Coronary Artery DiseaseENDEAVOR IVNCT00217269
The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions
A study testing Coronary Artery Stenting in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Medtronic Vascular at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalence in safety and efficacy of the Endeavor Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System when compared to the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System for the treatment of single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.5-3.5… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Coronary Artery Stenting
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,548 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient has clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease, stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, or a positive functional study.
- The patient is an acceptable candidate for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), stenting, and emergent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before the procedure.
- The patient or patient's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) of the respective clinical site.
- The patient agrees to return to the same research facility for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Who cannot join
- A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or bivalirudin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, cobalt, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, polymer coatings (e.g., Phosphorylcholine or Translute), or a sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- History of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to drugs such as ABT-578, rapamycin, tacrolimus, everolimus, or any other analogue or derivative.
- History of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to paclitaxel or drugs in similar class.
- A platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm³ or > 700,000 cells/mm³, or a white blood cell (WBC) count < 3,000 cells/mm³.
- A serum creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dl within seven days prior to index procedure.
- Evidence of an acute MI within 72 hours of the intended index procedure (defined as: QWMI or non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQWMI) having CK enzymes > 2X the upper laboratory normal with the presence of a CK-MB elevated above the Institution's upper limit of normal).
Show all 16Show fewer
- Previous PCI of the target vessel within 9 months pre-procedure.
- Planned PCI of any vessel within 30 days post-procedure.
- During the index procedure, the target lesion requires treatment with a device other than PTCA prior to stent placement (including but not limited to, cutting balloon, any atherectomy, any laser, thrombectomy, etc.).
- History of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the prior 6 months.
- Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the prior 6 months.
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
- Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 12 months.
- Any previous or planned treatment of the target vessel with anti-restenotic therapies including, but not limited to brachytherapy.
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints; or requires coronary angiography, IVUS or other coronary artery imaging procedures.
- Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% at most recent evaluation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug (ABT-578) Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions
The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalence in safety and efficacy of the Endeavor Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System when compared to the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System for the treatment of single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.5-3.5 mm.
Read the detailed description
The ENDEAVOR IV Trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, two-arm, single-blind trial that will enroll a total of 1,548 patients at up to 80 sites in the US. The ENDEAVOR IV Trial will assess if the Endeavor stent is equivalent in safety and efficacy to the Taxus stent for the treatment of single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a RVD of 2.5-3.5 mm.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Coronary Artery Stenting
- Keywords
- Restenosis
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coronary Artery StentingDevice
Endeavor Drug eluting stent
Coronary Artery StentingDevice
Taxus Drug Eluting Stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Endeavor Drug Eluting Stent Receives: Device: Coronary Artery Stenting |
| 2 | Active comparator | Taxus Drug Eluting Stent Receives: Device: Coronary Artery Stenting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Target vessel failure (TVF) rate
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Angiographic parameters (in-stent and in-segment) including: percent diameter stenosis (%DS)
Measured: 8 months
Late lumen loss (in-segment late lumen loss is a powered secondary endpoint)
Measured: 9 months
Late loss index
Measured: 9 months
Angiographic binary restenosis (ABR) rate
Measured: 9 months
Minimum luminal diameter (MLD)
Measured: 9 months
Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate
Measured: 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months
Neointimal hyperplastic volume and percent volume obstruction (%VO) as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Measured: 8 months
Target site revascularization (TSR) rate and clinically-driven TSR rate
Measured: 9 months
Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate and clinically-driven TVR rate
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Primary completionMar 2007
- Study completionJul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,548 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Vascular
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Martin B. Leon, M.D., Principal investigator, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00217269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IP060
- Acronym
- ENDEAVOR IV
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kirtane AJ, Leon MB, Ball MW, Bajwa HS, Sketch MH Jr, Coleman PS, Stoler RC, Papadakos S, Cutlip DE, Mauri L, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. The "final" 5-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.123. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23523453Mauri L, Massaro JM, Jiang S, Meredith I, Wijns W, Fajadet J, Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Cutlip DE, Thompson KP. Long-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal coronary stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.021.
PubMed 21232717Leon MB, Nikolsky E, Cutlip DE, Mauri L, Liberman H, Wilson H, Patterson J, Moses J, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.008.
PubMed 20965463Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ, Cutlip DE, Nikolsky E, O'Shaughnessy C, Overlie PA, McLaurin BT, Solomon SL, Douglas JS Jr, Ball MW, Caputo RP, Jain A, Tolleson TR, Reen BM 3rd, Kirtane AJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Thompson K, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):543-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.067.
PubMed 20152559Remak E, Manson S, Hutton J, Brasseur P, Olivier E, Gershlick A. Cost-effectiveness of the Endeavor stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions updated with contemporary data. EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):826-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a138.
