AzTrials
AzTrials

Urologic DiseaseNCT00227409

Long-Term Lead Chelation Therapy and Progressive Renal Insufficiency

A study testing calcium disodium EDTA (edetate calcium disodium) in people with Urologic Disease, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous study showed repeated lead chelation therapy significant reduced progressive renal insufficiency in patients with chronic renal diseases and high-normal body lead burden in a placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-year clinical trial, even factors that influence progression, such as blood pressure, the presence or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Urologic Disease
What is being tested?
calcium disodium EDTA (edetate calcium disodium)
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Nov 2001to Oct 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients from 18 through 80 years of age who had chronic renal insufficiency were eligible if they had a serum creatinine concentration between 1.5 mg per deciliter (132.6 μmol per liter) and 3.9 mg per deciliter (344.8 μmol per liter), with a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate of less than 5 ml per minute over a period of at least six months
  • Blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg
  • A cholesterol level below 240 mg per deciliter
  • Daily protein intake under 1 g per kilogram of body weight
  • No known history of exposure to lead or other heavy metals, and a high-normal body lead burden (between 60 and 600 μg, as measured by EDTA mobilization testing and 72-hour urine collection).

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have renal insufficiency with a potentially reversible cause, such as malignant hypertension, urinary tract infection, hypercalcemia, or drug-induced nephrotoxic effects
  • Systemic diseases, such as connective-tissue diseases or diabetes mellitus
  • Use of drugs that might alter the course of renal disease, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, steroids, or immunosuppressive drugs
  • Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or a high level of 24-hour urinary protein excretion (more than 8 g per day)
  • Previous marked exposure to lead and other metals(lead poisoning or occupational exposure)
  • Drug allergies
  • Absence of informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taipei, Taiwan, 105

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Long-Term Repeated Lead Chelation Therapy in Non-Diabetic Patients With Chronic Renal Insufficiency and High-Normal Body Lead Burden

Previous study showed repeated lead chelation therapy significant reduced progressive renal insufficiency in patients with chronic renal diseases and high-normal body lead burden in a placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-year clinical trial, even factors that influence progression, such as blood pressure, the presence or absence of hyperlipidemia, and urinary protein excretion were well controlled.Since relative small sample size and short duration of follow-up were noted in the previous study, whether repeated lead chelation therapy could long-term retard the progression of renal insufficiency remains unknown. Hence, we conducted a 51-month placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the long-term effect of repeated chelation in progressive renal insufficiency of patients with high-normal body lead burden.

Being tested
calcium disodium EDTA (edetate calcium disodium)
Keywords
Repeated chelation therapy, Progressive renal insufficiency, Body lead burden, Long-term outcome, Glomerular filtration rate
Medical subject headings
Urologic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • calcium disodium EDTA (edetate calcium disodium)Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary end point was an increase in serum creatinine to 2 times the base-line value or the need for dialysis.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2001
  3. Study completionOct 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00227409
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMRPG3029
Other IDs
NSC93-2314-B-182A- 079
Status last verified
Sep 2005
First submitted
26 Sep 2005
Last updated
18 Oct 2006
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing calcium disodium EDTA (edetate calcium disodium) in people with Urologic Disease, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary end point was an increase in serum creatinine to 2 times the base-line value or the need for dialysis.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in