Venous ThromboembolismPhase 2/3NCT00222677
Aspirin for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
A Phase 2/3 study testing aspirin in people with Venous Thromboembolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis, run by University Of Perugia at 15 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
To determine whether aspirin is more effective than placebo for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism when given for at least two years after the initial 6-12 month of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
- What is being tested?
- aspirin
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2004to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- first episode of symptomatic, objectively confirmed idiopathic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism;
- initial treatment with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (or effective alternative) followed by a vitamin K antagonist (target INR 2.0-3.0). All patients will receive 6 or 12 months of oral anticoagulant treatment. Patients initially treated with thrombolytic therapy who received warfarin therapy are eligible for inclusion.
Who cannot join
- permanent risk factors for venous thromboembolism: patients known to have antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (based on local laboratory criteria) or to have homozygous factor V Leiden or homozygous prothrombin G21210A or heterozygous factor V Leiden plus heterozygous prothrombin G21210A or antithrombin III deficiency; patients with active malignancy
- temporary risk factors for venous thromboembolism
- any recurrence of venous thromboembolism or bleeding episode during the established 6-month period of oral anticoagulant treatment
- allergy or intolerance of aspirin
- clear indication for aspirin or other anti-platelet therapy (e.g. clopidogrel, ticlopidine)
- clear indication for long-term anticoagulant therapy (e.g. recurrent idiopathic venous thromboembolism, prosthetic heart valve)
Show all 12Show fewer
- treatment with non-selective COX-1/2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- life expectancy less than 6 months
- active bleeding or at high risk of bleeding (gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 12 months; endoscopic diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease or ulcerative esophagitis within the past 6 months unless there is documented endoscopic evidence of healing; intracranial bleeding within the past year; known bleeding diathesis)
- anticipated non-adherence to study medications
- inability to attend follow up because of geographic inaccessibility
- failure to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 2 countries.
15 sites in 2 countries
Italy14 sites
Angiologia - Osp. Garibaldi - Piazza S. Maria del Gesù, 7
Catania, 95123
UO di Medicina 'Valentini' - PO 'Annunziata'
Cosenza, 87100
Angiologia - Ospedale di Faenza
Faenza
Divisione Medica II - Ospedale Galliera
Genova, 16128
Centro Emofilia e Trombosi - Ospedale Maggiore di Milano IRCCS
Milan
Divisione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna - Università di Milano-Bicocca
Monza, Milano
Clinica Medica II - Università di Padova
Padua
Unità malattie tromboemboliche ed emorragiche - Azienda universitaria Policlinico
Palermo
Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine - University of Perugia
Perugia
Medicina Interna I - Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Unità di Aterosclerosi e Trombosi -Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, 71013
Divisione Medica I, Ospedale Cà Foncello
Treviso, 31100
Medicina d'Urgenza - Ospedale Cattinara
Trieste, 34100
Department of Medicina Interna e Terapia Medica, Università dell'Insubria
Varese
Austria1 site
Department of Internal Medicine - University of Vienna
Vienna, A 1090
About this study
Official title: Aspirin After Six Months or One Year of Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism. The WARFASA Study.
