Coronary Heart DiseasePhase 4ASCETNCT00222261
Aspirin Non-responsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial.
A Phase 4 study testing aspirin and clopidogrel in people with Coronary Heart Disease and Angina Pectoris, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
In the ASCET study, 1000 patients with documented coronary heart disease will be randomized to either continued treatment with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75mg/d. Clinical endpoints will be recorded for at least 2 years and related to the initial aspirin response, assessed by the PFA-100® method, to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Heart Disease, Angina Pectoris, Atherosclerosis
- What is being tested?
- aspirin and clopidogrel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,001 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Apr 2003to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable, symptomatic coronary heart disease, verified by coronary angiography, being treated with angioplasty/stent implantation (PCI) or not.
Who cannot join
- Indication for warfarin treatment.
- Indication for or contraindication to the study drugs.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Malignancy that may interfere with life expectancy.
- Psychiatric disease, mental retardation, dementia, drug abuse, alcoholism or conditions that can severely reduce compliance.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In the ASCET study, 1000 patients with documented coronary heart disease will be randomized to either continued treatment with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75mg/d. Clinical endpoints will be recorded for at least 2 years and related to the initial aspirin response, assessed by the PFA-100® method, to investigate whether aspirin non-responders have higher composite event rate than responders or whether Clopidogrel treatment in patients non-responsive to aspirin will reduce their risk of future clinical events. The clinical events are the composite of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, stroke or death.
Read the detailed description
Background: Aspirin is widely used as an antiplatelet drug in patients with coronary heart disease. Despite documented clinical benefit, many patients on aspirin still experience severe cardiovascular events. Several laboratory reports have shown lack of platelet inhibition in 5-40% of aspirin-treated patients, and the term aspirin resistance has been introduced. The clinical relevance of these laboratory findings is, however, still unknown. New antiplatelet drugs have been developed, and the adenosin diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitor clopidogrel has at least the same efficacy as aspirin with an acceptable safety profile. Laboratory methods for determination of platelet reactivity and treatment efficacy have been complicated and time consuming. New methodologies, like the PFA-100® system, have made such analyses more suitable for clinical use.
Design: In the ASCET study, 1000 patients with documented coronary heart disease will be randomized to either continued treatment with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75mg/d after initial determination of their platelet reactivity while on aspirin treatment. Clinical endpoints will be recorded for at least 2 years and related to the initial aspirin response.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2004 Dec;38(6):353-6.
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease, Angina Pectoris, Atherosclerosis
- Being tested
- aspirin, clopidogrel
- Keywords
- antiplatelet therapy, aspirin non-responders, aspirin resistance, clopidogrel, coronary heart disease, stable angina pectoris
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease, Angina Pectoris, Atherosclerosis, Angina, Stable
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aspirinDrug
Aspirin 160 mg once daily for two years
clopidogrelDrug
clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for two years
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1, aspirin | Active comparator | Aspirin 160 mg Receives: Drug: aspirin |
| 2, clopidogrel | Active comparator | Clopidogrel 75 mg Receives: Drug: clopidogrel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Measured: 2 years
Myocardial infarction
Measured: 2 years
Unstable angina with ECG changes or raised levels of cardiac markers not to be classified as a myocardial infarction
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Instent restenosis and/or thrombosis detected by coronary angiography.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2003
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,001 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ullevaal University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Norwegian Council for Cardiovascular Diseases., Ada and Hagbart Waages Humanitarian and Charity Foundation, Alf and Aagot Helgesens Research Foundation.
- Investigators
- Alf-Aage R. Pettersen, M.D., Principal investigator, Dept. of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, OsloHarald Arnesen, M.D. Ph.D., Study chair, Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Ullevaal University Hospital, OsloIngebjorg Seljeflot, Ph.D., Study director, Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Ullevaal University Hospital, OsloMichael Abdelnoor, Ph.D., Study director, Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Ullevaal University Hospital, OsloArne Westheim, M.D. Ph.D, Study director, Dept. of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00222261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ASCET
- Acronym
- ASCET
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):71-86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71.
