Turner SyndromePhase 3OPTIMANCT00234533
Study to Define Optimal IGF-1 Monitoring in Children Treated With NutropinAq
A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin (rDNA origin) in people with Turner Syndrome and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Turner Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Pituitary Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Somatropin (rDNA origin)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 251 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Children under 18 with growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone secretion, or Turner syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.
Who cannot join
- Children with closed epiphyses
- Children with active neoplasm
- Children with acute critical illness
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 14 countries.
45 sites in 14 countries
France15 sites
CHU - Hôtel Dieu
Angers, 49033
Cabinet Médical
Bordeaux, 33000
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, 38043
Centre Hospitalier General
Le Havre, 76083
CHU Timone Enfants
Marseille, 13385
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295
Hôpital Archet 2
Nice, 06202
Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul
Paris, 75674
Groupe Hospitalier de Necker
Paris, 75743
Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
CHU Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67100
Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre
Tarbes, 65013
Cabinet Médical
Toulouse, 31000
Hôpital des Enfants
Toulouse, 31059
Centre Pédiatrique Gatien de Clocheville
Tours, 37044
Italy7 sites
Azienda Policlinico - Università di Catania
Catania, 78-95123
Ospedale Policlinico
Chieti, 5-66013
Clinica Pediatrica II
Florence, 13-50132
Il Università degli Studi di Napoli
Naples, 4-80138
Clinica Pediatrica, Universita Federico II di Napoli
Naples
Clinica Pediatrica
Novara, 18-28100
Clinica Pediatrica
Parma, 14-43100
Spain5 sites
Hospital de Nens de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08009
Hospital General Universitario
Elche, 03203
Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Parc Taulí
Sabadell, 08208
Hospital Clínico Universitario
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Belgium2 sites
Dienst Kindergeneeskunde
Brussels, B-1090
Dienst Kindergeneeskunde
Edegem, B-2650
Denmark2 sites
Aalborg Sygehus Nord, Borneafdelingen
Aalborg, 9100
Sygeh. i Ringkjobing Amt, Borneafdeling
Herning, 7400
Germany2 sites
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
Leipzig, 04317
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076
Greece2 sites
General State Hospital of Nikaia
Athens, 18454
PA Kyriakou Children's Hospital
Athens
Russia2 sites
Endocrinology Research Centre RAMS, Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology
Moscow
Tushino Pediatric Hospital, RMAPE Department of Endocrinology for Childhood and Adolescent Age
Moscow
Ukraine2 sites
Scientific-Research Institute of Endocrinology, Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine
Kiev
Ukrainian Scientific practical Centre of Endocrine surgery, Endocrine Organs and Tissues Transplantation
Kiev
United Kingdom2 sites
University Hospital Wales
Cardiff, Wales, 14 4XW
St George's Hospital
London, England, SW17 0QT
About this study
Official title: Phase IIIB, International, Single Group, Open Study to Define an Optimal Monitoring of IGF-1 in Children Treated With NutropinAq, Using a Novel Capillary Blood Collection Method
The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.
- Being tested
- Somatropin (rDNA origin)
- Keywords
- growth, child development, growth hormone, inadequate growth hormone secretion, growth failure
- Medical subject headings
- Turner Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Pituitary Diseases, Dwarfism, Failure to Thrive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Somatropin (rDNA origin)Drug
Daily subcutaneous injections, 0,025 - 0,05 mg/kg/day for 6 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU) | Experimental | Patients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows:
* GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight
* TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight
* CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight
Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23.
The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening. Receives: Drug: Somatropin (rDNA origin) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples
Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children.
Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations.
The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.
Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Secondary outcomes (15)
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)
The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.
Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status
The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).
Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed.
Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine.
Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition
A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed.
Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).
Measured: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay
3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay.
Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements
The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3.
Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).
Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS
The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome.
Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).
Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS
The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome.
Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).
Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS
The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome.
Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen
The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use.
The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.
Measured: At Month 5
Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose
It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.
Measured: Visit 1 (Baseline)
Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study
The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Turner SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 251 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00234533
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2-79-58035-700
- Other IDs
- 2004-000356-17, 2004
- Acronym
- OPTIMA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase IIIB, International, Single Group, Open Study to Define an Optimal Monitoring of IGF-1 in Children Treated With NutropinAq, Using a Novel Capillary Blood Collection Method
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00234533
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMA / 2-79-58035-700
- Keywords
- growth, child development, growth hormone, inadequate growth hormone secretion, growth failure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 251 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU) | Experimental | Drug: Somatropin (rDNA origin)Patients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows: * GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight * TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight * CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23. The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children under 18 with growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone secretion, or Turner syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children with closed epiphyses
- Children with active neoplasm
- Children with acute critical illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Somatropin (rDNA origin)Daily subcutaneous injections, 0,025 - 0,05 mg/kg/day for 6 months. | Drug | NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU) |
Primary outcome
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children. Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations. The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.
15 secondary outcomes
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status
Time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen
Time frame: At Month 5
Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose
Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline)
Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Turner Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadal Tissue Freezing for Fertility Preservation in Individuals at Risk for Ovarian Dysfunction, Premature Ovarian Insufficiency and Clinically Indicated Gonadectomy
Turner Syndrome, Post-menarcheal Adolescents
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hematological Profile in Children With Numerical Chromosomal Disorders
Down Syndrome, Turner Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension
Cystic Fibrosis, Immunologic Deficiency Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy and Safety of Phentermine/Topiramate in Youth With Hypothalamic Obesity
Hypothalamic Obesity, Hypothalamic Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
45 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin (rDNA origin) in people with Turner Syndrome and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Denmark and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples (time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2019.