AsthmaPhase 4NCT00238927
Clinical Trial of Fluticasone Versus Placebo at the Onset of a Cold for Children With Asthma
A Phase 4 study testing inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days) in people with Asthma, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 5 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine, in children aged 1 to 6 years with recurrent asthma induced by upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), whether the administration of high doses of inhaled fluticasone started at the onset of symptoms of a cold will result in a reduced severity and shorter duration of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days)
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 1999to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- (1) Children aged 1-6 years,
- (2) they had at least 2 documented episodes of URTI-induced asthma requiring systemic (i.e., oral, intravenous, or intramuscular) corticosteroids in the previous 12 months or 1 episode in the previous 6 months,
- (3) no intercurrent symptoms (i.e., cough, wheezing, or observed dyspnea) documented for at least 7 days between wheezing episodes,
- (4) no suspicion of allergy to pollen or perennial allergens, and
- (5) caregivers have a good understanding of French or English
Who cannot join
- (a) other chronic diseases such as cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cardiac disease, kidney disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux requiring treatment,
- (b) intake, in the 21 days preceding randomization, of inhaled, nasal, or oral corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, cromolyn, nedocromyl, or ketotifen, -(c) prior intubation for an asthma exacerbation.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Canada5 sites
Hopital Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 3C5
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3
Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec
Centre Pédiatrique La Courte Échelle
Repentigny, Quebec, J5Y 3X6
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial of Episodic Fluticasone Versus Placebo in Viral-induced Asthma in Children
The purpose of this study is to determine, in children aged 1 to 6 years with recurrent asthma induced by upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), whether the administration of high doses of inhaled fluticasone started at the onset of symptoms of a cold will result in a reduced severity and shorter duration of asthma exacerbations and will not be associated with reduced growth velocity, osteopenia, and adrenal suppression.
Read the detailed description
Preschool-aged children, who represent over half of asthmatics presenting to a pediatric emergency department with acute asthma, also account for most hospital admissions for pediatric asthma. More than 80% of exacerbations of preschool-aged children are triggered by upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Current management of this condition is clearly unsatisfactory. In most cases, there is a 24-48 hour delay between the first signs of a viral infection and the onset of asthmatic symptoms, suggesting that a window of opportunity where an intervention could be initiated to alter the severity of the asthma exacerbation. Prior trials testing chronic inhaled steroids throughout the viral season failed to demonstrate any benefit while those examining episodic inhaled steroids at onset of URTI reported a modest benefit on duration and severity of symptoms. The selection of children with mild exacerbations, the small sample size, the cross-over design, the short study period, and the relatively low doses of inhaled steroids may have limited the magnitude of observed benefits attributable to episodic treatment.
The aim of this multicentre double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled randomized trial is to compare the effectiveness of high doses (750 ug bid) of inhaled fluticasone with HFA propellant versus placebo started at the onset of a viral illness in attenuating the severity and duration of URTI-induced asthma in young children during a 12-month study period. Children aged 1 to 6 years with at least 2 URTI-induced asthma of moderate severity, i.e. requiring a short course of systemic steroids, in the previous 12 months or 1 in the previous 6 months, and no inter-current symptoms will be selected for inclusion. Fluticasone 250 ug or placebo will be administered at a dose of 3 puffs BID from the onset of viral illness until 48 hours without asthma symptoms for a maximum of 10 days. This dose was chosen to approach the efficacy of systemic steroids with significantly less adverse effects. Inhaled salbutamol will be administered as bronchodilator on an "as needed" basis for relief of asthma symptoms at a dose of 2 to 4 puffs of 100 ug at 4-hour interval or longer. A 7-day run-in period will serve to (1) establish the absence of chronic symptoms and the infrequent use of salbutamol and (2) obtain confirmation of eligibility by the pharmacy reports of all corticosteroid preparation dispensed in the preceding 12 months. Eligible children will receive baseline measurement of IgE as measure of atopy, varicella antibodies and of the safety parameters, including height, basal cortisol, and lumbar bone density. Children will then be randomly allocated to one of the two treatments in blocks of 4 with stratification on type of spacer (with mask or with mouthpiece) and recruitment site. Children will be followed every 3±1/2 months by the site investigators or delegates until the end of the 12-month study period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of URTIs in each group requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids as confirmed by review of medical records and pharmacy records of prescriptions dispensed. Secondary endpoints include other measures of the severity and duration of exacerbations, adjusted for the number of URTIs experienced by each child during the study period. Compliance with the study drug and the use of salbutamol (an important measure of severity) will be documented by the Doser, a device attached to the study inhalers which records, in a blinded mode, the date and number of doses administered over a 45-day period. The safety profile will be examined with the growth velocity, the basal cortisol, and the change in lumbar bone density between baseline and the end of the study period.
