Testicular NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT00231582
High-dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Poor Prognosis Germ-cell Tumors: TAXIF II
A Phase 2 study testing epirubicin, high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation and paclitaxel in people with Testicular Neoplasms, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) is able to circumvent platinum-resistance of resistant/refractory germ-cell tumors (GCTs), but expectancy of cure remains low. New strategies are needed with new drugs and a sequential approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Testicular Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- epirubicin, high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation and paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2004to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligibility requirements includes the following criteria:
- Age >18 years and < 65
- Performance status < 3
- Histologically or biologically documented GCTs
- Testicular, abdominal, or mediastinal tumors
- Measurable or evaluable disease
Show all 12Show fewer
- Life expectancy > 3 months
- Normal cardiac, liver, and renal function tests
- Absence of infection
- HIV negative test
- Signed informed consent
- All patients had to have been previously treated with at least one line of a cisplatin-containing regimen and were included if they were refractory after one or two line(s) of cisplatin-based CT, or had relapsed after two lines of a cisplatin-based CT
Who cannot join
- Fireproof diseases (progress unless month with regard to the last cycle of chemotherapy or in the course of chemotherapy)
- Relapses after complete answer obtained by surgery ( sCR )
- Neuropathy of superior rank or = II - renal Function (Office) superior creatinine or = 125 mmol/l and/or clearance of the creatinine subordinate or = II 60ml / mn
- Antecedents of congestive even compensated cardiac insufficiency
- Hurts of growing teratoma that is measurable hurts increasing by size (cutting) in the absence of rise of marker pens
- Extensive chemotherapy with support of haematopoietic stem cells. NB: A previous preventive irradiation under diaphragmatitis for a seminoma stage I (dose from 24 to 30 Gy in classic spreading) does not establish one against formal indication. However, an estimation clarifies capacities of the haematopoietic marrow is recommended with observation of the evolution of the NFP in the course of chemotherapy and quantification of cells CD 34 + in the peripheral blood. It's the same of the case where a chemotherapy by carboplatine was realized
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy Combining Two Mobilization and Cyto-Reductive Treatments Followed by Three High-Dose Chemotherapy Regimens Supported by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) is able to circumvent platinum-resistance of resistant/refractory germ-cell tumors (GCTs), but expectancy of cure remains low. New strategies are needed with new drugs and a sequential approach.
Patients with relapsed (but not absolutely refractory to Cisplatinum-based chemotherapy) poor-prognosis GCTs are scheduled to receive 2 cycles combining epirubicin and paclitaxel followed by 3 consecutive HD-CT supported by stem cell transplantation. One course will combine Taxol, 360 mg/m² + thiotepa, 720 mg/m², followed by two ICE regimens (Ifosfamide, 12 g/m², carboplatin, AUC 20, etoposide, 1500 mg/m²).
This phase II study is designed as a Gehan method. The main objective of the study is the complete response rate. With this aim in view, it is planned to enroll in its first step 14 patients to insure that if no complete response (CR) is noticed, study would be stopped for inefficacy (i.e., a CR rate lower than 20%). If one or more CR are noticed, protocol specified that up to 45 patients will be included in order to reduce the confidence interval (CI) of the CR rate. Secondary objectives are the overall response rate (RR), the overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) rates, toxicity and toxic death rate. The statistical analysis is done in terms of intent-to-treat.
Read the detailed description
The treatment is designed for relapsed poor prognosis patients with testicular or extra-gonadal GCTs previously treated with cisplatin-containing regimens.
Poor prognosis patients are defined as either relapsed/refractory patients more than one month after cisplatin administration, whether in the course of first-line CT or in that of salvage treatment, or patients who showed evidence of progression after at least 2 lines of cisplatin-containing CT (i.e., BEP and VeIP).
Eligibility requirements includes the following criteria: age >18 years and < 65, performance status < 3, histologically or biologically documented GCTs, testicular, abdominal or mediastinal tumors, measurable or evaluable disease, life expectancy > 3 months, normal cardiac, liver, and renal function tests, absence of infection, HIV negative test, and signed informed consent. All patients had to have been previously treated with at least one line of a cisplatin-containing regimen and were included if they were refractory after one or two line(s) of cisplatin-based CT, or had relapsed after two lines of a cisplatin-based CT.
Non-inclusion criteria are: patients with 'BEYER' score > 3, growing teratoma syndrome, possibility of being treated with a conventional cisplatin-based CT, and previous HD-CT regimen.