To determine whether aspirin is more effective than placebo for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism when given for at least two years after the initial 6-12 month of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism
Read the detailed description
Background
Venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common disease with an annual incidence of 0.5-1.6 per 1000 in the general population.1-4 Standard treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous heparin or low molecular heparin relayed with oral anticoagulants is highly effective in preventing recurrent episodes of venous thromboembolism.5 However, oral anticoagulant therapy has a number of limitations including an increased risk of major bleeding and the need for laboratory monitoring to adjust dose. Because of these limitations, venous thromboembolism is usually treated with oral anticoagulants for a limited period of time. Anticoagulants are generally discontinued when the risks and inconvenience of remaining on treatment outweigh the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Indeed, recent studies showed that after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism remains high in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
Recently, four major randomized trials have evaluated extended-duration treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism. In each of these trials more than 90% of recurrences occurred after oral anticoagulants had been discontinued 6-9. The rate of recurrence after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants was similar in patients assigned long-term therapy compared with short-term therapy (about 15% in the 2-3 years after warfarin discontinuation) which indicates that although oral anticoagulants are highly effective to prevent recurrence, it have no impact on the natural history of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Taken together, these data suggest that effective therapy should be continued indefinitely in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism if recurrence is to be avoided. Indeed, once oral anticoagulants are discontinued, there are currently no established safe and effective alternatives to prevent recurrence in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. However, the long-term use of oral anticoagulants is not only inconvenient because of the need for close laboratory monitoring but also is constrained by an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal and intracranial bleeding. In randomized trials of extended-duration oral anticoagulants (target INR 2.0-3.0) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism,6-9 the annual incidence of intracranial bleeding was 0.3%, major bleeding 3%, and the case-fatality rate of major bleeding approximately 10%. In addition, 5-15% of patients experienced minor bleeding each year. These data highlight the need to identify simple, safe, effective, and widely applicable strategies for the long-term prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
About 3% of patients with venous thromboembolism experience an arterial cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, sudden otherwise unexplained death) in the 2-3 years after the first episode of venous thromboembolism10. The long-term use of oral anticoagulants could potentially prevent these adverse events. Barriers to the more widespread appropriate use of oral anticoagulants include physician concerns regarding the risk of bleeding, particularly in the elderly, as well as the need for close monitoring and regular blood tests to measure the INR. A simple, safe, effective, and widely applicable pharmacological approach is needed for the prevention of these events.
The clinical utility of aspirin in the management of venous thromboembolism is a matter of debate. The Pulmonary Embolism Prevention Study 11 demonstrated that 35 days of low-dose aspirin (160 mg daily) compared with placebo reduced the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, including fatal pulmonary embolism, by about one-third (RRR 36%, 95% CI: 19-50%, p=0.0003) in patients undergoing emergency surgery for hip fracture or elective joint arthroplasty. There was no excess of fatal or intracranial bleeding. In the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)12 2800 postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease were randomized to hormonal replacement therapy or placebo. A secondary analysis showed that the use of aspirin was independently associated with a 50% reduction (95% CI: 20-80%) in risk of venous thromboembolism during an average of 4.1 years of follow-up. Taken together, these data suggest that aspirin reduces the risk of a first episode of venous thromboembolism by about one-quarter (i.e., 25% risk reduction).
A systematic overview including more than 8000 patients from randomized trials on antiplatelet primary thromboprophylaxis suggested that antiplatelet therapy was effective to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in high risk patients (Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration).13 Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a relative risk reduction [RRR] of 39%; (p=0.00001) in the incidence of venous thromboembolism in high-risk medical patients or undergoing orthopedic or general surgery. There was no excess in cerebral or fatal bleeding.
The European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (ESPS 2)14 evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin, dipyridamole (extended-release preparation), or aspirin and dipyridamole, versus placebo, for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in 6,600 patients. Prespecified secondary analyses found that aspirin resulted in a 30% reduction in venous thromboembolism.
Bleeding, particularly within the gastrointestinal tract, is the only important side effect of low-dose aspirin therapy in patients that are not already known to be aspirin intolerant (e.g., allergy). Long term, low-dose aspirin therapy (i.e., 160 mg per day), is associated with about a two-fold increase in the risk of bleeding.15-17 This increase of bleeding is small in patients without known contraindications to aspirin. Evidences from randomized trials of aspirin in asymptomatic subjects, patients with vascular risk factors, or patients with a past history of vascular disease (more than 250,000 patient-years of follow-up), showed an absolute excess of major bleeding with aspirin from 0.3 to 1.7 episodes per 1000 patient-years, equivalent to an absolute risk of 1 event for every 1000 patients treated.15 Increasing doses of aspirin, even within the range of 100-300 mg per day, were associated with an increasing risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, with the lowest risk occurring in patients receiving 100 mg daily.15;18-19
In summary, aspirin could achieve a risk reduction of 30 to 40 episodes of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism for every 1000 patients treated, at a cost of 1 bleed requiring transfusion in high-risk patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Aspirin is simple to administer and does not require laboratory monitoring.
In the present study we propose to evaluate the use of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with previous idiopathic venous thromboembolism who have received initial 6-month treatment with oral anticoagulants.
