AzTrials
AzTrials

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeNCT00220545

Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ovarian Diathermy and Clomiphene Citrate in Women With Anovulatory PCOS

A study testing Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy (LOD) is currently offered to infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who fail to conceive on clomiphene citrate (CC). However, using LOD before CC may result in a better reproductive outcome since LOD may reduce risks associated with CC such as miscarriages and multiple… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 39 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2002to Mar 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 39 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 19 - 39
  • BMI < 32
  • Anovulatory Infertility > 1 year
  • Diagnostic criteria for
  • No previous treatment for induction of ovulation
  • Normal semen analysis of partner
  • Proven patency of at least one Fallopian tube

Who cannot join

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Contraindication to CC
  • Contraindication to general anaesthetic or laparoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2SF

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Laparoscopic Ovarian Diathermy With Clomiphene Citrate as a First Line Treatment of Anovulatory Infertility in Patients With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy (LOD) is currently offered to infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who fail to conceive on clomiphene citrate (CC). However, using LOD before CC may result in a better reproductive outcome since LOD may reduce risks associated with CC such as miscarriages and multiple pregnancies. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LOD and its potential value in improving the success rates in infertile women with PCOS. This study will recruit 72 women with PCOS suffering from infertility due to lack of ovulation from the infertility clinic. After initial assessment, patients will be given explanation about the study and will receive an information leaflet. They will then be randomized into two groups: Group1 (36 patients) will receive CC as per infertility clinic protocol to induce ovulation for up to 6 months. Group 2 (36 patients) will undergo laparoscopic ovarian diathermy under general anaesthetic. Blood samples will be taken from both groups before any treatment, shortly after treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment to measure various hormones. Patients will be contacted every month after treatment for follow up. The reproductive outcomes particularly the pregnancy and livebirth rates will be compared between the two groups.

Being tested
Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy
Keywords
Polycystic ovarY, Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy, Induction of ovulation, Clomiphene citrate
Medical subject headings
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic ovarian diathermyProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pregnancy rates

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Ovulation, Pregnancy outcome (especially miscarriage), Menstrual pattern, Endocrine changes, Side effects / complications rate

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2002
  3. Study completionMar 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00220545
Sponsor's protocol ID
STH5735 01/173
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
14 Sep 2005
Last updated
9 May 2024
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Amer SA, Li TC, Metwally M, Emarh M, Ledger WL. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic ovarian diathermy with clomiphene citrate as a first-line method of ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jan;24(1):219-25. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den325. Epub 2008 Sep 14.

    PubMed 18794162

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pregnancy rates. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00220545, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in