by the natural restoration of normal atrial electrophysiology. Atrial action potential prolongation beyond normal values may indeed even be pro-arrhythmic. Therefore, it is tempting to treat the main electrophysiological end point of electrical remodeling, shortening of atrial action potential duration, by a limited short-term use of action potential-prolonging antiarrhythmic drugs.
Hypothesis: Targeted "pharmacological reversal" of atrial remodeling by short-term administration of action potential prolonging antiarrhythmic drugs (4 weeks therapy duration) is equally efficient and potentially safer to prevent recurrent AF after cardioversion when compared to current long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Trial design: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, parallel group multi-center investigator-initiated trial. The study medication is prescribed in an open fashion. We chose an open design in order to increase external validity ("relevance for clinical practice") of the results.
After successful cardioversion, patients will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:
Group A: No antiarrhythmic treatment
Group B: 4 weeks antiarrhythmic treatment with flecainide
Group C: Standard long term antiarrhythmic treatment (6 months) with flecainide
Group sizes were calculated to allow demonstration of non-inferiority of the two active treatment arms with a 10% boundary.
Flecainide was chosen for antiarrhythmic treatment in the Flec-SL trial because it is effective in the prevention of recurrent AF after cardioversion in the absence of major structural heart disease, has been safe as an outpatient treatment for recurrent AF, and prolongs the atrial action potential in patients with AF. In addition to its action potential-prolonging effect, flecainide induces post-repolarization refractoriness in the atria, an electrophysiological effect that may assist in the prevention of recurrent AF.
This is an investigator-initiated trial. Sponsor is the AFNET (www.kompetenznetz-vorhofflimmern.de).
Primary end point is the time to persistent AF as assessed by daily telemetric ECG recordings and confirmed by conventional Holter ECG recordings. Secondary end points include burden of AF, time to first symptomatic episode of AF, AF burden (number and duration of AF episodes), number of hospitalizations due to AF, time to termination of trial medication, number of serious adverse events including pro-arrhythmic events, and quality of life. Details of the secondary end points are indicated in the approved trial protocol.
All patients are systematically followed for 6 months by daily telemetric ECG recordings. All recordings are obtained using miniaturized ECG recorders which allow recording of a 60-second ECG and transtelephonic ECG transmission of the ECG via a toll-free number. All ECGs are received at the central analysis unit located at the Institute for Clinical Cardiovascular Research (IKKF) in Munich. Each telemetric ECG is analyzed within 24 hours of receipt at the analysis unit. The study physician is informed in case of any abnormal results within these 24 hours. Suspicion of persistent atrial fibrillation in the Tele-ECG prompts a local visit to record a Holte ECG. The Holter ECGs are centrally analyzed (blinded end point analysis). The systematic telemetric ECG monitoring allows for detection of all episodes of recurrent persistent AF.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Flecainide
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FlecainideDrug
Also called Flecainide in all its approved oral preparations
Flecainide 2 - 3 x 100 mg/d The main difference between the two active therapy groups is the duration of treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No antiarrhythmic treatment | No intervention | Control group |
| B-Flecainide treatment | Experimental | 4 weeks treatment with flecainide Receives: Drug: Flecainide |
| C-Flecainide treatment | Experimental | 6 months flecainide treatment Receives: Drug: Flecainide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
time to persistent atrial fibrillation as determined by daily telemetric ECG recordings and verified by Holter ECG recording
Measured: primary endpoint
Secondary outcomes (6)
time to first symptomatic episode of AF
Measured: end of trial
AF burden (number and duration of AF episodes)
Measured: end of trial
number of hospitalizations due to AF
Measured: end of trial
time to termination of trial medication
Measured: end of trial
number of serious adverse events including pro-arrhythmic events
Measured: end of trial
quality of life
Measured: end of trial
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionOct 2009
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Atrial Fibrillation Network
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Meda Pharmaceuticals, German Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paulus Kirchhof, Atrial Fibrillation Network
- Investigators
- P Kirchhof, Prof, Principal investigator, AFNET, Kompetenznetz VorhofflimmernG Breithardt, Prof, Principal investigator, AFNET, Kompetenznetz Vorhofflimmern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00215774
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AFNET-B11
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kirchhof P, Fetsch T, Hanrath P, Meinertz T, Steinbeck G, Lehmacher W, Breithardt G. Targeted pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion--rationale and design of the Flecainide Short-Long (Flec-SL) trial. Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):899. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.020.