- Being tested
- aspirin
- Keywords
- venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, antithrombotic agents
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Atherosclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aspirinDrug
100 mg daily
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recurrence of VTE and/or VTE related death
Measured: at least 24 months per patient
Secondary outcomes (1)
recurrent VTE+ death; cardiovascular events, bleeding events, critical ischemia of the lower limbs, mesenteric infarction, all cause mortality and newly diagnosed cancer
Measured: at least 24 months per patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2004
- Primary completionJan 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Venous ThromboembolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Of Perugia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cecilia Becattini, University Of Perugia
- Investigators
- Giancarlo Agnelli, MD, Study chair, Department of Internal Medicine - University of PerugiaCecilia Becattini, MD, Study director, Department of Internal Medicine - University of PerugiaPaolo Prandoni, PhD, Study director, University of Padova
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00222677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRU-UniPg-01-03
- Status last verified
- Aug 2011
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Flumignan CD, Nakano LC, Baptista-Silva JC, Flumignan RL. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 25;7(7):CD012369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012369.pub2.
PubMed 35876829Becattini C, Agnelli G, Schenone A, Eichinger S, Bucherini E, Silingardi M, Bianchi M, Moia M, Ageno W, Vandelli MR, Grandone E, Prandoni P; WARFASA Investigators. Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1959-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114238.
PubMed 22621626
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aspirin After Six Months or One Year of Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism. The WARFASA Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00222677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRU-UniPg-01-03
- Keywords
- venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, antithrombotic agents
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Of PerugiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2004
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether aspirin is more effective than placebo for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism when given for at least two years after the initial 6-12 month of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism
Detailed description
Background
Venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common disease with an annual incidence of 0.5-1.6 per 1000 in the general population.1-4 Standard treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous heparin or low molecular heparin relayed with oral anticoagulants is highly effective in preventing recurrent episodes of venous thromboembolism.5 However, oral anticoagulant therapy has a number of limitations including an increased risk of major bleeding and the need for laboratory monitoring to adjust dose. Because of these limitations, venous thromboembolism is usually treated with oral anticoagulants for a limited period of time. Anticoagulants are generally discontinued when the risks and inconvenience of remaining on treatment outweigh the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Indeed, recent studies showed that after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism remains high in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
Recently, four major randomized trials have evaluated extended-duration treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism. In each of these trials more than 90% of recurrences occurred after oral anticoagulants had been discontinued 6-9. The rate of recurrence after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants was similar in patients assigned long-term therapy compared with short-term therapy (about 15% in the 2-3 years after warfarin discontinuation) which indicates that although oral anticoagulants are highly effective to prevent recurrence, it have no impact on the natural history of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Taken together, these data suggest that effective therapy should be continued indefinitely in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism if recurrence is to be avoided. Indeed, once oral anticoagulants are discontinued, there are currently no established safe and effective alternatives to prevent recurrence in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. However, the long-term use of oral anticoagulants is not only inconvenient because of the need for close laboratory monitoring but also is constrained by an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal and intracranial bleeding. In randomized trials of extended-duration oral anticoagulants (target INR 2.0-3.0) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism,6-9 the annual incidence of intracranial bleeding was 0.3%, major bleeding 3%, and the case-fatality rate of major bleeding approximately 10%. In addition, 5-15% of patients experienced minor bleeding each year. These data highlight the need to identify simple, safe, effective, and widely applicable strategies for the long-term prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
About 3% of patients with venous thromboembolism experience an arterial cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, sudden otherwise unexplained death) in the 2-3 years after the first episode of venous thromboembolism10. The long-term use of oral anticoagulants could potentially prevent these adverse events. Barriers to the more widespread appropriate use of oral anticoagulants include physician concerns regarding the risk of bleeding, particularly in the elderly, as well as the need for close monitoring and regular blood tests to measure the INR. A simple, safe, effective, and widely applicable pharmacological approach is needed for the prevention of these events.
The clinical utility of aspirin in the management of venous thromboembolism is a matter of debate. The Pulmonary Embolism Prevention Study 11 demonstrated that 35 days of low-dose aspirin (160 mg daily) compared with placebo reduced the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, including fatal pulmonary embolism, by about one-third (RRR 36%, 95% CI: 19-50%, p=0.0003) in patients undergoing emergency surgery for hip fracture or elective joint arthroplasty. There was no excess of fatal or intracranial bleeding. In the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)12 2800 postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease were randomized to hormonal replacement therapy or placebo. A secondary analysis showed that the use of aspirin was independently associated with a 50% reduction (95% CI: 20-80%) in risk of venous thromboembolism during an average of 4.1 years of follow-up. Taken together, these data suggest that aspirin reduces the risk of a first episode of venous thromboembolism by about one-quarter (i.e., 25% risk reduction).