A clinically important reduction in the severity and duration of viral-induced asthma will lead to other trials to establish the lowest effective dose of fluticasone. If no adverse effects on growth, bone density, and adrenal function are detected with the tested dose, safety may be assumed at lower doses. An absence of benefit will lead to the abandonment of this frequently used treatment strategy to consider alternative therapies for young children with URTI-induced asthma, who contribute to a marked proportion of health care spending.
An upper respiratory tract infection is defined as rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sore throat, ear ache, with or without fever, lasting >=48 hours.
URTI-induced asthma is defined by wheezing in association with an URTI.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days)
- Keywords
- asthma, preschool, viral, upper respiratory track infection, fluticasone, inhaled corticosteroids, placebo, exacerbations, severity, safety, growth, bone mineral density, adrenal function, rescue beta2-agonists
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days)Drug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The proportion of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in each group requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids as confirmed by review of medical records and pharmacy records of prescriptions dispensed.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Rate of unscheduled visits for asthma to an acute care setting adjusted for the number of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).
Rate of hospital admissions for asthma adjusted for the number of URTIs.
Maximum and mean number of puffs of ß2-agonists/day during URTI illness.
Peak and mean symptom scores during URTI illness
The mean # of days/URTI during which rescue ß2-agonists were used for asthma symptoms.
The mean # of days/URTI during which asthma symptoms were observed
growth velocity from baseline to endpoint
change in bone mineral density between baseline and endpoint
proportion of osteopenia at endpoint
change from baseline in hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal function (basal cortisol) at endpoint
proportion of adrenal suppression at endpoint
proportion of treatment interruption due to perceived ineffectiveness in each group
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 1999
- Primary completionSep 2005
- Study completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council of Canada
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francine Ducharme, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Francine M. Ducharme, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, CHUS Ste-Justine Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00238927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FAP30006
- Other IDs
- MRC/PMAC program
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ducharme FM, Lemire C, Noya FJ, Davis GM, Alos N, Leblond H, Savdie C, Collet JP, Khomenko L, Rivard G, Platt RW. Preemptive use of high-dose fluticasone for virus-induced wheezing in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 22;360(4):339-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808907.
PubMed 19164187
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial of Episodic Fluticasone Versus Placebo in Viral-induced Asthma in Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00238927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAP30006
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- asthma, preschool, viral, upper respiratory track infection, fluticasone, inhaled corticosteroids, placebo, exacerbations
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Council of Canada
- Study start
- Nov 1999
- Primary completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine, in children aged 1 to 6 years with recurrent asthma induced by upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), whether the administration of high doses of inhaled fluticasone started at the onset of symptoms of a cold will result in a reduced severity and shorter duration of asthma exacerbations and will not be associated with reduced growth velocity, osteopenia, and adrenal suppression.
Detailed description
Preschool-aged children, who represent over half of asthmatics presenting to a pediatric emergency department with acute asthma, also account for most hospital admissions for pediatric asthma. More than 80% of exacerbations of preschool-aged children are triggered by upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Current management of this condition is clearly unsatisfactory. In most cases, there is a 24-48 hour delay between the first signs of a viral infection and the onset of asthmatic symptoms, suggesting that a window of opportunity where an intervention could be initiated to alter the severity of the asthma exacerbation. Prior trials testing chronic inhaled steroids throughout the viral season failed to demonstrate any benefit while those examining episodic inhaled steroids at onset of URTI reported a modest benefit on duration and severity of symptoms. The selection of children with mild exacerbations, the small sample size, the cross-over design, the short study period, and the relatively low doses of inhaled steroids may have limited the magnitude of observed benefits attributable to episodic treatment.