PubMed 16290956Kirchhof P, Andresen D, Bosch R, Borggrefe M, Meinertz T, Parade U, Ravens U, Samol A, Steinbeck G, Treszl A, Wegscheider K, Breithardt G. Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):238-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60570-4. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
PubMed 22713626Apostolakis S, Haeusler KG, Oeff M, Treszl A, Andresen D, Borggrefe M, Lip GY, Meinertz T, Parade U, Samol A, Steinbeck G, Wegscheider K, Breithardt G, Kirchhof P. Low stroke risk after elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the Flec-SL trial. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3977-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.090. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
PubMed 23871349
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Targeted Pharmacological Reversal of Electrical Remodeling After Cardioversion.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00215774
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AFNET-B11
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Atrial Fibrillation NetworkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Meda Pharmaceuticals, German Research Foundation
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized trial to test the hypothesis that short-term pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion is equally efficient to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation as standard long-term antiarrhythmic therapy.
Detailed description
Details of the trial are described in a design paper published in the American Heart Journal (1).
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia with approximately one million affected patients in Germany. Current estimates suggest that the life-time risk for AF is 30% for men and slightly less for women at the age of 40 years. Due to demographic changes in the German population, the incidence and prevalence of AF is expected to double within the next 30 years. AF almost doubles mortality and causes important morbidity, mainly due to thrombo-embolic complications and stroke. In addition, the arrhythmia in itself reduces the chronotropic adaptation of the heart to increased work load and reduces cardiac output, especially in patients with heart failure or other cardiac disease. Restoration of sinus rhythm would reduce this burden of disease.
Acute termination of AF is almost always successful by external electrical cardioversion, especially using recently optimized techniques [biphasic shock wave forms, anterior-posterior electrode position, sintered steel electrode paddles. Maintaining sinus rhythm, however, is a more difficult task. Antiarrhythmic, ion channel-blocking drugs are effective in preventing a part of recurrent episodes of AF. Their long-term use, however, is limited by pro-arrhythmic side effects which are especially apparent during long-term therapy. AF initiates major changes in atrial electrophysiology per se which have been summarized as "electrical remodeling". The main consequence of these changes is a shortening of the atrial refractory period and action potential duration. Electrical remodeling maintains AF and is related to recurrence of AF after successful cardioversion. Electrical remodeling is reversed when sinus rhythm is maintained over approximately 4 weeks after successful cardioversion. Interestingly, the vast majority of AF recurrences occur during these first few weeks after cardioversion.
Conceptually, the initial phase of "reversal" of electrical remodeling can be separated from the long-term treatment aimed at modifying the underlying substrate of AF. Classical sodium- or potassium channel blocking antiarrhythmic drugs prolong the atrial action potential even in the fibrillating atrium and may therefore support or even anticipate reversal of electrical remodeling. Such pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling may only transiently be required, i.e. until electrical remodeling is in itself reversed by the natural restoration of normal atrial electrophysiology. Atrial action potential prolongation beyond normal values may indeed even be pro-arrhythmic. Therefore, it is tempting to treat the main electrophysiological end point of electrical remodeling, shortening of atrial action potential duration, by a limited short-term use of action potential-prolonging antiarrhythmic drugs.
Hypothesis: Targeted "pharmacological reversal" of atrial remodeling by short-term administration of action potential prolonging antiarrhythmic drugs (4 weeks therapy duration) is equally efficient and potentially safer to prevent recurrent AF after cardioversion when compared to current long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Trial design: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, parallel group multi-center investigator-initiated trial. The study medication is prescribed in an open fashion. We chose an open design in order to increase external validity ("relevance for clinical practice") of the results.
After successful cardioversion, patients will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:
Group A: No antiarrhythmic treatment
Group B: 4 weeks antiarrhythmic treatment with flecainide
Group C: Standard long term antiarrhythmic treatment (6 months) with flecainide
Group sizes were calculated to allow demonstration of non-inferiority of the two active treatment arms with a 10% boundary.
Flecainide was chosen for antiarrhythmic treatment in the Flec-SL trial because it is effective in the prevention of recurrent AF after cardioversion in the absence of major structural heart disease, has been safe as an outpatient treatment for recurrent AF, and prolongs the atrial action potential in patients with AF. In addition to its action potential-prolonging effect, flecainide induces post-repolarization refractoriness in the atria, an electrophysiological effect that may assist in the prevention of recurrent AF.
This is an investigator-initiated trial. Sponsor is the AFNET (www.kompetenznetz-vorhofflimmern.de).
Primary end point is the time to persistent AF as assessed by daily telemetric ECG recordings and confirmed by conventional Holter ECG recordings. Secondary end points include burden of AF, time to first symptomatic episode of AF, AF burden (number and duration of AF episodes), number of hospitalizations due to AF, time to termination of trial medication, number of serious adverse events including pro-arrhythmic events, and quality of life. Details of the secondary end points are indicated in the approved trial protocol.
