AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson's Disease With End of Dose Wearing OffPhase 4NCT00219284

Effects of Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone on Motor Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 4 study testing Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone in people with Parkinson's Disease With End of Dose Wearing Off, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess motor function and quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with end-of-dose wearing off, comparing immediate and delayed switch to carbidopa/levodopa and entacapone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
359 participants
Where
42 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jan 2005to Jul 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females 30-80 years of age (inclusive). Patients aged 81-85 years were eligible to participate if the principal investigator considered the patient to be in otherwise good health.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease exhibiting two of three symptoms (rigidity, resting tremor, bradykinesia).
  • All patients were required to have end-of dose wearing off (EODWO, re-emergence of PD symptoms at the end of at least two daily doses of levodopa during waking hours).
  • Taking regular doses of immediate release carbidopa/levodopa

Who cannot join

  • Unstable Parkinson's Disease requiring booster doses or treatment with as needed dose regimens of levodopa
  • Female subjects who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant or nursing an infant
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to this study.

Trial locations and contacts

42 sites in 2 countries.

42 sites in 2 countries

United States41 sites
  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Study site

    Bellevue, Ohio, 44811

  • Study site

    Bingham Farms, Michigan, 48025

  • Study site

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Study site

    Bradenton, Florida, 34205

  • Study site

    Canton, Ohio, 44718

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Study site

    Columbia, Missouri, 65201

  • Study site

    Commack, New York, 11725

  • Study site

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

  • Study site

    East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 18301

  • Study site

    Flossmoor, Illinois, 60402

  • Study site

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524

  • Study site

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308

  • Study site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Study site

    Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401

  • Study site

    Hollywood, Florida, 33021

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Study site

    Irvine, California, 92618

  • Study site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Study site

    Lenexa, Kansas, 66214

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Study site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53233

  • Study site

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Study site

    Palm Beach, Florida, 33418

  • Study site

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Study site

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • Study site

    Pompano Beach, Florida, 33060

  • Study site

    Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Study site

    Reseda, California, 91355

  • Study site

    Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450

  • Study site

    Southfield, Michigan, 48034

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Study site

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Study site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Study site

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606

  • Study site

    Tualatin, Oregon, 97602

  • Study site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

Other trials in United States

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Study site

    Carolina, 00983

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Study With Blinded Raters to Evaluate the Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Switch to Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone on Motor Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Parkinson's Disease With End-of-dose Wearing Off

To assess motor function and quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with end-of-dose wearing off, comparing immediate and delayed switch to carbidopa/levodopa and entacapone.

Read the detailed description

This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label study with blinded raters to evaluate the effects of immediate versus delayed switch to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone on motor function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose wearing off.

Being tested
Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, tremor
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease, Tremor

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Carbidopa/levodopa/entacaponeDrug

    Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone.

Study groups in NCT00219284
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate switchExperimentalPatients were switched the day after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch.
Receives: Drug: Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone
Delayed switchActive comparatorPatients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch.
Receives: Drug: Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 4

    Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 4

    Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  2. Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 8

    Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  3. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 8

    Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5-point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  4. Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 4

    The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  5. Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 8

    The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  6. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

    Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group)

  7. Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

    Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group)

  8. Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

    The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Primary completionJul 2008
  4. Study completionJul 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
359 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00219284
Sponsor's protocol ID
CELC200AUS11
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
30 Jun 2005
Last updated
30 Mar 2017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone in people with Parkinson's Disease With End of Dose Wearing Off, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 42 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 4 (time frame: Baseline to Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in