During the initial evaluation: each patient must have a clinical evaluation that includes measurements of tumor marker levels, and an imaging work up. The tumor marker levels are determined every week during all the sequence of treatment (normal level < 10 ng/ml for alpha-foetoprotein and < 2 mU/mL for HCG). The tumor mass is measured after the first two cycles of induction/mobilization therapy and at the end of the treatment.
Chemotherapy, patients are scheduled to receive 2 courses of front-line mobilization CT followed by 3 HD-CT supported by PBSCT. The front-line treatment consists in a combination of epirubicin, (100 mg/m² in a 30-minute infusion), and paclitaxel (Taxol, 250 mg/m² given in a 3-hour infusion), administered both on days 1 and 14. These 2 cycles are supported by filgrastim (Neupogen), 5 µg/kg, twice a day from days 2 and 15, respectively, until apheresis performed on days 10-13 and 24-27. Apheresis is stopped when at least 9 x 106 CD34+ cells/Kg of BW are obtained for the 3 grafts. A third cycle is permitted if the number of CD34+ cells is not achieved after the first 2 cycles, provided the patient was responsive to CT, or for any reason decided upon by the investigator.
The first HD-CT regimen consists in an association of thiotepa, 720 mg/m² and taxol, 360 mg/m², both administered in a continuous infusion over 3 days (D34 to D36). The first pack of CD34+ cells is infused on day 39. The second and the third courses (ICE) scheduled on days 62-66 and 90-94 respectively, consist in a combination of etoposide (150 mg/m² twice a day, in a 2-hour infusion, for 5 days), ifosfamide (2 400 mg/m²/d in a 3-hour infusion, for 5 days) supported by sodium mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna, in a 30-minute infusion every 3 hours, during a 12-hour period, initiated at the same time as the ifosfamide infusion), and carboplatin (AUC 4/d, in a 6-hour infusion, for 5 days). Infusion of PBSCs is planned on days 71 and 99. During the 3 high-dose therapies, G-CSF is administered at a daily dose of 5µg/kg, from the day of PBSC infusion until PMN recovery (i.e., PMN > 1.5 x 109/L). Each of these ICE regimens is delayed if the PMN level is less than 1.5 x 109/L and/or the platelet level less than 100 x 109/L.
Toxicity and response to therapy are evaluated according to the ECOG and WHO criteria. The duration of response is calculated from the date of documented response to the date of progression. The duration of PFS and OS are calculated from the date of inclusion to the date of progression, or death if no progression (PFS), and the date of death (OS), according to Kaplan-Meier's method. Survival curves are established according to the classification proposed by BEYER et al. Progression, death from treatment and withdrawal from protocol for whatever reason are considered as treatment failures. Whenever possible, patients in clinical partial response (PR) with normal tumor markers (PRm-) will be proposed for surgery of residual masses at the end of the whole procedure. Sequential procedures are proposed in the case of multiple metastatic sites. If surgery is complete and the pathological examination does not show any viable tumor, patients will be considered as complete responders. If surgery is complete and the pathological examination showed persistent viable tumor, they will be considered as surgical complete response.
- Conditions
- Testicular Neoplasms
- Being tested
- epirubicin, high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation, paclitaxel, etoposide, ifosfamide
- Keywords
- High-dose with autologous germ-cell tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Testicular Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
epirubicinDrug
epirubicin
high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation
paclitaxelDrug
paclitaxel
etoposideDrug
etoposide
ifosfamideDrug
ifosfamide
carboplatinDrug
carboplatin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | 1 Receives: Drug: epirubicin; Procedure: high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: etoposide; Drug: ifosfamide; Drug: carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete response rate
Complete response rate
Measured: during de study
Secondary outcomes (1)
Survival (overall and progression-free), toxicity, toxic-death rate.
Survival (overall and progression-free), toxicity, toxic-death rate.
