Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3E-SIRIUSNCT00235144
The Study of the BX VELOCITY Stent In Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions.
A Phase 3 study testing sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent and uncoated Bx Velocity stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Cordis US Corp. at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent and uncoated Bx Velocity stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 353 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2001to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B\&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
- Treatment of a single de novo native coronary artery lesion in a major coronary artery in patients with single or multi-vessel disease; patients with multiple lesions can be included only if the other lesions do not require treatment;
- Target vessel diameter at the lesion site is >=2.50mm and <=3.0mm in diameter (visual estimate);
- Target lesion is >=15mm and <=32mm in length (visual estimate);
- Target lesion stenosis is >50% and <100% (visual estimate);
Who cannot join
- Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK >2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment;
- Has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C and A I-II-III, or is having a peri infarction;
- Unprotected left main coronary disease with >=50% stenosis;
- Significant (>50%) stenoses proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede runoff;
- Have an ostial target lesion;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus within target lesion;
- Heavily calcified lesion and/or calcified lesion which cannot be successfully predilated;
- Documented left ventricular ejection fraction <=25%;
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
Herzkatheterlabor und Praxisklinik
Hamburg
Med. Klinik und Poliklinik
Münster
About this study
Official title: E-Sirius Study: a European, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Sirolimus-Coated BX VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent. Both stents are mounted on the Raptor® Rapid Exchange Stent Delivery System.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter (up to 35 centers), prospective, randomized double blind study. This study has a 2-arm design assessing the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY stent to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY stent, both mounted on the Raptor Rapid Exchange Stent Delivery System. A total of 350 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 1:1 basis. Patients will be either randomized to the sirolimus coated or uncoated BX-VELOCITY stent. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years post-procedure, with all patients undergoing repeat angiography at 8 months. Medical resource use during the 5 years follow-up period will be collected and analyzed.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent, uncoated Bx Velocity stent
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stentDevice
drug-eluting stent
uncoated Bx Velocity stentDevice
bare-metal stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | drug-eluting stent Receives: Device: sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | bare-metal stent Receives: Device: uncoated Bx Velocity stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD).
Measured: 8 months.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Composite of MACE defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat TLR.
Measured: 1, 6, 9, and 12 months; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years post procedure.
Angiographic binary restenosis (>=50% diameter stenosis).
Measured: 8 months.
In-lesion MLD.
Measured: 8 months.
Target lesion revascularization.
Measured: 9 months.
Target vessel revascularization.
Measured: 9 months.
Target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
Measured: 9 months.
Device success (final residual diameter stenosis of < 50%).
Measured: any time post-procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2001
- Primary completionOct 2002
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 353 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Joachim Schofer, MD, Principal investigator, Herzkatheterlabor und Praxisklinik, HamburgGünter Breithardt, MD, Principal investigator, Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Münster
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00235144
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC00-07
- Acronym
- E-SIRIUS
- Status last verified
- May 2009
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 11 May 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hoffmann R, Morice MC, Moses JW, Fitzgerald PJ, Mauri L, Breithardt G, Schofer J, Serruys PW, Stoll HP, Leon MB. Impact of late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 4-year clinical events: intravascular ultrasound analysis from the multicentre, randomised, RAVEL, E-SIRIUS and SIRIUS trials. Heart. 2008 Mar;94(3):322-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.120154. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
PubMed 17761505Schampaert E, Moses JW, Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Cohen EA, Palisaitis DA, Breithardt G, Donohoe DJ, Wang H, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Leon MB; SIRIUS, E- and C-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents at two years: a pooled analysis of SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, and C-SIRIUS with emphasis on late revascularizations and stent thromboses. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.049. Epub 2006 May 4.
PubMed 16784917Schluter M, Schofer J, Gershlick AH, Schampaert E, Wijns W, Breithardt G; E- and C-SIRIUS Investigators. Direct stenting of native de novo coronary artery lesions with the sirolimus-eluting stent: a post hoc subanalysis of the pooled E- and C-SIRIUS trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 4;45(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.046.