The aim of this multicentre double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled randomized trial is to compare the effectiveness of high doses (750 ug bid) of inhaled fluticasone with HFA propellant versus placebo started at the onset of a viral illness in attenuating the severity and duration of URTI-induced asthma in young children during a 12-month study period. Children aged 1 to 6 years with at least 2 URTI-induced asthma of moderate severity, i.e. requiring a short course of systemic steroids, in the previous 12 months or 1 in the previous 6 months, and no inter-current symptoms will be selected for inclusion. Fluticasone 250 ug or placebo will be administered at a dose of 3 puffs BID from the onset of viral illness until 48 hours without asthma symptoms for a maximum of 10 days. This dose was chosen to approach the efficacy of systemic steroids with significantly less adverse effects. Inhaled salbutamol will be administered as bronchodilator on an "as needed" basis for relief of asthma symptoms at a dose of 2 to 4 puffs of 100 ug at 4-hour interval or longer. A 7-day run-in period will serve to (1) establish the absence of chronic symptoms and the infrequent use of salbutamol and (2) obtain confirmation of eligibility by the pharmacy reports of all corticosteroid preparation dispensed in the preceding 12 months. Eligible children will receive baseline measurement of IgE as measure of atopy, varicella antibodies and of the safety parameters, including height, basal cortisol, and lumbar bone density. Children will then be randomly allocated to one of the two treatments in blocks of 4 with stratification on type of spacer (with mask or with mouthpiece) and recruitment site. Children will be followed every 3±1/2 months by the site investigators or delegates until the end of the 12-month study period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of URTIs in each group requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids as confirmed by review of medical records and pharmacy records of prescriptions dispensed. Secondary endpoints include other measures of the severity and duration of exacerbations, adjusted for the number of URTIs experienced by each child during the study period. Compliance with the study drug and the use of salbutamol (an important measure of severity) will be documented by the Doser, a device attached to the study inhalers which records, in a blinded mode, the date and number of doses administered over a 45-day period. The safety profile will be examined with the growth velocity, the basal cortisol, and the change in lumbar bone density between baseline and the end of the study period.
A clinically important reduction in the severity and duration of viral-induced asthma will lead to other trials to establish the lowest effective dose of fluticasone. If no adverse effects on growth, bone density, and adrenal function are detected with the tested dose, safety may be assumed at lower doses. An absence of benefit will lead to the abandonment of this frequently used treatment strategy to consider alternative therapies for young children with URTI-induced asthma, who contribute to a marked proportion of health care spending.
An upper respiratory tract infection is defined as rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sore throat, ear ache, with or without fever, lasting >=48 hours.
URTI-induced asthma is defined by wheezing in association with an URTI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- (1) Children aged 1-6 years,
- (2) they had at least 2 documented episodes of URTI-induced asthma requiring systemic (i.e., oral, intravenous, or intramuscular) corticosteroids in the previous 12 months or 1 episode in the previous 6 months,
- (3) no intercurrent symptoms (i.e., cough, wheezing, or observed dyspnea) documented for at least 7 days between wheezing episodes,
- (4) no suspicion of allergy to pollen or perennial allergens, and
- (5) caregivers have a good understanding of French or English
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (a) other chronic diseases such as cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cardiac disease, kidney disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux requiring treatment,
- (b) intake, in the 21 days preceding randomization, of inhaled, nasal, or oral corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, cromolyn, nedocromyl, or ketotifen, -(c) prior intubation for an asthma exacerbation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days) | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The proportion of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in each group requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids as confirmed by review of medical records and pharmacy records of prescriptions dispensed.
12 secondary outcomes
Rate of unscheduled visits for asthma to an acute care setting adjusted for the number of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).
Rate of hospital admissions for asthma adjusted for the number of URTIs.
Maximum and mean number of puffs of ß2-agonists/day during URTI illness.
Peak and mean symptom scores during URTI illness
The mean # of days/URTI during which rescue ß2-agonists were used for asthma symptoms.
The mean # of days/URTI during which asthma symptoms were observed
growth velocity from baseline to endpoint
change in bone mineral density between baseline and endpoint
proportion of osteopenia at endpoint
change from baseline in hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal function (basal cortisol) at endpoint
proportion of adrenal suppression at endpoint
proportion of treatment interruption due to perceived ineffectiveness in each group
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19164187Ducharme FM, Lemire C, Noya FJ, Davis GM, Alos N, Leblond H, Savdie C, Collet JP, Khomenko L, Rivard G, Platt RW. Preemptive use of high-dose fluticasone for virus-induced wheezing in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 22;360(4):339-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808907.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francine M. Ducharme, MD, MSc principal investigator
CHUS Ste-Justine Hospital
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing inhaled fluticasone 750 mcg/day twice daily until 2 days without symptoms (maximum 15 consecutive days) in people with Asthma, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 5 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The proportion of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in each group requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids as confirmed by review of medical records and pharmacy records of prescriptions dispensed.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00238927, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2014.