PubMed 20142198Leon MB, Kandzari DE, Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Mauri L, Cutlip DE, Nikolsky E, O'Shaughnessy C, Overlie PA, Kirtane AJ, McLaurin BT, Solomon SL, Douglas JS Jr, Popma JJ; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008.
PubMed 20129547Waseda K, Miyazawa A, Ako J, Hasegawa T, Tsujino I, Sakurai R, Yock PG, Honda Y, Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Fitzgerald PJ; ENDEAVOR IV Trial Investigators. Intravascular ultrasound results from the ENDEAVOR IV trial: randomized comparison between zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.015.
PubMed 19695548
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug (ABT-578) Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00217269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENDEAVOR IV / IP060
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Restenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,548 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic VascularIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Primary completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalence in safety and efficacy of the Endeavor Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System when compared to the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System for the treatment of single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.5-3.5 mm.
Detailed description
The ENDEAVOR IV Trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, two-arm, single-blind trial that will enroll a total of 1,548 patients at up to 80 sites in the US. The ENDEAVOR IV Trial will assess if the Endeavor stent is equivalent in safety and efficacy to the Taxus stent for the treatment of single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a RVD of 2.5-3.5 mm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: Coronary Artery StentingEndeavor Drug Eluting Stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: Coronary Artery StentingTaxus Drug Eluting Stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient has clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease, stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, or a positive functional study.
- The patient is an acceptable candidate for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), stenting, and emergent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before the procedure.
- The patient or patient's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) of the respective clinical site.
- The patient agrees to return to the same research facility for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or bivalirudin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, cobalt, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, polymer coatings (e.g., Phosphorylcholine or Translute), or a sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- History of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to drugs such as ABT-578, rapamycin, tacrolimus, everolimus, or any other analogue or derivative.
- History of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to paclitaxel or drugs in similar class.
- A platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm³ or > 700,000 cells/mm³, or a white blood cell (WBC) count < 3,000 cells/mm³.
- A serum creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dl within seven days prior to index procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary Artery StentingEndeavor Drug eluting stent | Device | 1 |
| Coronary Artery StentingTaxus Drug Eluting Stent | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
Target vessel failure (TVF) rate
Time frame: 9 months
9 secondary outcomes
Angiographic parameters (in-stent and in-segment) including: percent diameter stenosis (%DS)
Time frame: 8 months
Late lumen loss (in-segment late lumen loss is a powered secondary endpoint)
Time frame: 9 months
Late loss index
Time frame: 9 months
Angiographic binary restenosis (ABR) rate
Time frame: 9 months
Minimum luminal diameter (MLD)
Time frame: 9 months
Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate
Time frame: 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months
Neointimal hyperplastic volume and percent volume obstruction (%VO) as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Time frame: 8 months
Target site revascularization (TSR) rate and clinically-driven TSR rate
Time frame: 9 months
Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate and clinically-driven TVR rate
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23523453Kirtane AJ, Leon MB, Ball MW, Bajwa HS, Sketch MH Jr, Coleman PS, Stoler RC, Papadakos S, Cutlip DE, Mauri L, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. The "final" 5-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.123. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21232717Mauri L, Massaro JM, Jiang S, Meredith I, Wijns W, Fajadet J, Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Cutlip DE, Thompson KP. Long-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal coronary stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20965463Leon MB, Nikolsky E, Cutlip DE, Mauri L, Liberman H, Wilson H, Patterson J, Moses J, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20152559Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ, Cutlip DE, Nikolsky E, O'Shaughnessy C, Overlie PA, McLaurin BT, Solomon SL, Douglas JS Jr, Ball MW, Caputo RP, Jain A, Tolleson TR, Reen BM 3rd, Kirtane AJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Thompson K, Kandzari DE; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):543-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.067.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20142198Remak E, Manson S, Hutton J, Brasseur P, Olivier E, Gershlick A. Cost-effectiveness of the Endeavor stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions updated with contemporary data. EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):826-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a138.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20129547Leon MB, Kandzari DE, Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Mauri L, Cutlip DE, Nikolsky E, O'Shaughnessy C, Overlie PA, Kirtane AJ, McLaurin BT, Solomon SL, Douglas JS Jr, Popma JJ; ENDEAVOR IV Investigators. Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19695548Waseda K, Miyazawa A, Ako J, Hasegawa T, Tsujino I, Sakurai R, Yock PG, Honda Y, Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Fitzgerald PJ; ENDEAVOR IV Trial Investigators. Intravascular ultrasound results from the ENDEAVOR IV trial: randomized comparison between zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.015.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin B. Leon, M.D. principal investigator
Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Coronary Artery Stenting in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Medtronic Vascular at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Target vessel failure (TVF) rate (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00217269, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2012.