Epithelial Ovarian CancerPhase 3NCT00226915
Trial of Tri-weekly TJ Versus Weekly TJ for Stage II-IV Mullerian Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Paclitaxel+Carboplatin in people with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer, run by Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare progression-free survival of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin vs weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 637 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- Apr 2003to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer
- No prior chemotherapy
- Age: 20 and more
- Performance status: ECOG 0-3
- 1) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 2) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 3) Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL 4) SGOT less than 100 IU/l 5) Serum creatinine less than 1.5mg/dL
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with ovarian borderline tumor
- Patients who have any evidence of the other cancer present within the last 5 years with the exception of carcinoma in situ or intramucosal cancer that is curable with local therapy
- Patients with active infection or uncontrolled diabetes
- Patients with unstable angina, or those who have had a myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or patients with serious arrythmia that requires medication
- Patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cremophor EL)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase III Trial of Conventional Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Dose Dense Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II-IV Mullerian Carcinoma
The purpose of the study is to compare progression-free survival of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin vs weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to residual disease 1 cm or less vs more than 1cm, stage II vs III vs IV, and histology (clear cell or mucinous vs. serous or others). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles.
Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles.
In both arms, cycles repeat 6 cycles every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additional 3 cycles are given if clinical partial or complete response after 6 cycles.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total 600 patients (300 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years. Assuming median progression-free survivals of 16 months and 21 months and a recruitment period of 3 years this can be achieved by recruiting 600 patients designed to have 80 % detect to a difference between the two arms at the two-sided 5% level of statistical significance.
- Being tested
- Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
- Keywords
- ovarian neoplasms, randomized controlled trial, paclitaxel, carboplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Paclitaxel+CarboplatinDrug
Paclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
Paclitaxel+CarboplatinDrug
Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel+Carboplatin |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel+Carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Suvaival
From the registration date, the earliest observed event from any of the following events 1. Death from any cause death date 2. The date of the first diagnostic imaging examination that confirmed exacerbation and recurrence.
Clinical exacerbation diagnosis date if not based on diagnostic imaging 3. If none of the above events are observed, the most recent outpatient consultation date / in hospital
Measured: During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall Survival
The period from the registration date to the date of death due to any cause. In the case of survivors, the final surviving confirmation date will be censored.
In the case of untraceable cases, the last surviving confirmation date before tracking becomes impossible will be censored.
Measured: During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment
QOL
QOL assessed by FACT-Taxane(Version 4A)
Measured: During the protocol treatment then 18 months
Adverse Event
Adverse Event assessed by CTC(Version 2.0 Japanese version)
Measured: During the protocol treatment then 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2003
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Epithelial Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 637 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Makoto Yasuda, M.D., Study chair, The Jikei University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00226915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JGOG3016
- Other IDs
- C000000183 (by UMIN)
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, Clarke-Pearson DL, Davidson M. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 4;334(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601043340101.
PubMed 7494563Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
PubMed 12668651Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Sideri M, Pecorelli S. Carcinoma of the ovary. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):107-38. No abstract available.
PubMed 11385772Strnad CM, Grosh WW, Baxter J, Burnett LS, Jones HW 3rd, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site in women. A distinctive subset of adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Aug 1;111(3):213-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-213.
PubMed 2502058Feuer GA, Shevchuk M, Calanog A. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;73(5 Pt 1):786-92.
PubMed 2704507Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, Cassidy J, Mangioni C, Simonsen E, Stuart G, Kaye S, Vergote I, Blom R, Grimshaw R, Atkinson RJ, Swenerton KD, Trope C, Nardi M, Kaern J, Tumolo S, Timmers P, Roy JA, Lhoas F, Lindvall B, Bacon M, Birt A, Andersen JE, Zee B, Paul J, Baron B, Pecorelli S. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699.
PubMed 10793106Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, Sutton G, Niemann TH, Lentz SL, Alvarez RD, Kucera PR, Small JM. Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):106-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.106.
PubMed 10623700International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Aug 17;360(9332):505-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09738-6.
PubMed 12241653Alberts DS, Green S, Hannigan EV, O'Toole R, Stock-Novack D, Anderson P, Surwit EA, Malvlya VK, Nahhas WA, Jolles CJ. Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):706-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.706.
PubMed 1569443Eisenhauer EA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Swenerton KD, Gianni L, Myles J, van der Burg ME, Kerr I, Vermorken JB, Buser K, Colombo N, et al. European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2654-66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2654.
PubMed 7989941Bois AD, Lueck HJ, Meier W, Moebus V, Costa SD, Bauknecht T, Richter B, Warm M, Schroeder W, Olbricht S, Nitz U, Jackisch C. Cisplatin/Paclitaxel Vs Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer: Update of an Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group Trial. American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract 1374), 1999.
Ozols R, Bundy B, Fowler J, Clarke-Pearson D, Mannel R, Hartenbach E , Baergen R. Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin (CIS)/Paclitaxel (PAC) Versus Carboplatin (CARBO)/PAC in Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (OC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial (GOG 158). American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract.1373), 1999.
Bertelsen K, Jakobsen A, Stroyer J, Nielsen K, Sandberg E, Andersen JE, Ahrons S, Nyland M, Hjortkjaer Pedersen P, Larsen G, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of 6 and 12 cycles of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and cisplatin in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Danish Ovarian Study Group trial (DACOVA). Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Apr;49(1):30-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1081.