Measured: during the study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2004
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Testicular NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Amgen, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Investigators
- Jean-Pierre LOTZ, Pr,MD,PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00231582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P031101
- Status last verified
- Mar 2007
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lotz JP, Bui B, Gomez F, Theodore C, Caty A, Fizazi K, Gravis G, Delva R, Peny J, Viens P, Duclos B, De Revel T, Cure H, Gligorov J, Guillemaut S, Segura C, Provent S, Droz JP, Culine S, Biron P; Groupe d'Etudes des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales (GETUG). Sequential high-dose chemotherapy protocol for relapsed poor prognosis germ cell tumors combining two mobilization and cytoreductive treatments followed by three high-dose chemotherapy regimens supported by autologous stem cell transplantation. Results of the phase II multicentric TAXIF trial. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):411-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi087. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
PubMed 15659420Selle F, Wittnebel S, Biron P, Gravis G, Roubaud G, Bui BN, Delva R, Bay JO, Flechon A, Geoffrois L, Caty A, Soares DG, de Revel T, Fizazi K, Gligorov J, Miclea JM, Dubot C, Provent S, Temby I, Gaulet M, Horn E, Brindel I, Lotz JP. A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the Multicentric TAXIF II study. Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1775-1782. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu198. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PubMed 24894084
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy Combining Two Mobilization and Cyto-Reductive Treatments Followed by Three High-Dose Chemotherapy Regimens Supported by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00231582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P031101
- Conditions
- Testicular Neoplasms
- Keywords
- High-dose with autologous germ-cell tumors
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Amgen, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Study start
- Sep 2004
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) is able to circumvent platinum-resistance of resistant/refractory germ-cell tumors (GCTs), but expectancy of cure remains low. New strategies are needed with new drugs and a sequential approach.
Patients with relapsed (but not absolutely refractory to Cisplatinum-based chemotherapy) poor-prognosis GCTs are scheduled to receive 2 cycles combining epirubicin and paclitaxel followed by 3 consecutive HD-CT supported by stem cell transplantation. One course will combine Taxol, 360 mg/m² + thiotepa, 720 mg/m², followed by two ICE regimens (Ifosfamide, 12 g/m², carboplatin, AUC 20, etoposide, 1500 mg/m²).
This phase II study is designed as a Gehan method. The main objective of the study is the complete response rate. With this aim in view, it is planned to enroll in its first step 14 patients to insure that if no complete response (CR) is noticed, study would be stopped for inefficacy (i.e., a CR rate lower than 20%). If one or more CR are noticed, protocol specified that up to 45 patients will be included in order to reduce the confidence interval (CI) of the CR rate. Secondary objectives are the overall response rate (RR), the overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) rates, toxicity and toxic death rate. The statistical analysis is done in terms of intent-to-treat.
Detailed description
The treatment is designed for relapsed poor prognosis patients with testicular or extra-gonadal GCTs previously treated with cisplatin-containing regimens.
Poor prognosis patients are defined as either relapsed/refractory patients more than one month after cisplatin administration, whether in the course of first-line CT or in that of salvage treatment, or patients who showed evidence of progression after at least 2 lines of cisplatin-containing CT (i.e., BEP and VeIP).
Eligibility requirements includes the following criteria: age >18 years and < 65, performance status < 3, histologically or biologically documented GCTs, testicular, abdominal or mediastinal tumors, measurable or evaluable disease, life expectancy > 3 months, normal cardiac, liver, and renal function tests, absence of infection, HIV negative test, and signed informed consent. All patients had to have been previously treated with at least one line of a cisplatin-containing regimen and were included if they were refractory after one or two line(s) of cisplatin-based CT, or had relapsed after two lines of a cisplatin-based CT.
Non-inclusion criteria are: patients with 'BEYER' score > 3, growing teratoma syndrome, possibility of being treated with a conventional cisplatin-based CT, and previous HD-CT regimen.
During the initial evaluation: each patient must have a clinical evaluation that includes measurements of tumor marker levels, and an imaging work up. The tumor marker levels are determined every week during all the sequence of treatment (normal level < 10 ng/ml for alpha-foetoprotein and < 2 mU/mL for HCG). The tumor mass is measured after the first two cycles of induction/mobilization therapy and at the end of the treatment.
Chemotherapy, patients are scheduled to receive 2 courses of front-line mobilization CT followed by 3 HD-CT supported by PBSCT. The front-line treatment consists in a combination of epirubicin, (100 mg/m² in a 30-minute infusion), and paclitaxel (Taxol, 250 mg/m² given in a 3-hour infusion), administered both on days 1 and 14. These 2 cycles are supported by filgrastim (Neupogen), 5 µg/kg, twice a day from days 2 and 15, respectively, until apheresis performed on days 10-13 and 24-27. Apheresis is stopped when at least 9 x 106 CD34+ cells/Kg of BW are obtained for the 3 grafts. A third cycle is permitted if the number of CD34+ cells is not achieved after the first 2 cycles, provided the patient was responsive to CT, or for any reason decided upon by the investigator.