PubMed 15629365Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Wijns W, Garcia E, Schampaert E, Breithardt G; E-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5.
PubMed 14550694Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, Cutlip DE, Serruys PW. A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066633. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PubMed 17296825
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- E-Sirius Study: a European, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Sirolimus-Coated BX VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00235144
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-SIRIUS / EC00-07
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 353 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2001
- Primary completion
- Oct 2002 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent. Both stents are mounted on the Raptor® Rapid Exchange Stent Delivery System.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter (up to 35 centers), prospective, randomized double blind study. This study has a 2-arm design assessing the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY stent to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY stent, both mounted on the Raptor Rapid Exchange Stent Delivery System. A total of 350 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 1:1 basis. Patients will be either randomized to the sirolimus coated or uncoated BX-VELOCITY stent. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years post-procedure, with all patients undergoing repeat angiography at 8 months. Medical resource use during the 5 years follow-up period will be collected and analyzed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stentdrug-eluting stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: uncoated Bx Velocity stentbare-metal stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B\&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
- Treatment of a single de novo native coronary artery lesion in a major coronary artery in patients with single or multi-vessel disease; patients with multiple lesions can be included only if the other lesions do not require treatment;
- Target vessel diameter at the lesion site is >=2.50mm and <=3.0mm in diameter (visual estimate);
- Target lesion is >=15mm and <=32mm in length (visual estimate);
- Target lesion stenosis is >50% and <100% (visual estimate);
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK >2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment;
- Has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C and A I-II-III, or is having a peri infarction;
- Unprotected left main coronary disease with >=50% stenosis;
- Significant (>50%) stenoses proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede runoff;
- Have an ostial target lesion;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stentdrug-eluting stent | Device | 1 |
| uncoated Bx Velocity stentbare-metal stent | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
In-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD).
Time frame: 8 months.
7 secondary outcomes
Composite of MACE defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat TLR.
Time frame: 1, 6, 9, and 12 months; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years post procedure.
Angiographic binary restenosis (>=50% diameter stenosis).
Time frame: 8 months.
In-lesion MLD.
Time frame: 8 months.
Target lesion revascularization.
Time frame: 9 months.
Target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 9 months.
Target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
Time frame: 9 months.
Device success (final residual diameter stenosis of < 50%).
Time frame: any time post-procedure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2009.
- Background: PubMed 17761505Hoffmann R, Morice MC, Moses JW, Fitzgerald PJ, Mauri L, Breithardt G, Schofer J, Serruys PW, Stoll HP, Leon MB. Impact of late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 4-year clinical events: intravascular ultrasound analysis from the multicentre, randomised, RAVEL, E-SIRIUS and SIRIUS trials. Heart. 2008 Mar;94(3):322-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.120154. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 16784917Schampaert E, Moses JW, Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Cohen EA, Palisaitis DA, Breithardt G, Donohoe DJ, Wang H, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Leon MB; SIRIUS, E- and C-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents at two years: a pooled analysis of SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, and C-SIRIUS with emphasis on late revascularizations and stent thromboses. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.049. Epub 2006 May 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 15629365Schluter M, Schofer J, Gershlick AH, Schampaert E, Wijns W, Breithardt G; E- and C-SIRIUS Investigators. Direct stenting of native de novo coronary artery lesions with the sirolimus-eluting stent: a post hoc subanalysis of the pooled E- and C-SIRIUS trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 4;45(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.046.
- Results publication: PubMed 14550694Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Wijns W, Garcia E, Schampaert E, Breithardt G; E-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17296825Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, Cutlip DE, Serruys PW. A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066633. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joachim Schofer, MD principal investigator
Herzkatheterlabor und Praxisklinik, Hamburg
Günter Breithardt, MD principal investigator
Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Münster
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent and uncoated Bx Velocity stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Cordis US Corp. at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD). (time frame: 8 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00235144, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2009.