PubMed 11786451Buchanan MR, Brister SJ. Individual variation in the effects of ASA on platelet function: implications for the use of ASA clinically. Can J Cardiol. 1995 Mar;11(3):221-7.
PubMed 7889440Grotemeyer KH. Effects of acetylsalicylic acid in stroke patients. Evidence of nonresponders in a subpopulation of treated patients. Thromb Res. 1991 Sep 15;63(6):587-93. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(91)90085-b.
PubMed 1780803Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Poggio ED, Gurm H, Welsh PA, Brooks L, Sapp SK, Topol EJ. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 1;88(3):230-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01631-9.
PubMed 11472699Helgason CM, Bolin KM, Hoff JA, Winkler SR, Mangat A, Tortorice KL, Brace LD. Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994 Dec;25(12):2331-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.12.2331.
PubMed 7974569Hurlen M, Seljeflot I, Arnesen H. The effect of different antithrombotic regimens on platelet aggregation after myocardial infarction. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1998;32(4):233-7. doi: 10.1080/14017439850140021.
PubMed 9802142De Gaetano G, Cerletti C. Aspirin resistance: a revival of platelet aggregation tests? J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Sep;1(9):2048-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00354.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 12941050Patrono C. Aspirin resistance: definition, mechanisms and clinical read-outs. J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Aug;1(8):1710-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00284.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 12911581Grotemeyer KH, Scharafinski HW, Husstedt IW. Two-year follow-up of aspirin responder and aspirin non responder. A pilot-study including 180 post-stroke patients. Thromb Res. 1993 Sep 1;71(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(93)90164-j.
PubMed 8236166Buchanan MR, Schwartz L, Bourassa M, Brister SJ, Peniston CM; BRAT Investigators. Results of the BRAT study--a pilot study investigating the possible significance of ASA nonresponsiveness on the benefits and risks of ASA on thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Can J Cardiol. 2000 Nov;16(11):1385-90.
PubMed 11109035Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Welsh PA, White J, Topol EJ. A prospective, blinded determination of the natural history of aspirin resistance among stable patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):961-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)03014-0.
PubMed 12651041CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet. 1996 Nov 16;348(9038):1329-39. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09457-3.
PubMed 8918275Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 26;347(13):969-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020496.
PubMed 12324552Andersen K, Hurlen M, Arnesen H, Seljeflot I. Aspirin non-responsiveness as measured by PFA-100 in patients with coronary artery disease. Thromb Res. 2002 Oct 1;108(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00405-x.
PubMed 12586130Pettersen AA, Seljeflot I, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H. Unstable angina, stroke, myocardial infarction and death in aspirin non-responders. A prospective, randomized trial. The ASCET (ASpirin non-responsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial) design. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2004 Dec;38(6):353-6. doi: 10.1080/14017430410024324.
PubMed 15804802
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aspirin Non-responsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00222261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASCET / ASCET
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease, Angina Pectoris, Atherosclerosis
- Keywords
- antiplatelet therapy, aspirin non-responders, aspirin resistance, clopidogrel, coronary heart disease, stable angina pectoris
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,001 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ullevaal University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Norwegian Council for Cardiovascular Diseases., Ada and Hagbart Waages Humanitarian and Charity Foundation, Alf and Aagot Helgesens Research Foundation.
- Study start
- Apr 2003
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the ASCET study, 1000 patients with documented coronary heart disease will be randomized to either continued treatment with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75mg/d. Clinical endpoints will be recorded for at least 2 years and related to the initial aspirin response, assessed by the PFA-100® method, to investigate whether aspirin non-responders have higher composite event rate than responders or whether Clopidogrel treatment in patients non-responsive to aspirin will reduce their risk of future clinical events. The clinical events are the composite of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, stroke or death.
Detailed description
Background: Aspirin is widely used as an antiplatelet drug in patients with coronary heart disease. Despite documented clinical benefit, many patients on aspirin still experience severe cardiovascular events. Several laboratory reports have shown lack of platelet inhibition in 5-40% of aspirin-treated patients, and the term aspirin resistance has been introduced. The clinical relevance of these laboratory findings is, however, still unknown. New antiplatelet drugs have been developed, and the adenosin diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitor clopidogrel has at least the same efficacy as aspirin with an acceptable safety profile. Laboratory methods for determination of platelet reactivity and treatment efficacy have been complicated and time consuming. New methodologies, like the PFA-100® system, have made such analyses more suitable for clinical use.