The first HD-CT regimen consists in an association of thiotepa, 720 mg/m² and taxol, 360 mg/m², both administered in a continuous infusion over 3 days (D34 to D36). The first pack of CD34+ cells is infused on day 39. The second and the third courses (ICE) scheduled on days 62-66 and 90-94 respectively, consist in a combination of etoposide (150 mg/m² twice a day, in a 2-hour infusion, for 5 days), ifosfamide (2 400 mg/m²/d in a 3-hour infusion, for 5 days) supported by sodium mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna, in a 30-minute infusion every 3 hours, during a 12-hour period, initiated at the same time as the ifosfamide infusion), and carboplatin (AUC 4/d, in a 6-hour infusion, for 5 days). Infusion of PBSCs is planned on days 71 and 99. During the 3 high-dose therapies, G-CSF is administered at a daily dose of 5µg/kg, from the day of PBSC infusion until PMN recovery (i.e., PMN > 1.5 x 109/L). Each of these ICE regimens is delayed if the PMN level is less than 1.5 x 109/L and/or the platelet level less than 100 x 109/L.
Toxicity and response to therapy are evaluated according to the ECOG and WHO criteria. The duration of response is calculated from the date of documented response to the date of progression. The duration of PFS and OS are calculated from the date of inclusion to the date of progression, or death if no progression (PFS), and the date of death (OS), according to Kaplan-Meier's method. Survival curves are established according to the classification proposed by BEYER et al. Progression, death from treatment and withdrawal from protocol for whatever reason are considered as treatment failures. Whenever possible, patients in clinical partial response (PR) with normal tumor markers (PRm-) will be proposed for surgery of residual masses at the end of the whole procedure. Sequential procedures are proposed in the case of multiple metastatic sites. If surgery is complete and the pathological examination does not show any viable tumor, patients will be considered as complete responders. If surgery is complete and the pathological examination showed persistent viable tumor, they will be considered as surgical complete response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: epirubicin, Procedure: high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: etoposide, Drug: ifosfamide, Drug: carboplatin1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age >18 years and < 65
- Performance status < 3
- Histologically or biologically documented GCTs
- Testicular, abdominal, or mediastinal tumors
- Measurable or evaluable disease
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Fireproof diseases (progress unless month with regard to the last cycle of chemotherapy or in the course of chemotherapy)
- Relapses after complete answer obtained by surgery ( sCR )
- Neuropathy of superior rank or = II - renal Function (Office) superior creatinine or = 125 mmol/l and/or clearance of the creatinine subordinate or = II 60ml / mn
- Antecedents of congestive even compensated cardiac insufficiency
- Hurts of growing teratoma that is measurable hurts increasing by size (cutting) in the absence of rise of marker pens
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| epirubicinepirubicin | Drug | 1 |
| high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantationhigh-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| paclitaxelpaclitaxel | Drug | 1 |
| etoposideetoposide | Drug | 1 |
| ifosfamideifosfamide | Drug | 1 |
| carboplatincarboplatin | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Complete response rate
Time frame: during de study
Complete response rate
1 secondary outcome
Survival (overall and progression-free), toxicity, toxic-death rate.
Time frame: during the study
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2011.
- Background: PubMed 15659420Lotz JP, Bui B, Gomez F, Theodore C, Caty A, Fizazi K, Gravis G, Delva R, Peny J, Viens P, Duclos B, De Revel T, Cure H, Gligorov J, Guillemaut S, Segura C, Provent S, Droz JP, Culine S, Biron P; Groupe d'Etudes des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales (GETUG). Sequential high-dose chemotherapy protocol for relapsed poor prognosis germ cell tumors combining two mobilization and cytoreductive treatments followed by three high-dose chemotherapy regimens supported by autologous stem cell transplantation. Results of the phase II multicentric TAXIF trial. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):411-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi087. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24894084Selle F, Wittnebel S, Biron P, Gravis G, Roubaud G, Bui BN, Delva R, Bay JO, Flechon A, Geoffrois L, Caty A, Soares DG, de Revel T, Fizazi K, Gligorov J, Miclea JM, Dubot C, Provent S, Temby I, Gaulet M, Horn E, Brindel I, Lotz JP. A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in germ-cell tumors (GCTs) patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy: the Multicentric TAXIF II study. Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1775-1782. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu198. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
Related trials for Testicular Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Germ Cell Tumor and Testicular Tumor DNA Registry
Germ Cell Tumor, Testicular Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Immunotherapy Drugs (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) With One Anti-cancer Targeted Drug (Cabozantinib) for Rare Genitourinary Tumors
Bladder Adenocarcinoma, Bladder Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Pierre LOTZ, Pr,MD,PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing epirubicin, high-dose and autologous stem cell transplantation and paclitaxel in people with Testicular Neoplasms, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete response rate (time frame: during de study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00231582, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2011.