PubMed 8482557Hakes TB, Chalas E, Hoskins WJ, Jones WB, Markman M, Rubin SC, Chapman D, Almadrones L, Lewis JL Jr. Randomized prospective trial of 5 versus 10 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992 Jun;45(3):284-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90305-3.
PubMed 1612505Planner RS, Allen DG, Brand AH, Grant PT, Toner GC, Sykes PH. Paclitaxel (Taxol) as salvage therapy for relapsed ovarian cancer. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 May;36(2):168-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03278.x.
PubMed 8798307
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Conventional Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Dose Dense Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II-IV Mullerian Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00226915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JGOG3016
- Keywords
- ovarian neoplasms, randomized controlled trial, paclitaxel, carboplatin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 637 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Japanese Gynecologic Oncology GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2003 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare progression-free survival of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin vs weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to residual disease 1 cm or less vs more than 1cm, stage II vs III vs IV, and histology (clear cell or mucinous vs. serous or others). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles.
Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1 for 6-9 cycles.
In both arms, cycles repeat 6 cycles every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additional 3 cycles are given if clinical partial or complete response after 6 cycles.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total 600 patients (300 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years. Assuming median progression-free survivals of 16 months and 21 months and a recruitment period of 3 years this can be achieved by recruiting 600 patients designed to have 80 % detect to a difference between the two arms at the two-sided 5% level of statistical significance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel+CarboplatinDrug: Paclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: Paclitaxel+CarboplatinDrug: Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically confirmed stage II-IV ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer
- No prior chemotherapy
- Age: 20 and more
- Performance status: ECOG 0-3
- 1) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 2) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 3) Bilirubin less than 1.5mg/dL 4) SGOT less than 100 IU/l 5) Serum creatinine less than 1.5mg/dL
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with ovarian borderline tumor
- Patients who have any evidence of the other cancer present within the last 5 years with the exception of carcinoma in situ or intramucosal cancer that is curable with local therapy
- Patients with active infection or uncontrolled diabetes
- Patients with unstable angina, or those who have had a myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or patients with serious arrythmia that requires medication
- Patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cremophor EL)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel+CarboplatinPaclitaxel 180mg/m2＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles | Drug | 1 |
| Paclitaxel+CarboplatinPaclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly ＋CBDCA AUC6 q21 days x 6-9cycles | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Suvaival
Time frame: During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment
From the registration date, the earliest observed event from any of the following events 1. Death from any cause death date 2. The date of the first diagnostic imaging examination that confirmed exacerbation and recurrence. Clinical exacerbation diagnosis date if not based on diagnostic imaging 3. If none of the above events are observed, the most recent outpatient consultation date / in hospital
3 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment
QOL
Time frame: During the protocol treatment then 18 months
Adverse Event
Time frame: During the protocol treatment then 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2020.
- Background: PubMed 7494563McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, Clarke-Pearson DL, Davidson M. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 4;334(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601043340101.
- Background: PubMed 12668651Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 11385772Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Sideri M, Pecorelli S. Carcinoma of the ovary. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):107-38. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2502058Strnad CM, Grosh WW, Baxter J, Burnett LS, Jones HW 3rd, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site in women. A distinctive subset of adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Aug 1;111(3):213-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-213.
- Background: PubMed 2704507Feuer GA, Shevchuk M, Calanog A. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;73(5 Pt 1):786-92.
- Background: PubMed 10793106Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, Cassidy J, Mangioni C, Simonsen E, Stuart G, Kaye S, Vergote I, Blom R, Grimshaw R, Atkinson RJ, Swenerton KD, Trope C, Nardi M, Kaern J, Tumolo S, Timmers P, Roy JA, Lhoas F, Lindvall B, Bacon M, Birt A, Andersen JE, Zee B, Paul J, Baron B, Pecorelli S. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699.
- Background: PubMed 10623700Muggia FM, Braly PS, Brady MF, Sutton G, Niemann TH, Lentz SL, Alvarez RD, Kucera PR, Small JM. Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):106-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.106.
- Background: PubMed 12241653International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Aug 17;360(9332):505-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09738-6.
- Background: PubMed 1569443Alberts DS, Green S, Hannigan EV, O'Toole R, Stock-Novack D, Anderson P, Surwit EA, Malvlya VK, Nahhas WA, Jolles CJ. Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):706-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.706.
- Background: PubMed 7989941Eisenhauer EA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Swenerton KD, Gianni L, Myles J, van der Burg ME, Kerr I, Vermorken JB, Buser K, Colombo N, et al. European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2654-66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2654.
- BackgroundBois AD, Lueck HJ, Meier W, Moebus V, Costa SD, Bauknecht T, Richter B, Warm M, Schroeder W, Olbricht S, Nitz U, Jackisch C. Cisplatin/Paclitaxel Vs Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer: Update of an Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group Trial. American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract 1374), 1999.
- BackgroundOzols R, Bundy B, Fowler J, Clarke-Pearson D, Mannel R, Hartenbach E , Baergen R. Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin (CIS)/Paclitaxel (PAC) Versus Carboplatin (CARBO)/PAC in Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (OC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial (GOG 158). American Society of Clinical Oncology 18:356a(Abstract.1373), 1999.
- Please refer "ongoing studies" (in Japanese)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Torvutatug Samrotecan Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Maintenance in Non-Homologous Recombination Deficiency (Non-HRD) Positive Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Makoto Yasuda, M.D. study chair
The Jikei University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Paclitaxel+Carboplatin in people with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer, run by Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Suvaival (time frame: During the protocol treatment then 18 months from the last day of the protocol treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00226915, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2020.