AzTrials
AzTrials

Turner SyndromePhase 3OPTIMANCT00234533

Study to Define Optimal IGF-1 Monitoring in Children Treated With NutropinAq

A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin (rDNA origin) in people with Turner Syndrome and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 years
What is being tested?
Somatropin (rDNA origin)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
251 participants
Where
45 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
Jun 2004to Jul 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children under 18 with growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone secretion, or Turner syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.

Who cannot join

  • Children with closed epiphyses
  • Children with active neoplasm
  • Children with acute critical illness

Trial locations and contacts

45 sites in 14 countries.

45 sites in 14 countries

France15 sites
  • CHU - Hôtel Dieu

    Angers, 49033

  • Cabinet Médical

    Bordeaux, 33000

  • CHU Grenoble

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Centre Hospitalier General

    Le Havre, 76083

  • CHU Timone Enfants

    Marseille, 13385

  • CHU de Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Hôpital Archet 2

    Nice, 06202

  • Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul

    Paris, 75674

  • Groupe Hospitalier de Necker

    Paris, 75743

  • Hôpital Charles Nicolle

    Rouen, 76031

  • CHU Hautepierre

    Strasbourg, 67100

  • Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre

    Tarbes, 65013

  • Cabinet Médical

    Toulouse, 31000

  • Hôpital des Enfants

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Centre Pédiatrique Gatien de Clocheville

    Tours, 37044

Other trials in France

Italy7 sites
  • Azienda Policlinico - Università di Catania

    Catania, 78-95123

  • Ospedale Policlinico

    Chieti, 5-66013

  • Clinica Pediatrica II

    Florence, 13-50132

  • Il Università degli Studi di Napoli

    Naples, 4-80138

  • Clinica Pediatrica, Universita Federico II di Napoli

    Naples

  • Clinica Pediatrica

    Novara, 18-28100

  • Clinica Pediatrica

    Parma, 14-43100

Other trials in Italy

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital de Nens de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08009

  • Hospital General Universitario

    Elche, 03203

  • Hospital Gregorio Marañón

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hospital Parc Taulí

    Sabadell, 08208

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

Other trials in Spain

Belgium2 sites
  • Dienst Kindergeneeskunde

    Brussels, B-1090

  • Dienst Kindergeneeskunde

    Edegem, B-2650

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark2 sites
  • Aalborg Sygehus Nord, Borneafdelingen

    Aalborg, 9100

  • Sygeh. i Ringkjobing Amt, Borneafdeling

    Herning, 7400

Other trials in Denmark

Germany2 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

    Leipzig, 04317

  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

Greece2 sites
  • General State Hospital of Nikaia

    Athens, 18454

  • PA Kyriakou Children's Hospital

    Athens

Other trials in Greece

Russia2 sites
  • Endocrinology Research Centre RAMS, Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology

    Moscow

  • Tushino Pediatric Hospital, RMAPE Department of Endocrinology for Childhood and Adolescent Age

    Moscow

Other trials in Russia

Ukraine2 sites
  • Scientific-Research Institute of Endocrinology, Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine

    Kiev

  • Ukrainian Scientific practical Centre of Endocrine surgery, Endocrine Organs and Tissues Transplantation

    Kiev

Other trials in Ukraine

United Kingdom2 sites
  • University Hospital Wales

    Cardiff, Wales, 14 4XW

  • St George's Hospital

    London, England, SW17 0QT

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia1 site
  • Klinika Deti a Dorostu

    Prague, 100 34

Other trials in Czechia

Finland1 site
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki

Other trials in Finland

Romania1 site
  • Institutul de Endocrinologie C.I. Parhon

    Bucharest, Sector 1

Other trials in Romania

Slovakia1 site
  • Il Detska Klinika

    Bratislava, 833 40

Other trials in Slovakia

About this study

Official title: Phase IIIB, International, Single Group, Open Study to Define an Optimal Monitoring of IGF-1 in Children Treated With NutropinAq, Using a Novel Capillary Blood Collection Method

The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.

Being tested
Somatropin (rDNA origin)
Keywords
growth, child development, growth hormone, inadequate growth hormone secretion, growth failure
Medical subject headings
Turner Syndrome, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Pituitary Diseases, Dwarfism, Failure to Thrive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Somatropin (rDNA origin)Drug

    Daily subcutaneous injections, 0,025 - 0,05 mg/kg/day for 6 months.

Study groups in NCT00234533
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU)ExperimentalPatients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows: * GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight * TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight * CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23. The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening.
Receives: Drug: Somatropin (rDNA origin)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples

    Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children.

    Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations.

    The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.

    Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)

    The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.

    Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

  2. Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal Status

    The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).

    Measured: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

  3. Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and Location

    A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed.

    Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine.

    Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  4. Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease Condition

    A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed.

    Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I Assay

    3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay.

    Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Measurements

    The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3.

    Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Height

    The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

    Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDS

    The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Weight

    The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

    Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDS

    The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity

    The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

    Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDS

    The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome.

    Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  13. Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its Pen

    The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use.

    The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.

    Measured: At Month 5

  14. Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean Dose

    It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.

    Measured: Visit 1 (Baseline)

  15. Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the Study

    The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2004
  3. Primary completionJul 2008
  4. Study completionJul 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
251 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00234533
Sponsor's protocol ID
2-79-58035-700
Other IDs
2004-000356-17, 2004
Acronym
OPTIMA
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
5 Oct 2005
Last updated
9 Dec 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Somatropin (rDNA origin) in people with Turner Syndrome and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 45 sites in France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Denmark and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot Samples (time frame: At Weeks 21, 22 and 23). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in