Kidney NeoplasmsPhase 2/3NCT00221728
Comparison Between Surgery and Radiofrequency for Treatment of Renal Tumors
A Phase 2/3 study testing Radiofrequency and conservative surgery in people with Kidney Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Radiofrequency and conservative surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Solid kidney tumor: diameter <= 40mm, maximum volume 32cc
- Intra-parenchymatous localization
- At least one of the following criteria:
- Patient of more than 70 years old
- Hereditary kidney cancer (von Hippel-Lindau Disease disease, hereditary tubulopapillary carcinoma...)
- Single kidney, with tumor difficult to reach to a conservative surgery (central-hilar or intra-parenchymatous tumour...)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Context of local recurrence after partial kidney surgery
- Patient with impaired renal function (renal clearance < 30 ml/min)
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Conservative surgery feasible in good technical and carcinological conditions
- Contra-indication to either treatment
- Kidney cancer metastases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Renal Tumors With Radiofrequency: Efficacy Evaluation in Comparison With Conservative Surgery (Multicentric Randomized Trial)
Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma. The purpose of the study is to compare, in patients at risk of renal insufficiency, a strategy based on surgical approach and a strategy based on RF approach. 180 patients from 9 centers will be randomized in two groups (surgical vs. RF, delivered either percutaneously or under laparoscopy). The proportion of patients with a local carcinologic efficacy at 5 years and the general and renal tolerance will be analysed and compared between both strategies.
Read the detailed description
Background. Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma.
Objectives. The main objective is to assess the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment) of the radiofrequency treatment. Secondary objectives are to assess 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy, predictive factors of technical success of RF procedures, and the general and renal tolerance 5 years after treatment.
Study design. Open label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentric clinical trial (9 centers).
Eligibility criteria. Patients with renal tumor in whom a surgical treatment may result in renal function impairment.
Intervention.
Experimental group: radiofrequency treatment, percutaneous or under laparoscopy, using RF 3000™ generator (Radiotherapeutics, Boston scientific) under a standardized heating protocol. A second procedure is allowed in case of residual tumoral tissue or tumor recurrence.
Control group: conservative kidney surgery.
Outcomes. The principal outcome is the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment, as assessed by tomodensitometry or MRI after injection). Secondary outcomes are 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy (local efficacy and no metastases), renal function, technical success of RF procedures (no residual tumor tissue 2 months after procedure) and tolerance.
Follow-up. Clinical, biological and imaging follow-ups are scheduled 2 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after the first treatment.
- Conditions
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Radiofrequency, conservative surgery
- Keywords
- Kidney Neoplasms, Surgery, Catheter Ablation, Randomized controlled trials, Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Neoplasms, Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RadiofrequencyDevice
conservative surgeryProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Carcinologic efficacy at the site of treatment,
Measured: at 5 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall carcinologic efficacy
Measured: at 5 years
Carcinologic efficacy and lack of adverse consequences on renal function
Measured: at 5 years
Local technical success
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Primary completionJan 2008
- Study completionJan 2008 (estimated)
Why it stopped: lack of patients
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Investigators
- Nicolas Grenier, Professor, Principal investigator, University Hospital, BordeauxArnaud Méjean, Professor, Principal investigator, Hôpital Necker, ParisPaul Perez, Dr, Study chair, University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00221728
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9359-03
- Other IDs
- 2003-006
- Status last verified
- May 2010
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 28 May 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Renal Tumors With Radiofrequency: Efficacy Evaluation in Comparison With Conservative Surgery (Multicentric Randomized Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00221728
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9359-03
- Conditions
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Kidney Neoplasms, Surgery, Catheter Ablation, Randomized controlled trials, Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: lack of patients
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma. The purpose of the study is to compare, in patients at risk of renal insufficiency, a strategy based on surgical approach and a strategy based on RF approach. 180 patients from 9 centers will be randomized in two groups (surgical vs. RF, delivered either percutaneously or under laparoscopy). The proportion of patients with a local carcinologic efficacy at 5 years and the general and renal tolerance will be analysed and compared between both strategies.
Detailed description
Background. Surgical treatment of multiple or recurrent renal tumors may be complicated by renal function impairment. Mini-invasive thermotherapy as radiofrequency (RF), induces necrosis of tumoral tissue while sparing normal renal parenchyma.
Objectives. The main objective is to assess the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment) of the radiofrequency treatment. Secondary objectives are to assess 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy, predictive factors of technical success of RF procedures, and the general and renal tolerance 5 years after treatment.
Study design. Open label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentric clinical trial (9 centers).
Eligibility criteria. Patients with renal tumor in whom a surgical treatment may result in renal function impairment.
Intervention.
Experimental group: radiofrequency treatment, percutaneous or under laparoscopy, using RF 3000™ generator (Radiotherapeutics, Boston scientific) under a standardized heating protocol. A second procedure is allowed in case of residual tumoral tissue or tumor recurrence.
Control group: conservative kidney surgery.
Outcomes. The principal outcome is the 5-year local carcinologic efficacy (no residual tumor tissue and no recurrence at the site of treatment, as assessed by tomodensitometry or MRI after injection). Secondary outcomes are 5-year overall carcinologic efficacy (local efficacy and no metastases), renal function, technical success of RF procedures (no residual tumor tissue 2 months after procedure) and tolerance.
Follow-up. Clinical, biological and imaging follow-ups are scheduled 2 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after the first treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Solid kidney tumor: diameter <= 40mm, maximum volume 32cc
- Intra-parenchymatous localization
- At least one of the following criteria:
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Conservative surgery feasible in good technical and carcinological conditions
- Contra-indication to either treatment
- Kidney cancer metastases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency | Device | – |
| conservative surgery | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Carcinologic efficacy at the site of treatment,
Time frame: at 5 years
3 secondary outcomes
Overall carcinologic efficacy
Time frame: at 5 years
Carcinologic efficacy and lack of adverse consequences on renal function
Time frame: at 5 years
Local technical success
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of patients). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2010.
Related trials for Kidney Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicolas Grenier, Professor principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Arnaud Méjean, Professor principal investigator
Hôpital Necker, Paris
Paul Perez, Dr study chair
University Hospital, Bordeaux
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Radiofrequency and conservative surgery in people with Kidney Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of patients). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Carcinologic efficacy at the site of treatment, (time frame: at 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2010.