AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaPhase 4NCT00224068

Effect of Iron Therapy as an Adjunct to Epoetin Alfa in the Anemia of Cancer Chemotherapy

A Phase 4 study of Anemia, run by Watson Pharmaceuticals at 32 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Ferrlecit® (ferric gluconate; a form of intravenous iron) or ferrous sulfate (a form of oral iron) in improving the response to epoetin alfa among anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anemia
How many people
180 participants
Where
32 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2002to Dec 2003
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of nonmyeloid malignancy
  • Moderate to severe anemia
  • Adequate iron stores as measured by either TSAT or ferritin
  • About to start cycle of chemotherapy
  • Eligible for epoetin alfa therapy

Who cannot join

  • Highly elevated TSAT or ferritin
  • Recent transfusion, epoetin alfa, darbepoetin or intravenous iron
  • Medical conditions that would confound the efficacy evaluation

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 1 country.

32 sites in 1 country

United States32 sites
  • Study site

    Bakersfield, California

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Study site

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Bismarck, North Dakota

  • Study site

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Chula Vista, California

  • Study site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

  • Study site

    Columbia, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Columbus, Georgia

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Denville, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Detroit, Michigan

  • Study site

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Greenwood, Mississippi

  • Study site

    Hutchinson, Kansas

  • Study site

    Laredo, Texas

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Long Beach, California

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Manhasset, New York

  • Study site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Norwich, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Saint Joseph, Michigan

  • Study site

    Salem, Virginia

  • Study site

    Southfield, Michigan

  • Study site

    Walla Walla, Washington

  • Study site

    West Chester, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Zephyrhills, Florida

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Prospective Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Ferrlecit® in Anemic Cancer Patients Who Are Receiving Acute Chemotherapy and Epoetin as Compared to Oral Iron and No Treatment

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Ferrlecit® (ferric gluconate; a form of intravenous iron) or ferrous sulfate (a form of oral iron) in improving the response to epoetin alfa among anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Conditions
Anemia
Being tested
Sodium ferric gluconate, ferrous sulfate, standard of care
Keywords
Iron deficiency, Sodium ferric gluconate, anemia, cancer chemotherapy, epoetin alfa, Anemia/drug therapy, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy/etiology, Hematinics/administration & dosage/pharmacology, Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects, Erythropoietin, Recombinant/therapeutic use/adverse effects
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Iron Deficiencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sodium ferric gluconate, ferrous sulfate, standard of careDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in hemoglobin

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in various iron indices

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2002
  3. Primary completionDec 2003
  4. Study completionDec 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
180 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00224068
Sponsor's protocol ID
FR01008
Status last verified
Feb 2012
First submitted
13 Sep 2005
Last updated
2 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Henry DH, Dahl NV, Auerbach M, Tchekmedyian S, Laufman LR. Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2007 Feb;12(2):231-42. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-2-231.

    PubMed 17296819

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study of Anemia, run by Watson Pharmaceuticals at 32 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in hemoglobin. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00224068, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in