All patients are systematically followed for 6 months by daily telemetric ECG recordings. All recordings are obtained using miniaturized ECG recorders which allow recording of a 60-second ECG and transtelephonic ECG transmission of the ECG via a toll-free number. All ECGs are received at the central analysis unit located at the Institute for Clinical Cardiovascular Research (IKKF) in Munich. Each telemetric ECG is analyzed within 24 hours of receipt at the analysis unit. The study physician is informed in case of any abnormal results within these 24 hours. Suspicion of persistent atrial fibrillation in the Tele-ECG prompts a local visit to record a Holte ECG. The Holter ECGs are centrally analyzed (blinded end point analysis). The systematic telemetric ECG monitoring allows for detection of all episodes of recurrent persistent AF.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No antiarrhythmic treatment | No intervention | –Control group |
| B-Flecainide treatment | Experimental | Drug: Flecainide4 weeks treatment with flecainide |
| C-Flecainide treatment | Experimental | Drug: Flecainide6 months flecainide treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Documented persistent atrial fibrillation
- Age of 18 years
- Documented oral anticoagulation (INR ≥ 2) for at least three weeks prior to inclusion, or exclusion of left atrial thrombi by trans-esophageal echocardiography
- Written informed consent of the patient
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Current therapy with antiarrhythmic agents of class I and class III other than study medication flecainide. Such antiarrhythmic treatment must be stopped five half lives prior to enrollment. Five half lives correspond to 48 hours for almost all antiarrhythmic agents. For details regarding a specific agent, this information can be obtained through the internet at www.rote-liste.de or from the Fachinformation of the specific compound.
- Long-term therapy with amiodarone within the last 6 months prior to inclusion
- Symptomatic bradycardia or symptomatic sick sinus syndrome unless treated with a permanent pacemaker
- Symptomatic higher degree AV nodal block (grade II or III) unless treated with a permanent pacemaker
- Brugada syndrome
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FlecainideAlso: Flecainide in all its approved oral preparationsFlecainide 2 - 3 x 100 mg/d The main difference between the two active therapy groups is the duration of treatment. | Drug | B-Flecainide treatment, C-Flecainide treatment |
Primary outcome
time to persistent atrial fibrillation as determined by daily telemetric ECG recordings and verified by Holter ECG recording
Time frame: primary endpoint
6 secondary outcomes
time to first symptomatic episode of AF
Time frame: end of trial
AF burden (number and duration of AF episodes)
Time frame: end of trial
number of hospitalizations due to AF
Time frame: end of trial
time to termination of trial medication
Time frame: end of trial
number of serious adverse events including pro-arrhythmic events
Time frame: end of trial
quality of life
Time frame: end of trial
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2012.
- Background: PubMed 16290956Kirchhof P, Fetsch T, Hanrath P, Meinertz T, Steinbeck G, Lehmacher W, Breithardt G. Targeted pharmacological reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion--rationale and design of the Flecainide Short-Long (Flec-SL) trial. Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):899. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.020.
- Results publication: PubMed 22713626Kirchhof P, Andresen D, Bosch R, Borggrefe M, Meinertz T, Parade U, Ravens U, Samol A, Steinbeck G, Treszl A, Wegscheider K, Breithardt G. Short-term versus long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (Flec-SL): a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment trial. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):238-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60570-4. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23871349Apostolakis S, Haeusler KG, Oeff M, Treszl A, Andresen D, Borggrefe M, Lip GY, Meinertz T, Parade U, Samol A, Steinbeck G, Wegscheider K, Breithardt G, Kirchhof P. Low stroke risk after elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the Flec-SL trial. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3977-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.090. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
- Kompetenznetz Vorhofflimmern (AFNET)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intracardiac Echocardiography Catheter Supply-Chain Reliability and Clinical Access Study
Cardiovascular Diseases, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Recruiting
Posterior Mitral Isthmus Line With Vein of Marshall Ethanolisation Compared With Anterior Mitral Lines in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruiting
Exclusion of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Emergency Department Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing CT to Assess for Pulmonary Embolus: A Feasibility Study
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Recruiting
Impact of Atrial Fibrosis Surface Area on the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke of Undetermined Origin: a Prospective Cardiac MRI Pilot Study.
Stroke, Implantation of an Implantable Cardiac Monitor
RecruitingObservational study
Globe Registry: Globe® Pulsed Field System Registry Study for Treating Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
P Kirchhof, Prof principal investigator
AFNET, Kompetenznetz Vorhofflimmern
G Breithardt, Prof principal investigator
AFNET, Kompetenznetz Vorhofflimmern
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Flecainide in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Atrial Fibrillation Network.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
time to persistent atrial fibrillation as determined by daily telemetric ECG recordings and verified by Holter ECG recording (time frame: primary endpoint). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00215774, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2012.