Design: In the ASCET study, 1000 patients with documented coronary heart disease will be randomized to either continued treatment with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75mg/d after initial determination of their platelet reactivity while on aspirin treatment. Clinical endpoints will be recorded for at least 2 years and related to the initial aspirin response.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2004 Dec;38(6):353-6.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1, aspirin | Active comparator | Drug: aspirinAspirin 160 mg |
| 2, clopidogrel | Active comparator | Drug: clopidogrelClopidogrel 75 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Stable, symptomatic coronary heart disease, verified by coronary angiography, being treated with angioplasty/stent implantation (PCI) or not.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Indication for warfarin treatment.
- Indication for or contraindication to the study drugs.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Malignancy that may interfere with life expectancy.
- Psychiatric disease, mental retardation, dementia, drug abuse, alcoholism or conditions that can severely reduce compliance.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aspirinAspirin 160 mg once daily for two years | Drug | 1, aspirin |
| clopidogrelclopidogrel 75 mg once daily for two years | Drug | 2, clopidogrel |
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 2 years
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 2 years
Unstable angina with ECG changes or raised levels of cardiac markers not to be classified as a myocardial infarction
Time frame: 2 years
1 secondary outcome
Instent restenosis and/or thrombosis detected by coronary angiography.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2011.
- Background: PubMed 11786451Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):71-86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71.
- Background: PubMed 7889440Buchanan MR, Brister SJ. Individual variation in the effects of ASA on platelet function: implications for the use of ASA clinically. Can J Cardiol. 1995 Mar;11(3):221-7.
- Background: PubMed 1780803Grotemeyer KH. Effects of acetylsalicylic acid in stroke patients. Evidence of nonresponders in a subpopulation of treated patients. Thromb Res. 1991 Sep 15;63(6):587-93. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(91)90085-b.
- Background: PubMed 11472699Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Poggio ED, Gurm H, Welsh PA, Brooks L, Sapp SK, Topol EJ. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 1;88(3):230-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01631-9.
- Background: PubMed 7974569Helgason CM, Bolin KM, Hoff JA, Winkler SR, Mangat A, Tortorice KL, Brace LD. Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994 Dec;25(12):2331-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.12.2331.
- Background: PubMed 9802142Hurlen M, Seljeflot I, Arnesen H. The effect of different antithrombotic regimens on platelet aggregation after myocardial infarction. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1998;32(4):233-7. doi: 10.1080/14017439850140021.
- Background: PubMed 12941050De Gaetano G, Cerletti C. Aspirin resistance: a revival of platelet aggregation tests? J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Sep;1(9):2048-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00354.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12911581Patrono C. Aspirin resistance: definition, mechanisms and clinical read-outs. J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Aug;1(8):1710-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00284.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8236166Grotemeyer KH, Scharafinski HW, Husstedt IW. Two-year follow-up of aspirin responder and aspirin non responder. A pilot-study including 180 post-stroke patients. Thromb Res. 1993 Sep 1;71(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(93)90164-j.
- Background: PubMed 11109035Buchanan MR, Schwartz L, Bourassa M, Brister SJ, Peniston CM; BRAT Investigators. Results of the BRAT study--a pilot study investigating the possible significance of ASA nonresponsiveness on the benefits and risks of ASA on thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Can J Cardiol. 2000 Nov;16(11):1385-90.
- Background: PubMed 12651041Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Welsh PA, White J, Topol EJ. A prospective, blinded determination of the natural history of aspirin resistance among stable patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):961-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)03014-0.
- Background: PubMed 8918275CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet. 1996 Nov 16;348(9038):1329-39. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09457-3.
Related trials for Coronary Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alf-Aage R. Pettersen, M.D. principal investigator
Dept. of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo
Harald Arnesen, M.D. Ph.D. study chair
Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo
Ingebjorg Seljeflot, Ph.D. study director
Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing aspirin and clopidogrel in people with Coronary Heart Disease and Angina Pectoris, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00222261, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2011.