A systematic overview including more than 8000 patients from randomized trials on antiplatelet primary thromboprophylaxis suggested that antiplatelet therapy was effective to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in high risk patients (Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration).13 Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a relative risk reduction [RRR] of 39%; (p=0.00001) in the incidence of venous thromboembolism in high-risk medical patients or undergoing orthopedic or general surgery. There was no excess in cerebral or fatal bleeding.
The European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (ESPS 2)14 evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin, dipyridamole (extended-release preparation), or aspirin and dipyridamole, versus placebo, for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in 6,600 patients. Prespecified secondary analyses found that aspirin resulted in a 30% reduction in venous thromboembolism.
Bleeding, particularly within the gastrointestinal tract, is the only important side effect of low-dose aspirin therapy in patients that are not already known to be aspirin intolerant (e.g., allergy). Long term, low-dose aspirin therapy (i.e., 160 mg per day), is associated with about a two-fold increase in the risk of bleeding.15-17 This increase of bleeding is small in patients without known contraindications to aspirin. Evidences from randomized trials of aspirin in asymptomatic subjects, patients with vascular risk factors, or patients with a past history of vascular disease (more than 250,000 patient-years of follow-up), showed an absolute excess of major bleeding with aspirin from 0.3 to 1.7 episodes per 1000 patient-years, equivalent to an absolute risk of 1 event for every 1000 patients treated.15 Increasing doses of aspirin, even within the range of 100-300 mg per day, were associated with an increasing risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, with the lowest risk occurring in patients receiving 100 mg daily.15;18-19
In summary, aspirin could achieve a risk reduction of 30 to 40 episodes of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism for every 1000 patients treated, at a cost of 1 bleed requiring transfusion in high-risk patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Aspirin is simple to administer and does not require laboratory monitoring.
In the present study we propose to evaluate the use of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with previous idiopathic venous thromboembolism who have received initial 6-month treatment with oral anticoagulants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- first episode of symptomatic, objectively confirmed idiopathic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism;
- initial treatment with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (or effective alternative) followed by a vitamin K antagonist (target INR 2.0-3.0). All patients will receive 6 or 12 months of oral anticoagulant treatment. Patients initially treated with thrombolytic therapy who received warfarin therapy are eligible for inclusion.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- permanent risk factors for venous thromboembolism: patients known to have antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (based on local laboratory criteria) or to have homozygous factor V Leiden or homozygous prothrombin G21210A or heterozygous factor V Leiden plus heterozygous prothrombin G21210A or antithrombin III deficiency; patients with active malignancy
- temporary risk factors for venous thromboembolism
- any recurrence of venous thromboembolism or bleeding episode during the established 6-month period of oral anticoagulant treatment
- allergy or intolerance of aspirin
- clear indication for aspirin or other anti-platelet therapy (e.g. clopidogrel, ticlopidine)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aspirin100 mg daily | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
recurrence of VTE and/or VTE related death
Time frame: at least 24 months per patient
1 secondary outcome
recurrent VTE+ death; cardiovascular events, bleeding events, critical ischemia of the lower limbs, mesenteric infarction, all cause mortality and newly diagnosed cancer
Time frame: at least 24 months per patient
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35876829Flumignan CD, Nakano LC, Baptista-Silva JC, Flumignan RL. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 25;7(7):CD012369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012369.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22621626Becattini C, Agnelli G, Schenone A, Eichinger S, Bucherini E, Silingardi M, Bianchi M, Moia M, Ageno W, Vandelli MR, Grandone E, Prandoni P; WARFASA Investigators. Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1959-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114238.
Related trials for Venous Thromboembolism
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giancarlo Agnelli, MD study chair
Department of Internal Medicine - University of Perugia
Cecilia Becattini, MD study director
Department of Internal Medicine - University of Perugia
Paolo Prandoni, PhD study director
University of Padova
15 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing aspirin in people with Venous Thromboembolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis, run by University Of Perugia at 15 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Italy, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recurrence of VTE and/or VTE related death (time frame: at least 24 months per patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00222677, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2011.